Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159598acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Coding or Hacking?: Exploring Inaccurate Views on Computing and Computer Scientists among K-6 Learners in Chile

Published: 21 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Advancing computational thinking in elementary education has been rapidly gaining attention due to the prospective of developing 21st century skills. However, interventions in this domain risk failure if they do not explicitly address the particular socio-cultural traits of the deployment scenario. This is the case in most countries of Latin America, where computing has not reached a sustainable penetration in K-12 education. In order to bridge this gap, we designed a one-week workshop for advancing computational thinking targeted to 10-12 years old Chilean students with no prior experience in programming. This paper describes our intervention and presents the results of a qualitative study analyzing positive and negative aspects of the experience. Although most participants effectively acquired basic programming skills by the end of the intervention, we also identified several inaccurate views on computing and computer scientists. For instance, computing was mostly perceived as a set of informal experiences rather than a way for enabling creation, automation, and work. The word "hacking" appears to be used as a metaphor for more technical terms, such as "programming" or "algorithm". Finally, negative stereotypical views of computer scientists resulting from the intervention were not as frequent as initial perceptions. These results provide fresh evidence on how to design, adapt, and evaluate computational thinking interventions targeted to K-6 students in Latin America.

References

[1]
Charoula Angeli, Joke Voogt, Andrew Fluck, Mary Webb, Margaret Cox, Joyce Malyn-Smith, and Jason Zagami. 2016. A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology & Society 19, 3 (2016), 47--57.
[2]
Tim Bell, Ian H. Witten, and Mike Fellows. 2015. CS Unplugged: an enrichment and extension programme for primary-aged students. (2015). Retrieved August 18, 2017 from http://csunplugged.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/CSUnplugged_ OS_2015_v3.1.pdf
[3]
Yingjun Cao and Leo Porter. 2017. Evaluating student learning from collaborative group tests in introductory programming. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 99--104.
[4]
David Wade Chambers. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: the draw-ascientist test. Science Education 67, 2 (April 1983), 255--265.
[5]
Magdalena Claro, David D. Preiss, Ernesto San Martín, Ignacio Jara, J. Enrique Hinostroza, Susana Valenzuela, Flavio Cortes, and Miguel Nussbaum. 2012. Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education 59, 3 (Nov. 2012), 1042--1053.
[6]
K-12 Computer Science Framework Steering Committee. 2016. K-12 Computer Science Framework. (2016). Retrieved August 28, 2017 from http://www.k12cs.org
[7]
Jesús Duarte, Carlos Gargiulo, and Martín Moreno. 2011. Infraestructura escolar y aprendizajes en la educación básica latinoamericana {School infrastructure and learning in Latin American K-8 education, in Spanish}. Inter-American Development Bank. Notas Técnicas IDB-TN-277. (2011). Retrieved August 16, 2017 from https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/4916
[8]
Shuchi Grover and Satabdi Basu. 2017. Measuring student learning in introductory block-based programming: examining misconceptions of loops, variables, and Boolean logic. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 267--272.
[9]
Shuchi Grover, Daisy Rutstein, and Eric Snow. 2016. "What is a computer"? what do secondary school students think?. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 564--569.
[10]
Alexandria K. Hansen, Hilary A. Dwyer, Ashley Iveland, Mia Talesfore, Lacy Wright, Danielle B. Harlow, and Diana Franklin. 2017. Assessing children's understanding of the work of computer scientists: the draw-a-computer-scientist test. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 279--284.
[11]
Pedro Hepp and Ignacio Jara. 2016. Enseñar ciencias de la computación: creando oportunidades para los jóvenes de América Latina {Teaching computer science: creating opportunities for young people in Latin America, in Spanish}. (2016). Retrieved August 28, 2017 from https://www.yopuedoprogramar.com/CS_Whiter_ Paper_Latam.pdf
[12]
Juan Enrique Hinostroza. 2011. Primer censo de informática educativa: radiografía de las brechas digitales de educación {First census on educational informatics: a radiography to the digital divides in education, in Spanish}. CEPPE Policy Brief 2. (2011). Retrieved August 16, 2017 from http://www.ceppeuc.cl/publicaciones/ policy-brief
[13]
Yasmin B. Kafai. 2016. From computational thinking to computational participation in K-12 education. Commun. ACM 59, 8 (Aug. 2016), 26--27.
[14]
Michael S. Kirkpatrick. 2017. Student perspectives of team-based learning in a CS course: summary of qualitative findings. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 327--332.
[15]
C. Dianne Martin. 2004. Draw a computer scientist. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 36, 4 (Dec. 2004), 11--12.
[16]
OECD. 2015. OECD Economic Surveys: Chile 2015. (2015). Retrieved August 31, 2017 from
[17]
Rim Razzouk and Valerie Shute. 2012. "What is design thinking and why is it important" Review of Educational Research 82, 3 (2012), 330--348.
[18]
Gabriela T. Richard and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2016. Blind spots in youth DIY programming: examining diversity in creators, content, and comments within the Scratch online community. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1473--1485.
[19]
Jennifer Tsan, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, and Collin F. Lynch. 2016. How early does the CS gender gap emerge?: a study of collaborative problem solving in 5th grade computer science. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 388--393.
[20]
Jennifer Wang and Sepehr Hejazi Moghadam. 2017. Diversity barriers in K-12 computer science education: structural and social. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 615--620.
[21]
Jeannette M. Wing. 2006. Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (March 2006), 33--35.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Student Perceptions of Computer Science as a ProfessionProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653623(339-345)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024

Index Terms

  1. Coding or Hacking?: Exploring Inaccurate Views on Computing and Computer Scientists among K-6 Learners in Chile

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
          February 2018
          1174 pages
          ISBN:9781450351034
          DOI:10.1145/3159450
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 21 February 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. computational thinking
          2. k-6 education
          3. latin america

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Conference

          SIGCSE '18
          Sponsor:

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGCSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 459 submissions, 35%;
          Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGCSE TS 2025
          The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
          February 26 - March 1, 2025
          Pittsburgh , PA , USA

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
          Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Student Perceptions of Computer Science as a ProfessionProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653623(339-345)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media