Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2807565.2807706acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgenderitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gender Analysis of a Large Scale Survey of Middle Grades Students' Conceptions of Computer Science Education

Published: 24 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper summarizes findings from a Student Motivation Survey (SMS) developed to monitor students' dispositions toward CS education. This survey was administered as part of the iDREAMS project, which involved creating in-school computer programming opportunities for middle school students. The analysis reported here is based on survey responses collected over 3.5 years from 2,473 girls and 3,247 boys. Results include students' use of technology, computer courses completed, and dispositions towards CS education. Our findings reveal several significant differences between boys and girls regarding their use of technology and dispositions toward CS education.

References

[1]
Anderson, N., Lankshear, C., Timms, C., & Courtney, L. (2008). 'Because it's boring, irrelevant and I don't like computers': Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1304--1318.
[2]
Cockburn, C., & Ormrod, S. (1993). Gender and Technology in the Making. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[3]
Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and Bolts and People: Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities. Social studies of science, 37(3), 331--356.
[4]
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410--8415.
[5]
Gurer, D. & Camp, T. (2002). An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 121--127.
[6]
Hayes, E. (2008). Girls, Gaming, and Trajectories of IT Expertise. In Y. B. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner & J. Y. Sun (Eds.), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Combat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming (pp. 217--230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[7]
Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M. L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2014). Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi-institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406--418.
[8]
No Child Left Behind. (2002). Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107--110, § 115. Stat, 1425, 107--110.
[9]
Rodriguez, C., Kirshstein, R., Amos, L. B., Jones, W., Espinosa, L. L., & Watnick, D. (2012). Broadening participation in STEM: A call to action. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
[10]
Sanders, J. (2006). Gender and technology: What the research tells us. In C. Skelton, B. Francis & L. Smulyan (Eds.), Handbook of gender and education (pp. 307--321). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
[11]
Snyder, T. D. (2014). Mobile Digest of Education Statistics, 2013 (NCES 2014-085). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
[12]
Wajcman, J. (2007). From women and technology to gendered technoscience. Information, Community and Society, 10(3), 287--298.
[13]
Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge journal of economics, 34(1), 143--152.
[14]
Webb, D. C. (2010). Troubleshooting assessment: an authentic problem solving activity for it education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 903--907.
[15]
Webb, D. C., Repenning, A., & Koh, K. H. (2012). Toward an Emergent Theory of Broadening Participation in Computer Science Education. Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '12 (pp. 173--178). Raleigh, NC.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Cross-Country Variation in (Binary) Gender Differences in Secondary School Students’ CS Attitudes: Re-Validating and Generalizing a CS Attitudes ScaleACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363001423:4(1-22)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Gender Disparities in AP Computer Science Exams: Analysis of Trends in Participation and top AchievementJournal of Advanced Academics10.1177/1932202X22111949933:4(574-603)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Connecting Spaces: Gender, Video Games and Computing in the Early TeensSociological Perspectives10.1177/0731121422112580266:2(201-225)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Gender Analysis of a Large Scale Survey of Middle Grades Students' Conceptions of Computer Science Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    GenderIT '15: Proceedings of the Third Conference on GenderIT
    April 2015
    68 pages
    ISBN:9781450335966
    DOI:10.1145/2807565
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • University of Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 April 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Computer science education
    2. gender
    3. student dispositions

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • NSF

    Conference

    GenderIT '15
    GenderIT '15: The Third Conference on GenderIT
    April 24, 2015
    PA, Philadelphia, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 39 of 55 submissions, 71%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Cross-Country Variation in (Binary) Gender Differences in Secondary School Students’ CS Attitudes: Re-Validating and Generalizing a CS Attitudes ScaleACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363001423:4(1-22)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Gender Disparities in AP Computer Science Exams: Analysis of Trends in Participation and top AchievementJournal of Advanced Academics10.1177/1932202X22111949933:4(574-603)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Connecting Spaces: Gender, Video Games and Computing in the Early TeensSociological Perspectives10.1177/0731121422112580266:2(201-225)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Toward More Generalizable CS and CT InstrumentsProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 110.1145/3502718.3524790(179-185)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
    • (2020)Drag and Drop Programming Experiences and EquityProceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3328778.3366875(664-670)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2020
    • (2019)Gender Differences in ICT StudiesGender Gaps and the Social Inclusion Movement in ICT10.4018/978-1-5225-7068-4.ch008(147-169)Online publication date: 2019
    • (2017)Social Perceptions in Computer Science and Implications for Diverse StudentsProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3105726.3106175(47-55)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2017
    • (2017)Analysis of Associations between Motivation and Previous Computer Science Experience, Gender, Ethnicity and Privilege as Observed in a Large Scale Survey of Middle School Students (Abstract Only)Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3017680.3022441(705-705)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2017
    • (2017)A Comparative Analysis of Online and Face-to-Face Professional Development Models for CS EducationProceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3017680.3017784(621-626)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2017
    • (2017)Diversity Barriers in K-12 Computer Science EducationProceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3017680.3017734(615-620)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2017

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media