Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3517579acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Seamless Visions, Seamful Realities: Anticipating Rural Infrastructural Fragility in Early Design of Digital Agriculture

Published: 29 April 2022 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Rural infrastructure is known to be more prone to breakdown than urban infrastructure. This paper explores how the fragility of rural infrastructure is reproduced through the process of engineering design. Building on values in design, we examine how eventual use is anticipated by engineering researchers building on emerging infrastructure for digital agriculture (DA). Our approach combines critically reflective technical systems-building with interviews with other practitioners to understand and address moments early in the design process where the eventual effects of DA systems may be being built-in. Our findings contrast researchers’ visions of seamless farming technologies with the seamful realities of their work to produce them. We trace how, when anticipating future use, the seams that researchers themselves experience disappear, other seams are hidden from view by institutional support, and seams end users may face are too distant to be in sight. We develop suggestions for the design of these technologies grounded in a more artful management of seamfulness and seamlessness during the process of design and development.

    Supplementary Material

    MP4 File (3491102.3517579-talk-video.mp4)
    Talk Video

    References

    [1]
    Vikram Adve. 2020. Center for Digital Agriculture at Illinois receives $20M to develop new AIFARMS institute. Retrieved December 01, 2021 from https://aces.illinois.edu/news/center-digital-agriculture-illinois-receives-20m-develop-new-aifarms-institute
    [2]
    Philip E. Agre. 1997. Computation and Human Experience. Cambridge University Press, USA.
    [3]
    Philip E. Agre. 1997. Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI. In Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 131–157.
    [4]
    Madeleine Akrich. 1992. The De-Scription of Technical Objects. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. In Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Wiebe Bijker and John Law (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 205–224.
    [5]
    Miguel Altieri, Clara Nicholls, and Rene Montalba. 2017. Technological Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture at a Crossroads: An Agroecological Perspective. Sustainability 9, 3 (2017), 349.
    [6]
    Danny Ardianto. 2014. Understanding Social Media-Enabled Participation and Resilience in Urban Farming Communities. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design(OzCHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2686612.2686627
    [7]
    Paramvir Bahl, Ranveer Chandra, Thomas Moscibroda, Rohan Murty, and Matt Welsh. 2009. White Space Networking with Wi-Fi like Connectivity. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 39, 4 (Aug. 2009), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/1594977.1592573
    [8]
    Hannah Barrett and David Christian Rose. 2020. Perceptions of the Fourth Agricultural Revolution: What’s In, What’s Out, and What Consequences are Anticipated?Sociologia Ruralis n/a, n/a (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12324 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/soru.12324
    [9]
    Frans Berkhout. 2006. Normative Expectations in Systems Innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, 3-4 (2006), 299–311.
    [10]
    Nicola J. Bidwell. 2009. Anchoring Design in Rural Customs of Doing and Saying. In Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part I(INTERACT ’09). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 686–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_75
    [11]
    Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. ’A Farmer, a Place and at Least 20 Members’: The Development of Artifact Ecologies in Volunteer-based Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820029
    [12]
    Rosemary Brandt. 2021. Researchers Develop Tools to Listen, Talk to Plants with $25M from NSF. Retrieved December 01, 2021 from https://news.arizona.edu/story/researchers-develop-tools-listen-talk-plants-25m-nsfs
    [13]
    Kelly Bronson. 2019. Looking through a Responsible Innovation Lens at Uneven Engagements with Digital Farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 90-91, December (2019), 1–6.
    [14]
    Nik Brown and Mike Michael. 2003. A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis & strategic management 15, 1 (2003), 3–18.
    [15]
    Jenna Burrell. 2018. Thinking Relationally about Digital Inequality in Rural Regions of the US. First Monday 23, 6 (2018).
    [16]
    Teresa Carlson. 2020. Mission: Technology-enabled, sustainable agriculture. Retrieved September 06, 2021 from https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/publicsector/mission-technology-enabled-sustainable-agriculture/
    [17]
    Michael Carolan. 2018. ‘Smart’ Farming Techniques as Political Ontology: Access, Sovereignty and the Performance of Neoliberal and Not-so-Neoliberal Worlds. Sociologia Ruralis 58, 4 (2018), 745–764.
    [18]
    Ranveer Chandra and Stewart Collis. 2021. Digital Agriculture for Small-Scale Producers: Challenges and Opportunities. Commun. ACM 64, 12 (Dec. 2021), 75–84.
    [19]
    EunJeong Cheon and Norman Makoto Su. 2018. Futuristic Autobiographies: Weaving Participant Narratives to Elicit Values around Robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction(HRI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171244
    [20]
    Arlene Kaplan Daniels. 1987. Invisible Work. Social Problems 34, 5 (Dec. 1987), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/800538
    [21]
    Carl DiSalvo and Tom Jenkins. 2017. Fruit Are Heavy: A Prototype Public IoT System to Support Urban Foraging. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064748
    [22]
    Carl DiSalvo, Jonathan Lukens, Thomas Lodato, Tom Jenkins, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making Public Things: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2397–2406. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557359
    [23]
    Marisa Elena Duarte, Morgan Vigil-Hayes, Ellen Zegura, Elizabeth Belding, Ivone Masara, and Jennifer Case Nevarez. 2021. As a Squash Plant Grows: Social Textures of Sparse Internet Connectivity in Rural and Tribal Communities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 3 (July 2021), 16:1–16:16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453862
    [24]
    Grace Dusseau. 2021. University of Virginia Biocomplexity Institute to Contribute High-Tech Expertise in National Research Institute Developing Artificial Intelligence for Agriculture. Retrieved December 01, 2021 from https://biocomplexity.virginia.edu/news/university-virginia-biocomplexity-institute-contribute-high-tech-expertise-national-research
    [25]
    Malcolm Eames, William Mcdowall, Mike Hodson, and Simon Marvin. 2006. Negotiating Contested Visions and Place-Specific Expectations of the Hydrogen Economy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, 3-4 (2006), 361–374.
    [26]
    Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2574–2585. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409
    [27]
    Mary Flanagan, Daniel C. Howe, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2005. Values at Play: Design Tradeoffs in Socially-Oriented Game Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055076
    [28]
    Center for Advanced Innovation in Agriculture. n.d. Welcome To CAIA. Retrieved December 01, 2021 from https://caia.cals.vt.edu
    [29]
    Nick Foster, Luke Compston, and Daniel Barkho. 2006. MAIL: A Framework for Critical Technical Practice. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments(Sydney, Australia) (OZCHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228175.1228212
    [30]
    Jessica Katherine Frawley and Laurel Evelyn Dyson. 2014. Animal Personas: Acknowledging Non-Human Stakeholders in Designing for Sustainable Food Systems. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design(OzCHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2686612.2686617
    [31]
    Joan H. Fujimura. 2003. Future Imaginaries: Genome Scientists as Socio-Cultural Entrepreneurs. Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two Culture Divide (2003), 176–199.
    [32]
    Elliott Grant. 2020. Mineral: Bringing the era of computational agriculture to life. Retrieved December 01, 2021 from https://blog.x.company/mineral-bringing-the-era-of-computational-agriculture-to-life-427bca6bd56a
    [33]
    Matthew J. Grassi. 2016. Opinion: Climate Corp. is the Jewel in Bayer’s Monsanto Deal Crown. Retrieved Dec 26, 2020 from https://www.precisionag.com/digital-farming/opinion-climate-corp-is-the-jewel-in-bayers-monsanto-deal-crown/
    [34]
    Leah Chan Grinvald and Ofer Tur-Sinai. 2019. Intellectual Property Law and the Right to Repair. Fordham Law Review 88(2019), 63.
    [35]
    Daniel A. Hanley, Claire Kelloway, and Vaheesan Sandeep. 2020. Fixing America: Breaking Manufacturers’ Aftermarket Monopoly and Restoring Consumers’ Right to Repair. Technical Report. Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, USA.
    [36]
    Jean Hardy. 2019. How the Design of Social Technology Fails Rural America. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion(DIS ’19 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3323906
    [37]
    Jean Hardy, Chanda Phelan, Morgan Vigil-Hayes, Norman Makoto Su, Susan Wyche, and Phoebe Sengers. 2019. Designing from the Rural. Interactions 26, 4 (June 2019), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328487
    [38]
    Jean Hardy, Susan Wyche, and Tiffany Veinot. 2019. Rural HCI Research: Definitions, Distinctions, Methods, and Opportunities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 196 (nov 2019), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359298
    [39]
    Shaddi Hasan, Mary Claire Barela, Matthew Johnson, Eric Brewer, and Kurtis Heimerl. 2019. Scaling Community Cellular Networks with CommunityCellularManager. In 16th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 19).
    [40]
    Masayuki Hatta. 2020. The Right to Repair, the Right to Tinker, and the Right to Innovate. Annals of Business Administrative Science 19 (08 2020). https://doi.org/10.7880/abas.0200604a
    [41]
    Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Rob Comber. 2018. Connected Seeds and Sensors: Co-Designing Internet of Things for Sustainable Smart Cities with Urban Food-Growing Communities. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2(PDC ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 18:1–18:5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210604.3210620
    [42]
    Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Rob Comber. 2019. The Right to the Sustainable Smart City. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 287, 287:1–287:13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300517
    [43]
    Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Janis Jefferies. 2013. Sustainable HCI for Grassroots Urban Food-Growing Communities. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration(OzCHI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541023
    [44]
    Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Janis Jefferies. 2014. The Talking Plants: An Interactive System for Grassroots Urban Food-Growing Communities. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 459–462. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2574792
    [45]
    Vaughan Higgins, Melanie Bryant, Andrea Howell, and Jane Battersby. 2017. Ordering Adoption: Materiality, Knowledge and Farmer Engagement with Precision Agriculture Technologies. Journal of Rural Studies 55 (Oct. 2017), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.011
    [46]
    Stephen Hilgartner. 2015. Capturing the Imaginary: Vanguards, Visions and the Synthetic Biology Revolution. In Science and Democracy, Clark Miller and Rob Hagendijk (Eds.). Routledge, 51–73.
    [47]
    Michael Hockenhull and Marisa Leavitt Cohn. 2021. Hot Air and Corporate Sociotechnical Imaginaries: Performing and Translating Digital Futures in the Danish Tech Scene. New Media & Society 23, 2 (Feb. 2021), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929319
    [48]
    Michael Hytha. 2021. ‘Biofacturing’ Firm Zymergen Raises $500 Million in Expanded IPO. Retrieved December 01, 2021 from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/-biofacturing-firm-zymergen-raises-500-million-in-expanded-ipo
    [49]
    GitHub Inc. n.d. GitHub: Where the world builds software. Retrieved September 09, 2021 from https://github.com/
    [50]
    Sarah Inman and David Ribes. 2019. ”Beautiful Seams”: Strategic Revelations and Concealments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14.
    [51]
    Esther Jang, Mary Claire Barela, Matt Johnson, Philip Martinez, Cedric Festin, Margaret Lynn, Josephine Dionisio, and Kurtis Heimerl. 2018. Crowdsourcing Rural Network Maintenance and Repair via Network Messaging. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 67, 67:1–67:12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173641
    [52]
    Esther Han Beol Jang, Philip Garrison, Ronel Vincent Vistal, Maria Theresa D. Cunanan, Maria Theresa Perez, Philip Martinez, Matthew William Johnson, John Andrew Evangelista, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Josephine Dionisio, Mary Claire Aguilar Barela, and Kurtis Heimerl. 2019. Trust and Technology Repair Infrastructures in the Remote Rural Philippines: Navigating Urban-Rural Seams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 99:1–99:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359201
    [53]
    Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47, 2 (June 2009), 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
    [54]
    Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. University of Chicago Press.
    [55]
    Isaac L. Johnson, Yilun Lin, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Andrew Hall, Aaron Halfaker, Johannes Schöning, and Brent Hecht. 2016. Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858123
    [56]
    Zoe Kahn and Jenna Burrell. 2021. A Sociocultural Explanation of Internet-Enabled Work in Rural Regions. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 3 (July 2021), 17:1–17:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3443705
    [57]
    Vera Khovanskaya, Maria Bezaitis, and Phoebe Sengers. 2016. The Case of the Strangerationist: Re-interpreting Critical Technical Practice. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901860
    [58]
    Ronald R Kline. 2000. Consumers in the Country: Technology and Social Change in Rural America. JHU Press.
    [59]
    Cory Knobel and Geoffrey C. Bowker. 2011. Values in Design. Commun. ACM 54, 7 (July 2011), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1965724.1965735
    [60]
    Kornelia Konrad. 2006. The Social Dynamics of Expectations: The Interaction of Collective and Actor-Specific Expectations on Electronic Commerce and Interactive Television. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, 3-4 (2006), 429–444.
    [61]
    Kornelia Konrad, Harro Van Lente, Christopher Groves, and Cynthia Selin. 2016. Performing and Governing the Future in Science and Technology. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr (Eds.). MIT Press, 465–493.
    [62]
    Frederic Lardinois. 2019. Microsoft Azure gets into ag tech with the preview of FarmBeats. Retrieved September 06, 2021 from https://techcrunch.com/2019/11/04/microsoft-azure-gets-into-agtech-with-the-preview-of-farmbeats/
    [63]
    Katharine Legun and Karly Burch. 2021. Robot-ready: How apple producers are assembling in anticipation of new AI robotics. Journal of Rural Studies 82 (2021), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.032
    [64]
    Kenneth Lipartito. 2003. Picturephone and the Information Age: The Social Meaning of Failure. Technology and Culture 44, 1 (2003), 50–81.
    [65]
    Jen Liu and Phoebe Sengers. 2021. Legibility and the Legacy of Racialized Dispossession in Digital Agriculture. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 480 (Oct 2021), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479867
    [66]
    Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2019. Symbiotic Encounters: HCI and Sustainable Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 317, 317:1–317:13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300547
    [67]
    Peter Lyle, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, and Marcus Foth. 2014. Designing for Grassroots Food Production: An Event-Based Urban Agriculture Community. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design(OzCHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 362–365. https://doi.org/10.1145/2686612.2686666
    [68]
    Peter Lyle, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, and Marcus Foth. 2015. Growing Food in the City: Design Ideations for Urban Residential Gardeners. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies(C&T ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768549
    [69]
    James M. McDonald and Robert A. Hoppe. 2017. Large Family Farms Continue To Dominate U.S. Agricultural Production. Amber Waves (March 2017).
    [70]
    Roberta M. Melvin and Andrea Bunt. 2012. Designed for Work, but Not from Here: Rural and Remote Perspectives on Networked Technology. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317984
    [71]
    Microsoft. 2021. Visual Studio 2019 version 16.11 Release Notes. Retrieved December 11, 2021 from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/releases/2019/release-notes
    [72]
    Carman Neustaedter and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Autobiographical Design in HCI Research: Designing and Learning through Use-It-Yourself. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318034
    [73]
    Helen Nissenbaum. 1998. The Cutting Edge: Values in the Design of Computer Systems. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 28, 1 (March 1998), 38–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/277351.277359
    [74]
    Helen Nissenbaum. 2001. How Computer Systems Embody Values. Computer 34, 3 (2001), 120–119.
    [75]
    Juliet Norton, Birgit Penzenstadler, and Bill Tomlinson. 2019. Implications of Grassroots Sustainable Agriculture Community Values on the Design of Information Systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 34:1–34:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359136
    [76]
    Juliet Norton, Ankita Raturi, Bonnie Nardi, Sebastian Prost, Samantha McDonald, Daniel Pargman, Oliver Bates, Maria Normark, Bill Tomlinson, Nico Herbig, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2017. A Grand Challenge for HCI: Food + Sustainability. Interactions 24, 6 (Oct. 2017), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137095
    [77]
    William Odom. 2010. ”Mate, We Don’t Need a Chip to Tell Us the Soil’s Dry”: Opportunities for Designing Interactive Systems to Support Urban Food Production. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858211
    [78]
    Samir Passi. 2021. Making Data Work. PhD Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
    [79]
    Raspberry Pi. 2021. Raspberry Pi 3 Model B. Retrieved December 10, 2021 from https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-3-model-b/
    [80]
    Raspberry Pi. 2021. Raspberry Pi 4 Model B. Retrieved December 10, 2021 from https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/
    [81]
    Barath Raghavan, Bonnie Nardi, Sarah T. Lovell, Juliet Norton, Bill Tomlinson, and Donald J. Patterson. 2016. Computational Agroecology: Sustainable Food Ecosystem Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892577
    [82]
    Krishna Ramanujan. 2021. $25M center will use digital tools to ‘communicate’ with plants. Retrieved December 01, 2021 from https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/09/25m-center-will-use-digital-tools-communicate-plants
    [83]
    Mollie Rappe. 2019. $10M Grant to NC State, USDA-ARS to Advance Cover Crops, Transform Agriculture. Retrieved December 01, 2021 from https://cals.ncsu.edu/news/10m-grant-to-nc-state-usda-ars-to-advance-cover-crops-transform-agriculture/
    [84]
    S. Roberts, P. Garnett, and R. Chandra. 2015. Connecting africa using the TV white spaces: from research to real world deployments. In The 21st IEEE International Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks. IEEE, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/LANMAN.2015.7114729
    [85]
    David Christian Rose and Jason Chilvers. 2018. Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2 (2018), 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087
    [86]
    Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (2008), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
    [87]
    Michael J Scroggins and Irene V Pasquetto. 2020. Labor out of Place: On the Varieties and Valences of (in) Visible Labor in Data-Intensive Science. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6 (2020), 111–132.
    [88]
    Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph ’Jofish’ Kaye. 2005. Reflective Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility(CC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, Aarhus, Denmark, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569
    [89]
    Katie Shilton. 2010. Technology Development with an Agenda: Interventions to Emphasize Values in Design. In Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem - Volume 47(ASIS&T ’10). American Society for Information Science, Silver Springs, MD, USA, Article 4, 4:1–4:10 pages.
    [90]
    Katie Shilton. 2018. Engaging Values despite Neutrality: Challenges and Approaches to Values Reflection during the Design of Internet Infrastructure. Science, Technology, & Human Values 43, 2 (2018), 247–269.
    [91]
    Katie Shilton, Jes A. Koepfler, and Kenneth R. Fleischmann. 2014. How to See Values in Social Computing: Methods for Studying Values Dimensions. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(CSCW ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531625
    [92]
    Ranjit Singh and Steven J. Jackson. 2017. From Margins to Seams: Imbrication, Inclusion, and Torque in the Aadhaar Identification Project. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4776–4824. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025910
    [93]
    Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. Steps toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information systems research 7, 1 (1996), 111–134.
    [94]
    Susan Leigh Star and Anselm Strauss. 1999. Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8, 1 (March 1999), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359
    [95]
    Stephanie B. Steinhardt and Steven J. Jackson. 2015. Anticipation Work: Cultivating Vision in Collective Practice. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675298
    [96]
    Rosemary Steup, Lynn Dombrowski, and Norman Makoto Su. 2019. Feeding the World with Data: Visions of Data-Driven Farming. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1503–1515. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322382
    [97]
    Rosemary Steup, Arvind Santhanam, Marisa Logan, Lynn Dombrowski, and Norman Makoto Su. 2018. Growing Tiny Publics: Small Farmers’ Social Movement Strategies. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 165 (Nov. 2018), 165:1–165:24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274434
    [98]
    Norman Makoto Su, Jean Hardy, Morgan Vigil-Hayes, Tiffany Veinot, and Rob Comber. 2021. Introduction: Performing Rurality with Computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 3 (July 2021), 16e:1–16e:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461832
    [99]
    Sharifa Sultana, François Guimbretière, Phoebe Sengers, and Nicola Dell. 2018. Design Within a Patriarchal Society: Opportunities and Challenges in Designing for Rural Women in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13.
    [100]
    Mohit Taneja, Nikita Jalodia, John Byabazaire, Alan Davy, and Cristian Olariu. 2019. SmartHerd management: A microservices-based fog computing–assisted IoT platform towards data-driven smart dairy farming. Software: Practice and Experience 49, 7 (2019), 1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2704 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/spe.2704
    [101]
    Deepak Vasisht, Zerina Kapetanovic, Jongho Won, Xinxin Jin, Ranveer Chandra, Sudipta Sinha, Ashish Kapoor, Madhusudhan Sudarshan, and Sean Stratman. 2017. FarmBeats: An IoT Platform for Data-Driven Agriculture. In 14th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 17). USENIX Association, Boston, MA, 515–529. https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi17/technical-sessions/presentation/vasisht
    [102]
    Janet Vertesi. 2014. Seamful Spaces: Heterogeneous Infrastructures in Interaction. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39, 2 (March 2014), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913516012
    [103]
    Morgan Vigil, Matthew Rantanen, and Elizabeth Belding. 2015. A First Look at Tribal Web Traffic. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web(WWW ’15). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 1155–1165. https://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741645
    [104]
    Eric Von Hippel. 1986. Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management science 32, 7 (1986), 791–805.
    [105]
    Kit Walsh. 2017. Supreme Court Victory for the Right to Tinker in Printer Cartridge Case. Retrieved September 07, 2021 from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/05/supreme-court-victory-right-tinker-printer-cartridge-case
    [106]
    Xiaowei Wang. 2020. Blockchain Chicken Farm: And Other Stories of Tech in China’s Countryside. FSG Originals.
    [107]
    Laura Watts. 2018. Energy at the End of the World: An Orkney Islands Saga. MIT Press.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AIProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373968:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Seam Work and Simulacra of Societal Impact in Networking Research: A Critical Technical Practice ApproachProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642337(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Migrant Farmworkers' Experiences of Agricultural Technologies: Implications for Worker Sociality and Desired ChangeProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642263(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Seamless Visions, Seamful Realities: Anticipating Rural Infrastructural Fragility in Early Design of Digital Agriculture

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2022
        10459 pages
        ISBN:9781450391573
        DOI:10.1145/3491102
        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 29 April 2022

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. computer networking
        2. critical technical practice
        3. digital agriculture
        4. infrastructure
        5. seamlessness
        6. values in design

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        CHI '22
        Sponsor:
        CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 29 - May 5, 2022
        LA, New Orleans, USA

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)627
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)100
        Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AIProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373968:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Seam Work and Simulacra of Societal Impact in Networking Research: A Critical Technical Practice ApproachProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642337(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Migrant Farmworkers' Experiences of Agricultural Technologies: Implications for Worker Sociality and Desired ChangeProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642263(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Exploring inclusion in UK agricultural robotics development: who, how, and why?Agriculture and Human Values10.1007/s10460-024-10555-6Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
        • (2023)Real-Time Monitoring of Animals and Environment in Broiler Precision Farming—How Robust Is the Data Quality?Sustainability10.3390/su15211552715:21(15527)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
        • (2023)Pluralising critical technical practiceConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10.1177/1354856523119210530:1(7-28)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2023
        • (2023)A Practice-Based Approach to Post-Human Computer Interaction: Design Notes from Nature ScenesProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3572802(1-14)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
        • (2022)Situating Network Infrastructure with People, Practices, and Beyond: A Community Building WorkshopCompanion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3500868.3560716(267-272)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2022

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media