research-article

Open access

How to Display Vehicle Information to Users of Automated Vehicles When Conducting Non-Driving-Related Activities

Authors:

Aditya Dandekar,

Lesley-Ann Mathis,

Melanie Berger,

Bastian PflegingAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 6, Issue MHCI

Article No.: 206, Pages 1 - 22

https://doi.org/10.1145/3546741

Published: 20 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Automated vehicles (AVs) are expected to enable users to engage in non-driving-related activities (NDRAs). However, users do not easily trust an automated vehicle which poses new challenges for automotive human-machine interfaces (HMIs). Over-presenting vehicle information can distract users from NDRAs, and under-presentation can impact trust and user experience (UX) negatively. To investigate how to best present vehicle information to foster users' trust and UX while performing NDRAs, we designed two in-vehicle HMI concepts: 1) A colored and animated light bar display around the windshield and 2) a windshield display interface presenting pictograms and numbers. Results from a simulator study ($N=18$) indicate that both concepts contribute to a high trust level and UX while not affecting the NDRA performance compared to the baseline of not showing vehicle information. In addition, the light bar provides better UX than the windshield display and is also preferred by users. With our findings, we contribute to the effective design of presenting vehicle information in automated vehicles.

References

[1]

Matthias Beggiato, Franziska Hartwich, Katja Schleinitz, Josef Krems, Ina Othersen, and Ina Petermann-Stock. 2015. What would drivers like to know during automated driving? Information needs at different levels of automation. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2462.6007

[2]

Nora Broy, Mengbing Guo, Stefan Schneegass, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2015. Introducing Novel Technologies in the Car: Conducting a Real-World Study to Test 3D Dashboards. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 179--186. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799280

Digital Library

[3]

Heiner Bubb. 2003. Fahrerassistenz - primaer ein Beitrag zum Komfort oder fuer die Sicherheit?. In In Proc. Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert '03, Vol. 1768. VDI-Verlag, Duesseldorf, Germany, 25--44.

[4]

J K Caird, W J Horrey, and C J Edwards. 2001. Effects of Conformal and Nonconformal Vision Enhancement Systems on Older-Driver Performance. Transportation Research Record 1759, 1 (2001), 38--45. https://doi.org/10.3141/1759-05

[5]

Oliver Carsten and Marieke H Martens. 2019. How can humans understand their automated cars? HMI principles, problems and solutions. Cognition, Technology & Work 21, 1 (2019), 3--20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0484-0

Digital Library

[6]

Mark Colley, Svenja Krauss, Mirjam Lanzer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2021. How Should Automated Vehicles Communicate Critical Situations? A Comparative Analysis of Visualization Concepts. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 5, 3, Article 94 (sep 2021), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478111

Digital Library

[7]

Commission of the European Communities. 2007. Commission Recommendation of 22 December 2006 on Safe and Efficient In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems: Update of the European Statement of Principles on Human Machine Interface. Commission of the European Communities. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv: OJ.L_.2007.032.01.0200.01.ENG

[8]

Aditya Dandekar, Lesley-Ann Mathis, and Bastian Pfleging. 2021. A Platform for Rapid Prototyping and Evaluation of Concepts for Interactive In-Vehicle Displays for Automated Vehicles. In Mensch und Computer 2021 - Workshopband, Carolin Wienrich, Philipp Wintersberger, and Benjamin Weyers (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn. https: //doi.org/10.18420/muc2021-mci-ws10--428

[9]

Henrik Detjen, Bastian Pfleging, and Stefan Schneegass. 2020. A Wizard of Oz Field Study to Understand Non-DrivingRelated Activities, Trust, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicles. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410662

Digital Library

[10]

Debargha Dey, Azra Habibovic, Bastian Pfleging, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band EHMI in Interactions Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376325

Digital Library

[11]

Cyriel Diels and Jelte E. Bos. 2015. User Interface Considerations to Prevent Self-Driving Carsickness. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 14--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809754

Digital Library

[12]

Cyriel Diels and Jelte E Bos. 2016. Self-driving carsickness. Applied Ergonomics 53 (2016), 374--382. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.apergo.2015.09.009

[13]

Cyriel Diels and Simon Thompson. 2018. Information Expectations in Highly and Fully Automated Vehicles. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, Neville A Stanton (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 742--748. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--60441--1_71

[14]

Fredrick Ekman, Mikael Johansson, and Jana Sochor. 2018. Creating Appropriate Trust in Automated Vehicle Systems: A Framework for HMI Design. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 48, 1 (2018), 95--101. https://doi.org/10. 1109/THMS.2017.2776209

[15]

Charlotte Eost and Margaret Galer Flyte. 1998. An investigation into the use of the car as a mobile office. Applied Ergonomics 29, 5 (1998), 383--388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003--6870(98)00075--1

[16]

Manfred Fahle and Christian Wehrhahn. 1991. Motion perception in the peripheral visual field. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 229, 5 (1991), 430--436. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166305

[17]

Alexander Feierle, Simon Danner, Sarah Steininger, and Klaus Bengler. 2020. Information Needs and Visual Attention during Urban, Highly Automated Driving-An Investigation of Potential Influencing Factors. Information 11, 2 (2020), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020062

[18]

Alexander Feierle, Fabian Schlichtherle, and Klaus Bengler. 2022. Augmented Reality Head-Up Display: A Visual Support During Malfunctions in Partially Automated Driving? Trans. Intell. Transport. Sys. 23, 5 (may 2022), 4853--4865. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3119774

Digital Library

[19]

Yannick Forster, Frederik Naujoks, and Alexandra Neukum. 2017. Increasing Anthropomorphism and Trust in Automated Driving Functions by Adding Speech Output. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE Press,Los Angeles, CA, USA, 365--372. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995746

Digital Library

[20]

Thomas Franke, Christiane Attig, and Daniel Wessel. 2017. Assessing Affinity for Technology Interaction -- The Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale. Scale Description -- English and German Scale Version. https: //doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28679.50081

[21]

Chris Harrison, John Horstman, Gary Hsieh, and Scott Hudson. 2012. Unlocking the Expressivity of Point Lights. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1683--1692. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208296

Digital Library

[22]

Marc Hassenzahl, Franz Koller, and Michael Burmester. 2008. On the trail of user experience (UX): on the use of www. attrakdiff. de. In Tagungsband UP08. Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart, 78--82. https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/5708

[23]

Renate Häuslschmid, Max von Bülow, Bastian Pfleging, and Andreas Butz. 2017. Supporting Trust in Autonomous Driving. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Limassol, Cyprus) (IUI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 319--329. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025198

Digital Library

[24]

Tobias Hecht, Emilia Darlagiannis, and Klaus Bengler. 2020. Non-driving Related Activities in Automated Driving -- An Online Survey Investigating User Needs. In Human Systems Engineering and Design II, Tareq Ahram, Waldemar Karwowski, Stefan Pickl, and Redha Taiar (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 182--188. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978--3-030--27928--8_28

[25]

Tobias Hecht, Anna Feldhütter, Kathrin Draeger, and Klaus Bengler. 2020. What Do You Do? An Analysis of Nondriving Related Activities During a 60 Minutes Conditionally Automated Highway Drive. In Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies, Tareq Ahram, Redha Taiar, Serge Colson, and Arnaud Choplin (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 28--34.

[26]

Tobias Hecht, Stefan Kratzert, and Klaus Bengler. 2020. The Effects of a Predictive HMI and Different Transition Frequencies on Acceptance, Workload, Usability, and Gaze Behavior during Urban Automated Driving. Information 11, 2 (2020), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020073

[27]

César A Hidalgo, Diana Orghiain, Jordi Albo Canals, Filipa De Almeida, and Natalia Martin. 2021. How humans judge machines. MIT Press, London, UK.

[28]

William J Horrey and Christopher D Wickens. 2004. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Human factors 46, 4 (2004), 611--624. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.4.611.56805

[29]

Renate Häuslschmid, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2016. A Design Space to Support the Development of Windshield Applications for the Car. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5076--5091. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858336

Digital Library

[30]

C Jarrold and J N Towse. 2006. Individual differences in working memory. Neuroscience 139, 1 (2006), 39--50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.002

[31]

Mishel Johns, Brian Mok, David Sirkin, Nikhil Gowda, Catherine Smith, Walter Talamonti, and Wendy Ju. 2016. Exploring shared control in automated driving. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE Press, Christchurch, New Zealand, 91--98. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451738

[32]

J Peter Kincaid, Robert P Fishburne Jr, Richard L Rogers, and Brad S Chissom. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Technical Report. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA006655

[33]

M. König and L. Neumayr. 2017. Users' resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 44 (2017), 42--52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10. 013

[34]

Moritz Körber. 2019. Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, and Yushi Fujita (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13--30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--96074--6_2

[35]

Ouren X Kuiper, Jelte E Bos, and Cyriel Diels. 2018. Looking forward: In-vehicle auxiliary display positioning affects carsickness. Applied Ergonomics 68 (2018), 169--175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.002

[36]

Andrew L Kun. 2018. Human-Machine Interaction for Vehicles: Review and Outlook. Foundations and Trends® in Human--Computer Interaction 11, 4 (2018), 201--293. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000069

