abstract

Feminizing Robots: User Responses to Gender Cues on Robot Body and Screen

Authors:

T. Franklin Waddell, and

S. Shyam SundarAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2016

Pages 3107 - 3113

https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892428

Published: 07 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Robots are increasingly being deployed in a number of domains typically associated with female workers, e.g., caregiving. Although past robot morphology has favored a machine-like appearance that is often perceived as masculine, monitor-based robots provide designers with enhanced opportunities to include interface cues that convey femininity. However, it is unclear whether screen-based interface cues can elicit perceptions of femininity and what effects, if any, they would have on user evaluations of a robot. To address this, we conducted an experiment examining the effect of gender cue (male vs. female) and cue location (robot body vs. robot screen) upon user evaluations. Female interface cues, especially when conveyed via the screen, elicited greater perceptions of robot femininity than male interface cues. Implications for the design of social robotics are discussed.

References

[1]

Abele, A.E. The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: findings from a prospective study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85, 4 (2003), 768--776.

[2]

Baker, K.A. Who saves the animated world? The sex-role stereotyping of superheroes and superheroines in children's animated programming. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations (2004), 962

[3]

Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., and Zoghbi, S. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 1 (2009), 71--81.

[4]

Breazeal, C. Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 3 (2003), 167--175.

[5]

Eyssel, F., and Hegel, F. (S) he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 9 (2012), 2213--2230.

[6]

Fiske, S.T. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998, 357--411.

[7]

Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., and Powers, A. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human- robot cooperation. Proceedings of Robot and Human Interactive Communication, (2003), 55--60.

[8]

Lee, K.M., Peng, W., Jin, S.-A., and Yan, C. Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56 4 (2006), 754--772.

[9]

Li, D., Rau, P.P., and Li, Y. A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2, 2 (2010), 175--186.

[10]

Macrae, C.N., and Martin, D. A boy primed Sue: Feature-based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37 (2007), 793-805.

[11]

Mason, M.F., Cloutier, J., and Macrae, C.N. On construing others: Category and stereotype activation from facial cues. Social Cognition, 24 (2006), 540-562.

[12]

Morgan, M., and Shanahan, J. The state of cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 2 (2010), 337--355.

[13]

Nass, C., Moon, Y., and Green, N. Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 10 (1997), 864--876.

[14]

Shibata, T. and Tanie, K. Physical and affective interaction between human and mental commit robot. In Robotics and Automation, IEEE (2001), 2572--2577

[15]

Sundar, S.S. and Nass, C. Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor? Communication Research, 27, 6 (2000), 683--703.

[16]

Tay, B., Jung, Y., and Park, T. When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38 (2014), 75--84.

Digital Library

[17]

Waddell, T.F., Zhang, B., and Sundar, S.S. Human-computer interaction. In C. R. Berger & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication. Wiley, Malden, MA, forthcoming.

Cited By

Mays K(2024)Authentic Impediments: The Influence of Identity Threat, Cultivated Perceptions, and Personality on RobophobiaHuman-Machine Communication10.30658/hmc.8.108(205-226)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.8.10
Fey JRobinson ROvali SLaffan NWeatherwax KDagan EIsbister KCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)Now That's What I Call A Robot(ics Education Kit)!Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633401(1-14)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633401
Robben DFukuda EDe Haas MCastellano GRiek LCakmak MLeite I(2023)The Effect of Gender on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Intentional Acceptance of a Storytelling RobotCompanion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568294.3580134(495-499)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568294.3580134
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Feminizing Robots: User Responses to Gender Cues on Robot Body and Screen
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Exploring Gender-Expansive Categorization Options for Robots
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Gender is increasingly being explored as a social characteristic ascribed to robots by people. Yet, research involving social robots that may be gendered tends not to address gender perceptions, such as through pilot studies or manipulation checks. ...
Read More
Robot Gendering: Influences on Trust, Occupational Competency, and Preference of Robot Over Human
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This paper presents an investigation into the differences found in participants' comfort levels with using new humanoid robots in addition to the tendency to give a gender to a robot designed to be gender neutral. These factors were used to examine ...
Read More
Will You Work with Us to Design a Robot? Boys’ and Girls’ Choices of Anthropomorphic Robots According to Their Gender
Design, User Experience, and Usability
Abstract
This study aimed to examine whether boys and girls demonstrate inclinations that drive them to select interactions with humanoid robots that share psychological and physical similarities with them and display gender characteristics aligning with ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2016

3954 pages

ISBN:9781450340823

DOI:10.1145/2851581

General Chairs:
Jofish Kaye
Yahoo
,
Allison Druin
University of Maryland / National Park Service
,
Program Chairs:
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan
,
Dan Morris
Microsoft
,
Juan Pablo Hourcade
University of Iowa

Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Abstract

Funding Sources

KORUS Tech Program

Conference

CHI'16

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI'16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 7 - 12, 2016

California, San Jose, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,000 of 5,000 submissions, 20%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI PLAY '24

Sponsor:
sigchi

The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play

October 14 - 17, 2024

Tampere , Finland

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

38
Total Citations
View Citations
708
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)61
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mays K(2024)Authentic Impediments: The Influence of Identity Threat, Cultivated Perceptions, and Personality on RobophobiaHuman-Machine Communication10.30658/hmc.8.108(205-226)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.8.10
Fey JRobinson ROvali SLaffan NWeatherwax KDagan EIsbister KCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)Now That's What I Call A Robot(ics Education Kit)!Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633401(1-14)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633401
Robben DFukuda EDe Haas MCastellano GRiek LCakmak MLeite I(2023)The Effect of Gender on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Intentional Acceptance of a Storytelling RobotCompanion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568294.3580134(495-499)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568294.3580134
Seaborn K(2023)Interacting with Masculinities: A Scoping ReviewExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585770(1-12)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585770
Torre ILagerstedt EDennler NSeaborn KLeite ISzékely É(2023)Can a gender-ambiguous voice reduce gender stereotypes in human-robot interactions?2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309500(106-112)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309500
Perugia GLisy D(2023)Robot’s Gendering Trouble: A Scoping Review of Gendering Humanoid Robots and Its Effects on HRIInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01061-615:11(1725-1753)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01061-6
Sparrow RHorn EEyssel F(2023)Do Robots Have Sex? A ProlegomenonInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01052-715:11(1707-1723)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01052-7
Mays KCummings J(2023)The Power of Personal Ontologies: Individual Traits Prevail Over Robot Traits in Shaping Robot Humanization PerceptionsInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01045-615:9-10(1665-1682)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01045-6
Forgas-Coll SHuertas-Garcia RAndriella AAlenyà G(2023)Gendered Human–Robot Interactions in ServicesInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01035-815:11(1791-1807)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01035-8
Ringwald MTheben PGerlinger KHedrich AKlein B(2023)How Should Your Assistive Robot Look Like? A Scoping Review on Embodiment for Assistive RobotsJournal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems10.1007/s10846-022-01781-3107:1Online publication date: 16-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10846-022-01781-3
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents