Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3176349.3176359acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Distant Voices in the Dark: Understanding the Incongruent Information Needs of Fiction Authors and Readers

Published: 01 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Online tools enable authors and readers to share information, questions and feedback about a written work without the mediation of a publisher or agent. Little is known about how the two groups interact online around works of fiction, using either specialist social reading platforms e.g. GoodReads or Wattpad, or popular social media tools like Twitter. A better understanding of the interplay between them and the role technology plays as mediator can help inform the development of next-generation tools to suit their needs. We describe findings from interviews conducted with genre fiction authors and readers about how and why they interact and share information online. Interviews revealed that the social dynamics between the groups are complex, and that intercommunication can be both limited and somewhat unwanted. This shifted our focus from identifying how they interact to understanding why they do not. We found that communication patterns established by the traditional publishing industry create barriers between the groups, made visible, and exacerbated, by their retrofit to online social platforms where readers and authors are treated as equal. We discuss our key findings and highlight opportunities to better support the incongruent information needs of the groups.

References

[1]
Roland Barthes. 1967. The Death of the Author. Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://www.tbook.constantvzw.org/wp-content/death_authorbarthes.pdf
[2]
George Buchanan and Dana Mckay. 2011. In the Bookshop': Examining Popular Search Strategies. Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries: 269--278.
[3]
Sally Jo Cunningham, Nicholas Vanderschantz, Claire Timpany, Annika Hinze, and George Buchanan. 2013. Social information behaviour in Bookshops: implications for digital libraries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8092 LNCS: 84--95.
[4]
Danielle Fuller and DeNel Rehberg Sedo. 2013. Reading beyond the book: The social practices of contemporary literary culture. Routledge, New York.
[5]
Thomas Keymer and Peter Sabor. 2005. Pamela in the marketplace': literary controversy and print culture in eighteenth-century Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[6]
Peter L. Shillingsburg. 2006. Script Act Theory. In From Gutenberg to Google: Electronic Representations of Literary Texts. 40--79.
[7]
Allison Woodruff. Necessary, Unpleasant, and Disempowering: Reputation Management in the Internet Age.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)I've Got All My Readers With MeProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3406522.3446022(185-195)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHIIR '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval
March 2018
402 pages
ISBN:9781450349253
DOI:10.1145/3176349
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 March 2018

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. authors
  2. design
  3. fiction
  4. information communication
  5. information needs
  6. readers

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Funding Sources

  • AHRC

Conference

CHIIR '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CHIIR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 57 submissions, 39%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 163 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)I've Got All My Readers With MeProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3406522.3446022(185-195)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media