Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3313057acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Characterizing Homelessness Discourse on Social Media

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Social media allows us to connect and maintain relationships in spite of physical distance and barriers; as computers and the internet become more accessible, hard-to-reach populations are finding a voice on these platforms. One such group is those who are or have been homeless. Through a computational linguistic analysis of a large corpus of Tumblr blog posts, this paper provides preliminary insights to understand the unique ways homeless bloggers express their needs, frustrations and financial/social distress, connect with others, and seek emotional and practical support from others. We highlight future investigations, building upon this research, that can be pursued in HCI to assist an underserved population with the difficult life experience of homelessness.

References

[1]
2015. Demographics of Tumblr. 2015-08--19_social-media-update_05/ h p://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/
[2]
Nazanin Andalibi, Margaret E Morris, and Andrea Forte. 2018. Testing waters, sending clues: Indirect disclosures of socially stigmatized experiences on social media. Proc. ACM - HCI 2, CSCW (2018), 19.
[3]
Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De. 2014. Mental Health Discourse on reddit: Self-Disclosure, Social Support, and Anonymity. In ICWSM.
[4]
Munmun De Choudhury, Sanket S Sharma, Tomaz Logar, Wouter Eekhout, and Rene Clausen Nielsen. 2017. Gender and cross-cultural differences in social media disclosures of mental illness. In Proc. CSCW. ACM, 353--369.
[5]
Jes A Koepfler and Kenneth R Fleischmann. 2012. Studying the values of hard-to-reach populations: content analysis of tweets by the 21st century homeless. In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference. ACM, 48--55.
[6]
Jes A Koepfler and Derek L Hansen. 2012. We Are Visible: Technology-mediated social participation in a Twi er network for the homeless. In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference. ACM, 492--493.
[7]
Christopher A Le Dantec and W Keith Edwards. 2008. Designs on dignity: perceptions of technology among the homeless. In Proc. CHI. ACM, 627--636.
[8]
Christopher A Le Dantec, Robert G Farrell, Jim E Christensen, Mark Bailey, Jason B Ellis, Wendy A Kellogg, and W Keith Edwards. 2011. Publics in practice: Ubiquitous computing at a shelter for homeless mothers. In Proc. CHI. ACM, 1687--1696.
[9]
Eric Rice and Anamika Barman-Adhikari. 2014. Internet and social media use as a resource among homeless youth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 2 (2014), 232--247.
[10]
Eric Rice, Alex Lee, and Sean Tai. 2011. Cell phone use among homeless youth: potential for new health interventions and research. Journal of Urban Health 88, 6 (2011), 1175--1182.
[11]
Haley Velasco. 2017. How Homeless Chicago Teens Are Using Social Media to Communicate. https://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/how-homeless-chicago-teens-are-using-social-media-to-communicate/
[12]
Jill Palzkill Woelfer and David G Hendry. 2010. Homeless young people's experiences with information systems: life and work in a community technology center. In Proc. CHI. ACM, 1291--1300.
[13]
Jill Palzkill Woelfer and David G. Hendry. 2012. Homeless Young People on Social Network Sites. In Proc. CHI (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2825--2834.
[14]
Mary Yost. 2012. The invisible become visible: An analysis of how people experiencing homelessness use social media. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications 3, 2 (2012).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)“The ChatGPT bot is causing panic now – but it’ll soon be as mundane a tool as Excel”: analysing topics, sentiment and emotions relating to ChatGPT on TwitterPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-024-01811-xOnline publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2023)Critical reflections on three popular computational linguistic approaches to examine Twitter discoursesPeerJ Computer Science10.7717/peerj-cs.12119(e1211)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2023
  • (2023)“Who is the right homeless client?”: Values in Algorithmic Homelessness Service Provision and Machine Learning ResearchProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581010(1-21)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2019
3673 pages
ISBN:9781450359719
DOI:10.1145/3290607
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. hard to research populations
  2. homelessness
  3. language analysis
  4. social media
  5. tumblr

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Funding Sources

Conference

CHI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)138
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)“The ChatGPT bot is causing panic now – but it’ll soon be as mundane a tool as Excel”: analysing topics, sentiment and emotions relating to ChatGPT on TwitterPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-024-01811-xOnline publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2023)Critical reflections on three popular computational linguistic approaches to examine Twitter discoursesPeerJ Computer Science10.7717/peerj-cs.12119(e1211)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2023
  • (2023)“Who is the right homeless client?”: Values in Algorithmic Homelessness Service Provision and Machine Learning ResearchProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581010(1-21)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Understanding Frontline Workers’ and Unhoused Individuals’ Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless ServicesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580882(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2021)An online home for the homeless: A content analysis of the subreddit r/homelessNew Media & Society10.1177/1461444821104861525:9(2419-2436)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2021
  • (2021)"So-called privacy breeds evil"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34329094:CSCW3(1-27)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2021

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media