Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

From Paper Flight Strips to Digital Strip Systems: Changes and Similarities in Air Traffic Control Work Practices

Published: 29 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

To increase capacity and safety in air traffic control, digital strip systems have superseded paper strips in lower airspace control centers in Europe. Previous ethnographic studies on paper strip systems anticipated a radical change in work practices with digital strip systems, but we are not aware of any studies that evaluated these predictions. We carried out contextual inquiries with controllers and focused on face-to-face and radio communication, interactions with the digital strip system and the workspace in general. In turn, we contribute (1) detailed descriptions of controllers' work practices, such as using tacit information from radio communication and 'standard advocates vs. tinkerers' operation modes, (2) respective implications for design and (3) discuss how the observed work practices are similar or different from the reported practices in the literature of the two preceding decades. Our key insights are, that documentation speed is faster with digital strips, although a high load in the case of radio frequency persists. Controllers retrieve tacit information from the radio communication and combine it with scattered cues from several displays to form empathic decisions that sometimes exceed the standard protocol. We conclude that the role of tacit information holds opportunities for future flight systems and should be considered in a holistic approach to individualized workspaces for controllers.

References

[1]
National Air Traffic Services (Nats). 2018. Heathrow Implements World's First Fully Systemised Optimised Runway Delivery Tool with Enhanced Time Based Separation. Retrieved from https://www.nats.aero/news/heathrow-implements-worlds-first-fully-systemised-optimised-runway-delivery-tool-enhanced-time-based-separation/
[2]
Federal Aviation Administration. 2015. Performance Success Stories - Phoenix Air Traffic Controller look to the future with NextGen Technology. Retrieved 17 December from https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/snapshots/stories/'slide=37
[3]
Federal Aviation Administration. 2019. TFDM Implementation Map and Timeline. Retrieved 17 December from https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/tfdm/implementation/
[4]
Chris A Albright, Todd R Truitt, Ami L Barile, Ou Vortac, and Carol A Manning. 1994. Controlling traffic without flight progress strips: Compensation, workload, performance, and opinion. Air Traffic Control Quarterly 2, 4, 229--248.
[5]
Kelley M. Baker, Sara K. Dimare, Erik T. Nelson, and Deborah A. Boehm-Davis. 2012. Effect of Data Communications on Pilot Situation Awareness, Decision Making, and Workload. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 56, 1 (September 2012), 1787--1788. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561359.
[6]
Raïlane Benhacene, Christophe Hurter, Marion Anthony, Bruno Merlin, Marie-Pierre Rousselle, and Philippe Ribet. 2007. Tackling the problem of flight integration. In ATM 2007, 7th USA/ Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Developpment Seminar, Barcelona, Spain.
[7]
R. Bentley, J. A. Hughes, D. Randall, T. Rodden, P. Sawyer, D. Shapiro, and I. Sommerville. 1992. Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 1992, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ACM, 143470. 123--129. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/143457.143470.
[8]
Jörg Bergner and Oliver Hassa. 2012. Air Traffic Control. In Information Ergonomics, Springer, 197--225.
[9]
Randall Bone and Kevin Long. 2016. Air traffic controller utilization of voice and Data Link Communications during Interval Management. In 2016 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS) IEEE, 2D1--1--2D1--16.
[10]
Deirdre Bonini. 2001. ATC do I trust thee? referents of trust in air traffic control. In Proceedings of the CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2001, Seattle, Washington. Association for Computing Machinery. 449--450. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/634067.634327.
[11]
Marie-Christine Bressolle, Bernard Pavard, and Marcel Leroux. 1995. The role of multimodal communication in cooperation and intention recognition: the case of air traffic control. In The International Conference on Cooperative and Multimodal Communication: Theory and Applications, MCM '95, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
[12]
Marie-Christine Bressolle, Bernard Pavard, and Marcel Leroux. 1995. The role of multimodal communication in cooperation: The cases of air traffic control. In International Conference on Cooperative Multimodal Communication Springer, 326--343.
[13]
Kim Cardosi, Tracy Lennertz, and Alan Yost. 2017. Analysis of reportable events in Kansas City air route traffic control center. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (US).
[14]
Stéphane Chatty and Patrick Lecoanet. 1996. Pen computing for air traffic control. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 87--94.
[15]
Stéphane Conversy, Hélène Gaspard-Boulinc, Stéphane Chatty, Stéphane Valès, Carole Dupré, and Claire Ollagnon. 2011. Supporting air traffic control collaboration with a TableTop system. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 2011, Hangzhou, China. ACM, 1958891. 425--434. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958891.
[16]
Victoria Dulchinos. 2019. Evaluation of Usability and Workload Associated with Paper Strips as Compared to Virtual Flight Strips Used for Ramp Operations. In Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology, T.Z. AHRAM and C. FALCÃO Eds. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 603--614.
[17]