Digital Library

[37]

Andrew L. Kun, Susanne Boll, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Shifting Gears: User Interfaces in the Age of Autonomous Driving. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 1 (2016), 32--38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2016.14

Digital Library

[38]

Andreas Löcken, Anna-Katharina Frison, Vanessa Fahn, Dominik Kreppold, Maximilian Götz, and Andreas Riener. 2020. Increasing User Experience and Trust in Automated Vehicles via an Ambient Light Display. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Oldenburg, Germany) (MobileHCI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379503. 3403567

Digital Library

[39]

Andreas Löcken, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. AutoAmbiCar: Using Ambient Light to Inform Drivers About Intentions of Their Automated Cars. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (AutomotiveUI '16 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57--62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3004323.3004329

Digital Library

[40]

Lester C Loschky, Antje Nuthmann, Francesca C Fortenbaugh, and Dennis M Levi. 2017. Scene perception from central to peripheral vision. Journal of Vision 17, 1 (2017), 6. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.1.6

[41]

Andreas Löcken, Philipp Wintersberger, Anna-Katharina Frison, and Andreas Riener. 2019. Investigating User Requirements for Communication Between Automated Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, Paris, France, 879--884. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2019.8814027

Digital Library

[42]

Stefanie M. Faas, Johannes Kraus, Alexander Schoenhals, and Martin Baumann. 2021. Calibrating Pedestrians' Trust in Automated Vehicles: Does an Intent Display in an External HMI Support Trust Calibration and Safe Crossing Behavior?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 157, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764. 3445738

Digital Library

[43]

Frederik Naujoks, Yannick Forster, Katharina Wiedemann, and Alexandra Neukum. 2017. Improving Usefulness of Automated Driving by Lowering Primary Task Interference through HMI Design. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2017 (2017), 6105087. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6105087

[44]

NHTSA. 2013. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/ Automated_Vehicles_Policy.pdf

[45]

Luis Oliveira, Jacob Luton, Sumeet Iyer, Chris Burns, Alexandros Mouzakitis, Paul Jennings, and Stewart Birrell. 2018. Evaluating How Interfaces Influence the User Interaction with Fully Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 320--331. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239065

Digital Library

[46]

Raja Parasuraman and Christopher D Wickens. 2008. Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation. Human Factors 50, 3 (2008), 511--520. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X312198

[47]

Bastian Pfleging. 2017. Automotive User Interfaces for the Support of Non-Driving-Related Activities. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-9090

[48]

Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating User Needs for Non-Driving-Related Activities during Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (2016-01-01) (MUM '16). Association for Computing Machinery, Rovaniemi, Finland, 91--99. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3012709.3012735

Digital Library

[49]

Bastian Pfleging and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. (Non-) Driving-Related Activities in the Car: Defining Driver Activities for Manual and Automated Driving. https://www.bastian-pfleging.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2015-chi15-wsnondriving-activities.pdf

[50]

M. Pfromm, S. Cieler, and R. Bruder. 2013. Driver assistance via optical information with spatial reference. In 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013). IEEE, The Hague, Netherlands, 2006-- 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728524

[51]

Samantha Reig, Selena Norman, Cecilia G. Morales, Samadrita Das, Aaron Steinfeld, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2018. A Field Study of Pedestrians and Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 198--209. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239064

Digital Library

[52]

Andreas Riegler, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2018. Investigating User Preferences for Windshield Displays in Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Munich, Germany) (PerDis '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205885

Digital Library

[53]

Ruth Rosenholtz. 2016. Capabilities and Limitations of Peripheral Vision. Annual review of vision science 2 (oct 2016), 437--457. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035733

[54]

SAE International. 2018. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles J3016. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/

[55]

Clemens Schartmüller, Klemens Weigl, Andreas Löcken, Philipp Wintersberger, Marco Steinhauser, and Andreas Riener. 2021. Displays for Productive Non-Driving Related Tasks: Visual Behavior and Its Impact in Conditionally Automated Driving. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 5 (4 2021), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5040021

[56]

Tobias Schneider, Sabiha Ghellal, Steve Love, and Ansgar R.S. Gerlicher. 2021. Increasing the User Experience in Autonomous Driving through Different Feedback Modalities. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (College Station, TX, USA) (IUI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7--10.https://doi.org/10.1145/3397481.3450687

Digital Library

[57]

Tobias Schneider, Sabiha Ghellal, Steve Love, and Ansgar R.S. Gerlicher. 2021. Increasing the User Experience in Autonomous Driving through Different Feedback Modalities. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (College Station, TX, USA) (IUI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397481.3450687

Digital Library

[58]

Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle. 2015. Motion sickness in self-driving vehicles. Technical Report. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/ 111747/103189.pdf

[59]

S. Stumpf, A. Peters, S. Bardzell, M. Burnett, D. Busse, J. Cauchard, and E. Churchill. 2020. Gender-Inclusive HCI Research and Design: A Conceptual Review. Foundations and Trends in Human?Computer Interaction 13, 1 (March 2020), 1--69. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 The final publication is available from now publishers via http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056.

