Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3001878.3001884acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What do we really know about data flow languages?

Published: 01 November 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Over the last years, a number of languages based on data flow abstractions have been proposed in different important areas including Big Data, stream processing, reactive programming, real time analytics. While there is a general agreement that the data flow style simplifies the access to such complex systems compared to low level imperative APIs, this design has been substantiated by little evidence. In this paper, we advocate a systematic investigation of the design principles of data flow languages and suggest important research questions that urge to be addressed.

    References

    [1]
    E. Bainomugisha, A. L. Carreton, T. v. Cutsem, S. Mostinckx, and W. d. Meuter. A survey on reactive programming. ACM Comput. Surv., 45(4):52:1–52:34, Aug. 2013.
    [2]
    T. R. G. Green and M. Petre. When Visual Programs are Harder to Read than Textual Programs. In In, pages 167–180, 1992.
    [3]
    T. D. LaToza and B. A. Myers. Developers ask reachability questions. ICSE ’10. ACM, 2010.
    [4]
    G. Salvaneschi, S. Amann, S. Proksch, and M. Mezini. An empirical study on program comprehension with reactive programming. FSE 2014. ACM, 2014.
    [5]
    G. Salvaneschi, P. Eugster, and M. Mezini. Programming with implicit flows. IEEE Software, 31(5):52–59, 2014.
    [6]
    G. Salvaneschi and M. Mezini. Debugging for reactive programming. ICSE ’16. ACM, 2016.
    [7]
    J. Siegmund and J. Schumann. Confounding parameters on program comprehension: A literature survey. Empirical Softw. Engg., 20(4), 2015.
    [8]
    J. Sushine, J. D. Herbsleb, and J. Aldrich. Searching the state space: A qualitative study of API protocol usability. ICPC ’15. IEEE Press, 2015.
    [9]
    A. von Mayrhauser and A. M. Vans. Comprehension processes during large scale maintenance. ICSE ’94. IEEE, 1994.
    [10]
    M. Zaharia, T. Das, H. Li, T. Hunter, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica. Discretized streams: Fault-tolerant streaming computation at scale. SOSP ’13. ACM, 2013.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Reactive Programming with Swift Combine: An Analysis of Problems Faced by Developers on Stack OverflowProceedings of the XXXVII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3613372.3613381(109-115)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
    • (2022)Mining the usage of reactive programming APIsProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1145/3524842.3527966(203-214)Online publication date: 23-May-2022
    • (2017)On the Positive Effect of Reactive Programming on Software ComprehensionIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2017.265552443:12(1125-1143)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PLATEAU 2016: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools
    November 2016
    33 pages
    ISBN:9781450346382
    DOI:10.1145/3001878
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 November 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. controlled experiment
    2. data flow languages
    3. reactive programming

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SPLASH '16
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 5 of 8 submissions, 63%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Reactive Programming with Swift Combine: An Analysis of Problems Faced by Developers on Stack OverflowProceedings of the XXXVII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3613372.3613381(109-115)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
    • (2022)Mining the usage of reactive programming APIsProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1145/3524842.3527966(203-214)Online publication date: 23-May-2022
    • (2017)On the Positive Effect of Reactive Programming on Software ComprehensionIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2017.265552443:12(1125-1143)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media