research-article

A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-scale Citizen Engagement around Urban Issues

Authors:

Mara Balestrini,

Carolyn Hassan,

Paul MarshallAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 2282 - 2294

https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025915

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Citizen sensing is an approach that develops and uses lightweight technologies with local communities to collect, share and act upon data. In doing so it enables them to become more aware of how they can tackle local issues. We report here on the development and uptake of the 'City- Commons Framework for Citizen Sensing', a conceptual model that builds on Participatory Action Research with the aim of playing an integrating role: outlining the processes and mechanisms for ensuring sensing technologies are co-designed by citizens to address their concerns. At the heart of the framework is the idea of a city commons: a pool of community-managed resources. We discuss how the framework was used by communities in Bristol to measure and monitor the problem of damp housing.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p2282-balestrini.mp4)

Download
241.57 MB

References

[1]

Adams, A., Fitzgerald, E., & Priestnall, G. (2013). Of catwalk technologies and boundary creatures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(3), 15.

Digital Library

[2]

Air Quality Egg. [Online]. Available: http: //airqualityegg.com.

[3]

Balestrini, M., Bird, J., Marshall, P., Zaro, A., & Rogers, Y. (2014, April). Understanding sustained community engagement: a case study in heritage preservation in rural Argentina. In Proc. CHI 2014 (pp. 2675--2684). ACM.

Digital Library

[4]

Balestrini, M., Diez, T., Marshall, P., Gluhak, A., & Rogers, Y. (2015). IoT community technologies: leaving users to their own devices or orchestration of engagement?. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, 1(1).

[5]

Benkler, Y. (2011). The penguin and the leviathan: How cooperation triumphs over self-interest. Crown Business.

[6]

Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons based peer production and virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394--419.

[7]

Bilandzic, M., & Venable, J. (2011). Towards participatory action design research: adapting action research and design science research methods for urban informatics. The Journal of Community Informatics, 7(3).

[8]

Bødker, S. (2000). Scenarios in user-centred design? setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with computers, 13(1), 61--75.

[9]

Boehner, K., & DiSalvo, C. (2016, May). Data, Design and Civics: An Exploratory Study of Civic Tech. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2970--2981). ACM.

Digital Library

[10]

Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977--984. Chicago

[11]

Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Terry, G. (2014). Thematic analysis. Qual Res Clin Health Psychol, 95--114.

[12]

Bria, F., Gascó, M., Baeck, P., Halpin, H., Almirall, E., Kresin, F. (2015). Growing a Digital Social Innovation System for Europe. DSI Final Report. ISBN: 978--9279--45603--9

[13]

Caldwell, G. A., & Foth, M. (2014, November). DIY media architecture: open and participatory approaches to community engagement. In Proceedings of the 2nd Media Architecture Biennale Conference: World Cities (pp. 1--10). ACM.

Digital Library

[14]

Carroll, J. M. (1996). Encountering others: Reciprocal openings in participatory design and user-centered design. Human--Computer Interaction, 11(3), 285--290.

Digital Library

[15]

Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. Wild at home: The neighborhood as a living laboratory for HCI. TOCHI 20, 3 (2013), 16:1--16:28.

Digital Library

[16]

Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. Doing action research in your own organization . Sage Publications, 2009.

[17]

Corburn, J. (2005). Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. The MIT Press.

[18]

Cornelius, C., Kapadia, A., Kotz, D., Peebles, D., Shin, M., & Triandopoulos, N. (2008, June). Anonysense: privacy-aware people-centric sensing. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 211--224). ACM.

Digital Library

[19]

Crabtree, A., Chamberlain, A., Davies, M., Glover, K., Reeves, S., Rodden, T., Tolmie, P., and Jones, M. Doing innovation in the wild. In Proc. of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI, ACM (2013), 25.

Digital Library

[20]

Cuff, D., Hansen, M., & Kang, J. (2008). Urban sensing: out of the woods.Communications of the ACM, 51(3), 24--33.

Digital Library

[21]

D'Hondt, E., J. Zaman, E. Philips, E. Gonzalez Boix, and W. De Meuter, "Orchestration Support for Participatory Sensing Campaigns", in UbiComp 2014 (in press) ACM.

[22]

de Lange, M., & De Waal, M. (2013). Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. First Monday, 18(11).

[23]

Diez, T., & Posada, A. (2013, February). The fab and the smart city: the use of machines and technology for the city production by its citizens. In Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on TEI (pp. 447--454). ACM.

Digital Library

[24]

DiSalvo, C., Louw, M., Coupland, J., & Steiner, M. (2009, October). Local issues, local uses: tools for robotics and sensing in community contexts. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (pp. 245--254). ACM.

Digital Library

[25]

Foster, Sheila R. and Iaione, Christian (2016) "The City as a Commons," Yale Law & Policy Review: Vol. 34: Iss. 2, Article 2.

[26]

Foth, M., & Axup, J. (2006). Participatory design and action research: Identical twins or synergetic pair.

[27]

Foth, M., Choi, J. H. J., & Satchell, C. (2011, March). Urban informatics. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1--8). ACM.

Digital Library

[28]

Foth, M., & Brynskov, M. (2016). Participatory action research for civic engagement. Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice.

[29]

Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., & Barratt, B. (2016). Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679677.

[30]

Ganti, R. K., Ye, F., & Lei, H. (2011). Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(11), 32--39.

[31]

Greenfield, A. (2013). Against the Smart City: A Pamphlet. Do projects.

[32]

Hall, R. (2000). The vision of a smart city International Life Extension Technology Workshop Paris, France September 28, 2000.

[33]

Hargreaves, I., & Hartley, J. (Eds.). (2016). The creative citizen unbound: How social media and DIY culture contribute to democracy, communities and the creative economy. Policy Press.

[34]

Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4).

Digital Library

[35]

Hayes, G. R. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. TOCHI 18, 3 (2011), 15.

[36]

Jiang, Q., Kresin, F., Bregt, A. K., Kooistra, L., Pareschi, E., van Putten, E., ... & Wesseling, J. (2016). Citizen Sensing for Improved Urban Environmental Monitoring. Journal of Sensors, 2016.

[37]

Johnson, I. G., Vines, J., Taylor, N., Jenkins, E., & Marshall, J. (2016). Reflections on Deploying Distributed Consultation Technologies with Community Organisations.

Digital Library

[38]

Kera, D., Rod, J., & Peterova, R. (2013). Postapocalyptic citizenship and humanitarian hardware. Nuclear Disaster at Fukushima Daiichi: Social, Political and Environmental Issues, 97.

[39]

Krishnaswamy, A. (2004). Participatory research: strategies and tools.Practitioner: Newsletter of the National Network of Forest Practitioners, 22, 17--22.

[40]

Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical inquiry, 30(2), 225--248.

[41]

Le Dantec, C. A., & DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, 43(2), 241--264.

[42]

Lessig, L. (1999). Reclaiming a commons. Building a Digital Commons, May,20.

[43]

Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin.

[44]

Marttila, S., & Botero, A. (2013). The 'Openness Turn' in Co-design. From Usability, Sociability and Designability Towards Openness. Smeds & Irrmann (eds) CO-CREATE, 99--111.

[45]

Marttila, S., Botero, A., & Saad-Sulonen, J. (2014, October). Towards commons design in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts-Volume 2(pp. 9--12). ACM.

Digital Library

[46]

Merkel, C. B., Xiao, L., Farooq, U., Ganoe, C. H., Lee, R., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. Participatory design in community computing contexts: Tales from the field. In Proc. PDC 2004, vol. 1, ACM (2004), 1-- 10.

Digital Library

[47]

Muller, M. J. (2003). Participatory design: the third space in HCI. Human-computer interaction: Development process, 4235, 165--185.

[48]

Müllert, N., & Jungk, R. (1987). Future Workshops: How to create desirable futures. London, United Kingdom: Institute for Social Inventions.

[49]

Mun, M., Reddy, S., Shilton, K., Yau, N., Burke, J., Estrin, D., ... & Boda, P. (2009, June). PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research. In Proc. of the 7th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 55--68). ACM.

Digital Library

[50]

MyPlace, 2016. Available: http://www.myplace.ac.uk/

[51]

Open Water, 2016. [Online]. Available online https://publiclab.org/wiki/open-water

[52]

Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons. Cambridge university press.

[53]

Paulos, E., Honicky, R., & Hooker, B. (2008). Citizen science: Enabling participatory urbanism. Urban Informatics: Community Integration and Implementation.

[54]

Pine, K. H., & Liboiron, M. (2015, April). The politics of measurement and action. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3147--3156). ACM.

Digital Library

[55]

Rogers, Y., & Marsden, G. (2013). Does he take sugar?: moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. interactions, 20(4), 48--57.

Digital Library

[56]

Rogers, Y. (2011). Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory. Interactions, 18(4), 58--62.

Digital Library

[57]

Ruddick, S. (2010). The politics of affect Spinoza in the work of Negri and Deleuze. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(4), 21--45.

[58]

Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2012). Convivial toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design. BIS.

[59]

Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. CRC Press.

Digital Library

[60]

Snyder, E. G., Watkins, T. H., Solomon, P. A., Thoma, E. D., Williams, R. W., Hagler, G. S., ... & Preuss, P. W. (2013). The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. Environmental science & technology, 47(20), 11369--11377.

[61]

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology,translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387--420.

[62]

Stevens, M., & D'Hondt, E. (2010, September). Crowdsourcing of pollution data using smartphones. In Workshop on Ubiquitous Crowdsourcing.

[63]

Taylor, N., Cheverst, K., Wright, P., & Olivier, P. (2013, April). Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1549--1558). ACM.

Digital Library

[64]

Teli, M., Bordin, S., Blanco, M. M., Orabona, G., & De Angeli, A. (2015). Public design of digital commons in urban places: a case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 81, 17--30.

Digital Library

[65]

Thomas, V., Wang, D., Mullagh, L., & Dunn, N. (2016). Where's Wally? In Search of Citizen Perspectives on the Smart City. Sustainability, 8(3), 207.

[66]

Toppeta, D. (2010). The smart city vision: how innovation and ICT can build smart, "livable", sustainable cities. The Innovation Knowledge Foundation. Think.

[67]

Townsend, A. & Chisholm, A. (2015). Citizen Urban Science. New Partnerships for Advancing Knowledge. Cities of Data Project. August 2015.

[68]

Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. WW Norton & Company. Trend, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 12(3), 303--320.

[69]

Vlachokyriakos, V., Comber, R., Ladha, K., Taylor, N., Dunphy, P., McCorry, P., & Olivier, P. (2014, June). Poster Vote: expanding the action repertoire for local political activism. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (pp. 795804). ACM.

Digital Library

[70]

Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011, January). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1--10). IEEE.

Digital Library

[71]

Whyte, W. F. E. (1991). Participatory action research. Sage Publications, Inc.

[72]

Willett, W., Aoki, P., Kumar, N., Subramanian, S., & Woodruff, A. (2010). Common sense community: scaffolding mobile sensing and analysis for novice users. In Pervasive Computing (pp. 301--318). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Digital Library

[73]

Krumm, J. (2009). A survey of computational location privacy. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(6), 391--399.

Digital Library

[74]

Reddy, S., Estrin, D., & Srivastava, M. (2010, May). Recruitment framework for participatory sensing data collections. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing (pp. 138--155). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Digital Library

Cited By

Buyannemekh BGasco-Hernandez MGil-Garcia J(2024)Fostering Smart Citizens: The Role of Public Libraries in Smart City DevelopmentSustainability10.3390/su1605175016:5(1750)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051750
Kim YKang MPark SHong jKwon Y(2024)Development Direction of Big Data-based Citizen Participation Urban Planning Interactive Communication PlatformJournal of Korea Planning Association10.17208/jkpa.2024.06.59.3.9859:3(98-114)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2024.06.59.3.98
Rosas-Silva CCórdoba-Cely C(2024)WAYRAKIT: empoderamiento tecnológico ciudadano desde la gobernanza de datosKepes10.17151/kepes.2023.20.28.520:28(101-136)Online publication date: 18-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2023.20.28.5
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-scale Citizen Engagement around Urban Issues
1. Human-centered computing
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Computing / technology policy

Recommendations

Citizen engagement in an open election data initiative: a case study of Indonesian's "Kawal Pemilu"
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age

Citizen engagement is key to the successful and sustainable use of Open Government Data (OGD), involving multiple activities ranging from the retrieval and conversion of raw data to OGD based applications, to the use of these applications to solve ...
Analyzing Citizen Participation and Engagement in European Smart Cities

With the advent of smart cities (SCs), governance has been placed at the core of the debate on how to create public value and achieve a high quality of life in urban environments. In particular, given that public value is rooted in democratic theory and ...
Is Brazilian Open Government Data Actually Open Data?: An Analysis of the Current Scenario

Open Government Data OGD hold great promise for transforming the efficiency and effectiveness of public services through the ease of publishing and access to government public information or through the offer of new kinds of services, such as smart ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2017

7138 pages

ISBN:9781450346559

DOI:10.1145/3025453

General Chairs:
Gloria Mark
University of California Irvine
,
Susan Fussell
Cornell University
,
Program Chairs:
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan
,
m.c. schraefel
University of Southampton
,
Juan Pablo Hourcade
University of Iowa
,
Caroline Appert
Université Paris-Sud
,
Daniel Wigdor
University of Toronto

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '17

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '17: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 6 - 11, 2017

Colorado, Denver, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

105
Total Citations
View Citations
1,886
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)213
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Buyannemekh BGasco-Hernandez MGil-Garcia J(2024)Fostering Smart Citizens: The Role of Public Libraries in Smart City DevelopmentSustainability10.3390/su1605175016:5(1750)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051750
Kim YKang MPark SHong jKwon Y(2024)Development Direction of Big Data-based Citizen Participation Urban Planning Interactive Communication PlatformJournal of Korea Planning Association10.17208/jkpa.2024.06.59.3.9859:3(98-114)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2024.06.59.3.98
Rosas-Silva CCórdoba-Cely C(2024)WAYRAKIT: empoderamiento tecnológico ciudadano desde la gobernanza de datosKepes10.17151/kepes.2023.20.28.520:28(101-136)Online publication date: 18-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2023.20.28.5
Yang SDortheimer JSprecher AYang Q(2024)When design workshops meet chatbots: Meaningful participation at scale?International Journal of Architectural Computing10.1177/14780771241253440Online publication date: 30-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771241253440
Gebremichael YSaad-Sulonen JKnutas A(2024)Game On: Using Serious Tabletop Games to Enhance User Engagement and Optimize Requirements Engineering for Smart City Urban Mobility SolutionsProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3677525.3678689(404-407)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677525.3678689
Johnson IVlachokyriakos V(2024)Socio-digital Rural Resilience: An Exploration of Information Infrastructures Within and Across Rural Villages During Covid-19Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374008:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637400
Tedeschi M(2024)Datafication and urban (in)justice: Towards a digital spatial justiceGeography Compass10.1111/gec3.1276318:6Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12763
Hrustek NPerši NDumenčić J(2024)The Role of Open Data and Simulation in Building Smart Cities2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO)10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569941(1006-1012)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569941
Carlen EEstien CCaspi TPerkins DGoldstein BKreling SHentati YWilliams TStanton LDes Roches SJohnson RYoung ACooper CSchell C(2024)A framework for contextualizing social‐ecological biases in contributory science dataPeople and Nature10.1002/pan3.105926:2(377-390)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10592
Kocman DRighi VErrandonea LMaccani GCreus JFroeling FHoek GAndrusaityte SGrazuleviciene RFicorilli ADe Marchi BBiggeri AFtičar JGignac FToran RBasagaña X(2023)Toolkit for conducting citizen science activities in environmental epidemiologyFrontiers in Environmental Science10.3389/fenvs.2023.117741311Online publication date: 9-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1177413
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents