research-article

Untangling the Concept of Task in Information Seeking and Retrieval

Authors:

Leif AzzopardiAuthors Info & Claims

ICTIR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval

Pages 73 - 81

https://doi.org/10.1145/3471158.3472259

Published: 31 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Many researchers have pointed to tasks as being the driving force for Information Seeking and Retrieval (ISR). Unfortunately, researchers do not agree on what is meant by tasks and related concepts such as activities and search tasks. Researchers often use different terminologies to describe the same concepts or use the same terms to refer to different concepts. Moreover, previous researchers ignored work roles and their effect on tasks. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to present some of the main competing task hierarchies by conducting a literature analysis in the field of ISR, management, work structure, and human resources. A specific contribution is to use key existing (explicit or implicit) hierarchies and frameworks of tasks into an integrated taxonomy of tasks and related concepts for use by researchers in ISR.

References

[1]

Marja Aartsen and Thomas Hansen. 2020. Social Participation in the Second Half of Life. (2020).

[2]

Nafisat Toyin Adewale, Yushiana Mansor, Muhammad-Bashir Owolabi Yusuf, and Ahmeed Onikosi. 2017. Uncertainty and subjective task complexity in the information-seeking behaviour of lawyers. Library Review (2017).

[3]

Marcia J Bates. 1979. Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for information Science 30, 4 (1979), 205--214.

[4]

David Bawden. 2007. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Information Retrieval in Context. Journal of Documentation (2007).

[5]

Katriina Byström. 1999. Task complexity, information types and information sources: examination of relationships. Tampere University Press.

[6]

Katriina BystrÖm. 2002. Information and information sources in tasks of varying complexity. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology 53, 7 (2002), 581--591.

Digital Library

[7]

Katriina Byström and Preben Hansen. 2005. Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information science and Technology 56, 10 (2005), 1050--1061.

[8]

Katriina Byström and Kalervo Järvelin. 1995. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information processing & management 31, 2 (1995), 191--213.

[9]

Donald J Campbell. 1988. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of management review 13, 1 (1988), 40--52.

[10]

Adam M Grant and Susan J Ashford. 2008. The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in organizational behavior 28 (2008), 3--34.

[11]

Mark A Griffin, Andrew Neal, and Sharon K Parker. 2007. A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of management journal 50, 2 (2007), 327--347.

[12]

Jillian R Griffiths and Peter Brophy. 2005. Student searching behavior and the web: use of academic resources and Google. (2005).

[13]

J Richard Hackman. 1969. Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research. Acta psychologica 31 (1969), 97--128.

[14]

Lotta Haglund and Per Olsson. 2008. The impact on university libraries of changes in information behavior among academic researchers: a multiple case study. The journal of academic librarianship 34, 1 (2008), 52--59.

[15]

P Hansen. 1999. User interface design for IR interaction. a task-oriented approach. Third International Conference on the Conceptions of the Library and Information Science (1999), 191--205.

[16]

Preben Hansen and Kalervo Järvelin. 2000. The information seeking and retrieval process at the Swedish Patent and Registration Office. In Proc. ACM SIGIR Workshop on Patent Retrieval.

[17]

Bradley M Hemminger, Dihui Lu, KTL Vaughan, and Stephanie J Adams. 2007. Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American society for information science and technology 58, 14 (2007), 2205--2225.

Digital Library

[18]

Isto Huvila. 2008. Work and work roles: a context of tasks. Journal of documentation (2008).

[19]

Daniel R Ilgen and John R Hollenbeck. 1991. The structure of work: Job design and roles. (1991).

[20]

Kalervo Järvelin, Pertti Vakkari, Paavo Arvola, Feza Baskaya, Anni Järvelin, Jaana Kekäläinen, Heikki Keskustalo, Sanna Kumpulainen, Miamaria Saastamoinen, Reijo Savolainen, et al. 2015. Task-based information interaction evaluation: The viewpoint of program theory. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 33, 1 (2015), 1--30.

Digital Library

[21]

Kalervo Järvelin and Thomas D Wilson. 2003. On conceptual models for information seeking and retrieval research. Information research 9, 1 (2003), 9--1.

[22]

Carol C Kuhlthau. 1991. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American society for information science 42, 5 (1991), 361--371.

[23]

Carol C Kuhlthau, Jannica Heinström, and Ross J Todd. 2008. The 'information search process' revisited: Is the model still useful. Information research 13, 4 (2008), 13--4.

[24]

Gloria J Leckie, Karen E Pettigrew, and Christian Sylvain. 1996. Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. The Library Quarterly 66, 2 (1996), 161--193.

[25]

Yuelin Li. 2009. Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology 60, 2 (2009), 275--291.

[26]

Yuelin Li and Nicholas J Belkin. 2008. A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Information Processing & Management 44, 6 (2008), 1822--1837.

Digital Library

[27]

Yuelin Li and Nicholas J Belkin. 2010. An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology 61, 9 (2010), 1771--1789.

Digital Library

[28]

Elisabeth Logan. 1993. Information retrieval interaction: P. Ingwersen. Taylor Graham, Los Angeles (1992). x+ 246 pp., $55, ISBN 0--947568--54--9. (1993).

[29]

Xi Niu, Bradley M Hemminger, Cory Lown, Stephanie Adams, Cecelia Brown, Allison Level, Merinda McLure, Audrey Powers, Michele R Tennant, and Tara Cataldo. 2010. National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 5 (2010), 869--890.

[30]

Donald A Norman. 2005. Human-centered design considered harmful. interactions 12, 4 (2005), 14--19.

[31]

Sharon K Parker, Toby D Wall, and Paul R Jackson. 1997. "That's not my job": Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of management journal 40, 4 (1997), 899--929.

[32]

Mikko Pennanen and Pertti Vakkari. 2003. Students' conceptual structure, search process, and outcome while preparing a research proposal: a longitudinal case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54, 8 (2003), 759--770.

Digital Library

[33]

Diane H Sonnenwald. 1996. Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design studies 17, 3 (1996), 277--301.

[34]

R. Taylor. 1991. Information use environments. Progress in communication sciences (1991), 217--255.

[35]

Elaine G Toms. 2019. Information activities and tasks. Information at Work: Information Management in the Workplace (2019), 33.

[36]

Pertti Vakkari. 1999. Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information processing & management 35, 6 (1999), 819--837.

Digital Library

[37]

Pertti Vakkari. 2000. Relevance and contributing information types of searched documents in task performance. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 2--9.

Digital Library

[38]

Pertti Vakkari. 2001. A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of documentation (2001).

[39]

Pertti Vakkari. 2003. Task-based information searching. Annual review of information science and technology 37, 1 (2003), 413--464.

[40]

Pertti Vakkari and Nanna Hakala. 2000. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance. Journal of documentation (2000).

[41]

Theresa M Welbourne, Diane E Johnson, and Amir Erez. 1998. The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of management journal 41, 5 (1998), 540--555.

[42]

Hong Xie. 2000. Shifts of interactive intentions and information-seeking strategies in interactive information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for information Science 51, 9 (2000), 841--857.

Digital Library

[43]

Iris Xie. 2009. Dimensions of tasks: influences on information-seeking and retrieving process. Journal of Documentation (2009).

Cited By

Wang BHui Yang GWang HHan SHauff CZuccon GZhang Y(2024)GOLF: Goal-Oriented Long-term liFe tasks supported by human-AI collaborationProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657655(3072-3072)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626772.3657655
Ruthven I(2024)Information shapingJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2487175:4(469-482)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/asi.24871
Shah CWhite RThomas PMitra BSarkar SBelkin N(2023)Taking Search to TaskProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578288(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576840.3578288

Index Terms

Untangling the Concept of Task in Information Seeking and Retrieval
1. Information systems
  1. Information retrieval

Recommendations

Personalizing information retrieval using task features, topic knowledge, and task product
SIGIR '09: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

Personalization of information retrieval tailors search towards individual users to meet their particular information needs. Personalization systems obtain additional information about users and their contexts beyond the queries they submit to the ...
The Role of the Task Topic in Web Search of Different Task Types
CHIIR '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval

When users are looking for information on the Web, they show different behavior for different task types, e.g., for fact finding vs. information gathering tasks. For example, related work in this area has investigated how this behavior can be measured ...
Information retrieval with concept-based pseudo-relevance feedback in MEDLINE

Although using domain specific knowledge sources for information retrieval yields more accurate results compared to pure keyword-based methods, more improvements can be achieved by considering both relations between concepts in an ontology and also their ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICTIR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval

July 2021

334 pages

ISBN:9781450386111

DOI:10.1145/3471158

General Chair:
Faegheh Hasibi
Radboud University, Netherlands
,
Program Chairs:
Yi Fang
Santa Clara University, USA
,
Akiko Aizawa
National Institute of Informatics, Japan

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 August 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

European Union?s Horizon 2020 Marie Sk?odowska-Curie

Conference

ICTIR '21

Sponsor:

SIGIR

ICTIR '21: The 2021 ACM SIGIR International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval

July 11, 2021

Virtual Event, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 235 of 527 submissions, 45%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
194
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)40
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wang BHui Yang GWang HHan SHauff CZuccon GZhang Y(2024)GOLF: Goal-Oriented Long-term liFe tasks supported by human-AI collaborationProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657655(3072-3072)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626772.3657655
Ruthven I(2024)Information shapingJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2487175:4(469-482)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/asi.24871
Shah CWhite RThomas PMitra BSarkar SBelkin N(2023)Taking Search to TaskProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578288(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576840.3578288

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten