Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/3298239.3298381guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence

Published: 04 February 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Analyses of text corpora over time can reveal trends in beliefs, interest, and sentiment about a topic. We focus on views expressed about artificial intelligence (AI) in the New York Times over a 30-year period. General interest, awareness, and discussion about AI has waxed and waned since the field was founded in 1956. We present a set of measures that captures levels of engagement, measures of pessimism and optimism, the prevalence of specific hopes and concerns, and topics that are linked to discussions about AI over decades. We find that discussion of AI has increased sharply since 2009, and that these discussions have been consistently more optimistic than pessimistic. However, when we examine specific concerns, we find that worries of loss of control of AI, ethical concerns for AI, and the negative impact of AI on work have grown in recent years. We also find that hopes for AI in healthcare and education have increased over time.

References

[1]
60 Minutes. 2016. 60 minutes poll: Artificial intelligence.
[2]
BSA. 2015. One in three believe that the rise of artificial intelligence is a threat to humanity.
[3]
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C.; Sudhof, M.; Jurafsky, D.; Leskovec, J.; and Potts, C. 2013. A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.6078.
[4]
Dietterich, T. G., and Horvitz, E. J. 2015. Rise of concerns about AI: reflections and directions. Communications of the ACM 58(10):38-40.
[5]
Doroudi, S.; Kamar, E.; Brunskill, E.; and Horvitz, E. 2016. Toward a learning science for complex crowdsourcing tasks. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2623-2634. ACM.
[6]
Fast, E., and Horvitz, E. 2016. Identifying dogmatism in social media: Signals and models. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2016.
[7]
Fast, E.; Chen, B.; and Bernstein, M. S. 2016. Empath: Understanding topic signals in large-scale text. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4647-4657. ACM.
[8]
Greenfield, P. M. 2013. The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological science 24(9):1722-1731.
[9]
Guardian, T. 2014. Elon Musk: Artificial intelligence is our biggest existential threat.
[10]
Horvitz, E., and Selman, B. 2009. Interim report from the panel chairs, AAAI presidential panel on long-term AI futures. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, August 2009.
[11]
Leetaru, K. 2011. Culturomics 2.0: Forecasting large-scale human behavior using global news media tone in time and space. First Monday 16(9).
[12]
Michel, J.-B.; Shen, Y. K.; Aiden, A. P.; Veres, A.; Gray, M. K.; Pickett, J. P.; Hoiberg, D.; Clancy, D.; Norvig, P.; Orwant, J.; et al. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014):176-182.
[13]
ProPublica. 2016. Machine bias in criminal sentencing.
[14]
Radinsky, K., and Horvitz, E. 2013. Mining the web to predict future events. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, 255-264. ACM.
[15]
Salehi, N.; Irani, L. C.; and Bernstein, M. S. 2015. We are Dynamo: Overcoming stalling and friction in collective action for crowd workers. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1621-1630.
[16]
Serrà, J.; Corral, Á .; Boguñá, M.; Haro, M.; and Arcos, J. L. 2012. Measuring the evolution of contemporary western popular music. Nature Scientific reports.
[17]
Sheng, V. S.; Provost, F.; and Ipeirotis, P. G. 2008. Get another label? Improving data quality and data mining using multiple, noisy labelers. Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining 614-622.
[18]
Stanford University. 2014. One hundred year study on artificial intelligence.
[19]
Stone, P. et al. 2016. Artificial intelligence and life in 2030. One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel.
[20]
Zhang, A. X., and Counts, S. 2015. Modeling ideology and predicting policy change with social media: Case of same-sex marriage. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2603-2612. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Getting it Just Right: Towards Balanced Utility, Privacy, and Equity in Shared Space SensingACM Transactions on Internet of Things10.1145/36484795:2(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
  • (2023)"There will be less privacy, of course"Proceedings of the Nineteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3632186.3632218(579-603)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Co-Designing with Users the Explanations for a Proactive Auto-Response Messaging AgentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042487:MHCI(1-23)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    AAAI'17: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
    February 2017
    5106 pages

    Sponsors

    • Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
    • amazon: amazon
    • Infosys
    • Facebook: Facebook
    • IBM: IBM

    Publisher

    AAAI Press

    Publication History

    Published: 04 February 2017

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Getting it Just Right: Towards Balanced Utility, Privacy, and Equity in Shared Space SensingACM Transactions on Internet of Things10.1145/36484795:2(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
    • (2023)"There will be less privacy, of course"Proceedings of the Nineteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3632186.3632218(579-603)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Co-Designing with Users the Explanations for a Proactive Auto-Response Messaging AgentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042487:MHCI(1-23)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
    • (2022)AI-Competent Individuals and Laypeople Tend to Oppose Facial Analysis AIProceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization10.1145/3551624.3555294(1-12)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
    • (2022)”Because AI is 100% right and safe”: User Attitudes and Sources of AI Authority in IndiaProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517533(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Exciting, Useful, Worrying, Futuristic: Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in 8 CountriesProceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society10.1145/3461702.3462605(627-637)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2021
    • (2020)Defining AI in Policy versus PracticeProceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society10.1145/3375627.3375835(72-78)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2020
    • (2020)What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design ConsiderationsProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376727(1-16)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
    • (2019)Using Sentiment Analysis for Comparing Attitudes between Computer Professionals and Laypersons on the Topic of Artificial IntelligenceProceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval10.1145/3342827.3342829(5-8)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2019
    • (2019)Do people believe in Artificial Intelligence?Proceedings of the 5th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good10.1145/3342428.3342667(31-36)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media