Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Quantifying the Invisible Labor in Crowd Work

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Crowdsourcing markets provide workers with a centralized place to find paid work. What may not be obvious at first glance is that, in addition to the work they do for pay, crowd workers also have to shoulder a variety of unpaid invisible labor in these markets, which ultimately reduces workers' hourly wages. Invisible labor includes finding good tasks, messaging requesters, or managing payments. However, we currently know little about how much time crowd workers actually spend on invisible labor or how much it costs them economically. To ensure a fair and equitable future for crowd work, we need to be certain that workers are being paid fairly for all of the work they do. In this paper, we conduct a field study to quantify the invisible labor in crowd work. We build a plugin to record the amount of time that 100 workers on Amazon Mechanical Turk dedicate to invisible labor while completing 40,903 tasks. If we ignore the time workers spent on invisible labor, workers' median hourly wage was $3.76. But, we estimated that crowd workers in our study spent 33% of their time daily on invisible labor, dropping their median hourly wage to $2.83. We found that the invisible labor differentially impacts workers depending on their skill level and workers' demographics. The invisible labor category that took the most time and that was also the most common revolved around workers having to manage their payments. The second most time-consuming invisible labor category involved hyper-vigilance, where workers vigilantly watched over requesters' profiles for newly posted work or vigilantly searched for labor. We hope that through our paper, the invisible labor in crowdsourcing becomes more visible, and our results help to reveal the larger implications of the continuing invisibility of labor in crowdsourcing.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (v5cscw319vf.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Ali Alkhatib, Michael S Bernstein, and Margaret Levi. 2017. Examining crowd work and gig work through the historical lens of piecework. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4599--4616.
[2]
Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Mark A Blythe. 2018. Critical theory and interaction design. MIT Press.
[3]
Veronica Beechey. 1977. Some notes on female wage labour in capitalist production. Capital & Class 1, 3 (1977), 45--66.
[4]
Michael S Bernstein, Eytan Bakshy, Moira Burke, and Brian Karrer. 2013. Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 21--30.
[5]
Michael S Bernstein, Joel Brandt, Robert C Miller, and David R Karger. 2011. Crowds in two seconds: Enabling realtime crowd-powered interfaces. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 33--42.
[6]
Jeffrey P Bigham, Raja Kushalnagar, Ting-Hao Kenneth Huang, Juan Pablo Flores, and Saiph Savage. 2017. On how deaf people might use speech to control devices. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 383--384.
[7]
Monica Blagescu and John Young. 2006. Capacity development for policy advocacy: current thinking and approaches among agencies supporting civil society organisations. Overseas Development Institute London.
[8]
Encyclopaedia Britannica et al. 2008. Britannica concise encyclopedia. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
[9]
Mayra Buvinic and Elizabeth M King. 2018. Invisible No More? A Methodology and Policy Review of How Time Use Surveys Measure Unpaid Work. United Nations Foundation, Data2X. Available at https://data2x. org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Data2X-Invisible-No-More 1 (2018).
[10]
Erran Carmel and Steve Sawyer. 2020. The Five-Dimensional Space of the Futures of Work: A View to 2030. In IFIP Joint Working Conference on the Future of Digital Work: The Challenge of Inequality. Springer, 295--309.
[11]
NU CEPAL. 2015. Classification of time-use activities for Latin America (CAUTAL). (2015).
[12]
Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2015. Peeking beneath the hood of uber. In Proceedings of the 2015 internet measurement conference. 495--508.
[13]
Justin Cheng and Michael S Bernstein. 2015. Flock: Hybrid crowd-machine learning classifiers. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 600--611.
[14]
Lucia Ciciolla and Suniya S Luthar. 2019. Invisible household labor and ramifications for adjustment: Mothers as captains of households. Sex Roles 81, 7--8 (2019), 467--486.
[15]
Marion Crain, Winifred Poster, and Miriam Cherry. 2016. Invisible labor: Hidden work in the contemporary world. Univ of California Press.
[16]
Emma Crewe and Mr John Young. 2002. Bridging research and policy: context, evidence and links. (2002).
[17]
Brandon Dang, Martin J Riedl, and Matthew Lease. 2018. But who protects the moderators? the case of crowdsourced image moderation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.10999 (2018).
[18]
Arlene Kaplan Daniels. 1987. Invisible work. Social Problems 34, 5 (1987), 403--415.
[19]
Angela Davis. 1983. The approaching obsolescence of housework: A working-class perspective. Women, Race, and Class (1983), 222--44.
[20]
Valerio De Stefano. 2015. The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 37 (2015), 471.
[21]
Xuefei Nancy Deng and KD Joshi. 2013. Is crowdsourcing a source of worker empowerment or exploitation? Understanding crowd workers' perceptions of crowdsourcing career. (2013).
[22]
Xuefei Nancy Deng and KD Joshi. 2016. Why individuals participate in micro-task crowdsourcing work environment: Revealing crowdworkers' perceptions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 17, 10 (2016), 3.
[23]
Iqbal Dhaliwal and Caitlin Tulloch. 2012. From research to policy: using evidence from impact evaluations to inform development policy. Journal of Development Effectiveness 4, 4 (2012), 515--536.
[24]
Djellel Eddine Difallah, Michele Catasta, Gianluca Demartini, Panagiotis G Ipeirotis, and Philippe Cudré-Mauroux. 2015. The dynamics of micro-task crowdsourcing: The case of amazon mturk. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web. 238--247.
[25]
Djellel Eddine Difallah, Michele Catasta, Gianluca Demartini, Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis, and Philippe Cudré-Mauroux. 2015. The Dynamics of Micro-Task Crowdsourcing: The Case of Amazon MTurk. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (Florence, Italy) (WWW '15 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 617. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2744109
[26]
Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2020. Data feminism. Mit Press.
[27]
Carl DiSalvo, Tom Jenkins, and Thomas Lodato. 2016. Designing speculative civics. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4979--4990.
[28]
Arindrajit Dube, Jeff Jacobs, Suresh Naidu, and Siddharth Suri. 2020. Monopsony in Online Labor Markets. American Economic Review: Insights 2, 1 (March 2020), 33--46. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20180150
[29]
Benjamin Duke and UK April. 2020. The effects of the COVID-19 crisis on the gig economy and zero hour contracts. Group 24 (2020), 8.
[30]
Margrit Eichler and Patrizia Albanese. 2007. What is household work? A critique of assumptions underlying empirical studies of housework and an alternative approach. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie (2007), 227--258.
[31]
Fairwork. 2020. The Gig Economy and Covid-19: Fairwork Report on Platform Policies. Fairwork Report on Platform Policies, Oxford,United Kingdom 24 (2020), 8.
[32]
Shaoyang Fan, Ujwal Gadiraju, Alessandro Checco, and Gianluca Demartini. 2020. CrowdCO-OP: Sharing Risks and Rewards in Crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--24.
[33]
Silvia Federici. 1975. Wages against housework. Falling Wall Press Bristol.
[34]
Casey Fiesler. 2018. Owning the Servers: A Design Fiction Exploring the Transformation of Fandom into ?Our Own'. Transformative Works and Cultures 28 (2018).
[35]
Casey Fiesler. 2021. Innovating Like an Optimist, Preparing Like a Pessimist: Ethical Speculation and the Legal Imagination. Colorado Technology Law Journal 19, 1 (2021).
[36]
Ailbhe Finnerty, Pavel Kucherbaev, Stefano Tranquillini, and Gregorio Convertino. 2013. Keep It Simple: Reward and Task Design in Crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI (Trento, Italy) (CHItaly '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 4 pages. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2499149.2499168
[37]
Claudia Flores-Saviaga, Yuwen Li, Benjamin Hanrahan, Jeffrey Bigham, and Saiph Savage. 2020. The Challenges of Crowd Workers in Rural and Urban America. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Vol. 8. 159--162.
[38]
Maria S Floro and Hitomi Komatsu. 2011. Gender and work in South Africa: what can time-use data reveal? Feminist Economics 17, 4 (2011), 33--66.
[39]
Maria S Floro and Anant Pichetpongsa. 2010. Gender, work intensity, and well-being of Thai home-based workers. Feminist Economics 16, 3 (2010), 5--44.
[40]
Nancy Folbre and Jayoung Yoon. 2007. What is child care? Lessons from time-use surveys of major English-speaking countries. Review of Economics of the Household 5, 3 (2007), 223--248.
[41]
Harley Frazis and Jay Stewart. 2012. How to think about time-use data: What inferences can we make about long-and short-run time use from time diaries? Annals of Economics and Statistics/Annales d'économie et de statistique (2012), 231--245.
[42]
Ujwal Gadiraju, Alessandro Checco, Neha Gupta, and Gianluca Demartini. 2017. Modus operandi of crowd workers: The invisible role of microtask work environments. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 1--29.
[43]
Ujwal Gadiraju, Jie Yang, and Alessandro Bozzon. 2017. Clarity is a worthwhile quality: On the role of task clarity in microtask crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. 5--14.
[44]
Ruijiang Gao, Maytal Saar-Tsechansky, Maria De-Arteaga, Ligong Han, Min Kyung Lee, and Matthew Lease. 2021. Human-AI Collaboration with Bandit Feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.10614 (2021).
[45]
Martha Garcia-Murillo and Ian MacInnes. 2019. The impact of AI on employment: a historical account of its evolution. (2019).
[46]
Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
[47]
Thomas Gillier, Cédric Chaffois, Mustapha Belkhouja, Yannig Roth, and Barry L Bayus. 2018. The effects of task instructions in crowdsourcing innovative ideas. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 134 (2018), 35--44.
[48]
Miriam Glucksmann. 2016. Completing and complementing: The work of consumers in the division of labour. Sociology 50, 5 (2016), 878--895.
[49]
Elham Shafiei Gol, Mari-Klara Stein, and Michel Avital. 2018. Why Take the Risk?: Motivations of Highly SkilledWorkers to Participate in Crowdworking Platforms. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
[50]
Patricia A Gouthro. 2009. Neoliberalism, lifelong learning, and the homeplace: problematizing the boundaries of ?public'and ?private'to explore women's learning experiences. Studies in Continuing Education 31, 2 (2009), 157--172.
[51]
Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Eamon Dolan Books.
[52]
Harish Guda and Upender Subramanian. 2019. Your uber is arriving: Managing on-demand workers through surge pricing, forecast communication, and worker incentives. Management Science 65, 5 (2019), 1995--2014.
[53]
Jonathan Hall, Cory Kendrick, and Chris Nosko. 2015. The effects of Uber's surge pricing: A case study. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business (2015).
[54]
Lei Han, Eddy Maddalena, Alessandro Checco, Cristina Sarasua, Ujwal Gadiraju, Kevin Roitero, and Gianluca Demartini. 2020. Crowd worker strategies in relevance judgment tasks. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 241--249.
[55]
Lei Han, Kevin Roitero, Ujwal Gadiraju, Cristina Sarasua, Alessandro Checco, Eddy Maddalena, and Gianluca Demartini. 2019. All those wasted hours: On task abandonment in crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 321--329.
[56]
Lingxin Hao, Daniel Q Naiman, and Daniel Q Naiman. 2007. Quantile regression. Number 149. Sage.
[57]
Kotaro Hara, Abigail Adams, Kristy Milland, Saiph Savage, Chris Callison-Burch, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2018. A data-driven analysis of workers' earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[58]
Kotaro Hara, Abigail Adams, Kristy Milland, Saiph Savage, Benjamin V Hanrahan, Jeffrey P Bigham, and Chris Callison-Burch. 2019. Worker demographics and earnings on amazon mechanical turk: An exploratory analysis. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6.
[59]
Erin Hatton. 2017. Mechanisms of invisibility: rethinking the concept of invisible work. Work, employment and society 31, 2 (2017), 336--351.
[60]
Danula Hettiachchi, Niels Van Berkel, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2020. CrowdCog: A Cognitive skill based system for heterogeneous task assignment and recommendation in crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--22.
[61]
Paul Hitlin. 2016. Research in the Crowdsourcing Age, a Case Study: How Scholars, Companies and Workers are Using Mechanical Turk, a" Gig Economy" Platform, for Tasks Computers Can't Handle. Pew Research Center.
[62]
Sara Horowitz. 2015. The Costs of Nonpayment. Retrieved June 26, 2019 from https://blog.freelancersunion.org/ 2015/12/10/costs-nonpayment/
[63]
Ting-Hao Kenneth Huang and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2017. A 10-month-long deployment study of on-demand recruiting for low-latency crowdsourcing. In Fifth AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing.
[64]
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2018. Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons 61, 4 (2018), 577--586.
[65]
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Gemma Newlands, Brian Butler, Saiph Savage, Christoph Lutz, Michael Dunn, and Steve Sawyer. 2021. Flexible work and personal digital infrastructures. Commun. ACM 64, 7 (2021), 72--79.
[66]
Martin Jay. 1996. The dialectical imagination: A history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923--1950. Vol. 10. Univ of California Press.
[67]
Toni Kaplan, Susumu Saito, Kotaro Hara, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2018. Striving to earn more: a survey of work strategies and tool use among crowd workers. In Sixth AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing.
[68]
Patrick Gage Kelley. 2010. Conducting usable privacy & security studies with amazon's mechanical turk. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS)(Redmond, WA.
[69]
Sara Constance Kingsley, Mary L. Gray, and Siddharth Suri. 2015. Accounting for Market Frictions and Power Asymmetries in Online Labor Markets. Policy & Internet 7, 4 (2015), 383--400. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.111
[70]
Aniket Kittur, Ed H Chi, and Bongwon Suh. 2008. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 453--456.
[71]
Aniket Kittur, Susheel Khamkar, Paul André, and Robert Kraut. 2012. CrowdWeaver: visually managing complex crowd work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1033--1036.
[72]
Aniket Kittur, Jeffrey V Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, Elizabeth Gerber, Aaron Shaw, John Zimmerman, Matt Lease, and John Horton. 2013. The future of crowd work. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 1301--1318.
[73]
Siou Chew Kuek, Cecilia Paradi-Guilford, Toks Fayomi, Saori Imaizumi, Panos Ipeirotis, Patricia Pina, and Manpreet Singh. 2015. The global opportunity in online outsourcing. (2015).
[74]
Laura Lascau, Sandy JJ Gould, Anna L Cox, Elizaveta Karmannaya, and Duncan P Brumby. 2019. Monotasking or Multitasking: Designing for Crowdworkers' Preferences. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[75]
Walter S Lasecki, Christopher D Miller, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2013. Warping time for more effective real-time crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2033--2036.
[76]
Walter S Lasecki, Jeffrey M Rzeszotarski, Adam Marcus, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2015. The effects of sequence and delay on crowd work. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1375--1378.
[77]
Zhifang Liao, Dayu He, Zhijie Chen, Xiaoping Fan, Yan Zhang, and Shengzong Liu. 2018. Exploring the characteristics of issue-related behaviors in github using visualization techniques. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 24003--24015.
[78]
Linda Lim. 1983. Capitalism, imperialism, and patriarchy: the dilemma of third-world women workers in multinational factories. Women, men and the international division of labor (1983), 70--91.
[79]
Joseph Lindley and Paul Coulton. 2015. Back to the future: 10 years of design fiction. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference. 210--211.
[80]
Conor Linehan, Ben J Kirman, Stuart Reeves, Mark A Blythe, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Audrey Desjardins, and Ron Wakkary. 2014. Alternate endings: using fiction to explore design futures. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 45--48.
[81]
Anna Lioznova, Alexey Drutsa, Vladimir Kukushkin, and Anastasia Bezzubtseva. 2020. Prediction of Hourly Earnings and Completion Time on a Crowdsourcing Platform. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3172--3182.
[82]
Caitlin Lustig, Sean Rintel, Liane Scult, and Siddharth Suri. 2020. Stuck in the middle with you: The Transaction Costs of Corporate Employees Hiring Freelancers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1--28.
[83]
VK Chaithanya Manam and Alexander J Quinn. 2018. Wingit: Efficient refinement of unclear task instructions. In Sixth AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing.
[84]
Herbert Marcuse. 1964. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.
[85]
Herbert Marcuse. 1966. The individual in the great society. Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse Vol. 2: Towards a Critical Theory of Society (1966), 59--80.
[86]
Anoush Margaryan. 2016. Understanding crowdworkers' learning practices. (2016).
[87]
David Martin, Benjamin V Hanrahan, Jacki O'Neill, and Neha Gupta. 2014. Being a turker. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 224--235.
[88]
Brian McInnis, Dan Cosley, Chaebong Nam, and Gilly Leshed. 2016. Taking a HIT: Designing around rejection, mistrust, risk, and workers' experiences in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2271--2282.
[89]
Yann Moulier-Boutang. 2011. Cognitive capitalism. Polity.
[90]
Gemma Newlands and Christoph Lutz. 2020. Crowdwork and the mobile underclass: Barriers to participation in India and the United States. new media & society (2020), 1461444820901847.
[91]
Sihang Qiu, Ujwal Gadiraju, and Alessandro Bozzon. 2020. Improving worker engagement through conversational microtask crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[92]
Alex Rosenblat. 2018. Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. Univ of California Press.
[93]
Jeffrey Rzeszotarski and Aniket Kittur. 2012. CrowdScape: interactively visualizing user behavior and output. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 55--62.
[94]
Jeffrey M Rzeszotarski, Ed H Chi, Praveen Paritosh, and Peng Dai. 2013. Inserting micro-breaks into crowdsourcing workflows. (2013).
[95]
JeffreyMRzeszotarski and Aniket Kittur. 2011. Instrumenting the crowd: using implicit behavioral measures to predict task performance. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 13--22.
[96]
Susumu Saito, Chun-Wei Chiang, Saiph Savage, Teppei Nakano, Tetsunori Kobayashi, and Jeffrey Bigham. 2019. Turkscanner: Predicting the hourly wage of microtasks. In The World Wide Web Conference. 3187--3193.
[97]
Shruti Sannon and Dan Cosley. 2019. Privacy, Power, and Invisible Labor on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[98]
Saiph Savage, Chun Wei Chiang, Susumu Saito, Carlos Toxtli, and Jeffrey Bigham. 2020. Becoming the Super Turker: IncreasingWages via a Strategy from High EarningWorkers. In Proceedings of TheWeb Conference 2020. 1241--1252.
[99]
Saiph Savage and Mohammad H Jarrahi. 2020. Solidarity and AI for Transitioning to Crowd Work during COVID-19. In The New Future of Work Symposium 2020.
[100]
Nigel R Shadbolt, Daniel A Smith, Elena Simperl, Max Van Kleek, Yang Yang, and Wendy Hall. 2013. Towards a classification framework for social machines. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. 905--912.
[101]
M Six Silberman, Bill Tomlinson, Rochelle LaPlante, Joel Ross, Lilly Irani, and Andrew Zaldivar. 2018. Responsible research with crowds: pay crowdworkers at least minimum wage. Commun. ACM 61, 3 (2018), 39--41.
[102]
RACHEL N SIMONS, DANNA GURARI, and KENNETH R FLEISCHMANN. 2020. " I Hope This Is Helpful": Understanding Crowdworkers' Challenges and Motivations for an Image Description Task. ACM CSCW (2020).
[103]
Aaron Smith. 2016. Labor platforms: Technology-enabled "gig work'. Pew Research Center, Internet and Technology. November 17 (2016).
[104]
Daniel Spurk and Caroline Straub. 2020. Flexible employment relationships and careers in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.
[105]
Daniel Start and Ingie Hovland. 2004. Tools for policy impact: a handbook for researchers. Overseas Development Institute London.
[106]
Hao Su, Jia Deng, and Li Fei-Fei. 2012. Crowdsourcing annotations for visual object detection. In Workshops at the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[107]
Will Sutherland and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2018. The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management 43 (2018), 328--341.
[108]
Tiziana Terranova. 2000. Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social text 18, 2 (2000), 33--58.
[109]
Carlos Toxtli and Saiph Savage. 2020. Meta-Gig: Empowering anyone to create crowd marketplaces. Avances en Interacción Humano-Computadora 1 (2020), 11--19.
[110]
Hai Wang and Hai Yang. 2019. Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 129 (2019), 122--155.
[111]
Vanesa Weyrauch and Gala Díaz Langou. 2011. Sound expectations: from impact evaluations to policy change. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation Working Paper 12 (2011).
[112]
Mark E Whiting, Grant Hugh, and Michael S Bernstein. 2019. Fair Work: Crowd Work Minimum Wage with One Line of Code. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Vol. 7. 197--206.
[113]
Rebecca Whiting and Gillian Symon. 2020. Digi-housekeeping: the invisible work of flexibility. Work, Employment and Society (2020), 0950017020916192.
[114]
Alex C Williams, Gloria Mark, Kristy Milland, Edward Lank, and Edith Law. 2019. The Perpetual Work Life of Crowdworkers: How Tooling Practices Increase Fragmentation in Crowdwork. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--28.
[115]
Richmond Y Wong, Ellen Van Wyk, and James Pierce. 2017. Real-fictional entanglements: Using science fiction and design fiction to interrogate sensing technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 567--579.
[116]
Meng-Han Wu and Alexander Quinn. 2017. Confusing the crowd: Task instruction quality on amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Vol. 5.
[117]
Ming Yin, Siddharth Suri, and Mary L. Gray. 2018. Running Out of Time: The Impact and Value of Flexibility in On-Demand Crowdwork. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Labor issues from the perspective of drivers on the Uber and Lyft apps and the impact on riders who use wheelchairsTravel Behaviour and Society10.1016/j.tbs.2024.10089138(100891)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)A dinâmica laborativa do crowdsourcing on-line análoga ao trabalho escravo: uma análise sobre as atividades laborativas por meio das plataformas digitaisLaborare10.33637/2595-847x.2024-2777:13(7-35)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Work Schedules, Finances, and Freedom: Work Schedule Fit and Platform Dependence among Gig Workers on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk PlatformSocius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World10.1177/2378023124128693310Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW2
CSCW2
October 2021
5376 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3493286
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 October 2021
Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. browser plugin
  2. crowdsourcing
  3. ghost work
  4. invisible labor
  5. online work
  6. productivity
  7. research methodology
  8. system
  9. time measurement
  10. tool

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)161
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Labor issues from the perspective of drivers on the Uber and Lyft apps and the impact on riders who use wheelchairsTravel Behaviour and Society10.1016/j.tbs.2024.10089138(100891)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)A dinâmica laborativa do crowdsourcing on-line análoga ao trabalho escravo: uma análise sobre as atividades laborativas por meio das plataformas digitaisLaborare10.33637/2595-847x.2024-2777:13(7-35)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Work Schedules, Finances, and Freedom: Work Schedule Fit and Platform Dependence among Gig Workers on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk PlatformSocius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World10.1177/2378023124128693310Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
  • (2024)(In)visible by Design: An Analysis of a Domestic Labor PlatformCritical Sociology10.1177/08969205241276803Online publication date: 8-Sep-2024
  • (2024)El costo de la independencia: Latino house-cleaners in Technology-Mediated Labour MarketsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869998:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Digital Gig Work Under Unstable Energy Infrastructures: Invisible Workarounds and Alternative ImaginariesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869498:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)A Culturally-Aware AI Tool for Crowdworkers: Leveraging Chronemics to Support Diverse Work StylesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36868998:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Longitudinal Loyalty: Understanding The Barriers To Running Longitudinal Studies On Crowdsourcing PlatformsACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/36748847:1-4(1-49)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2024
  • (2024)‘Your Duties Are To Sweep A Floor Remotely’: Low Information Quality in Job Advertisements is a Barrier to Low-Income Job-Seekers’ Successful Use of Digital PlatformsProceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3663384.3663403(1-20)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Creative Precarity in Motion: Revealing the Hidden Labor Behind Animating Virtual CharactersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661545(3471-3484)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media