Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Free access

Uncertainty in current and future health wearables

Published: 20 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Expect inherent uncertainties in health-wearables data to complicate future decision making concerning user health.

References

[1]
Barcena, M.B., Wueest, C., and Lau, H. How safe is your quantified self? Symantec, Inc., 2014; https://www.symantec.com/content/dam/symantec/docs/white-papers/how-safe-is-your-quantified-self-en.pdf
[2]
Bentley, F., Tollmar, K., Stephenson, P., Levy, L., Jones, B., Robertson, S., Price, E., Catrambone, R., and Wilson, J. Health mashups: Presenting statistical patterns between well-being data and context in natural language to promote behavior change. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions 20, 5 (Nov. 2013), 1--27.
[3]
Case, M.A., Burwick, H.A., Volpp, K.G., and Patel, M.S. Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. Journal of the American Medical Association 313, 6 (Feb. 2015), 625--626.
[4]
Choe, E.K., Lee, N.B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., and Kientz, J.A. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the 32<sup>nd</sup> Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, ON, Canada, Apr. 26--May 1). ACM Press, New York, 2014, 1143--1152.
[5]
Clawson, J., Pater, J.A., Miller, A.D., Mynatt, E.D., and Mamykina, L. No longer wearing: Investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on Craigslist. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan, Sept. 7--11). ACM Press, New York, 2015, 647--658.
[6]
Consolvo, S., McDonald, D.W., Toscos, T., Chen, M.Y., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., LaMarca, A., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., Smith, I., and Landay, J. Activity sensing in the wild: A field trial of UbiFit Garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, Apr. 5--10). ACM Press, New York, 2008, 1797--1806.
[7]
Epstein, D.A., Caraway, M., Johnston, C., Ping, A., Fogarty, J., and Munson, S. A. Beyond abandonment to next steps: Understanding and designing for life after personal informatics tool use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, CA, May 7--12). ACM Press, New York, 2016, 1109--1113.
[8]
Fritz, T., Huang, E.M., Murphy, G.C., and Zimmermann, T. Persuasive technology in the real world: A study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, ON, Canada, Apr. 26--May 1). ACM Press, New York, 2014, 487--496.
[9]
Grounds, M.A., Joslyn, S., and Otsuka, K. Probabilistic interval forecasts: An individual differences approach to understanding forecast communication. Advances in Meteorology (2017).
[10]
Herz, J. Wearables are totally failing the people who need them most. Wired (Nov. 6, 2014); https://www.wired.com/2014/11/where-fitness-trackers-fail/
[11]
Kay, M., Morris, D., and Kientz, J.A. There's no such thing as gaining a pound: Reconsidering the bathroom scale user interface. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Zurich, Switzerland, Sept. 8--12). ACM Press, New York, 2013, 401--410.
[12]
Kay, M., Patel, S.N., and Kientz, J.A. How good is 85%? A survey tool to connect classifier evaluation to acceptability of accuracy. In Proceedings of the 33<sup>rd</sup> Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea, Apr. 18--23). ACM Press, New York, 2015, 347--356.
[13]
Knowles, B. Emerging trust implications of data-rich systems. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 4 (Oct. 2016), 76--84.
[14]
Lazar, A., Koehler, C., Tanenbaum, J., and Nguyen, D.H. Why we use and abandon smart devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan, Sept. 7--11). ACM Press, New York, 2015, 635--646.
[15]
Li, I., Dey, A., and Forlizzi, J. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, GA, Apr. 10--15). ACM Press, New York, 2010, 557--566.
[16]
Liu, W., Ploderer, B., and Hoang, T. In bed with technology: Challenges and opportunities for sleep tracking. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (Parkville, VIC, Australia, Dec. 7--10). ACM Press, New York, 2015, 142--151.
[17]
Lim, B.Y., Dey, A.K., and Avrahami, D. Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, Apr. 4--9). ACM Press, New York, 2009, 2119--2128.
[18]
Mackinlay, M.Z. Phases of accuracy diagnosis: (In) visibility of system status in the FitBit. Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology and Society 6, 2 (June 2013).
[19]
Meyer, J., Wasmann, M., Heuten, W., El Ali, A., and Boll, S.C. Identification and classification of usage patterns in long-term activity tracking. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, CO, May 6--11). ACM Press, New York, 2017, 667--678.
[20]
Packer, H.S., Buzogany, G., Smith, D.A., Dragan, L., Van Kleek, M., and Shadbolt, N.R. The editable self: A workbench for personal activity data. In Proceedings of CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, ON, Canada, Apr. 26--May 1). ACM Press, New York, 2014, 2185--2190.
[21]
Poursabzi-Sangdeh, F., Goldstein D.G., Hofman J.M., Wortman Vaughan, J., and Wallach H. Manipulating and measuring model interpretability. arXiv preprint, 2018; https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.07810
[22]
Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., and Chalmers, M.C. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the 32<sup>nd</sup> annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, ON, Canada, Apr. 26--May 1). ACM Press, New York, 2014, 1163--1172.
[23]
Shih, P.C., Han, K., Poole, E.S., Rosson, M.B., and Carroll, J. M. Use and adoption challenges of wearable activity trackers. IConference Proceedings (2015); https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/73649/164_ready.pdf
[24]
Swan, M. Emerging patient-driven health care models: An examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 6, 2 (Feb. 2009), 492--525.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Embracing Deep Variability For Reproducibility and ReplicabilityProceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability10.1145/3641525.3663621(30-35)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Benchmarking state-of-the-art imbalanced data learning approaches for credit scoringExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118878213:PBOnline publication date: 1-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Spatio-temporal and contextual cues to support reflection in physical activity trackingInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102865165(102865)Online publication date: Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 61, Issue 12
December 2018
104 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/3293542
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 November 2018
Published in CACM Volume 61, Issue 12

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Popular
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)124
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Embracing Deep Variability For Reproducibility and ReplicabilityProceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability10.1145/3641525.3663621(30-35)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Benchmarking state-of-the-art imbalanced data learning approaches for credit scoringExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118878213:PBOnline publication date: 1-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Spatio-temporal and contextual cues to support reflection in physical activity trackingInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102865165(102865)Online publication date: Sep-2022
  • (2021)Eliciting Design Guidelines for Privacy Notifications in mHealth EnvironmentsResearch Anthology on Privatizing and Securing Data10.4018/978-1-7998-8954-0.ch093(1909-1928)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Lifestyle-based health awareness using digital gadgets and online interactive platformsNeuroPharmac Journal10.37881/1.638(295-310)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2021
  • (2021)Internet of Things (IoT): A Review of Its Enabling Technologies in Healthcare Applications, Standards Protocols, Security, and Market OpportunitiesIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2021.30626308:13(10474-10498)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
  • (2021)Is clinically measured knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty ‘good enough?’: A feasibility study using wearable inertial measurement units to compare knee range of motion captured during physical therapy versus at homeMedicine in Novel Technology and Devices10.1016/j.medntd.2021.100085(100085)Online publication date: Jul-2021
  • (2021)1,2,3,4 tell me how to grow moreInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.10032830:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2021
  • (2021)Do Wearable Activity Trackers Improve Employees’ Health and Increase Re-participation in Wellness Programs?Health Policy and Technology10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100582(100582)Online publication date: Nov-2021
  • (2021)Adversarial machine learning in Network Intrusion Detection SystemsExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115782186:COnline publication date: 30-Dec-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media