Digital Library

[60]

Pinyan Tang, Xu Sun, and Shi Cao. 2020. Investigating user activities and the corresponding requirements for information and functions in autonomous vehicles of the future. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 80 (2020), 103044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103044

[61]

Bernhard Wandtner, Nadja Schömig, and Gerald Schmidt. 2018. Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving. Human Factors 60, 6 (2018), 870--881. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0018720818768199

[62]

Lisa F Weinstein and Christopher D Wickens. 1992. Use of Nontraditional Flight Displays for the Reduction of Central Visual Overload in the Cockpit. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 2, 2 (apr 1992), 121--142. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0202_4

[63]

Christopher D Wickens. 2002. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3, 2 (2002), 159--177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806

[64]

Christopher D Wickens, Justin G Hollands, Simon Banbury, and Raja Parasuraman. 2015. Engineering psychology and human performance. Routledge, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315665177

[65]

Ingo Wolf. 2015. Wechselwirkung Mensch und autonomer Agent. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 103--125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--662--45854--9_6

[66]

Sol Hee Yoon and Yong Gu Ji. 2019. Non-driving-related tasks, workload, and takeover performance in highly automated driving contexts. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 60 (2019), 620--631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.015

Cited By

Demir CMeschtscherjakov AGärtner M(2024)Unlocking Trust and Acceptance in Tomorrow’s Ride: How In-Vehicle Intelligent Agents Redefine SAE Level 5 AutonomyMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti81201118:12(111)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8120111
Atakishiyev SSalameh MGoebel R(2024)Incorporating Explanations into Human-Machine Interfaces for Trust and Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)10.1109/IV55156.2024.10588812(2948-2955)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/IV55156.2024.10588812
Dandekar ARishaan RRead OCain ESevenster APuente Guillen PSkrypchuk L(2023)How In-Vehicle Message Location can Impact Driver’s Attention ManagementAdjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3581961.3609866(115-120)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3581961.3609866
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

How to Display Vehicle Information to Users of Automated Vehicles When Conducting Non-Driving-Related Activities
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
  2. Visualization
    1. Empirical studies in visualization

Recommendations

Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving
MUM '16: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia

In this paper, we investigate which non-driving-related activities drivers want to perform while driving highly or fully automated. Beyond the available advanced driving assistance functions, we expect that highly automated driving will soon be ...
A Wizard of Oz Field Study to Understand Non-Driving-Related Activities, Trust, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicles
AutomotiveUI '20: 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

Understanding user needs and behavior in automated vehicles (AVs) while traveling is essential for future in-vehicle interface and service design. Since AVs are not yet market-ready, current knowledge about AV use and perception is based on ...
Automated Driving System, Male, or Female Driver: Who'd You Prefer? Comparative Analysis of Passengers' Mental Conditions, Emotional States & Qualitative Feedback
Automotive'UI 16: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

It is expected that automated vehicles (AVs) will only be used when customers believe them to be safe, trustworthy, and match their personal driving style. As AVs are not very common today, most previous studies on trust, user experience, or acceptance ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 6, Issue MHCI

MHCI

September 2022

852 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3564624

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 September 2022

Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue MHCI

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
777
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)255
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28

Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Demir CMeschtscherjakov AGärtner M(2024)Unlocking Trust and Acceptance in Tomorrow’s Ride: How In-Vehicle Intelligent Agents Redefine SAE Level 5 AutonomyMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti81201118:12(111)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8120111
Atakishiyev SSalameh MGoebel R(2024)Incorporating Explanations into Human-Machine Interfaces for Trust and Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)10.1109/IV55156.2024.10588812(2948-2955)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/IV55156.2024.10588812
Dandekar ARishaan RRead OCain ESevenster APuente Guillen PSkrypchuk L(2023)How In-Vehicle Message Location can Impact Driver’s Attention ManagementAdjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3581961.3609866(115-120)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3581961.3609866
Schneider THois JRosenstein AMetzl SGerlicher AGhellal SLove S(2023)Don’t fail me! The Level 5 Autonomous Driving Information Dilemma regarding Transparency and User ExperienceProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581641.3584085(540-552)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3581641.3584085

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents