Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3544548.3581049acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Keep it Real: Investigating Driver-Cyclist Interaction in Real-World Traffic

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Cyclists encounter drivers in many traffic scenarios; good communication is key to avoiding collisions. Little is known about everyday driver-cyclist interaction and communication. This is important in designing Automated Vehicles (AVs) that must drive safely around cyclists. We explored driver-cyclist interaction across diverse scenarios through in-the-wild observations (N = 414) and a naturalistic study involving cyclists wearing eye-trackers (N = 12). Results showed cyclists attended to road markings and traffic signs in controlled traffic scenarios but to vehicle sides and windows in uncontrolled encounters. Interactions were unlikely at controlled intersections, but various techniques were used to negotiate right-of-way in uncontrolled scenarios, e.g. cyclists used arm gestures and shoulder checks to communicate their intent and awareness when lane merging. Drivers communicated these through on-vehicle signals and head movements at roundabouts. We discuss the implications of driver-cyclist interaction behaviour on AV interaction design and offer insights into system requirements to support cyclists riding in traffic.

    Supplementary Material

    Supplemental Materials (3544548.3581049-supplemental-materials.zip)
    MP4 File (3544548.3581049-video-preview.mp4)
    Video Preview
    MP4 File (3544548.3581049-talk-video.mp4)
    Pre-recorded Video Presentation

    References

    [1]
    2020. Reported road casualties in Great Britain: pedal cycle factsheet, 2020 - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-pedal-cyclist-factsheet-2020/reported-road-casualties-in-great-britain-pedal-cycle-factsheet-2020
    [2]
    2022. Speed limits - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/speed-limits
    [3]
    Ammar Al-Taie, Frank Pollick, and Stephen Brewster. 2022. Tour de Interaction: Understanding Cyclist-Driver Interaction with Self-Reported Cyclist Behaviour. In 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    [4]
    James Anderson, Nidhi Kalra, Karlyn Stanley, Paul Sorensen, Constantine Samaras, and Oluwatobi Oluwatola. 2016. Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR443-2
    [5]
    Shunsuke Aoki and Ragunathan Rajkumar. 2018. Dynamic Intersections and Self-Driving Vehicles. Proceedings - 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, ICCPS 2018 (8 2018), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPS.2018.00038
    [6]
    Siri Hegna Berge, Marjan Hagenzieker, Haneen Farah, and Joost de Winter. 2022. Do cyclists need HMIs in future automated traffic? An interview study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 84 (1 2022), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.013
    [7]
    Bryan Botello, Ralph Buehler, Steve Hankey, Andrew Mondschein, and Zhiqiu Jiang. 2019. Planning for walking and cycling in an autonomous-vehicle future. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 1 (6 2019), 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIP.2019.100012
    [8]
    Debargha Dey, Azra Habibovic, Andreas Löcken, Philipp Wintersberger, Bastian Pfleging, Andreas Riener, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles’ external human-machine interfaces. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 7 (9 2020), 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIP.2020.100174
    [9]
    Debargha Dey and Jacques Terken. 2017. Pedestrian interaction with vehicles: Roles of explicit and implicit communication. AutomotiveUI 2017 - 9th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Proceedings (9 2017), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123009
    [10]
    Debargha Dey, Arjen van Vastenhoven, Raymond H. Cuijpers, Marieke Martens, and Bastian Pfleging. 2021. Towards Scalable eHMIs: Designing for AV-VRU Communication Beyond One Pedestrian. In 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409118.3475129
    [11]
    Debargha Dey, Francesco Walker, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2019. Gaze patterns in pedestrian interaction with vehicles: Towards effective design of external human-machine interfaces for automated vehicles. Proceedings - 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2019 (9 2019), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344523
    [12]
    Marjan P Hagenzieker, Sander Van Der Kint, Luuk Vissers, Ingrid N L G Van Schagen, Jonathan De Bruin, Paul Van Gent, Jacques J F Commandeur, Ã Marjan, and P Hagenzieker. 2019. Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: Results of a photo experiment Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: Results of a photo experiment. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security 12, 1 (2019), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2019.1591556
    [13]
    Siri Hegna Berge, Joost de Winter, and Marjan P Hagenzieker. 2022. Support systems for cyclists in automated traffic: A review and future outlook. (2022). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29549.05606
    [14]
    Kai Holländer, Mark Colley, Enrico Rukzio, and Andreas Butz. 2021. A Taxonomy of Vulnerable Road Users for HCI Based On A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445480
    [15]
    Ming Hou, Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, Ehud Sharlin, and Lora Oehlberg. 2020. Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and Promise. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376884
    [16]
    Nóra Krizsik and Tibor Sipos. 2022. Social Perception of Autonomous Vehicles. SSRN Electronic Journal(2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4060916
    [17]
    Yee Mun Lee, Ruth Madigan, Oscar Giles, Laura Garach-Morcillo, Gustav Markkula, Charles Fox, Fanta Camara, Markus Rothmueller, · Signe, Alexandra Vendelbo-Larsen, · Pernille, Holm Rasmussen, Andre Dietrich, Dimitris Nathanael, Villy Portouli, Anna Schieben, and Natasha Merat. 2021. Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: implications for automated vehicles. Cognition, Technology & Work 23 (2021), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00635-y
    [18]
    Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, and Ehud Sharlin. 2018. Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174003
    [19]
    Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, and Ehud Sharlin. 2018. Communicating awareness and intent in autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 2018-April. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174003
    [20]
    G Markkula, R Madigan, D Nathanael, E Portouli, Y M Lee, A Dietrich, J Billington, A Schieben, and N Merat. 2020. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science Defining interactions: a conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1736686
    [21]
    Milecia Matthews, Girish V Chowdhary, and Emily Kieson. 2017. Intent Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians. (8 2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07123
    [22]
    Andrii Matviienko, Florian Müller, Dominik Schön, Paul Seesemann, Sebastian Günther, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. BikeAR: Understanding Cyclists’ Crossing Decision-Making at Uncontrolled Intersections using Augmented Reality. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517560
    [23]
    Hannah R M Pelikan. 2021. Why Autonomous Driving Is So Hard: The Social Dimension of Traffic; Why Autonomous Driving Is So Hard: The Social Dimension of Traffic. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447133
    [24]
    Petr Pokorny and Kelly Pitera. 2019. Observations of truck-bicycle encounters: A case study of conflicts and behaviour in Trondheim, Norway. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 60 (1 2019), 700–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.018
    [25]
    Petr Pokorny, Belma Skender, Torkel Bjørnskau, and Marjan P. Hagenzieker. 2021. Video observation of encounters between the automated shuttles and other traffic participants along an approach to right-hand priority T-intersection. European Transport Research Review 13, 1 (12 2021), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00518-x
    [26]
    Amir Rasouli and John K. Tsotsos. 2020. Autonomous vehicles that interact with pedestrians: A survey of theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 3 (3 2020), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2901817
    [27]
    Megan S. Ryerson, Carrie S. Long, Michael Fichman, Joshua H. Davidson, Kristen N. Scudder, Michelle Kim, Radhika Katti, George Poon, and Matthew D. Harris. 2021. Evaluating cyclist biometrics to develop urban transportation safety metrics. Accident Analysis & Prevention 159 (9 2021), 106287. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2021.106287
    [28]
    Katayoun Salamati, Bastian J. Schroeder, Duane R. Geruschat, and Nagui M. Rouphail. 2013. Event-Based Modeling of Driver Yielding Behavior to Pedestrians at Two-Lane Roundabout Approaches. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2389, 1 (1 2013), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3141/2389-01
    [29]
    Mathias Trefzger, Tanja Blascheck, Michael Raschke, Sarah Hausmann, and Thomas Schlegel. 2018. A visual comparison of gaze behavior from pedestrians and cyclists. Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium (ETRA) (6 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204553
    [30]
    Mathias Trefzger, Waldemar Titov, Karol Sgodzaj, and Thomas Schlegel. 2020. Analysis and Comparison of the Gaze Behavior of E-Scooter Drivers and Cyclists Depending on Road Surface Quality in a Real Test Environment. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Proceedings - Series of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI) P-307 (2020), 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.18420/INF2020_108
    [31]
    J. Uttley, Y.M. Lee, R. Madigan, and N. Merat. 2020. Road user interactions in a shared space setting: Priority and communication in a UK car park. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 72 (7 2020), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.004
    [32]
    Tamara Von Sawitzky, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Löcken, Anna-Katharina Frison, and Andreas Riener. 2020. Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383022

