Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Hidden Figures: Roles and Pathways of Successful OSS Contributors

Published: 15 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Open Source Software (OSS) development is a collaborative endeavor where expert developers, distributed around the globe create software solutions. Given this characteristic, OSS communities have been studied as technical communities, where stakeholders join and evolve in their careers based on their (often voluntary) code contributions to the project. However, the OSS landscape is slowly changing with more people and companies getting involved in OSS. This means that projects now need people in non-technical roles and activities to keep the project sustainable and evolving. In this paper, we focus on understanding the roles and activities that are part of the current OSS landscape and the different career pathways in OSS. By conducting and analyzing 17 interviews with OSS contributors who are well known in the community, we provide empirical evidence of the existence and importance of community-centric roles (e.g advocate, license manager, community founder) in addition to the well-known project-centric ones (e.g maintainer, core member). However, the community-centric roles typically remain hidden, since these roles may not leave traces in software repositories typically analyzed by researchers. We found that people can build a career in OSS through different roles and activities, with different backgrounds, including those not related to writing software. Furthermore, people's career pathways are fluid, moving between project and community-centric roles. Our work highlights that communities and researchers need to take action to acknowledge the importance of these varied roles, making these roles visible and well-recognized, which can ultimately help attract and retain more people in the OSS projects.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (v4cscw180aux.zip)
Codebook from interviews and interview script

References

[1]
Ezgi Akar, Sona Mardikyan, and Tevfik Dalgic. 2019. User roles in online communities and their moderating effect on online community usage intention: An integrated approach. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 35, 6 (2019), 495--509.
[2]
Stephanos Androutsellis-Theotokis, Diomidis Spinellis, Maria Kechagia, Georgios Gousios, et al. 2011. Open source software: A survey from 10,000 feet. Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management 4, 3--4 (2011), 187--347.
[3]
Maurício Aniche, Christoph Treude, Igor Steinmacher, Igor Wiese, Gustavo Pinto, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Marco Aurélio Gerosa. 2018. How Modern News Aggregators Help Development Communities Shape and Share Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 499--510. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180180
[4]
Gary Anthes. 2016. Open source software no longer optional. Commun. ACM 59, 8 (2016), 15--17.
[5]
Ofer Arazy, Johannes Daxenberger, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Oded Nov, and Iryna Gurevych. 2016. Turbulent stability of emergent roles: The dualistic nature of self-organizing knowledge coproduction. Information Systems Research 27, 4 (2016), 792--812.
[6]
Ofer Arazy, Hila Liifshitz-Assaf, Oded Nov, Johannes Daxenberger, Martina Balestra, and Coye Cheshire. 2017. On the How and Why of Emergent Role Behaviors in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 2039--2051.
[7]
Ofer Arazy, Felipe Ortega, Oded Nov, Lisa Yeo, and Adam Balila. 2015. Functional roles and career paths in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported CooperativeWork & Social Computing. ACM, 1092--1105.
[8]
Sogol Balali, Igor Steinmacher, Umayal Annamalai, Anita Sarma, and Marco Aurelio Gerosa. 2018. Newcomers? barriers... is that all? an analysis of mentors? and newcomers? barriers in OSS projects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27, 3--6 (2018), 679--714.
[9]
Flore Barcellini, Françoise Détienne, and Jean-Marie Burkhardt. 2014. A situated approach of roles and participation in Open Source Software Communities. Human--Computer Interaction 29, 3 (2014), 205--255.
[10]
Yochai Benkler and Helen Nissenbaum. 2006. Commons-based peer production and virtue. Journal of political philosophy 14, 4 (2006), 394--419.
[11]
H Russell Bernard. 2017. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
[12]
BlackDuck. 2016. The Tenth Annual Future of Open Source Survey. Available at: https://www.blackducksoftware.com/2016-future-of-open-source. Accessed: 2016--11-08.
