Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3568162.3577004acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

I Learn Better Alone! Collaborative and Individual Word Learning With a Child and Adult Robot

Published: 13 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The use of social robots as a tool for language learning has been studied quite extensively recently. Although their effectiveness and comparison with other technologies are well studied, the effects of the robot's appearance and the interaction setting have received less attention. As educational robots are envisioned to appear in household or school environments, it is important to investigate how their designed persona or interaction dynamics affect learning outcomes. In such environments, children may do the activities together or alone or perform them in the presence of an adult or another child. In this regard, we have identified two novel factors to investigate: the robot's perceived age (adult or child) and the number of learners interacting with the robot simultaneously (one or two). We designed an incidental word learning card game with the Furhat robot and ran a between-subject experiment with 75 middle school participants. We investigated the interactions and effects of children's word learning outcomes, speech activity, and perception of the robot's role. The results show that children who played alone with the robot had better word retention and anthropomorphized the robot more, compared to those who played in pairs. Furthermore, unlike previous findings from human-human interactions, children did not show different behaviors in the presence of a robot designed as an adult or a child. We discuss these factors in detail and make a novel contribution to the direct comparison of collaborative versus individual learning and the new concept of the robot's age.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (hrifp1023aux.zip)
MP4 File (hri23-fp1023.mp4)
Video presentation of the paper including the research questions and the main results.

References

[1]
Rebecca Adams. 2007. Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? Conversational interaction in second language learning (Jan. 2007), 29--51.
[2]
Tracy McKee Agostin and Sherry K. Bain. 1997. Predicting early school success with developmental and social skills screeners. Psychology in the Schools 34, 3 (1997), 219--228. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199707)34:3219::AID-PITS43.0.CO;2-J
[3]
Samer Al Moubayed, Jonas Beskow, Gabriel Skantze, and Björn Granström. 2012. Furhat: A Back-Projected Human-Like Robot Head for Multiparty Human- Machine Interaction. In Cognitive Behavioural Systems (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Anna Esposito, Antonietta M. Esposito, Alessandro Vinciarelli, Rüdiger Hoffmann, and Vincent C. Müller (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 114--130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_9
[4]
Samer Al Moubayed and Gabriel Skantze. 2011. Turn-taking Control Using Gaze in Multiparty Human-Computer Dialogue: Effects of 2D and 3D Displays. In Proc. Auditory-Visual Speech Processing. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 99--102. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-52205
[5]
Minoo Alemi, Ali Meghdari, and Maryam Ghazisaedy. 2014. Employing Humanoid Robots for Teaching English Language in Iranian Junior High-Schools. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 11, 03 (Sept. 2014), 1450022. https: //doi.org/10.1142/S0219843614500224 Publisher: World Scientific Publishing Co.
[6]
Jan Andersson. 2001. Net effect of memory collaboration: How is collaboration affected by factors such as friendship, gender and age? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 42, 4 (2001), 367--375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467--9450.00248
[7]
Yutong Ao and Zhonggen Yu. 2022. Exploring the Relationship between Interactions and Learning Performance in Robot-Assisted Language Learning. Education Research International 2022 (April 2022), e1958317. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1958317 Publisher: Hindawi.
[8]
David Ayllon, Ting-Shuo Chou, Adam King, and Yang Shen. 2021. Identification and Engagement of Passive Subjects in Multiparty Conversations by a Humanoid Robot. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 535--539. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447229
[9]
Chris Baker, Noah Goodman, and Joshua Tenenbaum. 2009. Cause and Intent: Social Reasoning in Causal Learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 31, 31 (2009). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vv3v9d0
[10]
Jenay M. Beer, Arthur D. Fisk, and Wendy A. Rogers. 2014. Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, 2 (July 2014), 74--99. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.2.Beer
[11]
Elizabeth Bonawitz, Patrick Shafto, Hyowon Gweon, Noah D. Goodman, Elizabeth Spelke, and Laura Schulz. 2011. The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition 120, 3 (Sept. 2011), 322--330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001
[12]
Marc Brysbaert, Amy Beth Warriner, and Victor Kuperman. 2014. Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 46, 3 (Sept. 2014), 904--911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
[13]
V. J Carey and You-Gan Wang. 2001. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96, 455 (Sept. 2001), 1135--1136. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa. 2001.s411 Publisher: Taylor & Francis.