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Grand challenges in CyclingHCIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661550(2577-2590)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Cycling with Robots: How Long-Term Interaction Experience with Automated Shuttle Buses Shapes Cyclist AttitudesCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640594(1043-1047)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Pimp My Ride: Designing Versatile eHMIs for CyclistsProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3580585.3607161(213-223)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Keep it Real: Investigating Driver-Cyclist Interaction in Real-World Traffic

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2023
      14911 pages
      ISBN:9781450394215
      DOI:10.1145/3544548
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 April 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Badges

      • Honorable Mention

      Author Tags

      1. Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction
      2. Cyclists
      3. Eye-Tracking
      4. Field Study
      5. Naturalistic Study
      6. Observations
      7. Vulnerable Road Users

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE)
      • University of Glasgow Excellence Bursary Award

      Conference

      CHI '23
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI PLAY '24
      The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 14 - 17, 2024
      Tampere , Finland

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)470
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)45

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Grand challenges in CyclingHCIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661550(2577-2590)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Cycling with Robots: How Long-Term Interaction Experience with Automated Shuttle Buses Shapes Cyclist AttitudesCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640594(1043-1047)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2023)Pimp My Ride: Designing Versatile eHMIs for CyclistsProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3580585.3607161(213-223)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
      • (2023)Cycling Simulation in Virtual Reality for Autonomous Vehicle Traffic Scenarios2023 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI)10.1109/SOLI60636.2023.10425141(1-6)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2023

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media