research-article

Open access

Your Text Is Hard to Read: Facilitating Readability Awareness to Support Writing Proficiency in Text Production

Authors:

Sebastian S. Feger,

Albrecht Schmidt,

Paweł W. WoźniakAuthors Info & Claims

DIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Pages 147 - 160

https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596052

Published: 10 July 2023 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Allowing users of interactive systems to reflect on their task proficiency is often incidental. This is unfortunate, as communicating meaningful task-related proficiency feedback could improve users’ awareness of their abilities and their willingness to improve. To highlight the feasibility of this concept, we evaluated how different methods of readability feedback impacted users during a text production task. In general, our results showed that having access to readability feedback allowed participants to reflect on their task solving approach, facilitating the users’ understanding of their proficiency. Revision-based methods are less distracting for the user than continuous feedback methods, while still offering high efficacy. Further, feedback should be paired with a subtle form of gamification elements. We envision this reflection-oriented design to user proficiency to be applicable to a variety of interactive systems, allowing for an improved and engaging user experience.

Supplemental Material

ZIP File

Source code, scripts and tables as well as graphs (high quality). web_form: source code for the web form used in the studies web_form_conditions: specific views for of all the conditions used in the studies scripts: associated scripts and datasets for S1 and S2, including R analysis and python scripts to plot readability over time; datasets are cleaned as described in the paper tables_graphs: high resolution image/vector graphics of figures in the paper

Download
16.75 MB

References

[1]

Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, and Anna L Cox. 2020. Trackly : A Customisable and Pictorial Self-Tracking App to Support Agency in Multiple Sclerosis Self-Care. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020), 1–15.

[2]

Nikola Banovic, Fanny Chevalier, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2012. Triggering Triggers and Burying Barriers to Customizing Software. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2717–2726. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208666

Digital Library

[3]

Gabriel Barata, Sandra Gama, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2013. Improving Participation and Learning with Gamification. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (Gamification ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583010

Digital Library

[4]

Scott Bateman, Jaime Teevan, and Ryen W. White. 2012. The Search Dashboard: How Reflection and Comparison Impact Search Behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1785–1794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208311

Digital Library

[5]

Eric P.S. Baumer, Timothy Berrill, Sarah C. Botwinick, Jonathan L. Gonzales, Kevin Ho, Allison Kundrik, Luke Kwon, Tim LaRowe, Chanh P. Nguyen, Fredy Ramirez, Peter Schaedler, William Ulrich, Amber Wallace, Yuchen Wan, and Benjamin Weinfeld. 2018. What Would You Do? Design Fiction and Ethics. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork(GROUP ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3149405

Digital Library

[6]

Eric P.S. Baumer, Vera Khovanskaya, Mark Matthews, Lindsay Reynolds, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Geri Gay. 2014. Reviewing Reflection: On the Use of Reflection in Interactive System Design. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598598

Digital Library

[7]

Marit Bentvelzen, Jasmin Niess, and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2021. The Technology-Mediated Reflection Model: Barriers and Assistance in Data-Driven Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 246, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445505

Digital Library

[8]

Susanne Bødker. 1995. Applying Activity Theory to Video Analysis: How to Make Sense of Video Data in Human-Computer Interaction. In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 147–174.

[9]

Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv:2005.14165 [cs] (July 2020). arxiv:2005.14165 [cs] http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165

[10]

J. Carroll and M. Rosson. 1987. Paradox of the Active User. In Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. The MIT Press.

[11]

Center for Self-Determination Theory. [n. d.]. Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/

[12]

Bo Chang. 2019. Reflection in learning.Online Learning 23, 1 (2019), 95–110.

[13]

Elizabeth Clark, Anne Spencer Ross, Chenhao Tan, Yangfeng Ji, and Noah A. Smith. 2018. Creative Writing with a Machine in the Loop: Case Studies on Slogans and Stories. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(IUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3172983

Digital Library

[14]

Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, Joey Scarr, and Sylvain Malacria. 2014. Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 2 (Nov. 2014), 31:1–31:36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659796

Digital Library

[15]

Richard T. Cole, Larry A. Hembroff, and Andrew D. Corner. 2009. National Assessment of the Perceived Writing Skills of Entry-Level PR Practitioners. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 64, 1 (March 2009), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769580906400102

[16]

David Denton. 2011. Reflection and learning: Characteristics, obstacles, and implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43, 8 (2011), 838–852.

[17]

Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (Tampere, Finland) (MindTrek ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Digital Library

[18]

Steven Dow, Anand Kulkarni, Scott Klemmer, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Shepherding the Crowd Yields Better Work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145355

Digital Library

[19]

Peggy A Ertmer, Jennifer C Richardson, Brian Belland, Denise Camin, Patrick Connolly, Glen Coulthard, Kimfong Lei, and Christopher Mong. 2007. Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 2 (2007), 412–433.

[20]

Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2004. A Comparison of Static, Adaptive, and Adaptable Menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985704

Digital Library

[21]

Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2010. Beyond Performance: Feature Awareness in Personalized Interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 3 (March 2010), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.10.002

Digital Library

[22]

Rudolph Flesch. 1948. A New Readability Yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 3 (1948), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532

[23]

Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Katherine Everitt, Desney S. Tan, Mary Czerwinski, and Daniel S. Weld. 2008. Predictability and Accuracy in Adaptive User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1271–1274. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357252

Digital Library

[24]

Katy Ilonka Gero and Lydia B. Chilton. 2019. Metaphoria: An Algorithmic Companion for Metaphor Creation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300526

Digital Library

[25]

Frédéric Guay, Robert J. Vallerand, and Céline Blanchard. 2000. On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion 24, 3 (Sept. 2000), 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250

[26]

Guy Brook-Hart and Simon Haines. 2014. Complete Advanced (second edition ed.). Cambridge University Press.

[27]

Juho Hamari and Jonna Koivisto. 2014. Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional flow scale-2. Computers in Human Behavior 40 (2014), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.048

Digital Library

[28]

Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, Harri Sarsa, 2014. Does Gamification Work?-A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. In HICSS, Vol. 14. 3025–3034.

[29]

Sandra G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9 (2006), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909

[30]

Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2010. Notifications and Awareness: A Field Study of Alert Usage and Preferences. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718926

Digital Library

[31]

Lawrence R. James, Robert G. Demaree, and Gerrit Wolf. 1984. Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability with and without Response Bias.Journal of Applied Psychology 69, 1 (1984), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85

[32]

Adam C. Johnson, Joshua Wilson, and Rod D. Roscoe. 2017. College Student Perceptions of Writing Errors, Text Quality, and Author Characteristics. Assessing Writing 34 (Oct. 2017), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002

[33]

Jakob Karolus and Pawel W. Wozniak. 2021. Proficiency-Aware Systems: Designing for User Reflection in Context-Aware Systems. it Inf. Technol. 63, 3 (2021), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2020-0039

[34]

Ryan Kelly, Daniel Gooch, and Leon Watts. 2018. ’It’s More Like a Letter’: An Exploration of Mediated Conversational Effort in Message Builder. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 87:1–87:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274356

Digital Library

[35]

Thomas Kosch, Robin Welsch, Lewis Chuang, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2023. The Placebo Effect of Artificial Intelligence in Human–Computer Interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 6 (Jan. 2023), 56:1–56:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3529225

Digital Library

[36]

Justin Kruger and David Dunning. 1999. Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (1999), 1121–1134.

[37]

David M. Lane, H. Albert Napier, S. Camille Peres, and Aniko Sandor. 2005. Hidden Costs of Graphical User Interfaces: Failure to Make the Transition from Menus and Icon Toolbars to Keyboard Shortcuts. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 18, 2 (May 2005), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1802_1

[38]

Xiaotong Liu, Anbang Xu, Zhe Liu, Yufan Guo, and Rama Akkiraju. 2019. Cognitive Learning: How to Become William Shakespeare. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312844

Digital Library

[39]

Wendy E. Mackay. 1991. Triggers and Barriers to Customizing Software. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’91). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108867

Digital Library

[40]

Sylvain Malacria, Joey Scarr, Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Tovi Grossman. 2013. Skillometers: Reflective Widgets That Motivate and Help Users to Improve Performance. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2501996

Digital Library

[41]

Sampada Marathe and S. Shyam Sundar. 2011. What Drives Customization? Control or Identity?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979056

Digital Library

[42]

Justin Matejka, Wei Li, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2009. CommunityCommands: Command Recommendations for Software Applications. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/1622176.1622214

Digital Library

[43]

Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Performance. (1990).

[44]

Jeanne Nakamura and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2009. Flow Theory and Research. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2009), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0018

[45]

Eslam Nofal, Georgia Panagiotidou, Rabee M. Reffat, Hendrik Hameeuw, Vanessa Boschloos, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2020. Situated Tangible Gamification of Heritage for Supporting Collaborative Learning of Young Museum Visitors. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 1, Article 3 (Feb. 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3350427

Digital Library

[46]

Rita Orji, Gustavo F. Tondello, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2018. Personalizing Persuasive Strategies in Gameful Systems to Gamification User Types. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174009

Digital Library

[47]

Rita Orji, Gustavo F Tondello, and Lennart E Nacke. 2018. Personalizing persuasive strategies in gameful systems to gamification user types. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174009

Digital Library

[48]

Zhenhui Peng, Qingyu Guo, Ka Wing Tsang, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2020. Exploring the Effects of Technological Writing Assistance for Support Providers in Online Mental Health Community. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376695

Digital Library

[49]

James L. Peterson. 1980. Computer Programs for Detecting and Correcting Spelling Errors. Commun. ACM 23, 12 (Dec. 1980), 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1145/359038.359041

Digital Library

[50]

David Robinson and Victoria Bellotti. 2013. A preliminary taxonomy of gamification elements for varying anticipated commitment. In Proc. ACM CHI 2013 Workshop on Designing Gamification: Creating Gameful and Playful Experiences.

[51]

Yvonne Rogers. 2006. Moving on from Weiser’s Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Paul Dourish and Adrian Friday (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853565_24

Digital Library

[52]

Wendy Roldan, Ziyue Li, Xin Gao, Sarah Kay Strickler, Allison Marie Hishikawa, Jon E. Froehlich, and Jason Yip. 2021. Pedagogical Strategies for Reflection in Project-based HCI Education with End Users. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021(DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1846–1860. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462113

Digital Library

[53]

Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68.

[54]

Richard M Ryan and Heather Patrick. 2009. Self-determination theory and physical. Hellenic journal of psychology 6 (2009), 107–124.

[55]

John Sadauskas, Daragh Byrne, and Robert K. Atkinson. 2015. Mining Memories: Designing a Platform to Support Social Media Based Writing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3691–3700. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702383

Digital Library

[56]

Herman Saksono and Andrea G. Parker. 2017. Reflective informatics through family storytelling: Self-discovering physical activity predictors. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2017-May (2017), 5232–5244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025651

Digital Library

[57]

Alan W. Salmoni, Richard A. Schmidt, and Charles B. Walter. 1984. Knowledge of Results and Motor Learning: A Review and Critical Reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95, 3 (1984), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355

[58]

Joey Scarr, Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Philip Quinn. 2011. Dips and Ceilings: Understanding and Supporting Transitions to Expertise in User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2741–2750. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979348

Digital Library

[59]

D.A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.

[60]

Katie Seaborn and Deborah I Fels. 2015. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of human-computer studies 74 (2015), 14–31.

