Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Care as a Resource in Underserved Learning Environments

Published: 06 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We present results from an ethnographic inquiry of technology-based learning at an after-school learning center in Mumbai (India) that caters to students from neighboring slum communities.We conducted participant observation for 120 hours and 58 semi-structured interviews with different stakeholders (including teachers, staff, parents, and students) at the center over nine weeks from December 2015 to July 2016. Taking an assets-based approach in an underserved context, we uncover the role of care as a resource and present the rich and varied caring behaviors enacted in this sociotechnical system.We then discuss how care effects a greater sense of ownership, interdependency, and community. Examining the role of aligning values in motivating caring behavior, we conclude with recommendations for supporting, leveraging, and extending care via technology design in an underserved, technology-enhanced learning environment.

References

[1]
Nora Alder. 2002. Interpretations of the meaning of care: Creating caring relationships in urban middle school classrooms. Urban education 37, 2 (2002), 241--266.
[2]
Nora I Alder and Margaret R Moulton. 1998. Caring relationships: Perspectives from middle school students. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly 21, 3 (1998), 15--32.
[3]
Saleema Amershi, Meredith Ringel Morris, Neema Moraveji, Ravin Balakrishnan, and Kentaro Toyama. 2010. Multiple mouse text entry for single-display groupware. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 169--178.
[4]
Morgan G Ames and Jenna Burrell. 2017. "Connected Learning" and the Equity Agenda: A Microsociology of Minecraft Play. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 446--457.
[5]
Payal Arora. 2010. Hope-in-the-Wall? A digital promise for free learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 5 (2010), 689--702.
[6]
2009. Digital Bangladesh Concept Note: Access to Information Programme Prime Minister's Office. (5 Nov 2009).
[7]
Nicki McCullough Calabrese. 2006. Video technology: A vehicle for educators to enhance relationships with families. Education 127, 1 (2006).
[8]
Cardboard 2014. Google Cardboard. https://vr.google.com/cardboard/. (2014).
[9]
Wanda Cassidy and Anita Bates. 2005. Drop-outs and push-outs: Finding hope at a school that actualizes the ethic of care. American Journal of Education 112, 1 (2005), 66--102.
[10]
Ruy Cervantes, Mark Warschauer, Bonnie Nardi, and Nithya Sambasivan. 2011. Infrastructures for low-cost laptop use in Mexican schools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 945--954.
[11]
Malolan Chetlur, Ashay Tamhane, Vinay Kumar Reddy, Bikram Sengupta, Mohit Jain, Pongsakorn Sukjunnimit, and Ramrao Wagh. 2014. Edupal: Enabling blended learning in resource constrained environments. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Computing for Development. ACM, 73--82.
[12]
Teresa Correa. 2014. Bottom-Up Technology Transmission Within Families: Exploring How Youths Influence Their Parents' Digital Media Use With Dyadic Data. Journal of communication 64, 1 (2014), 103--124.
[13]
Andrew Cross, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. Low-cost audience polling using computer vision. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 45--54.
[14]
Larry Cuban, Heather Kirkpatrick, and Craig Peck. 2001. High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American educational research journal 38, 4 (2001), 813--834.
[15]
Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2011. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41, 1 (2011), 85--106.
[16]
Nicola Dell and Neha Kumar. 2016. The Ins and Outs of HCI for Development. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2220--2232.
[17]
Deborah R Dillon. 1989. Showing them that I want them to learn and that I care about who they are: A microethnography of the social organization of a secondary low-track English-reading classroom. American Educational Research Journal 26, 2 (1989), 227--259.
[18]
DIY 2015. Fears In A Hat: A Facilitator's Guide. http://www.holliseaster.com/p/fears-in-a-hat/. (2015).
[19]
DIY 2015. Icebreaker Deserted Island. https://activities4play.wordpress.com/2014/08/22/ icebreaker-deserted-island/. (2015).
[20]
Brooke Boback Eisenbach. 2015. Stories of care in the virtual classroom: An autoethnographic narrative inquiry. (2015).
[21]
Ernestine K Enomoto. 1997. Negotiating the ethics of care and justice. Educational Administration Quarterly 33, 3 (1997), 351--370.
[22]
Facebook 2013. Internet.org. https://info.internet.org/en/. (2013).
[23]
Bruce Fuller, José Ramón Lizárraga, and James H Gray. 2015. Digital Media and Latino Families: New Channels for Learning, Parenting, and Local Organizing. Joan Ganz Cooney Center (2015).
[24]
Joseph B Giacquinta, Jo Anne Bauer, and Jane E Levin. 1993. Beyond technology's promise: An examination of children's educational computing at home. Cambridge University Press.
[25]
Carol Gilligan. 1977. In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard educational review 47, 4 (1977), 481--517.
[26]
Google Blogs 2015. Bringing the Internet to More Indians-starting with 10 Million Rail Passengers a Day. https: //googleblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/bringing-the-internet-to-more-indians.html. (2015).
[27]
Elyse Hambacher and Elizabeth Bondy. 2016. Creating Communities of Culturally Relevant Critical Teacher Care. Action in Teacher Education 38, 4 (2016), 327--343.
[28]
Kurtis Heimerl, Janani Vasudev, Kelly G Buchanan, Tapan Parikh, and Eric Brewer. 2010. Metamouse: Improving multi-user sharing of existing educational applications. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 19.
[29]
Frank Heuts and Annemarie Mol. 2013. What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies 1, 2 (2013), 125--146.
[30]
Lara Houston and Steven J Jackson. 2016. Caring for the next billion mobile handsets: opening proprietary closures through the work of repair. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 10.
[31]
Lara Houston, Steven J Jackson, Daniela K Rosner, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. Values in repair. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1403--1414.
[32]
Martin Hughes and Pamela Greenhough. 2006. Boxes, bags and videotape: enhancing home--school communication through knowledge exchange activities. Educational Review 58, 4 (2006), 471--487.
[33]
Mizuko Ito, Kris Gutiérrez, Sonia Livingstone, Bill Penuel, Jean Rhodes, Katie Salen, Juliet Schor, Julian Sefton-Green, and S Craig Watkins. 2013. Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. BookBaby.
[34]
Steven J Jackson, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Md Rashidujjaman Rifat. 2014. Learning, innovation, and sustainability among mobile phone repairers in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, 905--914.
[35]
Nassim JafariNaimi, Lisa Nathan, and Ian Hargraves. 2015. Values as hypotheses: design, inquiry, and the service of values. Design issues 31, 4 (2015), 91--104.
[36]
Matthew Kam, Anuj Kumar, Shirley Jain, Akhil Mathur, and John Canny. 2009. Improving literacy in rural India: Cellphone games in an after-school program. In Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), 2009 International Conference on. IEEE, 139--149.
[37]
Matthew Kam, Akhil Mathur, Anuj Kumar, and John Canny. 2009. Designing digital games for rural children: a study of traditional village games in India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 31--40.
[38]
Barbara Korth. 2003. A critical reconstruction of care-in-action. The Qualitative Report 8, 3 (2003), 487--512.
[39]
Neha Kumar. 2014. Facebook for self-empowerment? A study of Facebook adoption in urban India. new media & society 16, 7 (2014), 1122--1137.
[40]
John Law. 2009. Actor network theory and material semiotics. The new Blackwell companion to social theory (2009), 141--158.
[41]
June Lee and Brigid Barron. 2015. Aprendiendo en Casa: Media as a Resource for Learning among Hispanic-Latino Families. A Report of the Families and Media Project. Joan Ganz Cooney Center (2015).
[42]
Angela Lumpkin. 2007. Caring teachers the key to student learning. Kappa Delta Pi Record 43, 4 (2007), 158--160.
[43]
Alison Mathie and Gord Cunningham. 2005. Who is driving development? Reflections on the transformative potential of asset-based community development. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 26, 1 (2005), 175--186.
[44]
Joseph Maxwell. 1992. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard educational review 62, 3 (1992), 279--301.
[45]
Rooshabh Kumar Mehta and CD Bhavsar. 2017. An Exploratory Study to Understand the Usage of WhatsApp in India. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 7, 5 (2017), 135--145.
[46]
Sharan B Merriam. 2002. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.
[47]
Stephanie Mihalas, William C Morse, David H Allsopp, and Patricia Alvarez McHatton. 2009. Cultivating caring relationships between teachers and secondary students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Implications for research and practice. Remedial and Special Education 30, 2 (2009), 108--125.
[48]
MIT 2010. MIT App Inventor. http://appinventor.mit.edu/explore/. (2010).
[49]
Andrea Moed, Owen Otto, Joyojeet Pal, Udai Pawar Singh, Matthew Kam, and Kentaro Toyama. 2009. Reducing dominance in multiple-mouse learning activities. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning-Volume 1. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 360--364.
[50]
Annemarie Mol, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols. 2015. Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Vol. 8. transcript Verlag.
[51]
Bonnie A. Nardi and Vicki L. O'Day. 1999. Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
[52]
Nel Noddings. 1988. An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. American journal of education 96, 2 (1988), 215--230.
[53]
Nel Noddings. 2002. Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education. ERIC.
[54]
Nel Noddings. 2013. Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Univ of California Press.
[55]
Joyojeet Pal, Rabin Patra, Sergiu Nedevschi, Madelaine Plauche, and Udai Singh Pawar. 2009. The Case of the Occasionally Cheap Computer: Low-cost Devices and Classrooms in the Developing Regions. Information Technologies & International Development 5, 1 (2009), pp--49.
[56]
Joyojeet Pal, Udai Singh Pawar, Eric A Brewer, and Kentaro Toyama. 2006. The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 781--789.
[57]
Ismael Peña-López. 2010. From Laptops to Competences: Bridging the Digital Divide in Education. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal 7, 1 (2010).
[58]
Ismael Peña-López et al. 2016. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. (2016).
[59]
Mari Ann Roberts. 2009. African American, European American, or does it make a difference? Teacher perceptions of care for African American students. Ph.D. Dissertation. Emory University.
[60]
Rosalie Rolón-Dow. 2005. Critical care: A color (full) analysis of care narratives in the schooling experiences of Puerto Rican girls. American Educational Research Journal 42, 1 (2005), 77--111.
[61]
Jeremy M Roschelle, Roy D Pea, Christopher M Hoadley, Douglas N Gordin, and Barbara M Means. 2000. Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The future of children (2000), 76--101.
[62]
Daniela K Rosner and Morgan Ames. 2014. Designing for repair?: infrastructures and materialities of breakdown. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 319--331.
[63]
Amethyst Saludo. 2015. Care through design. (2015).
[64]
Julie Shepherd and Debi Roker. 2005. The parenting of young people: using newsletters to provide information and support. Children & society 19, 4 (2005), 264--277.
[65]
Morten Skovdal. 2016. It's because they care: understanding pathways to classroom concentration problems among HIV-affected children and youth in Western Kenya. Aids Care 28, sup2 (2016), 42--48.
[66]
Morten Skovdal and Ruth Evans. 2016. The emergence of an ethic of care in rural Kenyan schools? Perspectives of teachers and orphaned and vulnerable pupils. Children's Geographies (2016), 1--17.
[67]
Austin Toombs, Shad Gross, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2016. From empathy to care: a feminist care ethics perspective on long-term researcher--participant relations. Interacting with Computers (2016).
[68]
Austin L Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2015. The proper care and feeding of hackerspaces: Care ethics and cultures of making. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 629--638.
[69]
Joan C Tronto. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Psychology Press.
[70]
Aditya Vashistha, Pooja Sethi, and Richard Anderson. 2017. Respeak: A Voice-based, Crowd-powered Speech Transcription System. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1855--1866.
[71]
Mark Warschauer. 2004. Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT press.
[72]
Mark Warschauer. 2006. Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. Teachers College Press.
[73]
Mark Warschauer and Morgan Ames. 2010. Can One Laptop per Child save the world's poor? Journal of international affairs (2010), 33--51.
[74]
MarisolWong-Villacres, Upol Ehsan, Amber Solomon, Mercedes Pozo Buil, and Betsy DiSalvo. 2017. Design Guidelines for Parent-School Technologies to Support the Ecology of Parental Engagement. (2017).
[75]
Yuhang Zhao, Alexis Hope, Jin Huang, Yoel Sumitro, James A Landay, and Yuanchun Shi. 2013. Hero: designing learning tools to increase parental involvement in elementary education in china. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 637--642.
[76]
Jolene Zywica. 2014. Using social media to connect families and kindergarten classrooms. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Creating Resources for Designing with and for Care Ecologies in HCIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660709(3161-3178)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Sustaining Community-Based Research in Computing: Lessons from Two Tech Capacity Building Initiatives for Local BusinessesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410178:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)'Not Just a Computer Screen:' Distributed Attunement in Virtual School EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410128:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Care as a Resource in Underserved Learning Environments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 1, Issue CSCW
    November 2017
    2095 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3171581
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 December 2017
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 1, Issue CSCW

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. care
    2. hci4d
    3. ictd
    4. india
    5. learning
    6. qualitative

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)96
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Creating Resources for Designing with and for Care Ecologies in HCIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660709(3161-3178)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Sustaining Community-Based Research in Computing: Lessons from Two Tech Capacity Building Initiatives for Local BusinessesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410178:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)'Not Just a Computer Screen:' Distributed Attunement in Virtual School EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410128:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)A Turn to Assets in Community-Based Computing Research: Tradeoffs, Deficits, and Neoliberalism in Technological DevelopmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372918:CSCW1(1-20)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Post-growth HCI: Co-Envisioning HCI Beyond Economic GrowthExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636292(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)“I was able to give her the confidence”: Reciprocal Capacity Building in a Community-based Program for Digital EngagementProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642209(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Post-growth Human–Computer InteractionACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/362498131:1(1-37)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Cultivating a Team Mindset about Productivity with a Nudge: A Field Study in Hybrid Development TeamsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101847:CSCW2(1-21)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Crowdsourcing Subjective Annotations Using Pairwise Comparisons Reduces Bias and Error Compared to the Majority-vote MethodProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101837:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)"Contradiction pushes me to improvise": Performer Expressivity and Engagement in Distanced Movement Performance ParadigmsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101827:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media