Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Piracy and the Impaired Cyborg: Assistive Technologies, Accessibility, and Access

Published: 05 January 2021 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This paper examines software piracy in the Global South from an accessibility lens, using the bio-technical metaphor of the 'cyborg.' Drawing on qualitative interviews with people with visual impairment (VI) from India and Peru, the paper interrogates the intimate relationships that users have with assistive technologies (ATs). It outlines the effectiveness of ATs in allowing users to actively control and shape their own lives and identities, and describes the various modalities that regulate the human body, technology, and human body-technology linkages. The paper argues that software piracy, when looked through the lens of the 'cyborg,' is an act of self-making that is motivated by a desire to gain autonomy and independence, i.e., it can be understood as a way to overcome the barriers that undermine access to the technological self. Further, software piracy allows a shift in the distribution of power from those who control and regulate the assistive technologies to the cyborgs themselves.

    References

    [1]
    Aleksandra Łukaszewicz Alcaraz. 2019. Cyborg Persons or Selves.
    [2]
    Elisabet Apelmo. 2012. Falling in love with a wheelchair: enabling/disabling technologies. Sport in society, Vol. 15, 3 (2012), 399--408.
    [3]
    Anne Marie Balsamo et almbox. 1996. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women .Duke University Press.
    [4]
    Paul Belleflamme and Martin Peitz. 2014. Digital piracy. Springer.
    [5]
    Yochai Benkler. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom.Yale University Press.
    [6]
    Cynthia L Bennett, Keting Cen, Katherine M Steele, and Daniela K Rosner. 2016. An intimate laboratory? Prostheses as a tool for experimenting with identity and normalcy. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1745--1756.
    [7]
    Cynthia L Bennett, Abigale Stangl, Alexa F Siu, and Joshua A Miele. 2019. Making Nonvisually: Lessons from the Field. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 279--285.
    [8]
    Stacy M Branham and Shaun K Kane. 2015. The invisible work of accessibility: how blind employees manage accessibility in mixed-ability workplaces. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. 163--171.
    [9]
    Robin N Brewer and Vaishnav Kameswaran. 2019. Understanding trust, transportation, and accessibility through ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
    [10]
    Lauren M Britton and Bryan Semaan. 2017. Manifesting the cyborg through techno-body modification: From human-computer interaction to integration. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2499--2510.
    [11]
    Erin Buehler, Stacy Branham, Abdullah Ali, Jeremy J Chang, Megan Kelly Hofmann, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K Kane. 2015. Sharing is caring: Assistive technology designs on thingiverse. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 525--534.
    [12]
    Priyank Chandra. 2016. Order in the warez scene: explaining an underground virtual community with the CPR framework. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 372--383.
    [13]
    Priyank Chandra and Jasmine Jones. 2015. Assistive technologies and autonomy in a cyborg world. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 31.
    [14]
    Samir Chopra and S Dexter. 2007. Free software and the political philosophy of the cyborg world. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, Vol. 37, 2 (2007), 41--52.
    [15]
    Roger Clarke. 2010. Cyborg rights. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society. IEEE, 9--22.
    [16]
    Manfred E Clynes and Nathan S Kline. 1995. Cyborgs and space. The cyborg handbook (1995), 29--34.
    [17]
    Ian Condry. 2004. Cultures of music piracy: An ethnographic comparison of the US and Japan. International journal of cultural studies, Vol. 7, 3 (2004), 343--363.
    [18]
    Maitraye Das, Katya Borgos-Rodriguez, and Anne Marie Piper. 2020. Weaving by touch: A case analysis of accessible making. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
    [19]
    Robert M Davison. 2012. The privacy rights of cyborgs. Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 27, 4 (2012), 324--325.
    [20]
    Alexander S Dent. 2012. Piracy, circulatory legitimacy, and neoliberal subjectivity in Brazil. Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 27, 1 (2012), 28--49.
    [21]
    Kerry Dobransky and Eszter Hargittai. 2006. The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 9, 3 (2006), 313--334.