[13]
Gargi Bougie, Jamie Starke, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Daniel M. German. 2011. Towards Understanding Twitter Use in Software Engineering: Preliminary Findings, Ongoing Challenges and Future Questions. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web 2.0 for Software Engineering. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--36.
[14]
Gerardo Canfora, Massimiliano Di Penta, Rocco Oliveto, and Sebastiano Panichella. 2012. Who is going to mentor newcomers in open source projects?. In Proceedings of the ACMSIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. ACM, 44.
[15]
Kevin Carillo, Sid Huff, and Brenda Chawner. 2017. What makes a good contributor? Understanding contributor behavior within large Free/Open Source Software projects--A socialization perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 26, 4 (2017), 322--359.
[16]
Can Cheng, Bing Li, Zeng-Yang Li, Yu-Qi Zhao, and Feng-Ling Liao. 2017. Developer role evolution in open source software ecosystem: An explanatory study on GNOME. Journal of computer science and technology 32, 2 (2017), 396--414.
[17]
Jinghui Cheng and Jin LC Guo. 2019. Activity-based analysis of open source software contributors: roles and dynamics. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE). IEEE, 11--18.
[18]
Enrico Di Bella, Alberto Sillitti, and Giancarlo Succi. 2013. A multivariate classification of open source developers. Information Sciences 221 (2013), 72--83.
[19]
Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2005. Socialization in an open source software community: A socio-technical analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 14, 4 (2005), 323--368.
[20]
Fabian Fagerholm, Alejandro S Guinea, Jürgen Münch, and Jay Borenstein. 2014. The role of mentoring and project characteristics for onboarding in open source software projects. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. ACM, 55.
[21]
Joseph Feller, Patrick Finnegan, Björn Lundell, and Olof Nilsson. 2008. The servicitization of peer production: Reflections on the open source software experience. In Information technology in the service economy: Challenges and possibilities for the 21st century. Springer, 353--355.
[22]
Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, R Benjamin Shapiro, and Amy S Bruckman. 2017. Growing their own: Legitimate peripheral participation for computational learning in an online fandom community. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. ACM, 1375--1386.
[23]
Brian Fitzgerald. 2006. The transformation of open source software. MIS quarterly 30, 3 (2006), 587--598.
[24]
Andrea Forte and Cliff Lampe. 2013. Defining, understanding, and supporting open collaboration: Lessons from the literature. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5 (2013), 535--547.
[25]
Barney G Glaser and Anselm L Strauss. 2017. Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
[26]
Wei Guo, Qing Zheng,Weijin An, andWei Peng. 2017. User roles and contributions during the newproduct development process in collaborative innovation communities. Applied ergonomics 63 (2017), 106--114.
[27]
Aaron Halfaker, Os Keyes, and Dario Taraborelli. 2013. Making peripheral participation legitimate: reader engagement experiments in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 849--860.
[28]
Karen Handley, Andrew Sturdy, Robin Fincham, and Timothy Clark. 2006. Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of management studies 43, 3 (2006), 641--653.
[29]
Carolin D. Hardin and Matthew Berland. 2016. Learning to Program Using Online Forums: A Comparison of Links Posted on Reddit and Stack Overflow (Abstract Only). In Proceedings of the 47th Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 723--723.
[30]
Chris Jensen andWalt Scacchi. 2007. Role migration and advancement processes in OSSD projects: A comparative case study. In Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 364--374.
[31]
Corey Jergensen, Anita Sarma, and Patrick Wagstrom. 2011. The onion patch: migration in open source ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineering. ACM, 70--80.
[32]
Giordano Koch, Katja Hutter, Peter Decarli, Dennis Hilgers, and Johann Füller. 2013. Identifying participants? roles in open government platforms and its impact on community growth. In 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1900--1910.
[33]
Yubo Kou, Colin Gray, Austin Toombs, and Robin Adams. 2018. Knowledge production and social roles in an online community of emerging occupation: A study of user experience practitioners on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2068--2077.
[34]
Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger, et al. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
[35]
Zhuoxuan Li,Warren Seering, Tiffany Tao, and Shengnan Cao. 2019. Understanding Community Behaviors in For-Profit Open Source Hardware Projects. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design. Cambridge University Press, 2397--2406.
[36]
Yuyang Liang and Joshua Introne. 2019. Social Roles, Interactions and Community Sustainability in Social Q&A Sites: A Resource-based Perspective. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2802--2811.
[37]
Jun Liu and Sudha Ram. 2011. Who does what: Collaboration patterns in the wikipedia and their impact on article quality. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 2, 2 (2011), 11.
[38]
Sharan B Merriam and Elizabeth J Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
[39]
Audris Mockus, Roy T Fielding, and James D Herbsleb. 2002. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 11, 3 (2002), 309--346.
[40]
Dawn Nafus. 2012. 'Patches don't have gender?: What is not open in open source software. New Media & Society 14, 4 (2012), 669--683.
[41]
Kumiyo Nakakoji, Yasuhiro Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki Nishinaka, Kouichi Kishida, and Yunwen Ye. 2002. Evolution patterns of open-source software systems and communities. In Proceedings of the international workshop on Principles of software evolution. ACM, 76--85.
[42]
Shaul Oreg and Oded Nov. 2008. Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in human behavior 24, 5 (2008), 2055--2073.
[43]
Gustavo Pinto, Igor Steinmacher, and Marco Aurélio Gerosa. 2016. More common than you think: An in-depth study of casual contributors. In 2016 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), Vol. 1. IEEE, 112--123.
[44]
Alessandro Piscopo and Elena Simperl. 2018. Who Models the World?: Collaborative Ontology Creation and User Roles in Wikidata. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 141.
[45]
Wolfgang Reinhardt, Benedikt Schmidt, Peter Sloep, and Hendrik Drachsler. 2011. Knowledge worker roles and actions?results of two empirical studies. Knowledge and Process Management 18, 3 (2011), 150--174.
[46]
Gregorio Robles, Laura Arjona Reina, Jesús M González-Barahona, and Santiago Dueñas Domínguez. 2016. Women in Free/Libre/Open Source Software: The Situation in the 2010s. In IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems. Springer, 163--173.
[47]
Gregorio Robles, Igor Steinmacher, Paul Adams, and Christoph Treude. 2019. Twenty Years of Open Source Software: From Skepticism to Mainstream. IEEE Software 36, 6 (2019), 12--15.
[48]
Walt Scacchi. 2007. Free/open source software development: recent research results and emerging opportunities. In The 6th Joint Meeting on European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on the foundations of software engineering: companion papers. ACM, 459--468.
[49]
Carolyn B. Seaman. 1999. Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on software engineering 25, 4 (1999), 557--572.
[50]
Leif Singer, Fernando Figueira Filho, and Margaret-Anne Storey. 2014. Software Engineering at the Speed of Light: How Developers Stay Current Using Twitter. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 211--221.
[51]
Ruvar Spauwen and Slinger Jansen. 2013. Towards the roles and motives of open source software developers. In 5th International Workshop Software Ecosystems (IWSECO). Citeseer, 62--73.
[52]
Diomidis Spinellis. 2006. Open source and professional advancement. IEEE Software 23, 5 (2006), 70--71.
[53]
Igor Steinmacher, Gregorio Robles, Brian Fitzgerald, and Anthony Wasserman. 2017. Free and open source software development: the end of the teenage years. Journal of Internet Services and Applications 8, 1 (05 Dec 2017), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-017-0069--9
[54]
Klaas-Jan Stol and Brian Fitzgerald. 2014. Inner source--adopting open source development practices in organizations: a tutorial. IEEE Software 32, 4 (2014), 60--67.
[55]
Damian A Tamburri, Rick Kazman, and Hamed Fahimi. 2016. The architect's role in community shepherding. IEEE Software 33, 6 (2016), 70--79.
[56]
Christopher Vendome, Mario Linares-Vasquez, Gabriele Bavota, Massimiliano Di Penta, Daniel M German, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2015. When and why developers adopt and change software licenses. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). IEEE, 31--40.
[57]
Georg Von Krogh, Sebastian Spaeth, and Karim R Lakhani. 2003. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Research policy 32, 7 (2003), 1217--1241.
[58]
Xiaofeng Wang, Ilona Kuzmickaja, Klaas-Jan Stol, Pekka Abrahamsson, and Brian Fitzgerald. 2014. Microblogging in Open Source Software Development: The Case of Drupal and Twitter. IEEE Software 31, 4 (2014), 72--80.
[59]
Howard T Welser, Eric Gleave, Danyel Fisher, and Marc Smith. 2007. Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of social structure 8, 2 (2007), 1--32.
[60]
Yuhao Wu, Yuki Manabe, Tetsuya Kanda, Daniel M German, and Katsuro Inoue. 2015. A method to detect license inconsistencies in large-scale open source projects. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. IEEE, 324--333.
[61]
YuhaoWu, Yuki Manabe, Tetsuya Kanda, Daniel M German, and Katsuro Inoue. 2017. Analysis of license inconsistency in large collections of open source projects. Empirical Software Engineering 22, 3 (2017), 1194--1222.
[62]
Jin Xu, Yongqin Gao, Scott Christley, and Gregory Madey. 2005. A topological analysis of the open souce software development community. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 198a--198a.
[63]
Diyi Yang, Aaron Halfaker, Robert Kraut, and Eduard Hovy. 2016. Who did what: Editor role identification in Wikipedia. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 446--455.
[64]
Yunwen Ye and Kouichi Kishida. 2003. Toward an understanding of the motivation Open Source Software developers. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on software engineering. IEEE, 419--429.
[65]
Liguo Yu and Srini Ramaswamy. 2007. Mining cvs repositories to understand open-source project developer roles. In Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR'07: ICSE Workshops 2007). IEEE, 8--8.
[66]
Frances Zlotnick. 2017. GitHub Open Source Survey 2017. http://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.806811

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Accelerating social science knowledge production with the coordinated open-source modelQuality & Quantity10.1007/s11135-024-02020-7Online publication date: 8-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Modeling interconnected social and technical risks in open source software ecosystemsCollective Intelligence10.1177/263391372412319123:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)How to Gain Commit Rights in Modern Top Open Source Communities?Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering10.1145/36607841:FSE(1727-1749)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW2
CSCW
October 2020
2310 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3430143
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 October 2020
Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. career
  2. collaborative development
  3. open-source
  4. role

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • National Science Foundation

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)213
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Accelerating social science knowledge production with the coordinated open-source modelQuality & Quantity10.1007/s11135-024-02020-7Online publication date: 8-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Modeling interconnected social and technical risks in open source software ecosystemsCollective Intelligence10.1177/263391372412319123:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)How to Gain Commit Rights in Modern Top Open Source Communities?Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering10.1145/36607841:FSE(1727-1749)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
  • (2024)From the Inside Out: Organizational Impact on Open-Source Communities and Women's RepresentationProceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 17th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.1145/3641822.3641875(36-50)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Mitigating Barriers to Public Social Interaction with Meronymous CommunicationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642241(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Guiding the way: A systematic literature review on mentoring practices in open source software projectsInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107470171(107470)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)Codes of Conduct in Open SourceEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_17(295-308)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • (2024)How Much Do Women Build Open Source Infrastructure?Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_14(231-253)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • (2024)An ecology‐oriented convergence evolution analysis method of crossover service ecosystemsJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.263536:7Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Off to a Good Start: Dynamic Contribution Patterns and Technical Success in an OSS Newcomer’s Early CareerIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2022.315607149:2(529-548)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media