Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2807565.2807715acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgenderitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Encouraging Women to Become CS Teachers

Published: 24 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Previous research suggested a relationship between teachers' and students' attitudes towards a subject area. In order to increase female representation in Computer Science (CS), we need female teachers who have positive attitudes and can provide role models to encourage their female students to pursue CS careers. This study investigated factors that motivated female prospective teachers to pursue an add-on computer teacher certification program, their experiences in the program, and their perceptions regarding CS. Classroom observations and interviews conducted with female pre-service teachers suggested promising strategies for increasing female representation in CS and educational technology careers.

References

[1]
Abrams, K. 1989. Gender discrimination and the transformation of workplace norms. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 42 (1989), 1183--1247.
[2]
Anderson, G. L. 1989. Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Rev. Educ. Res. 59 (1989), 249--270.
[3]
Atkeson, C. G., Hale, J. G., Pollick, F. E., Riley, M., Kotosaka, S., Schaul, S., and Vijayakumar, S. 2000. Using humanoid robots to study human behavior. IEEE Intell. Syst. App. 15, (2000), 46--56.
[4]
Aubrey, D. 2014. The Times They Are A-changing, Keynote Talk presented at International Society for Performance Improvement Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
[5]
Becker, E. S., Goetz, T., Morger, V., and Ranellucci, J. 2014. The importance of teachers' emotions and instructional behavior for their students' emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Teach. Teach. Educ. 43 (2014), 15--26.
[6]
Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R., Moller, S., and Valentino, L. Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Econ. Educ. Rev. 45 (2015), 14--27.
[7]
Briggs, A., & Snyder, L. 2012. Computer science principles and the CS 10K initiative. ACM Inroads 3, (2012), 29--31.
[8]
Carspecken, P. F. 1996. Critical ethnography in educational research. Routledge, New York, NY.
[9]
Code.org. http://code.org/about
[10]
Downes, T., & Looker, D. Factors that influence students' plans to take computing and information technology subjects in senior secondary school. Comp. Sc. Educ. 21, (2011), 175--199.
[11]
Friedman, T. L. 2006. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century, New York, NY.
[12]
George, R. 2000. Measuring change in students' attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology 9, (2000), 213--225.
[13]
Jackson, D. L., Starobin, S. S. and Laanan, F. S. 2013. The shared experiences: Facilitating successful transfer of women and underrepresented minorities in STEM fields. New Dir. Higher Educ. 162, (2013), 69--76.
[14]
Kincheloe, J. L., and McLaren, P. 2008. Our idiosyncratic interpretation of critical theory and critical research. The Landsc. Qual. Res. 1 (2008), 403.
[15]
Klawe, M. 2013. Increasing female participation in computing: The Harvey Mudd college story. Computer 3, (2013), 56--58.
[16]
Knezek, G., Christensen, R., and Tyler-Wood, T. 2011. Contrasts in teacher and student perceptions of STEM content and careers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 11, (2011), 92--117.
[17]
Malcom-Piqueux, L. E. and S. M. Malcom. 2013. Engineering diversity: Fixing the educational system to promote equity. Bridge 43 (2013), 24--34.
[18]
Microsoft. 2013. A National Talent Strategy: Ideas For Securing U.S. Competitiveness and Economic Growth. http://www.microsoft.com/enus/news/download/presskits/citizenship/MSNTS.pdf.
[19]
National Center for Education Statistics. 2013. Digest of Education Statistics 2012.
[20]
National Center for Women and Information Technology. http://www.ncwit.org/programs-campaigns/pacesetters.
[21]
National Science Foundation. 2013. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013.
[22]
Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L. and Orfield, G. 2011. Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educ. Rev. 81, 2 (2011), 172--209.
[23]
Ross, J., Litzler, E., Cohoon, J. M., & Sanders, L. 2012. Improving gender composition in computing. Commun. ACM. 55, 4 (2012), 29--31.
[24]
Tierney, W. G., & Gitlin, A. 1994. On method and hope. Power and method: Political activism and educational research, 97--115. Routledge, New York, NY.
[25]
Tucker, A., Deek, F., Jones, J., McCowan, D., Stephenson, C., & Verno, A. 2003. A model curriculum for K-12 computer science. Final Report of the ACM K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee, CSTA.
[26]
Tyler-Wood, T., Kneze, K, G., & Christensen, R. Instruments for assessing interest in STEM content and careers. J. Tech. Teach. Educ. 18, 2 (2010), 345--368.
[27]
U.K. Department of Education. Teach Computing. https://getintoteaching.education.gov.uk/explore-my-options/secondary/teach-computing.
[28]
Zweben, S. 2011. Computing degree and enrollment trends. Computing Research Association. http://cra.org/govaffairs/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/CRA_Taulbee_CS_Degrees_and_Enrollment_2011-12.pdf

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Understanding U.S. secondary computer science teachers’ challenges and needsComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.2209474(1-33)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
  • (2023)Using Backward Design for Flipped Learning EnvironmentsLearning, Design, and Technology10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_183-1(1-20)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
GenderIT '15: Proceedings of the Third Conference on GenderIT
April 2015
68 pages
ISBN:9781450335966
DOI:10.1145/2807565
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

  • University of Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 April 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Computers science education
  2. gender
  3. teacher education
  4. women

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

GenderIT '15
GenderIT '15: The Third Conference on GenderIT
April 24, 2015
PA, Philadelphia, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 39 of 55 submissions, 71%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Understanding U.S. secondary computer science teachers’ challenges and needsComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.2209474(1-33)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
  • (2023)Using Backward Design for Flipped Learning EnvironmentsLearning, Design, and Technology10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_183-1(1-20)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Using Backward Design for Flipped Learning EnvironmentsLearning, Design, and Technology10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_183(2543-2562)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2023
  • (2021)Confronting Inequities in Computer Science Education: A Case for Critical TheoryProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432453(425-430)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
  • (2019)Gender-balanced TAs from an Unbalanced Student BodyProceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3287324.3287404(300-306)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019
  • (2019)Informatics Education in School: A Multi-Year Large-Scale Study on Female Participation and Teachers’ BeliefsInformatics in Schools. New Ideas in School Informatics10.1007/978-3-030-33759-9_5(53-67)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2019

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media