Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3342827.3342829acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnlpirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using Sentiment Analysis for Comparing Attitudes between Computer Professionals and Laypersons on the Topic of Artificial Intelligence

Published: 28 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Most research in investigating computer professionals and laypersons' attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) are limited to online or offline surveys. This paper analyzes computer professionals' and laypersons' attitudes toward AI by using a sentiment lexicon developed by Wilson et al. To explore whether there is a correlation between the occupation categories (computer-related versus non-computer-related occupations) and people's attitudes toward artificial intelligence, I conducted a polarity classification of over 0.6 million tweets containing references to "AI", "artificial intelligence", or both. The result did not provide evidence of a relationship between public attitudes toward AI and the occupation categories. In the end, several future directions in the data collection and the data analysis are discussed.

References

[1]
Twitter Usage Statistics. (2018, October). Retrieved from http://www.internetlivestats.com/twitter-statistics/
[2]
Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public understanding of science, 13(1), 55--74.
[3]
Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7 (6), 659--667.
[4]
Lee, C. J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27 (2), 240--267.
[5]
Sterman, J. D. and Sweeney, L. B. (2007) 'Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults' mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter'. Climatic Change, 80: 213--38.
[6]
Gaines-Ross, L. 2016. What do people -- not techies, not companies -- think about artificial intelligence? In Harvard Business Review.
[7]
ARM, and Northstar. 2017. 'AI Today, AI Tomorrow: Awareness, Acceptance and Anticipation of AI: A Global Consumer Perspective'. http://pages.arm.com/rs/312- SAX-488/images/arm-ai-survey-report.pdf
[8]
Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2017). Tweeting AI: Perceptions of Lay vs Expert Twitterati. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.09534.
[9]
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010, May). Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[10]
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2 (1), 1--8.
[11]
Kramer, A. (2010). An unobtrusive behavioral model of "gross national happiness." In Proc. CHI-10.
[12]
Wiebe, J., & Riloff, E. (2005, February). Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. In International conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics (pp. 486--497). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[13]
Balahur, A., Mihalcea, R., & Montoyo, A. (2014). Computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis: Present and envisaged methods and applications.
[14]
Liu, B. (2010). Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity. In N. Indurkhya & F. Damerau (Eds.), Handbook of Natural Language Processing (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
[15]
Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC {Computer softwware}. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
[16]
Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
[17]
Liu, S. M., & Chen, J. H. (2015). A multi-label classification based approach for sentiment classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3), 1083--1093.
[18]
Peters, H. P. (2000). From information to attitudes? Thoughts on the relationship between knowledge about science and technology and attitudes toward technologies. Between understanding and trust. The public, science and technology, 265--286.
[19]
Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017, February). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[20]
Hu, T., Xiao, H., Luo, J., & Nguyen, T. V. T. (2016, March). What the Language You Tweet Says About Your Occupation. In ICWSM (pp. 181--190).
[21]
Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann (2005). Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis. Proc. of HLT-EMNLP-2005.
[22]
Aman, S., & Szpakowicz, S. (2007, September). Identifying expressions of emotion in text. In International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue (pp. 196--205). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[23]
Akkaya, C., Wiebe, J., & Mihalcea, R. (2009). Subjectivity word sense disambiguation. In Proc. EMNLP-09
[24]
Gilbert, C. H. E. (2014). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-14). Available at (20/04/16) http://comp. social. gatech. edu/papers/icwsm14. vader. hutto. pdf.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence and Its Connections to the Sustainable Development GoalsSustainability10.3390/su1316916513:16(9165)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2021

Index Terms

  1. Using Sentiment Analysis for Comparing Attitudes between Computer Professionals and Laypersons on the Topic of Artificial Intelligence

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        NLPIR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval
        June 2019
        171 pages
        ISBN:9781450362795
        DOI:10.1145/3342827
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        In-Cooperation

        • Southwest Jiaotong University

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 28 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. AI
        2. Computer Professional
        3. Layperson
        4. Lexicon
        5. Polarity Classification
        6. Public Attitudes
        7. Scientific Knowledge
        8. Tweets

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        NLPIR 2019

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
        Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2021)Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence and Its Connections to the Sustainable Development GoalsSustainability10.3390/su1316916513:16(9165)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2021

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media