Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Together But Alone: Atomization and Peer Support among Gig Workers

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The individualistic nature of gig work allows workers to have high levels of flexibility, but it also leads to atomization, leaving them isolated from peer workers. In this paper, we employed a qualitative approach to understand how online social media groups provide informational and emotional support to physical gig workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that social media groups alleviate the atomization effect, as workers use these groups to obtain experiential knowledge from their peers, build connections, and organize collective action. However, we noted a reluctance among workers to share strategic information where there was a perceived risk of being competitively disadvantaged. In addition, we found that the diversity among gig workers has also led to limited empathy for one another, which further impedes the provision of emotional support. While social media groups could potentially become places where workers organize collective efforts, several factors, including the uncertainty of other workers' activities and the understanding of the independent contractor status, have diminished the effectiveness of efforts at collective action.

References

[1]
[n.d.]. Uber and Lyft Drivers in California Will Remain Contractors.
[2]
2021. US unions not fazed by Amazon setback and vow to keep up the organizing fight. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/13/us-unions-amazing-organizing-effort-drive
[3]
Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Nicola J Bidwell, Himanshu Zade, Srihari H Muralidhar, Anupama Dhareshwar, Baneen Karachiwala, Cedrick N Tandong, and Jacki O'Neill. 2016. Peer-to-peer in the Workplace: A View from the Road. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5063--5075.
[4]
Andrea Alarcon and Mary L Gray. [n.d.]. Future of Work Global Labor. Literature Review. Learning, Evaluation and Research Activity II (LER II).
[5]
Mashael Yousef Almoqbel and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. Individual and Collaborative Behaviors of Rideshare Drivers in Protecting their Safety. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--21.
[6]
Uttam Bajwa, Denise Gastaldo, Erica Di Ruggiero, and Lilian Knorr. 2018. The health of workers in the global gig economy. Globalization and health 14, 1 (2018), 1--4.
[7]
Chris Benner, Erin Johansson, Kung Feng, and Hays Witt. 2020. On-Demand and on-the-edge: Ride-hailing and Delivery Workers in San Francisco. https://transform.ucsc.edu/on-demand-and-on-the-edge/
[8]
Thor Berger, Carl Benedikt Frey, Guy Levin, and Santosh Rao Danda. 2019. Uber happy? Work and well-being in the 'gig economy'. Economic Policy 34, 99 (2019), 429--477.
[9]
danah boyd. 2010. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites 39 (2010), 58.
[10]
Alex Bryson, Rafael Gomez, and Paul Willman. 2010. Online social networking and trade union membership: What the Facebook phenomenon truly means for labor organizers. Labor History 51, 1 (2010), 41--53.
[11]
Eliane Bucher, Christian Fieseler, Christoph Lutz, and Gemma Newlands. 2020. Shaping emotional labor practices in the sharing economy. In Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing. Emerald Publishing Limited.
[12]
Ben Chapman and Valerie Bauerlein. 2020. U.S. Coronavirus Cases Rose to Monthly Record in July. https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-latest-news-080220--11596361041
[13]
Kathy Charmaz and Linda Liska Belgrave. 2007. Grounded theory. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (2007).
[14]
Ruth Berins Collier, VB Dubal, and Christopher Carter. 2017. Labor platforms and gig work: the failure to regulate. (2017).
[15]
Kate Conger, Adam Satariano, and Mike Isaac. 2020. Pandemic Erodes Gig Economy Work. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/18/technology/gig-economy-pandemic.html
[16]
Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De. 2014. Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In Eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[17]
Willem De Groen, Ilaria Maselli, and Brian Fabo. 2016. The Digital Market for Local Services: A one-night stand for workers? An example from the on-demand economy. An Example from the On-Demand Economy (April 4, 2016). CEPS Special Report 133 (2016).
[18]
Megan Rose Dickey. 2020. Gig workers say they are struggling to get personal protective equipment from companies. https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/16/gig-workers-personal-protective-equipment/
[19]
Sarah A Donovan, David H Bradley, and Jon O Shimabukuru. 2016. What does the gig economy mean for workers? Congressional Research Service (2016). https://ecommons.cornell.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1813/79155/CRS_What_does_the_gig_economy_mean.pdf
[20]
Veena B Dubal. 2017. The Drive to Precarity: A Political History of Work, Regulation, & Labor Advocacy in San Francisco's Taxi & Uber Economics. Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 38 (2017), 73.
[21]
Benjamin G Edelman and Michael Luca. 2014. Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb. com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper 14-054 (2014).
[22]
Nicole B Ellison and Jessica Vitak. 2015. Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. The handbook of the psychology of communication technology 32 (2015), 205--228.
[23]
Sarah Feldman. 2019. Infographic: What Is the Top Paying Gig Job? https://www.statista.com/chart/19411/gig-work-pay/
[24]
Bronwyn Frey. 2020. Platform Labor and In/Formality: Organization among Motorcycle Taxi Drivers in Bandung, Indonesia. Anthropology of Work Review 41, 1 (2020), 36--49.
[25]
Eric Gilbert and Karrie Karahalios. 2009. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 211--220.
[26]
Mareike Glöss, Moira McGregor, and Barry Brown. 2016. Designing for labour: uber and the on-demand mobile workforce. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1632--1643.
[27]
John Godard. 1992. Strikes as collective voice: A behavioral analysis of strike activity. ILR Review 46, 1 (1992), 161--175.
[28]
Rebecca J Gooden and Helen R Winefield. 2007. Breast and prostate cancer online discussion boards: a thematic analysis of gender differences and similarities. Journal of Health Psychology 12, 1 (2007), 103--114.
[29]
Mark S Granovetter. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.
[30]
Kurt Gray, Adrian F Ward, and Michael I Norton. 2014. Paying it forward: Generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity. Journal of experimental psychology: General 143, 1 (2014), 247.
[31]
Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Eamon Dolan Books.
[32]
Anikó Hannák, Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Alan Mislove, Markus Strohmaier, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Bias in online freelance marketplaces: Evidence from taskrabbit and fiverr. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 1914--1933.
[33]
Arlie Russell Hochschild. 2012. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Univ of California Press.
[34]
Maya Holikatti, Shagun Jhaver, and Neha Kumar. 2019. Learning to Airbnb by engaging in online communities of practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--19.
[35]
Gary Hsieh, Robert Kraut, Scott E Hudson, and Roberto Weber. 2008. Can markets help? Applying market mechanisms to improve synchronous communication. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 535--544.
[36]
Julietta Hua and Kasturi Ray. 2018. Beyond the precariat: race, gender, and labor in the taxi and Uber economy. Social Identities 24, 2 (2018), 271--289.
[37]
Lei Vincent Huang and Piper Liping Liu. 2017. Ties that work: Investigating the relationships among coworker connections, work-related Facebook utility, online social capital, and employee outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017), 512--524.
[38]
Julie Hui, Nefer Ra Barber, Wendy Casey, Suzanne Cleage, Danny C Dolley, Frances Worthy, Kentaro Toyama, and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2020. Community Collectives: Low-tech Social Support for Digitally-Engaged Entrepreneurship. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[39]
Abigail Hunt, Emma Samman, Sherry Tapfuma, Grace Mwaura, Rhoda Omenya, Kay Kim, Sara Stevano, and Aida Roumer. 2019. Women in the gig economy: paid work, care and flexibility in Kenya and South Africa. (2019).
[40]
Lyft Inc. [n.d.]. Helping Lyft's driver community - COVID-19. https://www.lyft.com/safety/coronavirus/driver
[41]
Uber Inc. [n.d.]. Why is My Local GLH Closed? https://help.uber.com/driving-and-delivering/article/why-is-my-local-glh-closed?nodeId=e882c6fc-465c-498b-ad48-b9216020fa9c
[42]
Uber Technologies Inc. 2020. An update on COVID-19 financial assistance. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/30/business/economy/coronavirus-instacart-amazon.html
[43]
Instacart. [n.d.]. https://covidresponse.instacart.com/shopper-resources/
[44]
Nura Jabagi, Anne-Marie Croteau, Luc K Audebrand, and Josianne Marsan. 2019. Gig-workers' motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks. Journal of Managerial Psychology (2019).
[45]
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi and Will Sutherland. 2019. Algorithmic Management and Algorithmic Competencies: Understanding and Appropriating Algorithms in Gig work. In International Conference on Information. Springer, 578--589.
[46]
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Will Sutherland, Sarah Beth Nelson, and Steve Sawyer. 2020. Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29, 1 (2020), 153--189.
[47]
Zhou Jiang and Xiaowen Hu. 2016. Knowledge sharing and life satisfaction: The roles of colleague relationships and gender. Social Indicators Research 126, 1 (2016), 379--394.
[48]
Arne L Kalleberg and Michael Dunn. 2016. Good jobs, bad jobs in the gig economy. LERA for Libraries 20, 1--2 (2016).
[49]
Vaishnav Kameswaran, Lindsey Cameron, and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2018. Support for social and cultural capital development in real-time ridesharing services. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[50]
Melissa G Keith, Peter D Harms, and Alexander C Long. 2020. Worker Health and Well-Being in the Gig Economy: A Proposed Framework and Research Agenda. In Entrepreneurial and Small Business Stressors, Experienced Stress, and Well-Being. Emerald Publishing Limited.
[51]
Vera Khovanskaya, Phoebe Sengers, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2020. Bottom-Up Organizing with Tools from On High: Understanding the Data Practices of Labor Organizers. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[52]
Eliscia Kinder, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, and Will Sutherland. 2019. Gig Platforms, Tensions, Alliances and Ecosystems: An Actor-Network Perspective. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--26.
[53]
Neha Kumar, Nassim Jafarinaimi, and Mehrab Bin Morshed. 2018. Uber in Bangladesh: The Tangled Web of mobility and justice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--21.
[54]
Airi Lampinen, Christoph Lutz, Gemma Newlands, Ann Light, and Nicole Immorlica. 2018. Power struggles in the digital economy: platforms, workers, and markets. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 417--423.
[55]
Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 1603--1612.
[56]
Vili Lehdonvirta. 2016. Algorithms that divide and unite: Delocalisation, identity and collective action in ?microwork'. In Space, place and global digital work. Springer, 53--80.
[57]
Jun Liu. 2018. Who speaks for the past? Social media, social memory, and the production of historical knowledge in contemporary China. International Journal of Communication 12 (2018), 21.
[58]
Ning F Ma and Benjamin V Hanrahan. 2019. Part-Time Ride-Sharing: Recognizing the Context in which Drivers Ride-Share and its Impact on Platform Use. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, GROUP (2019), 1--17.
[59]
Ning F Ma, Chien Wen Yuan, Moojan Ghafurian, and Benjamin V Hanrahan. 2018. Using Stakeholder Theory to Examine Drivers' Stake in Uber. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[60]
Brenton J Malin and Curry Chandler. 2017. Free to work anxiously: Splintering precarity among drivers for Uber and Lyft. Communication, Culture & Critique 10, 2 (2017), 382--400.
[61]
Elizabeth B Marquis, Sangmi Kim, Rasha Alahmad, Casey S Pierce, and Lionel P Robert Jr. 2018. Impacts of perceived behavior control and emotional labor on gig workers. In Companion of the 2018 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 241--244.
[62]
Dan Mercea. 2013. Probing the implications of Facebook use for the organizational form of social movement organizations. Information, Communication & Society 16, 8 (2013), 1306--1327.
[63]
Michael Muller, N Sadat Shami, David R Millen, and Jonathan Feinberg. 2010. We are all lurkers: consuming behaviors among authors and readers in an enterprise file-sharing service. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work. 201--210.
[64]
Gemma Newlands, Christoph Lutz, and Christian Fieseler. 2018. Collective action and provider classification in the sharing economy. New Technology, Work and Employment 33, 3 (2018), 250--267.
[65]
Blair Nonnecke and Jenny Preece. 2000. Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 73--80.
[66]
Peter Norlander, Nenad Jukic, Arup Varma, and Svetlozar Nestorov. 2020. The effects of technological supervision on gig workers: organizational control and motivation of Uber, taxi, and limousine drivers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management (2020), 1--25.
[67]
Sara Ashley O'Brien. [n.d.]. Uber has more work to do winning over drivers. https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/18/technology/uber-drivers-180-days-of-change/index.html
[68]
Sara Ashley O'Brien. 2019. Why Uber and Lyft drivers are striking. https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/07/tech/uber-driver-strike-ipo/index.html
[69]
Sara Ashley O'Brien. 2020. Prop 22 passes in California, exempting Uber and Lyft from classifying drivers as employees. https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/04/tech/california-proposition-22/index.html
[70]
Kirsty Grant Pandey and Manish. 2021. Uber pay changes: Gig economy workers on what it could mean for them. https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-56433922
[71]
Stephen A Rains. 2018. Coping with illness digitally. MIT Press.
[72]
Noopur Raval and Paul Dourish. 2016. Standing out from the crowd: Emotional labor, body labor, and temporal labor in ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 97--107.
[73]
Alex Rosenblat and Luke Stark. 2016. Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber's drivers. International Journal of Communication 10 (2016), 27.
[74]
Niloufar Salehi, Lilly C Irani, Michael S Bernstein, Ali Alkhatib, Eva Ogbe, and Kristy Milland. 2015. We are dynamo: Overcoming stalling and friction in collective action for crowd workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 1621--1630.
[75]
Noam Scheiber and Kate Conger. 2020. Strikes at Instacart and Amazon Over Coronavirus Health Concerns. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/30/business/economy/coronavirus-instacart-amazon.html
[76]
Joseph Seering, Felicia Ng, Zheng Yao, and Geoff Kaufman. 2018. Applications of Social Identity Theory to Research and Design in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--34.
[77]
Cathy Donald Sherbourne and Anita L Stewart. 1991. The MOS social support survey. Social science & medicine 32, 6 (1991), 705--714.
[78]
Daniel Spurk and Caroline Straub. 2020. Flexible employment relationships and careers in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.
[79]
Will Sutherland and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2017. The gig economy and information infrastructure: The case of the digital nomad community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--24.
[80]
Will Sutherland, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Michael Dunn, and Sarah Beth Nelson. 2020. Work precarity and gig literacies in online freelancing. Work, Employment and Society 34, 3 (2020), 457--475.
[81]
Arianna Tassinari and Vincenzo Maccarrone. 2020. Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society 34, 1 (2020), 35--54.
[82]
Rannie Teodoro, Pinar Ozturk, Mor Naaman, Winter Mason, and Janne Lindqvist. 2014. The motivations and experiences of the on-demand mobile workforce. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 236--247.
[83]
Steven Vallas and Juliet B Schor. 2020. What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy. Annual Review of Sociology 46 (2020).
[84]
Kurt Vandaele. 2020. Collective Resistance and Organizational Creativity Amongst Europe's Platform Workers: A New Power in the Labour Movement? Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism, Forthcoming (2020).
[85]
Jessica Vitak and Nicole B Ellison. 2013. ?There'sa network out there you might as well tap': Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New media & society 15, 2 (2013), 243--259.
[86]
Leah F Vosko. 2006. Precarious employment: Understanding labour market insecurity in Canada. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
[87]
Yi-Chia Wang, Robert E. Kraut, and John. M. Levine. 2015. Eliciting and Receiving Online Support: Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Examine the Dynamics of Online Social Support. Journal of Medical Internet Research 17, 4 (2015), e99.
[88]
Juliet Webster. 2016. Microworkers of the gig economy: separate and precarious. In New Labor Forum, Vol. 25. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 56--64.
[89]
Alex Wood and Vili Lehdonvirta. 2019. Platform labour and structured antagonism: Understanding the origins of protest in the gig economy. Available at SSRN 3357804 (2019).
[90]
Alex J Wood, Mark Graham, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Isis Hjorth. 2019. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society 33, 1 (2019), 56--75.
[91]
Alex J Wood, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Mark Graham. 2018. Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment 33, 2 (2018), 95--112.
[92]
Jamie Woodcock and Mark Graham. 2019. The gig economy: a critical introduction. Polity.
[93]
Kevin Wright. 2012. Similarity, network convergence, and availability of emotional support as predictors of strong-tie/weak-tie support network preference on Facebook. Southern Communication Journal 77, 5 (2012), 389--402.
[94]
Zhijun Yan, Tianmei Wang, Yi Chen, and Han Zhang. 2016. Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management 53, 5 (2016), 643--653.
[95]
Diyi Yang, Zheng Yao, Joseph Seering, and Robert Kraut. 2019. The channel matters: Self-disclosure, reciprocity and social support in online cancer support groups. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[96]
Zheng Yao, Diyi Yang, John M Levine, Carissa A Low, Tenbroeck Smith, Haiyi Zhu, and Robert E Kraut. 2021. Join, Stay or Go? A Closer Look at Members' Life Cycles in Online Health Communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW (2021), 1--22.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Worker Handyman SolutionsInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology10.32628/CSEIT241025210:2(525-534)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Situating Empathy in HCI/CSCW: A Scoping ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870528:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)El costo de la independencia: Latino house-cleaners in Technology-Mediated Labour MarketsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869998:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Together But Alone: Atomization and Peer Support among Gig Workers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW2
    CSCW2
    October 2021
    5376 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3493286
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 October 2021
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. gig economy
    2. gig work
    3. online community
    4. peer support
    5. social support

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)900
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)137
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Worker Handyman SolutionsInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology10.32628/CSEIT241025210:2(525-534)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Situating Empathy in HCI/CSCW: A Scoping ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870528:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)El costo de la independencia: Latino house-cleaners in Technology-Mediated Labour MarketsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869998:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Integrating Equity in Public Sector Data-Driven Decision Making: Exploring the Desired Futures of Underserved StakeholdersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869058:CSCW2(1-39)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)A Culturally-Aware AI Tool for Crowdworkers: Leveraging Chronemics to Support Diverse Work StylesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36868998:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Advancing HCI and Design Methods to Empower Gig WorkersCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3665123(37-40)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)"My Sense of Morality Leads to My Suffering, Battling, and Arguing": The Role of Platform Designers in (Un)Deciding Gig Worker IssuesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660713(3501-3514)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)The Hidden Burden: Encountering and Managing (Unintended) Stigma in Children with Serious IllnessesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410218:CSCW1(1-35)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)"We are no Luddites!" - CSCW, Co-Determination and Digital Transformation in GermanyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374308:CSCW1(1-23)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Understanding the Technology-Mediated Home Phlebotomy Ecosystem in IndiaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374218:CSCW1(1-26)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media