    [22]
    Arne H Eide and Tone Øderud. 2009. Assistive technology in low-income countries. In Disability & international development. Springer, 149--160.
    [23]
    Katie Ellis and Mike Kent. 2011. Disability and new media. Routledge.
    [24]
    Heather A Faucett, Kate E Ringland, Amanda LL Cullen, and Gillian R Hayes. 2017. (In) visibility in disability and assistive technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), Vol. 10, 4 (2017), 1--17.
    [25]
    Laura Forlano. 2016. Decentering the human in the design of collaborative cities. Design Issues, Vol. 32, 3 (2016), 42--54.
    [26]
    Alexandre Apsan Frediani. 2010. Sen's Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development. Development in practice, Vol. 20, 2 (2010), 173--187.
    [27]
    Peter ES Freund. 2004. Civilised bodies redux: seams in the cyborg. Social Theory & Health, Vol. 2, 3 (2004), 273--289.
    [28]
    Barbara E Gibson, Franco A Carnevale, and Gillian King. 2012. 'This is my way': reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 34, 22 (2012), 1894--1899.
    [29]
    Tarleton Gillespie. 2009. Wired Shut, Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (2009).
    [30]
    Antonio Gramsci. 2011. Prison Notebooks Volume 2. Vol. 2. Columbia University Press.
    [31]
    Chris Hables Gray. 2000. Cyborg citizen: Politics in the posthuman age .Routledge.
    [32]
    Chris Hables Gray, Heidi J Figueroa-Sarriera, and Steven Mentor. 1995. The Cyborg Handbook. (1995).
    [33]
    Jonathan W Gray. 2016. 'Why Couldn't You Let Me Die??: Cyborg, Social Death, and Narratives of Black Disability. In Disability in Comic Books and Graphic Narratives. Springer, 125--139.
    [34]
    David J Gunkel. 2003. Second thoughts: toward a critique of the digital divide. New media & society, Vol. 5, 4 (2003), 499--522.
    [35]
    Martin Heidegger. 1996. Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit. SUNY press.
    [36]
    P David Howe. 2011. Cyborg and supercrip: The Paralympics technology and the (dis) empowerment of disabled athletes. Sociology, Vol. 45, 5 (2011), 868--882.
    [37]
    Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 11--18.
    [38]
    John Jones, Catherine Gouge, and Mariah Crilley. 2017. Design principles for health wearables. Communication Design Quarterly Review, Vol. 5, 2 (2017), 40--50.
    [39]
    Vaishnav Kameswaran, Jatin Gupta, Joyojeet Pal, Sile O'Modhrain, Tiffany C Veinot, Robin Brewer, Aakanksha Parameshwar, and Jacki O'Neill. 2018. 'We can go anywhere' Understanding Independence through a Case Study of Ride-hailing Use by People with Visual Impairments in metropolitan India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--24.
    [40]
    Nixon K Kariithi. 2011. Is the devil in the data? A literature review of piracy around the world. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 14, 2 (2011), 133--154.
    [41]
    Krista Kennedy. 2018. Designing for human-machine collaboration: smart hearing aids as wearable technologies. Communication Design Quarterly Review, Vol. 5, 4 (2018), 40--51.
    [42]
    Bert-Jaap Koops, Mireille Hildebrandt, and David-Olivier Jaquet-Chiffelle. 2010. Bridging the accountability gap: Rights for new entities in the information society. Minn. JL Sci. & Tech., Vol. 11 (2010), 497.
    [43]
    Neha Kumar and Nimmi Rangaswamy. 2013. The mobile media actor-network in urban India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1989--1998.
    [44]
    Lawrence Lessig. 2009. Code: And other laws of cyberspace.
    [45]
    Lawrence Liang. 2005. Porous legalities and avenues of participation. Sarai reader, Vol. 5, 1 (2005), 6--17.
    [46]
    Ramon Lobato and Julian Thomas. 2018. The informal media economy. John Wiley & Sons.
    [47]
    MacKinnon Richard. 2017. The Cyborg Bill of Rights v1.0 / Boing Boing. https://boingboing.net/2017/02/01/the-cyborg-bill-of-rights-v1-0.html
    [48]
    Ted McCarthy, Joyojeet Pal, and Edward Cutrell. 2013. The 'voice' has it: screen reader adoption and switching behavior among vision impaired persons in India. Assistive Technology, Vol. 25, 4 (2013), 222--229.
    [49]
    Helen Meekosha and Karen Soldatic. 2011. Human rights and the global South: The case of disability. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 32, 8 (2011), 1383--1397.
    [50]
    Janis Lena Meissner, John Vines, Janice McLaughlin, Thomas Nappey, Jekaterina Maksimova, and Peter Wright. 2017. Do-it-yourself empowerment as experienced by novice makers with disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 1053--1065.
    [51]
    Ingunn Moser. 2000. Against normalisation: subverting norms of ability and disability. Science as culture, Vol. 9, 2 (2000), 201--240.
    [52]
    Ruth Neubauer. 2019. Design Thinking: From Individual Thinking Towards a Technohuman Reconfiguration. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Demos and Posters. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
    [53]
    Mike Oliver. 1989. Disability and dependency: A creation of industrial societies. Disability and dependency (1989), 6--22.
    [54]
    Michael J Oliver. 1999. Capitalism, disability, and ideology: A materialist critique of the. A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (1999), 163.
    [55]
    World Health Organization et almbox. 2011. World report on disability 2011. World Health Organization.
    [56]
    Jo Orsatti, Ella Hafermalz, and Dirk S Hovorka. 2016. Rethinking," Rethinking: Post-Human Boundaries" Pre-given or Performed? ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 47, 4 (2016), 41--44.
    [57]
    Joyojeet Pal, Tawfiq Ammari, Ramaswami Mahalingam, Ana Maria Huaita Alfaro, and Meera Lakshmanan. 2013. Marginality, aspiration and accessibility in ICTD. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers-Volume 1. 68--78.
    [58]
    Joyojeet Pal and Meera Lakshmanan. 2012. Assistive technology and the employment of people with vision impairments in India. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 307--317.
    [59]
    Joyojeet Pal, Manas Pradhan, Mihir Shah, and Rakesh Babu. 2011a. Assistive technology for vision-impairments: anagenda for the ICTD community. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web. ACM, 513--522.
    [60]
    Joyojeet Pal, Ugo Vallauri, and Victor Tsaran. 2011b. Low-cost assistive technology in the developing world: a research agenda for information schools. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. ACM, 459--465.
    [61]
    Joyojeet Pal, Anjali Vartak, Vrutti Vyas, Saikat Chatterjee, Nektarios Paisios, and Rahul Cherian. 2010. A ratification of means: International law and assistive technology in the developing world. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--11.
    [62]
    Joyojeet Pal, Anandhi Viswanathan, Priyank Chandra, Anisha Nazareth, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Hariharan Subramonyam, Aditya Johri, Mark S Ackerman, and Sile O'Modhrain. 2017. Agency in assistive technology adoption: Visual impairment and smartphone use in Bangalore. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 5929--5940.
    [63]
    Joyojeet Pal, Anandhi Viswanathan, and Ji-Hye Song. 2016. Smartphone adoption drivers and challenges in urban living: Cases from Seoul and Bangalore. In Proceedings of the 8th Indian Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 24--34.
    [64]
    Alyson Patsavas. 2012. Suffering Cyborgs: Inhuman Pain, Human Subjects . Ph.D. Dissertation. MA thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago.
    [65]
    Kavita Philip. 2005. What is a technological author? The pirate function and intellectual property. Postcolonial Studies, Vol. 8, 2 (2005), 199--218.
    [66]
    Halley P Profita, Abigale Stangl, Laura Matuszewska, Sigrunn Sky, and Shaun K Kane. 2016. Nothing to hide: aesthetic customization of hearing aids and cochlear implants in an online community. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 219--227.
    [67]
    Gowri Ramachandran. 2009. Against the right to bodily integrity: of cyborgs and human rights. Denv. UL Rev., Vol. 87 (2009), 1.
    [68]
    Neil Ramiller. 2016. New technology and the post-human self: Rethinking appropriation and resistance. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 47, 4 (2016), 23--33.
    [69]
    Donna Reeve. 2012. Cyborgs, cripples and iCrip: Reflections on the contribution of Haraway to disability studies. In Disability and Social Theory. Springer, 91--111.
    [70]
    Gustavo Lins Ribeiro. 2012. Globalization from Below and the non Hegemonic Word-System. G. Mathews, G. Lins Ribeiro y C. Alba Vega, Globalization from Below: The World's Other Economy, Londres, Routdledge (2012), 221--236.
    [71]
    Jacquie Ripat and Roberta Woodgate. 2011. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol. 6, 2 (2011), 87--96.
    [72]
    Emma J Rose and Rebecca Walton. 2015. Factors to actors: Implications of posthumanism for social justice work. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication. 1--10.
    [73]
    Marcia J Scherer. 1996. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and rehabilitation, Vol. 18, 9 (1996), 439--448.
    [74]
    Amartya Sen. 2001. Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.
    [75]
    Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 705--714.
    [76]
    Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2016. Self-conscious or self-confident? A diary study conceptualizing the social accessibility of assistive technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), Vol. 8, 2 (2016), 1--31.
    [77]
    Tobin Siebers. 2008. Disability theory .University of Michigan Press.
    [78]
    Karin Slegers, Kristel Kouwenberg, Tereza Louvc ova, and Ramon Daniels. 2020. Makers in Healthcare: The Role of Occupational Therapists in the Design of DIY Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
    [79]
    Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. Designing for cohabitation: Naturecultures, hybrids, and decentering the human in design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1714--1725.
    [80]
    Thomas N Smyth, Satish Kumar, Indrani Medhi, and Kentaro Toyama. 2010. Where there's a will there's a way: mobile media sharing in urban india. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. 753--762.
    [81]
    Andrew C Sparkes, James Brighton, and Kay Inckle. 2018. 'It'sa part of me': an ethnographic exploration of becoming a disabled sporting cyborg following spinal cord injury. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, Vol. 10, 2 (2018), 151--166.
    [82]
    Ravi Sundaram. 2009. Pirate modernity: Delhi's media urbanism. Routledge.
    [83]
    Linnet Taylor. 2016. From zero to hero: How zero-rating became a debate about human rights. IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 20, 4 (2016), 79--83.
    [84]
    Maria Rosalia Vicente and Ana Jesus Lopez. 2010. A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for Internet use. The Information Society, Vol. 26, 1 (2010), 48--64.
    [85]
    Shujen Wang. 2003. Recontextualizing copyright: Piracy, Hollywood, the state, and globalization. Cinema Journal (2003), 25--43.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Comparative study between JAWS® And NVDA® in academic performance of students with visual impairmentBritish Journal of Visual Impairment10.1177/02646196241255889Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Characterizing the Technology Needs of Vulnerable Populations for Participation in Research and Design by Adopting Maslow’s Hierarchy of NeedsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581221(1-20)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)“I am both here and there” Parallel Control of Multiple Robotic Avatars by Disabled Workers in a CaféProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581124(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW3
    CSCW
    December 2020
    1825 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3446568
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 January 2021
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. access
    2. accessibility
    3. assistive technologies
    4. cyborgs
    5. disability
    6. piracy
    7. posthuman

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)107
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Comparative study between JAWS® And NVDA® in academic performance of students with visual impairmentBritish Journal of Visual Impairment10.1177/02646196241255889Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Characterizing the Technology Needs of Vulnerable Populations for Participation in Research and Design by Adopting Maslow’s Hierarchy of NeedsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581221(1-20)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)“I am both here and there” Parallel Control of Multiple Robotic Avatars by Disabled Workers in a CaféProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581124(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Providing AccessDisability and Video Games10.1007/978-3-031-34374-2_11(295-317)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Protecting The VulnerableProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556476:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media