Digital Library

[61]

Abigail Sellen, Yvonne Rogers, Richard Harper, and Tom Rodden. 2009. Reflecting human values in the digital age. Commun. ACM 52, 3 (March 2009), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/1467247.1467265

Digital Library

[62]

Kennon M Sheldon, Andrew J Elliot, Youngmee Kim, and Tim Kasser. 2001. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.Journal of personality and social psychology 80, 2 (2001), 325.

[63]

Roberta Shroyer. 2000. Actual Readers versus Implied Readers: Role Conflicts in Office 97. Technical Communication 47, 2 (2000), 238–240. jstor:43748856http://www.jstor.org/stable/43748856

[64]

C-H. Su and C-H. Cheng. 2015. A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31, 3 (2015), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12088 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcal.12088

Digital Library

[65]

Gustavo F. Tondello, Alberto Mora, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2017. Elements of Gameful Design Emerging from User Preferences. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY ’17 (2017), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116627

Digital Library

[66]

Lauren Wilcox, Betsy DiSalvo, Dick Henneman, and Qiaosi Wang. 2019. Design in the HCI Classroom: Setting a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322381

Digital Library

[67]

Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only Anova Procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963

Digital Library

[68]

Jonathan Zittrain. 2008. Ubiquitous human computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366, 1881 (Oct. 2008), 3813–3821. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0116

Cited By

Wan RGebreegziabher SLi TBadillo-Urquiola K(2024)CoCo Matrix: Taxonomy of Cognitive Contributions in Co-writing with Intelligent AgentsProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664260(504-511)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3664260
Lee MGero KChung JShum SRaheja VShen HVenugopalan SWambsganss TZhou DAlghamdi EAugust TBhat AChoksi MDutta SGuo JHoque MKim YKnight SNeshaei SShibani AShrivastava DShroff LSergeyuk AStark JSterman SWang SBosselut ABuschek DChang JChen SKreminski MPark JPea RRho EShen ZSiangliulue P(2024)A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642697(1-35)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642697
Chen QShuai WZhang JSun ZCao N(2024)Beyond Numbers: Creating Analogies to Enhance Data Comprehension and Communication with Generative AIProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642480(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642480
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Your Text Is Hard to Read: Facilitating Readability Awareness to Support Writing Proficiency in Text Production
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interactive systems and tools

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

DIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

July 2023

2717 pages

ISBN:9781450398930

DOI:10.1145/3563657

Editors:
Daragh Byrne
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Nikolas Martelaro
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Andy Boucher
Northumbria University
,
David Chatting
Goldsmiths, University of London
,
Sarah Fdili Alaoui
LISN-Université Paris Saclay
,
Sarah Fox
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Iohanna Nicenboim
Delft University of Technology
,
Cayley MacArthur
University of Waterloo

Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 July 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

DIS '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

DIS '23: Designing Interactive Systems Conference

July 10 - 14, 2023

PA, Pittsburgh, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
551
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)392
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30

Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wan RGebreegziabher SLi TBadillo-Urquiola K(2024)CoCo Matrix: Taxonomy of Cognitive Contributions in Co-writing with Intelligent AgentsProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664260(504-511)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3664260
Lee MGero KChung JShum SRaheja VShen HVenugopalan SWambsganss TZhou DAlghamdi EAugust TBhat AChoksi MDutta SGuo JHoque MKim YKnight SNeshaei SShibani AShrivastava DShroff LSergeyuk AStark JSterman SWang SBosselut ABuschek DChang JChen SKreminski MPark JPea RRho EShen ZSiangliulue P(2024)A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642697(1-35)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642697
Chen QShuai WZhang JSun ZCao N(2024)Beyond Numbers: Creating Analogies to Enhance Data Comprehension and Communication with Generative AIProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642480(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642480
Li JLi JSu Y(2024)A Map of Exploring Human Interaction Patterns with LLM: Insights into Collaboration and CreativityArtificial Intelligence in HCI10.1007/978-3-031-60615-1_5(60-85)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-60615-1_5

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents