Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Context Recognition In-the-Wild: Unified Model for Multi-Modal Sensors and Multi-Label Classification

Published: 08 January 2018 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Automatic recognition of behavioral context (location, activities, body-posture etc.) can serve health monitoring, aging care, and many other domains. Recognizing context in-the-wild is challenging because of great variability in behavioral patterns, and it requires a complex mapping from sensor features to predicted labels. Data collected in-the-wild may be unbalanced and incomplete, with cases of missing labels or missing sensors. We propose using the multiple layer perceptron (MLP) as a multi-task model for context recognition. Based on features from multi-modal sensors, the model simultaneously predicts many diverse context labels. We analyze the advantages of the model's hidden layers, which are shared among all sensors and all labels, and provide insight to the behavioral patterns that these hidden layers may capture. We demonstrate how recognition of new labels can be improved when utilizing a model that was trained for an initial set of labels, and show how to train the model to withstand missing sensors. We evaluate context recognition on the previously published ExtraSensory Dataset, which was collected in-the-wild. Compared to previously suggested models, the MLP improves recognition, even with fewer parameters than a linear model. The ability to train a good model using data that has incomplete, unbalanced labeling and missing sensors encourages further research with uncontrolled, in-the-wild behavior.

    Supplementary Material

    vaizman (vaizman.zip)
    Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Context Recognition In-the-Wild: Unified Model for Multi-Modal Sensors and Multi-Label Classification

    References

    [1]
    Kay Henning Brodersen, Cheng Soon Ong, Klaas Enno Stephan, and Joachim M Buhmann. 2010. The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. In Pattern recognition (ICPR), 2010 20th international conference on. IEEE, 3121--3124.
    [2]
    Katherine Ellis, Suneeta Godbole, Jacqueline Kerr, and Gert Lanckriet. 2014. Multi-Sensor physical activity recognition in free-living. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication. ACM, 431--440.
    [3]
    Miikka Ermes, Juha Parkka, Jani Mantyjarvi, and Ilkka Korhonen. 2008. Detection of daily activities and sports with wearable sensors in controlled and uncontrolled conditions. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on 12, 1 (2008), 20--26.
    [4]
    John J Guiry, Pepijn van de Ven, and John Nelson. 2014. Multi-Sensor Fusion for Enhanced Contextual Awareness of Everyday Activities with Ubiquitous Devices. Sensors 14 (2014), 5687--5701.
    [5]
    Jacqueline Kerr, Ruth E Patterson, Katherine Ellis, Suneeta Godbole, Eileen Johnson, Gert Lanckriet, and John Staudenmayer. 2016. Objective Assessment of Physical Activity: Classifiers for Public Health. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 48, 5 (2016), 951--957.
    [6]
    Adil Mehmood Khan, Ali Tufail, Asad Masood Khattak, and Teemu H Laine. 2014. Activity recognition on smartphones via sensor-fusion and kda-based svms. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 2014 (2014).
    [7]
    Jennifer R Kwapisz, Gary M Weiss, and Samuel A Moore. 2011. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SigKDD Explorations Newsletter 12, 2 (2011), 74--82.
    [8]
    Matthew L Lee and Anind K Dey. 2015. Sensor-based observations of daily living for aging in place. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 19, 1 (2015), 27--43.
    [9]
    Zachary C Lipton, Charles Elkan, and Balakrishnan Naryanaswamy. 2014. Optimal thresholding of classifiers to maximize F1 measure. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 225--239.
    [10]
    Zachary C Lipton, David C Kale, and Randall Wetzel. 2016. Modeling missing data in clinical time series with RNNs. Machine Learning for Healthcare (2016).
    [11]
    Sri Harish Mallidi and Hynek Hermansky. 2016. Novel neural network based fusion for multistream ASR. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 5680--5684.
    [12]
    Jani Mantyjarvi, Johan Himberg, and Tapio Seppanen. 2001. Recognizing human motion with multiple acceleration sensors. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2001 IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 747--752.
    [13]
    Annamalai Natarajan, Gustavo Angarita, Edward Gaiser, Robert Malison, Deepak Ganesan, and Benjamin M Marlin. 2016. Domain adaptation methods for improving lab-to-field generalization of cocaine detection using wearable ECG. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 875--885.
    [14]
    Jiquan Ngiam, Aditya Khosla, Mingyu Kim, Juhan Nam, Honglak Lee, and Andrew Y Ng. 2011. Multimodal deep learning. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11). 689--696.
    [15]
    Hamed Pirsiavash and Deva Ramanan. 2012. Detecting activities of daily living in first-person camera views. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2847--2854.
    [16]
    Susanna Pirttikangas, Kaori Fujinami, and Tatsuo Nakajima. 2006. Feature selection and activity recognition from wearable sensors. In International Symposium on Ubiquitious Computing Systems. Springer, 516--527.
    [17]
    Mattia Rossi, Sebastian Feese, Oliver Amft, Nils Braune, Sandro Martis, and G Troster. 2013. AmbientSense: A real-time ambient sound recognition system for smartphones. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 230--235.
    [18]
    Julia Seiter, Oliver Amft, Mirco Rossi, and Gerhard Tröster. 2014. Discovery of activity composites using topic models: An analysis of unsupervised methods. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 15 (2014), 215--227.
    [19]
    Muhammad Shoaib, Stephan Bosch, Hans Scholten, Paul JM Havinga, and Ozlem Durmaz Incel. 2015. Towards detection of bad habits by fusing smartphone and smartwatch sensors. In Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 591--596.
    [20]
    Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15, 1 (2014), 1929--1958.
    [21]
    Yonatan Vaizman, Katherine Ellis, and Gert Lanckriet. 2017. Recognizing Detailed Human Context In-the-Wild from Smartphones and Smartwatches. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 4 (2017), 62--74.
    [22]
    Jamie A Ward, Paul Lukowicz, and Hans W Gellersen. 2011. Performance metrics for activity recognition. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 2, 1 (2011), 6.
    [23]
    Huiru Zheng, Haiying Wang, and Norman Black. 2008. Human activity detection in smart home environment with self-adaptive neural networks. In Networking, Sensing and Control, 2008. ICNSC 2008. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1505--1510.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring the Impact of the NULL Class on In-the-Wild Human Activity RecognitionSensors10.3390/s2412389824:12(3898)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2024
    • (2024)A Wearable Inertial Sensor Approach for Locomotion and Localization Recognition on Physical ActivitySensors10.3390/s2403073524:3(735)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2024
    • (2024)ADA-SHARKProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314167:4(1-25)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 4
    December 2017
    1298 pages
    EISSN:2474-9567
    DOI:10.1145/3178157
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 January 2018
    Accepted: 01 September 2017
    Revised: 01 August 2017
    Received: 01 May 2017
    Published in IMWUT Volume 1, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Behavioral context recognition
    2. Multi-label classification
    3. Multi-modal sensing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)180
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring the Impact of the NULL Class on In-the-Wild Human Activity RecognitionSensors10.3390/s2412389824:12(3898)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2024
    • (2024)A Wearable Inertial Sensor Approach for Locomotion and Localization Recognition on Physical ActivitySensors10.3390/s2403073524:3(735)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2024
    • (2024)ADA-SHARKProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314167:4(1-25)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Spatial-Temporal Masked Autoencoder for Multi-Device Wearable Human Activity RecognitionProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314157:4(1-25)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
    • (2024)A Multiscale Cross-Modal Interactive Fusion Network for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors and SmartphonesIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2024.340002211:16(27139-27152)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Advanced IoT-Based Human Activity Recognition and Localization Using Deep Polynomial Neural NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.342075212(94337-94353)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2023)Intelligent Localization and Deep Human Activity Recognition through IoT DevicesSensors10.3390/s2317736323:17(7363)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2023
    • (2023)A Study on the Influence of Sensors in Frequency and Time Domains on Context RecognitionSensors10.3390/s2312575623:12(5756)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Federated Meta-Learning with Attention for Diversity-Aware Human Activity RecognitionSensors10.3390/s2303108323:3(1083)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Less is more: Efficient behavioral context recognition using Dissimilarity-Based Query StrategyPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.028691918:6(e0286919)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media