[14]
Chih-Wei Chang, Jih-Hsien Lee, Chin-Yeh Wang, and Gwo-Dong Chen. 2010. Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment. Computers & Education 55, 4 (Dec. 2010), 1572--1578. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.023
[15]
Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 6 (Dec. 1972), 671--684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
[16]
Annette M. B. de Groot. 2006. Effects of Stimulus Characteristics and Background Music on Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning and Forgetting. Language Learning 56, 3 (2006), 463--506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00374.x
[17]
Annette M. B. De Groot and Rineke Keijzer. 2000. What Is Hard to Learn Is Easy to Forget: The Roles of Word Concreteness, Cognate Status, and Word Frequency in Foreign-Language Vocabulary Learning and Forgetting. Language Learning 50, 1 (2000), 1--56. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00110
[18]
Jan de Wit, Thorsten Schodde, Bram Willemsen, Kirsten Bergmann, Mirjam de Haas, Stefan Kopp, Emiel Krahmer, and Paul Vogt. 2018. The Effect of a Robot's Gestures and Adaptive Tutoring on Children's Acquisition of Second Language Vocabularies. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 50--58. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171277
[19]
Ana Fernández Dobao. 2014. Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research 18, 4 (Oct. 2014), 497--520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813519730 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[20]
Greg J. Duncan, Chantelle J. Dowsett, Amy Claessens, Katherine Magnuson, Aletha C. Huston, Pamela Klebanov, Linda S. Pagani, Leon Feinstein, Mimi Engel, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Holly Sexton, Kathryn Duckworth, and Crista Japel. 2007. School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology 43 (2007), 1428--1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
[21]
Lloyd M. Dunn and Douglas M. Dunn. 2012. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test--Fourth Edition. Technical Report. American Psychological Association. https: //doi.org/10.1037/t15144-000 Type: dataset.
[22]
Johannes Eckerth and Parveneh Tavakoli. 2012. The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research 16, 2 (April 2012), 227--252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811431377 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[23]
Sabrina Eimler, Astrid von der Pütten, Ulrich Schächtle, Lucas Carstens, and Nicole Krämer. 2010. Following the White Rabbit -- A Robot Rabbit as Vocabulary Trainer for Beginners of English. In HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Gerhard Leitner, Martin Hitz, and Andreas Holzinger (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 322--339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_22
[24]
Olov Engwall and José Lopes. 2022. Interaction and collaboration in robot-assisted language learning for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35, 5-6 (July 2022), 1273--1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799821 Publisher: Routledge.
[25]
María José de la Fuente. 2002. NEGOTIATION AND ORAL ACQUISITION OF L2 VOCABULARY: The Roles of Input and Output in the Receptive and Productive Acquisition of Words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 1 (March 2002), 81--112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102001043 Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
[26]
Ruben G. Fukkink, Henk Blok, and Kees de Glopper. 2001. Deriving Word Meaning from Written Context: A Multicomponential Skill. Language Learning 51, 3 (2001), 477--496. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023--8333.00162
[27]
Sarah Gillet, Ronald Cumbal, André Pereira, José Lopes, Olov Engwall, and Iolanda Leite. 2021. Robot Gaze Can Mediate Participation Imbalance in Groups with Different Skill Levels. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 303--311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444670
[28]
Marlise Horst, Tom Cobb, and Paul Meara. 1998. Beyond a Clockwork Orange: Acquiring Second Language Vocabulary Through Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 11, 2 (1998), 207--23.
[29]
Shufen Huang, Victor Willson, and Zohreh Eslami. 2012. The Effects of Task Involvement Load on L2 Incidental Vocabulary Learning: A Meta-Analytic Study. The Modern Language Journal 96, 4 (2012), 544--557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1540-4781.2012.01394.x
[30]
Jan H. Hulstijn. 2003. Incidental and Intentional Learning. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 349--381. https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470756492.ch12 Section: 12.
[31]
Eun-ja Hyun, So-yeon Kim, Siekyung Jang, and Sungju Park. 2008. Comparative study of effects of language instruction program using intelligence robot and multimedia on linguistic ability of young children. In RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 187--192. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600664 ISSN: 1944--9437.
[32]
Takamasa Iio, Ryota Maeda, Kohei Ogawa, Yuichiro Yoshikawa, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Kaori Suzuki, Tomohiro Aoki, Miharu Maesaki, and Mika Hama. 2019. Improvement of Japanese adults' English speaking skills via experiences speaking to a robot. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35, 2 (2019), 228--245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12325
[33]
Mitsuru Ishida, AlBara Khalifa, Tsuneo Kato, and Seiichi Yamamoto. 2016. Features of learner corpus collected with joining-in type robot assisted language learning system. In 2016 Conference of The Oriental Chapter of International Committee for Coordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (O-COCOSDA). 128--131. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSDA.2016.7918997ISSN: 2472-7695.
[34]
Vikram K. Jaswal and Leslie A. Neely. 2006. Adults Don't Always Know Best: Preschoolers Use Past Reliability Over Age When Learning New Words. Psychological Science 17, 9 (Sept. 2006), 757--758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01778.x Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
[35]
Gregor Kachel, Richard Moore, Robert Hepach, and Michael Tomasello. 2021. Toddlers Prefer Adults as Informants: 2- and 3-Year-Olds' Use of and Attention to Pointing Gestures From Peer and Adult Partners. Child Development 92, 4 (2021), e635--e652. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13544
[36]
Gregory D. Keating. 2008. Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research 12, 3 (July 2008), 365--386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089922
[37]
AlBara Khalifa, Tsuneo Kato, and Seiichi Yamamoto. 2019. Learning Effect of Implicit Learning in Joining-in-type Robot-assisted Language Learning System. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 14, 02 (Jan. 2019), 105--123. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i02.9212 Number: 02.
[38]
Youjin Kim. 2008. The Contribution of Collaborative and Individual Tasks to the Acquisition of L2 Vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal 92, 1 (2008), 114--130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.x
[39]
You Jin Kim. 2011. The Role of Task-Induced Involvement and Learner Proficiency in L2 Vocabulary Acquisition. Language Learning 61, s1 (2011), 100--140. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1467--9922.2011.00644.x
[40]
Jacqueline M. Kory Westlund, Leah Dickens, Sooyeon Jeong, Paul L. Harris, David DeSteno, and Cynthia L. Breazeal. 2017. Children use non-verbal cues to learn new words from robots as well as people. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 13 (July 2017), 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.04.001
[41]
Marjan Laal and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31 (Jan. 2012), 486--490. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
[42]
Sharon Lapkin, Merrill Swain, and Monika Smith. 2002. Reformulation and the Learning of French Pronominal Verbs in a Canadian French Immersion Context. The Modern Language Journal 86, 4 (2002), 485--507. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540- 4781.00157
[43]
B Laufer and J Hulstijn. 2001. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: the construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 22, 1 (March 2001), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1
[44]
Batia Laufer and Bella Rozovski-Roitblat. 2011. Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research 15, 4 (Oct. 2011), 391--411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412019 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[45]
Hansol Lee and Jang Ho Lee. 2022. The effects of robot-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 35 (Feb. 2022), 100425. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100425
[46]
Sungjin Lee, Hyungjong Noh, Jonghoon Lee, Kyusong Lee, Gary Geunbae Lee, Seongdae Sagong, and Munsang Kim. 2011. On the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Language Learning. ReCALL 23, 1 (Jan. 2011), 25--58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000273 Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
[47]
Hanneke Leeuwestein, Marie Barking, Hande Sodacı, Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz, Josje Verhagen, Paul Vogt, Rian Aarts, Sybren Spit, Mirjam de Haas, Jan de Wit, and Paul Leseman. 2021. Teaching Turkish-Dutch kindergartners Dutch vocabulary with a social robot: Does the robot's use of Turkish translations benefit children's Dutch vocabulary learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37, 3 (2021), 603--620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12510
[48]
Julia A. Leonard, Dominique N. Martinez, Samantha C. Dashineau, Anne T. Park, and Allyson P. Mackey. 2021. Children Persist Less When Adults Take Over. Child Development 92, 4 (2021), 1325--1336. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13492
[49]
Vivien Lin, Hui-Chin Yeh, and Nian-Shing Chen. 2022. A Systematic Review on Oral Interactions in Robot-Assisted Language Learning. Electronics 11, 2 (Jan. 2022), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11020290 Number: 2 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
[50]
Frederico S. Lourenco, Johannes H. Decker, Gloria A. Pedersen, Danielle V. Dellarco, B. J. Casey, and Catherine A. Hartley. 2015. Consider the Source: Adolescents and Adults Similarly Follow Older Adult Advice More than Peer Advice. PLOS ONE 10, 6 (June 2015), e0128047. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128047 Publisher: Public Library of Science.