Francis T Durso, Carla A Hackworth, Todd R Truitt, Jerry Crutchfield, Danko Nikolic, and Carol A Manning. 1998. Situation awareness as a predictor of performance for en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly 6, 1, 1--20.
[18]
Francis T Durso and Carol A Manning. 2002. Spinning paper into glass: transforming flight progress strips. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 2, 1, 1--31.
[19]
Patrick C Dwyer. 2015. Gratitude as persuasion: Understanding when and why gratitude expressions facilitate and inhibit compliance. Ph.D. Dissertation. Retrieved from https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/175125
[20]
Ge Fenimore. 1957. Real-time data processing for CAA air-traffic control. In Papers and discussions presented at the December 9--13, 1957, eastern joint computer conference: Computers with deadlines to meet ACM, 169--172.
[21]
Nanda Geelvink. 2018. Increased Capacity at Leipzig Halle Airport. Retrieved 08. Oct from https://www.dfs.de/dfs_homepage/en/Press/Press%20releases/2018/24.07.2018.-%20Increased%20capacity%20at%20Leipzig%20Halle%20Airport/
[22]
Tobias Grundgeiger, Jörn Hurtienne, and Oliver Happel. 2020. Why and How to Approach User Experience in Safety-Critical Domains: The example of healthcare. Human Factors. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720819887575. .
[23]
Tobias Grundgeiger, Penelope M Sanderson, and R Key Dismukes. 2014. Prospective memory in complex sociotechnical systems. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
[24]
Hejar Gürlük, Malte-Levin Jauer, and Maria Uebbing-Rumke. 2014. Design and evaluation of a multi-touch interaction language for approach controllers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace, 2014, Santa Clara, California Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY. 1--4. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2669592.2669691.
[25]
Claudia Harss, Jitzchack Lichtenfeld, Michael Kastner, and Jan Goodrich. 1991. Air Traffic Controller Working Conditions and Organization: Suggestions for Analysis and Improvements from a Psychological Point of View. In Automation and Systems Issues in Air Traffic Control, Springer, 395--406.
[26]
Karen Holtzblatt and Hugh Beyer. 2016. Contextual Design: Design for Life. Morgan Kaufmann.
[27]
Karen Holtzblatt, Jessamyn Burns Wendell, and Shelley Wood. 2004. Rapid contextual design: a how-to guide to key techniques for user-centered design. Elsevier.
[28]
Michael P. Huerta. 2016. NextGen Implementation Plan 2016, F.A. ADMINISTRATION Ed.
[29]
John A. Hughes, David Randall, and Dan Shapiro. 1992. Faltering from ethnography to design. Association for Computing Machinery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
[30]
Christophe Hurter, Paul Edouard, Vincent Gaits, Hasna Nadfaoui, Jérome Pailler, Catherine Letondal, and Stéphane Conversy. 2011. Etude exploratoire du stylo électronique pour le Contrôle Aérien [Exploring the Use of Electronic Pens for Air Traffic Control]. Association for Computing Machinery, Sophia Antipolis, France.
[31]
William Kaczynski, Lawrence Leemis, and John Drew. 2010. Modeling and analyzing transient military air traffic control. Winter Simulation Conference, Baltimore, Maryland.
[32]
Michael W Kraus. 2017. Voice-only communication enhances empathic accuracy. American Psychologist 72, 7, 644.
[33]
Catherine Letondal, Christophe Hurter, Rémi Lesbordes, Jean-Luc Vinot, and Stéphane Conversy. 2013. Flights in my hands: coherence concerns in designing Strip'TIC, a tangible space for air traffic controllers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, 2175--2184.
[34]
Wendy E. Mackay. 1999. Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control. ACM Transactions of Computer-Human Interaction 6, 4, 311--340. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/331490.331491.
[35]
Wendy E. Mackay, Anne-Laure Fayard, Laurent Frobert, and Lionel Médini. 1998. Reinventing the familiar: exploring an augmented reality design space for air traffic control. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1998, Los Angeles, California, USA,. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 274719. 558--565. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/274644.274719.
[36]
Robert Mauro. 2019. Confronting Functional Complexity Failures: The Case of a Runway Excursion in Munich. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2019 Annual Meeting.
[37]
Lindsey K. Mcintire, John P. Mcintire, R. Andy Mckinley, and Chuck Goodyear. 2014. Detection of vigilance performance with pupillometry. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, 2014, Safety Harbor, Florida. Association for Computing Machinery. 167--174. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2578153.2578177.
[38]
Christophe Mertz, Stéphane Chatty, and Jean-Luc Vinot. 2000. Pushing the limits of ATC user interface design beyond S&M interaction: the DigiStrips experience. In Proceedings of the Air Traffic Management '2000 R&D Seminar.
[39]
Kohei Nonose, Sifra Corver, Arnab Majumdar, Grote Gudela, Taro Kanno, and Kazuo Furuta. 2014. A behavioural observation method to assess team situation awareness of air traffic control teams. Association for Computing Machinery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
[40]
Linda Pfeiffer, Georg Valtin, Nicholas Hugo Müller, and Paul Rosenthal. 2015. The mental organization of air traffic and its implications to an emotion sensitive assistance system. International Journal of Advanced Life Sciences 8, 164--174.
[41]
François Richard-Bole. 2018. RECAT-EU at Paris-CDG, a first in Europe! [Press release] Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne.
[42]
Frederic Rooseleer and Vincent Treve. 2015. RECAT-EU European Wake Turbulence Categorisation and Separation Minima on Approach and Departure. EUROCONTROL Headquarters, Brussels.
[43]
