Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3548658acmotherbooksBook PagePublication Pageseducational-resourcesacm-pubtype
Usability Testing Plan Template: A flexible tool for planning and teaching usability evaluationMarch 2023
  • Author:
  • Emma Rose
Publisher:
  • Association for Computing Machinery
  • New York
  • NY
  • United States
ISBN:978-1-4503-9451-2
Published:06 March 2023
Pages:
3
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

Usability testing is a key research method in human-computer interaction (HCD. When students are designing for others, usability testing is an opportunity to learn how the design is currently working and how it can be improved. This usability testing plan template gives individual students or teams a structure to help plan, conduct, and analyze data from a study. The template walks students through the process of planning a study through a series of questions and planning materials. The template is especially helpful for students new to usability testing and can be adapted and adjusted as needed.

Educational-resources Downloads

ZIP
ecse-2021-0011-File002.zip

This zip contains the supplemental materials for this article.

References

  1. Carol M Barnum. 2011. Usability testing essentials: ready, set - test. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Joseph Bartolotta. 2019. Usability testing for oppression. Communication Design Quarterly 1, 3: 16-29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In B. Jordan, B. Thomas, Weerdmeester, and McClelland, eds., Usability evaluation in industry.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Joseph S Dumas and Janice C Redish. 1999. A practical guide to usability testing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kat Holmes. 2019. Mismatch. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lauren Isaacson. 2019. Inclusive Research. Push UX. Retrieved from https://noti.st/curioresearch/videos/ucoOHI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. George D. Kuh. 2008. High-Impact Educational PracticesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kara Pernice and Jakob Nielsen. 2001. Usability Guidelines for Accessible Web Design. 1 150. Retrieved from www.nngroup.com/reports/usability-guidelines-accessible-web-design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Maria Rosala. 2019. Ethical Maturity in User Research. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/user-research-ethics/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeffrey Rubin and Dana Chisnell. 2011. Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S Wachter-Boettcher. 2017. Technically Wrong: Sexist Apps, Biased Algorithms, and Other Threats of Toxic Tech. W.W. Norton.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) at US Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. UXPA Code of Professional Conduct. UXPA International. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from https://uxpa.org/uxpa-code-of-professional-conduct/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 2018. ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. ACM. Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Contributors
  • University of Washington, Tacoma
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations