Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Design principles for health wearables

Published: 04 August 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    As wearables become increasingly prevalent, there is a concurrent and growing expectation that we use these devices to track and monitor our bodily states in order to be responsible "biocitizens." To mitigate this, some health, design, and usability scholars have advocated for greater patient control over health data. To support these efforts, this article offers a set of criteria for analyzing wearables, criteria that account for the handling of data and user connections via wearables as they relate to three priorities: accessibility, adaptability, and iterability. These are meant to support analyses that will clarify the ways wearables can more ethically serve end-users'---that is, patients' and wearers'---emerging needs, rather than primarily serving the intermediary goals of care delivery personnel and systems to monitor and manage patient behavior. To do this, this article addresses the usability of wearables as it relates to other critical care issues, such as "information integrity" and enabling patients to maintain their own health records and participate in shared decision making.

    References

    [1]
    Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [2]
    Bellwoar, H. (2012). Everyday matters: Reception and use as productive design of health-related texts. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 325--345.
    [3]
    Boudreaux, E. D., Waring M. E., Hayes, R. B., Sadasivam, R. S., Mullen, S., & Pagoto, S. (2014). Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4(4), 363--371.
    [4]
    Boyd, d. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 13(1).
    [5]
    Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
    [6]
    Burwell, S. M. (2015). Setting value-based payment goals---HHS efforts to improve US health care. New England journal of Medicine, 372(10), 897--899.
    [7]
    Carman, A. (2016, Feb. 2). An Oklahoma university now requires new students to wear Fitbits. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2016/2/2/10893630/oral-roberts- university-fitbits-Requirement
    [8]
    Chen, C., & Pettypiece, S. (2015, Sept. 16, 2016). Target to offer Fitbits to 335,000 employees. Bloomberg Business. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/ articles/2015-09-15/target-to- offer-health-tracking-fitbits-to- 335-000-employees
    [9]
    Dolmage, J. T. (2014). Disability rhetoric. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
    [10]
    Donovan, L. M., Boeder, S., Malhotra, A., & Patel, S. R. (2015). New developments in the use of positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Thoracic Cisease, 7(8), 1323.
    [11]
    Evenson, K. R., Wen, F., & Herring, A. H. (2016). Associations of accelerometry-assessed and self- reported physical activity and sedentary behavior with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 184(9), 621--632.
    [12]
    FHIR Infrastructure Work Group. (2015). 1.8.0 FHIR Overview. Retrieved from https://www.hl7.org/fhir/overview.html
    [13]
    Fitbit. (2016a, Oct. 28). How do I delete data? Retrieved from https://help.fitbit.com/articles/en_US/ Help_article/1306
    [14]
    Fitbit. (2016b, May 16). Is my Fitbit data secure? Retrieved from https://help.fitbit.com/articles/en_US/ Help_ article/1758/?l=en_US&c=Topics%3AAccount_Settings&fs=Search&pn=1
    [15]
    Fitbit. (2016c). Let's talk about privacy, publicly. Retrieved from https://www.fitbit.com/legal/privacy
    [16]
    Gouge, C. C. (forthcoming). 'The inconvenience of meeting you': Rereading non/compliance, enabling care. In A. K. Booher & J. Jung (Eds.), Feminist rhetorical science studies: Human bodies, posthuman worlds. Southern Illinois University Press.
    [17]
    Gouge, C. C. (2016). Improving patient discharge communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1--21.
    [18]
    Grant, L., Hausman, B. L., Cashion, M., Lucchesi, N., Patel, K., & Roberts, J. (2015). Vaccination persuasion online: A qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(5), e133.
    [19]
    Hamraie, A. (2013). Designing collective access: A feminist disability theory of universal design. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4), n.p.
    [20]
    Health wearables: Early days. (2014, Oct. 2014). PwC. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/ health-industries/top- health-industry-issues/assets/pwc-hri-wearable-devices.pdf
    [21]
    Howard, T., & Greer, M. (2011). Innovation and collaboration in product development: Creating a new role for usability studies in educational publishing. In M. J. Albers & B. Still (Eds.), Usability of complex information systems: Evaluation of user interaction (pp. 67--88), Oxford, UK: CRC Press.
    [22]
    Imrie, R. (2012). Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Disability and rehabilitation, 34(10), 873--882.
    [23]
    Ito, J., & Howe, J. (2016). Whiplash: How to survive our faster future. New York: Grand Central Publishing.
    [24]
    Koninklijke Philips N.V. (2016). DreamMapper 2.4: Mobile app user guide. Murrysville, Pa.
    [25]
    Kopelson, K. (2009). Writing patients' wrongs: The rhetoric and reality of information age medicine. JAC, 29(1/2), 353--404.
    [26]
    Lazard, A. J., & Mackert, M. S. (2015). E-health first impressions and visual evaluations: Key design principles for attention and appeal. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(4), 25--34.
    [27]
    Long, R. (2015, Jan. 25). Garmin Connect and Google Fit. Retrieved from www.stationarywaves.com/ 2015/01/garmin-connect-and-google-fit.html
    [28]
    Lynn, J. (2015, Nov. 3). Fitbit data in the EMR? Retrieved from http://www.emrandehr.com/2015/11/03/fitbit-data-in-the-emr/
    [29]
    Meloncon, L., & Frost, E. A. (2015). Special issue introduction: Charting an emerging field: The rhetorics of health and medicine and its importance in communication design. Communication design quarterly, 3(4), 7--14.
    [30]
    Murray, S., & Holmes, D. (Eds.). (2009). Critical interventions in the ethics of healthcare: Challenging the principle of autonomy in bioethics. London: Ashgate.
    [31]
    NHLBI. (2012, July 10). What is sleep apnea? Retrieved from https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/sleepapnea
    [32]
    O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Crown.
    [33]
    ONC. (2016). Connecting and accelerating a FHIR app ecosystem. Retrieved from www.healthit.gov/techlab/ innovation/connecting-accelerating-fhir-app-ecosystem
    [34]
    Patel, M. S., Asch, D. A., & Volpp, K. G. (2015). Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA, 313(5), 459--460.
    [35]
    Patient protection and affordable care act, 42 C.F.R. § 18001 et seq. (2010).
    [36]
    Pennic, F. (2015). Novant health to integrate pic MyChart with Fitbit & HealthKit. Retrieved from http://hitconsultant.net/2015/08/21/novant-health-to-integrate-epic-mychart- with-fitbit-healthkit/
    [37]
    Philips Respironics. (2015, Aug. 6). Privacy notice: DreamMapper application. Retrieved from https://www.mydreammapper.com/Legal/PrivacyPolicy
    [38]
    Philips Respironics. (n.d.-a). DreamMapper: Saving you time, helping your bottom line. Retrieved from http://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/product/HCNOCTN196/dreammapper
    [39]
    Philips Respironics. (n.d.-b). EncorePro 2: Patient data management software. Retrieved from http://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/product/HC1054785/encorepro-2- patient-data-management-software
    [40]
    Philips Respironics. (n.d.-c). FAQ: Common questions and answers about DreamMapper. Retrieved from https://www.sleepapnea.com/products/dreammapper/faq
    [41]
    Philips Respironics. (n.d.-d). Introducing the dream family. Retrieved from https://www.sleepapnea.com/products/dream-family
    [42]
    Potts, L. (2014). Social media in disaster response: How experience architects can build for participation. New York: Routledge.
    [43]
    Rivers, N., & Söderlund, L. (2016). Speculative usability. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(1), 125--146.
    [44]
    Segal, J. Z. (2009). Internet health and the 21st-century patient: A rhetorical view. Written Communication, 26(4), 351--369.
    [45]
    Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [46]
    Sullivan, M. (2014, Aug. 15). Guess what? Doctors don't care about your Fitbit data. Retrieved from http://venturebeat.com/2014/08/15/guess-what-doctors-dont-care-about-your- fitbit-data/
    [47]
    Swan, M. (2012). Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2(3), 93--118.
    [48]
    Teston, C. (2016). Rhetoric, precarity, and mHealth technologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46(3), 251--268.
    [49]
    Topol, E. (2015). The patient will see you now: The future of medicine is in your hands. New York: Basic Books.
    [50]
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2015). HHS issues rules to advance electronic health records with added simplicity and flexibility. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ about/ news/2015/10/06/hhs-issues-rules-advance- electronic-health-records-added-simplicity-and-flexibility.html
    [51]
    Virk, J. S., & Kotecha, B. (2016). When continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) fails. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8(10), E1112.
    [52]
    Walker, K. (2009). My life? My choice? Ethics, autonomy, and evidence-based practice in contemporary clinical care. In S. Murray and D. Holmes (Eds.). Critical interventions in the ethics of healthcare: Challenging the principle of autonomy in bioethics (pp. 15--32). London: Ashgate.
    [53]
    Watkins, M. (2011). SleepyHead. Retrieved from http://sleepyhead.jedimark.net/
    [54]
    Wilbanks, J. T., & Topol, E. J. (2016). Stop the privatization of health data. Nature, 535, 345--348.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/5217912(e52179)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
    • (2023)A Comparative Analysis of Design Principles for Integration in Wearable Persuasive MultimediaAnnals of Emerging Technologies in Computing10.33166/AETiC.2023.04.0027:4(14-26)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Toward TPC-UX: UX Topics in TPC Journals 2013–2022Journal of Technical Writing and Communication10.1177/0047281623119199854:3(324-356)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Design principles for health wearables

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Communication Design Quarterly
      Communication Design Quarterly  Volume 5, Issue 2
      July 2017
      67 pages
      EISSN:2166-1642
      DOI:10.1145/3131201
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 August 2017
      Published in SIGDOC-CDQ Volume 5, Issue 2

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. accessibility
      2. biocitizens
      3. digital medicine
      4. ehealth
      5. electronic medical records
      6. information integrity
      7. usability
      8. wearable technologies

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)82
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/5217912(e52179)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
      • (2023)A Comparative Analysis of Design Principles for Integration in Wearable Persuasive MultimediaAnnals of Emerging Technologies in Computing10.33166/AETiC.2023.04.0027:4(14-26)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Toward TPC-UX: UX Topics in TPC Journals 2013–2022Journal of Technical Writing and Communication10.1177/0047281623119199854:3(324-356)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2023
      • (2023)Ethical Design Approaches for Workplace Augmented RealityCommunication Design Quarterly10.1145/3531210.353121210:4(16-26)Online publication date: 10-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Co-designing opportunities for Human-Centred Machine Learning in supporting Type 1 diabetes decision-makingInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103003173(103003)Online publication date: May-2023
      • (2022)Safe return to the workplace: Perceived opportunities and threats in the use of health surveillance technologies in public administrationsProceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3543434.3543435(328-335)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2022
      • (2022)Towards a data collection methodology for Responsible Artificial Intelligence in health: A prospective and qualitative study in pregnancyInformation Fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2022.03.01183-84(53-78)Online publication date: Jul-2022
      • (2021)Robotic-Based Well-Being Monitoring and Coaching System for the Elderly in Their Daily ActivitiesSensors10.3390/s2120686521:20(6865)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2021
      • (2021)Assessing the usability of wearable devices to measure gait and physical activity in chronic conditions: a systematic reviewJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation10.1186/s12984-021-00931-218:1Online publication date: 15-Sep-2021
      • (2021)Piracy and the Impaired CyborgProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34329414:CSCW3(1-21)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2021
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media