Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3338286.3347544acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Hacks for Cost-Justifying Usability: "Fear-Setting" vs. "Goal-Setting"

Published: 01 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This paper is designed to guide user-centered design professionals in running negotiations of usability cost justification with product owners. The paper introduces hacks that can be used by usability professionals to convince entrepreneurs or other decision makers to invest in usability improvements. The traditional cost-justifying usability approach focuses on emphasizing the potential profits that can be expected. This "goal-setting" approach, commonly represents a strong influence on the investment decision of young, nascent entrepreneurs. The new approach, which we are suggesting, is about avoiding losses and costs stemming from not taking any action. This is a "fear-setting" approach, which tends to influence the investment decisions of older and more experienced entrepreneurs. Usability professionals can thus identify and classify their audience regarding to age and years of experience in order to choose the most efficient mode of presenting justification of usability cost.

References

[1]
Bloomer, S., Croft, R., Kieboom, H. 1997. Strategic Usability: Introducing Usability into Organisations. CHI 1997. ACM Digital Library.
[2]
Bias, R.G., Mayhew, D. J. 2005. Cost-Justifying Usability. An Update for the Internet Age. ISBN 9780120958115.
[3]
Sadeghi, J. 2007. Cost-Justifying Usability. Semantic Scholar. CPSC 681 - Topic. Retrieved January 9, 2018 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/23cf/be0182f050f6a53a209397646e3ae9a4f257.pdf
[4]
Ries, E. 2011. The Lean Startup. Crown Publishing Group, Random House, New York. ISBN 978-1-5247-6240-7.
[5]
Sturm, C., Aly, M. von Schmidt, B., Flatten, T. 2017. Entrepreneurial & UX mindsets: two perspectives - one objective. MobileHCI '17 Conference Proceedings. AMC Digital Library.
[6]
Donahue, G.M. 2001. Usability and the Bottom Line. IEEE SOFTWARE January/February 2001.
[7]
Freud, S. 1956. Turnings in the ways of psychoanalytic therapy. In: Jones, E. (Ed.), Collected papers (Vol. 2, pp. 392--402). London, Hogarth Press.
[8]
Garner, T., Grimshaw, M. 2011. A Climate of Fear: Considerations for Designing a Virtual Acoustic Ecology of Fear. AM '11 Proceedings. Pages 31--38. ACM Digital Library.
[9]
Kalin, N. H. 1993. "The Neurobiology of Fear". Scientific American, pages 94--101; May 1993.
[10]
Kets de Vries, M.F.R. 1996. The anatomy of the entrepreneur: Clinical observations. Human relations- Sage journal. www.sagepub.com
[11]
Kotter. JP., Schlesinger, LA. 1989. Choosing strategies for change. Best of Harvard Business Review. www.hbr.org
[12]
Kotter. JP. 1995. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. Reprint 95204.
[13]
Tykocinski, O.E., Pittman, T. S. 1998. The consequences of doing nothing: Inaction inertia as avoidance of anticipated counterfactual regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, \M. 75, No. 3, 607--616.
[14]
Anand, S., Desmond, C., Fuje, H., Marques, N. 2012. The Cost of Inaction: Case Studies from Rwanda and Angola. Harvard University Press. Publication: June 2012. ISBN 9780674065581.
[15]
Hagan, J. 2017. The Cost of Status Quo: When is it Time to Look at a Software Change?. Managing Partner of One Motion Technologies Inc. Retrieved January 11, 2018 from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cost-status-quo-when-time-look-software-change-josh-hagan
[16]
The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2015. The cost of inaction: Recognising the value at risk from climate change. Retrieved January 10, 2018 from https://www.eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/The%20cost%20of%20inaction_0.pdf
[17]
Ronak, C. What is the Cost of Inaction?. Retrieved January 10, 2018 from http://blog.4castplus.com/blog/what-is-the-cost-of-inaction
[18]
Shy. O. 2002. A quick-and-easy method for estimating switching costs. International journal of industrial organization, 20(1), pp. 71--87.
[19]
Boyarchenko. S. 2004. Irreversible Decisions and Record-Setting News Principles. American Economic Review 94(3): 557--568.
[20]
Stokey. N.L. 2009. The Economics of Inaction: Stochastic Control models with fixed costs. Princeton University Press.
[21]
Baron R. A. 2006. Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs "connect the dots" to identify new business opportunities. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2006. vol. 20 no. 1 104--119.
[22]
Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G., 2003. A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management 29, 963--990.
[23]
McGrath R, MacMillian I. 2000. The entrepreneurial mindset: strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty. Harvard Business Press: Boston.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Usability Cost-Benefit Analysis for Information Technology Applications and Decision MakingResearch Anthology on Agile Software, Software Development, and Testing10.4018/978-1-6684-3702-5.ch048(970-986)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Usability Cost-Benefit Analysis for Information Technology Applications and Decision MakingHandbook of Research on IT Applications for Strategic Competitive Advantage and Decision Making10.4018/978-1-7998-3351-2.ch008(136-152)Online publication date: 2020
  1. Hacks for Cost-Justifying Usability: "Fear-Setting" vs. "Goal-Setting"

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MobileHCI '19: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
    October 2019
    646 pages
    ISBN:9781450368254
    DOI:10.1145/3338286
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 October 2019

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    MobileHCI '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Usability Cost-Benefit Analysis for Information Technology Applications and Decision MakingResearch Anthology on Agile Software, Software Development, and Testing10.4018/978-1-6684-3702-5.ch048(970-986)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2020)Usability Cost-Benefit Analysis for Information Technology Applications and Decision MakingHandbook of Research on IT Applications for Strategic Competitive Advantage and Decision Making10.4018/978-1-7998-3351-2.ch008(136-152)Online publication date: 2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media