Nallini Selvaraj and Bob Fields. 2012. Rethinking collaborative decision making across distributed work communities in complex work settings. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 2012, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Association for Computing Machinery. 8--14. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2448136.2448139.
[44]
Nallini Selvaraj, Bob Fields, and Paola Amaldi-Trillo. 2007. Decisions and collaborative work: a different perspective. In Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore!, 2007, London, United Kingdom. Association for Computing Machinery. 243--246. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1362550.1362599.
[45]
Steven T Shorrock. 2005. Errors of memory in air traffic control. Safety science 43, 8, 571--588.
[46]
Nelson Silva, Volker Settgast, Eva Eggeling, Florian Grill, Theodor Zeh, and Dieter Fellner. 2014. Sixth sense - air traffic control prediction scenario augmented by sensors. Association for Computing Machinery, Graz, Austria.
[47]
Alex W. Stedmon, Sarah Sharples, Robert Littlewood, Gemma Cox, Harshada Patel, and John R. Wilson. 2007. Datalink in air traffic management: Human factors issues in communications. Applied ergonomics 38, 4 (2007/07/01/), 473--480. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.013.
[48]
Monica Tavanti, Patrizia Marti, and Marc Bourgois. 2006. Tacit knowledge and frugal artifacts: a challenge for technology mediated collaboration. In Proceedings of the 13th Eurpoean conference on Cognitive ergonomics: trust and control in complex socio-technical systems, 2006, Zurich, Switzerland. Association for Computing Machinery. 105--108. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1274892.1274909.
[49]
Michael Traoré and Christophe Hurter. 2016. Exploratory study with eye tracking devices to build interactive systems for air traffic controllers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace, 2016, Paris, France. ACM. 1--9. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2950112.2964584.
[50]
Martina Truschzinski, Alberto Betella, Guido Brunnett, and Paul F M J Verschure. 2018. Emotional and cognitive influences in air traffic controller tasks: An investigation using a virtual environment? Applied ergonomics 69, 1--9.
[51]
Jean-Luc Vinot, Catherine Letondal, Rémi Lesbordes, Stéphane Chatty, Stéphane Conversy, and Christophe Hurter. 2014. Tangible augmented reality for air traffic control. interactions 21, 4, 54--57.
[52]
Markus Vogel, Christoph Thiel, and Hartmut Fricke. 2012. Assessing the air traffic control safety impact of airline pilot induced latencies. IRIT Press, London, United Kingdom.
[53]
Tzu-Yang Wang, Ikkaku Kawaguchi, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Mai Otsuki. 2018. Effect of manipulated amplitude and frequency of human voice on dominance and persuasiveness in audio conferences 2, CSCW, Article 177. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3274446.
[54]
Vernon I Weihe. 1953. Computer applications in air traffic control. In Eastern Joint Computer Conference IEEE, 18--22.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Analysis of the Methods of Flight Clearance Entry and the Impact on the Situational Awareness of Air Traffic Control Operators2024 New Trends in Civil Aviation (NTCA)10.23919/NTCA60572.2024.10517856(275-281)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Emotion Sonification As Opportunity For Inclusive Texting: Replacing Emoji With Vocal Bursts And Prosodic VoicesProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685403(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Revealing the Challenges to Automation Adoption in Organizations: Examining Practitioner Perspectives From an International AirportExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650964(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW1
CSCW
May 2020
1285 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3403424
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 May 2020
Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ATC
  2. air traffic control
  3. approach
  4. contextual design
  5. ethnography
  6. inquiry
  7. safety-critical

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Analysis of the Methods of Flight Clearance Entry and the Impact on the Situational Awareness of Air Traffic Control Operators2024 New Trends in Civil Aviation (NTCA)10.23919/NTCA60572.2024.10517856(275-281)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Emotion Sonification As Opportunity For Inclusive Texting: Replacing Emoji With Vocal Bursts And Prosodic VoicesProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685403(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Revealing the Challenges to Automation Adoption in Organizations: Examining Practitioner Perspectives From an International AirportExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650964(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Transitioning Cognitive Aids into Decision Support Platforms: Requirements and Design GuidelinesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/358243130:3(1-28)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Supporting Awareness of Dynamic Data: Approaches to Designing and Capturing Data within Interactive Clinical ChecklistsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3595979(1293-1308)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Empathic Accuracy and Mental Effort During Remote Assessments of EmotionsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580824(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Fin, Whale, Coin and Flatterer: Exploring Tangibles for Air Traffic ControlProceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3490149.3502260(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Toward User Experience in ATC: Exploring Novel Interface Concepts for Air Traffic ControlInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwac03234:2(43-59)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2022

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media