Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3383082acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Can Computer-Generated Speech Have an Age?

Published: 25 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The present study examines whether computer-generated speech is perceived to have an age, and if so, whether we can manipulate the perceived age of the voice. We conducted an experimental study with 51 participants where each computer-generated voice had different age-related characteristics such as the speed rate of the voice and frequency of the pitch. Participants listened to vehicle reviews presented by computer-generated voices with age-related characteristics we manipulated and then evaluated the age of the voice. Results show that we can change the perceived age of a computer-generated voice by manipulating the age-related characteristics of the voice. This work contributes to communities of HCI researchers interested in voice user interfaces (VUIs), conversational agents, and age stereotypes.

References

[1]
2016. Millennial Car Buyers Busting Gender Stereotypes. (2016). https://www.fi-magazine.com/322693/millennial-car-buyers-busting-gender-stereotypes
[2]
Apple. n.d. Text to Speech - TTS. (n.d.). https://apps.apple.com/us/app/text-to-speech-tts/id1183892228
[3]
CJ PonyParts. 2019. Men vs Women Car Buying | Car Buying By Gender. (2019). https://www.cjponyparts.com/resources/men-vs-women-car-buying
[4]
W. Endres, W. Bambach, and G. Flösser. 1971. Voice Spectrograms as a Function of Age, Voice Disguise, and Voice Imitation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 6B (June 1971), 1842--1848.
[5]
Google. n.d. Cloud Text-to-Speech - Speech Synthesis. (n.d.). https://cloud.google.com/text-to-speech/
[6]
Earl W Huff, Naja A Mack, Robert Cummings, Kevin Womack, Kinnis Gosha, and Juan E Gilbert. 2019. Evaluating the Usability of Pervasive Conversational User Interfaces for Virtual Mentoring. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 80--98.
[7]
Y Morishima, C Bennett, C Nass, and KM Lee. 2002. Effects of (Synthetic) Voice Gender, User Gender, and Product Gender on Credibility in E-Commerce. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford, CA: Stanford University (2002).
[8]
Clifford Nass and Kwan Min Lee. Does Computer-generated Speech Manifest Personality? An Experimental Test of Similarity-attraction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2000) (CHI '00). ACM, 329--336. event-place: The Hague, The Netherlands.
[9]
Clifford Nass, Youngme Moon, and Nancy Green. 1997. Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of applied social psychology 27, 10 (1997), 864--876.
[10]
Clifford Ivar Nass and Scott Brave. 2005. Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. MIT press Cambridge, MA.
[11]
Americo Talarico Neto, Renata Pontin M. Fortes, and Adalberto G. da Silva Filho. 2008. Multimodal Interfaces Design Issues: The Fusion of Well-Designed Voice and Graphical User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 277--278.
[12]
Sharon Oviatt. 2002. Multimodal Interfaces. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 286--304.
[13]
Joe Parker. 2018. Bucking the Buick stereotype. (2018). https://www.northfulton.com/online_ features/automotive/bucking-the-buick-stereotype/article_ 06938218--5e1a-11e8--81cb-ffb71eda6aa3.html
[14]
Cathy Pearl. 2016. Designing Voice User Interfaces: Principles of Conversational Experiences. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
[15]
Eyal Peer, Joachim Vosgerau, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2014. Reputation as a suffcient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods 46, 4 (2014), 1023--1031.
[16]
Paul H Ptacek and Eric K Sander. 1966. Age recognition from voice. Journal of speech and hearing Research 9, 2 (1966), 273--277.
[17]
Ulrich Reubold, Jonathan Harrington, and Felicitas Kleber. 2010. Vocal aging effects on F0 and the frst formant: A longitudinal analysis in adult speakers. Speech Communication 52, 7--8 (2010), 638--651.
[18]
Sara Skoog Waller and Mårten Eriksson. 2016. Vocal Age Disguise: The Role of Fundamental Frequency and Speech Rate and Its Perceived Effects. Frontiers in psychology 7 (nov 2016), 1814.
[19]
Elaine T. Stathopoulos, Jessica E. Huber, and Joan E. Sussman. 2011. Changes in acoustic characteristics of the voice across the life span: Measures from individuals 4--93 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54, 4 (2011), 1011--1021. //dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092--4388(2010/10-0036)
[20]
Bozi Tatarevic. 2016. How Salespeople Stereotype New Car Buyers. (Sept. 2016). https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2016/09/salespeople-stereotype-car-buyers/
[21]
Warrenty Direct. 2017. Car Brand Stereotypes Infographic -- Warranty Direct Blog. (2017). https://blog.warrantydirect.co.uk/2017/03/07/car-brand-stereotypes-infographic/#.XL9TiehKiUk
[22]
Ralf Winkler. 2007. Testing the relevance of speech rate, pitch and a glottal chink for the perception of age in synthesized speech using formant synthesis. In International Speech Communication Association - 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2007, Vol. 3. 2097--2100.
[23]
Stephanie Yang. 2017. 15 Cars And Common Stereotypes About Who Drives Them. (2017). https://www.theclever.com/15-cars-and-common-stereotypes-about-who-drives-them/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)External Speech Interface: Effects of Gendered and Aged Voices on Pedestrians' Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles in Shared SpacesAdjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3641308.3685046(190-196)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Right for the Job or Opposites Attract? Exploring Cross-Generational User Experiences with “Younger” and “Older” Voice AssistantsCompanion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563703.3596642(160-163)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Gender and Age Stereotypes in Robotics for Eldercare: Ethical Implications of Stakeholder Perspectives from Technology Development, Industry, and NursingScience and Engineering Ethics10.1007/s11948-022-00394-128:4Online publication date: 9-Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2020
4474 pages
ISBN:9781450368193
DOI:10.1145/3334480
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. computer-generated speech
  2. conversational agents
  3. voice user interfaces

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

CHI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 27 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)External Speech Interface: Effects of Gendered and Aged Voices on Pedestrians' Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles in Shared SpacesAdjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3641308.3685046(190-196)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Right for the Job or Opposites Attract? Exploring Cross-Generational User Experiences with “Younger” and “Older” Voice AssistantsCompanion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563703.3596642(160-163)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Gender and Age Stereotypes in Robotics for Eldercare: Ethical Implications of Stakeholder Perspectives from Technology Development, Industry, and NursingScience and Engineering Ethics10.1007/s11948-022-00394-128:4Online publication date: 9-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Investigating User Perceptions and Stereotypic Responses to Gender and Age of Voice AssistantsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118132064143464:1(1800-1804)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media