Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3411764.3445112acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Data Agents: Promoting Reflection through Meaningful Representations of Personal Data in Everyday Life

Published: 07 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Visual and physical representations of historical personal data have been discussed as artifacts that can lead to self-reflection through meaning-making. However, it is yet unclear how those two concepts relate to each other. We focus on meaningfulness, a part of meaning-making that relates to feelings. In this paper, we present three projects where mundane objects, our data agents, are combined in meaningful ways with personal data with the aim to trigger reflection by placing a person’s individual experience of data in relation to others’. To identify relationships between self-reflection and meaningfulness we use Fleck and Fitzpatrick’s framework to describe the levels of reflection that we found in our projects and Mekler and Hornbæk’s meaning framework to define the depth of reflection. We conclude with a discussion on four themes in which we outline how data agents informed the intersections between our central concepts. This paper, constitutes a first step towards unpacking those relationships and invites for further explorations by the HCI community.

References

[1]
Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is” critical” about critical design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Paris, 3297–3306.
[2]
Stephen Barrass. 2014. Acoustic sonification of blood pressure in the form of a singing bowl. In Conference on Sonification of Health and Environmental Data (SoniHED). SoniHED, University of York, 1–6.
[3]
Eric PS Baumer. 2015. Reflective informatics: conceptual dimensions for designing technologies of reflection. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Korea, 585–594.
[4]
Eric PS Baumer, Vera Khovanskaya, Mark Matthews, Lindsay Reynolds, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Geri Gay. 2014. Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, Vancouver, 93–102.
[5]
Laurens Boer and Jared Donovan. 2012. Provotypes for participatory innovation. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. ACM, Newcastle, 388–397.
[6]
Jerome Seymour Bruner. 1990. Acts of meaning. Vol. 3. Harvard university press, US.
[7]
Vanessa Carpenter. 2019. Designing for Meaningfulness in Future Smart Products: an explorative investigation of values and physical characteristics. Ph.D. Dissertation. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
[8]
Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto, 1143–1152.
[9]
Anthony Dunne. 2008. Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. The MIT press, London.
[10]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2001. Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Springer Science & Business Media, London.
[11]
Chris Elsden, David S Kirk, and Abigail C Durrant. 2016. A quantified past: Toward design for remembering with personal informatics. Human–Computer Interaction 31, 6 (2016), 518–557.
[12]
Rowanne Fleck and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2010. Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM, Brisbane, 216–223.
[13]
Laurie Frick. 2011. Sleep Patterns. Frick. Retrieved September 9, 2019 from https://vimeo.com/21852158
[14]
Julie Hennegan, Catherine Dolan, Maryalice Wu, Linda Scott, and Paul Montgomery. 2016. Measuring the prevalence and impact of poor menstrual hygiene management: a quantitative survey of schoolgirls in rural Uganda. BMJ open 6, 12 (2016), e012596.
[15]
Steven Houben, Connie Golsteijn, Sarah Gallacher, Rose Johnson, Saskia Bakker, Nicolai Marquardt, Licia Capra, and Yvonne Rogers. 2016. Physikit: Data engagement through physical ambient visualizations in the home. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose, 1608–1619.
[16]
Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Alice Thudt, Anthony Tang, and Michael Mauerer. 2014. Constructive visualization. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, Vancouver, 433–442.
[17]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and challenges for data physicalization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seoul, 3227–3236.
[18]
Loizeau Jimmy and Auger James. 2002. Audio tooth implant. Goldsmiths - University of London. http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/289/
[19]
Maria Karyda, Iyubanit Rodríguez, and Andrés Lucero. 2018. Gifting interpretations of personal data. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal, 1–6.
[20]
Maria Karyda, Danielle Wilde, and Mette Kjærsgaard. 2020. Narrative Physicalization: Supporting Interactive Engagement with Personal Data. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications ? (2020), 1–14.
[21]
Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaité, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. ” Everyone Is Talking about It!” A Distributed Approach to Urban Voting Technology and Visualisations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seoul, 3127–3136.
[22]
Ilpo Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redstrom, and Stephan Wensveen. 2011. Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Elsevier, Netherlands.
[23]
Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Atlanta, 557–566.
[24]
Ian Li, Anind K Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, Beijing, 405–414.
[25]
Deborah Lupton. 2017. Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data. New Media & Society 19, 10 (2017), 1599–1614.
[26]
Elisa D. Mekler and Kasper Hornbæk. 2019. A Framework for the Experience of Meaning in Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 225, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300455
[27]
George Miiro, Rwamahe Rutakumwa, Jessica Nakiyingi-Miiro, Kevin Nakuya, Saidat Musoke, Juliet Namakula, Suzanna Francis, Belen Torondel, Lorna J Gibson, David A Ross, 2018. Menstrual health and school absenteeism among adolescent girls in Uganda (MENISCUS): a feasibility study. BMC women’s health 18, 1 (2018), 4.
[28]
Andrew Vande Moere. 2008. Beyond the tyranny of the pixel: Exploring the physicality of information visualization. In 2008 12th International Conference Information Visualisation. IEEE, London, 469–474.
[29]
Bettina Nissen and John Bowers. 2015. Data-things: digital fabrication situated within participatory data translation activities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seoul, 2467–2476.
[30]
Andrew Vande Moere Pierre Dragicevic, Yvonne Jansen. 2019. Data Physicalization. Springer Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, Netherlands, 1–50.
[31]
John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Toronto, 1163–1172.
[32]
Donald A Schön. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[33]
Mark Selby and David Kirk. 2015. Experiential manufacturing: The earthquake shelf. In Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Research Through Design Conference. RTD, Cambridge,UK, 25–27.
[34]
John F Sherry Jr. 1983. Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of consumer research 10, 2 (1983), 157–168.
[35]
Ricardo Sosa, Victoria Gerrard, Antonio Esparza, Rebeca Torres, Robbie Napper, 2018. Data Objects: Design Principles For Data Physicalisation. In DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. DS, Croatia, 1685–1696.
[36]
Simon Stusak, Aurélien Tabard, Franziska Sauka, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Andreas Butz. 2014. Activity sculptures: Exploring the impact of physical visualizations on running activity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12(2014), 2201–2210.
[37]
Alex S Taylor and Richard Harper. 2002. Age-old practices in the’new world’ a study of gift-giving between teenage mobile phone users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, Minneapolis, 439–446.
[38]
Lisa Thomas, Pam Briggs, Finola Kerrigan, and Andrew Hart. 2018. Exploring digital remediation in support of personal reflection. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 110 (2018), 53–62.
[39]
Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2017. Data craft: integrating data into daily practices and shared reflections. 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI2017 Workshop,http://alicethudt.de/data-craft/
[40]
Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2018. Self-reflection and personal physicalization construction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal, 1–13.
[41]
Kendra Wannamaker, Wesley J Willett, Lora A Oehlberg, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2019. Data Embroidery: Exploring Alternative Mediums for Personal Physicalization. PRISM, Calgary, ?https://prism.ucalgary.ca/handle/1880/110218
[42]
Gary Wolf. 2009. Know thyself: Tracking every facet of life, from sleep to mood to pain. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2009/06/lbnp-knowthyself/
[43]
Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Lisa Meekison. 2003. Making sense of experience. Springer, Dordrecht, 43–53.
[44]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, San Jose, 493–502.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Data Jeans : Data Physicalization of Everyday Data and Its ExperienceArchives of Design Research10.15187/adr.2024.02.37.1.16737:1(167-179)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Say You, Say Me: Investigating the Personal insights Generated from One's Own data and Other's dataProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685345(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)A Retrospective Autoethnography Documenting Dance Learning Through Data PhysicalisationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661607(2357-2373)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Data Agents: Promoting Reflection through Meaningful Representations of Personal Data in Everyday Life
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2021
    10862 pages
    ISBN:9781450380966
    DOI:10.1145/3411764
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 May 2021

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Meaningfulness
    2. data representations
    3. personal data
    4. self-reflection

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CHI '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)506
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)75
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Data Jeans : Data Physicalization of Everyday Data and Its ExperienceArchives of Design Research10.15187/adr.2024.02.37.1.16737:1(167-179)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Say You, Say Me: Investigating the Personal insights Generated from One's Own data and Other's dataProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685345(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)A Retrospective Autoethnography Documenting Dance Learning Through Data PhysicalisationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661607(2357-2373)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Informing the design of question-asking conversational agents for reflectionPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-024-01831-7Online publication date: 24-Aug-2024
    • (2023)Being, Having, Doing, and Interacting: A Personal Informatics Approach to Understanding Human Need Satisfaction in Everyday LifeProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596120(2593-2610)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Everyday Space as an Interface for Health Data Engagement: Designing Tangible Displays of Stress DataProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596096(1648-1659)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Design premise and diary study exploring felt senses as data for self-reflectionThe Design Journal10.1080/14606925.2023.226327127:1(30-48)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Close but Not Too Close: Distance and Relevance in Designing Games for ReflectionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35494876:CHI PLAY(1-24)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Revisiting Reflection in HCIProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35172336:1(1-27)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Recentering Reframing as an RtD ContributionProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517789(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media