[51]
Kim McDonough. 2004. Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System 32, 2 (June 2004), 207--224. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003
[52]
Serik Meiirbekov, Kairat Balkibekov, Zhandarbek Jalankuzov, and Anara Sandygulova. 2016. ?You win, I lose": Towards adapting robot's teaching strategy. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 475--476. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451813 ISSN: 2167--2148.
[53]
Samer Al Moubayed, Gabriel Skantze, and Jonas Beskow. 2013. The furhat back-projected humanoid head--lip reading, gaze and multi-party interaction. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 10, 01 (March 2013), 1350005. https: //doi.org/10.1142/S0219843613500059 Publisher: World Scientific Publishing Co.
[54]
Hossein Nassaji and Jun Tian. 2010. Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research 14, 4 (Oct. 2010), 397--419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375364 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[55]
I. S. P. Nation. 2013. Knowing a word. In Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 44--91. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139858656.004
[56]
Amr Rabie-Ahmed and Ayman Mohamed. 2022. Collaborative and individual vocabulary learning in the Arabic classroom: The role of engagement and task demands. Foreign Language Annals (July 2022), flan.12636. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12636
[57]
Hannes. Rakoczy, Katharina. Hamann, Felix. Warneken, and Michael. Tomasello. 2010. Bigger knows better: Young children selectively learn rule games from adults rather than from peers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 28, 4 (2010), 785--798. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X479178
[58]
Natasha Randall. 2019. A Survey of Robot-Assisted Language Learning (RALL). ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 9, 1 (Dec. 2019), 7:1--7:36. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3345506
[59]
Katharina J. Rohlfing, Nicole Altvater-Mackensen, Nathan Caruana, Rianne van den Berghe, Barbara Bruno, Nils F. Tolksdorf, and Adriana Hanulíková. 2022. Social/dialogical roles of social robots in supporting children's learning of language and literacy-A review and analysis of innovative roles. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 9 (2022). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2022.971749
[60]
Susanne Rott. 1999. THE EFFECT OF EXPOSURE FREQUENCY ON INTERME- DIATE LANGUAGE LEARNERS' INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION AND RETENTION THROUGH READING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 4 (Dec. 1999), 589--619. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004039 Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
[61]
Mark Sadoski. 2005. A Dual Coding View of Vocabulary Learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly 21, 3 (July 2005), 221--238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590949359 Publisher: Routledge.
[62]
Thorsten Schodde, Kirsten Bergmann, and Stefan Kopp. 2017. Adaptive Robot Language Tutoring Based on Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and Predictive Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 128--136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020222
[63]
Gabriel Skantze. 2017. Predicting and Regulating Participation Equality in Human-Robot Conversations: Effects of Age and Gender. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 196--204. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020210 event-place: Vienna, Austria.
[64]
Gabriel Skantze, Martin Johansson, and Jonas Beskow. 2015. Exploring Turn-taking Cues in Multi-party Human-robot Discussions about Objects. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67--74. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818346.2820749
[65]
David M. Sobel and Zoe Finiasz. 2020. How Children Learn From Others: An Analysis of Selective Word Learning. Child Development 91, 6 (2020), e1134--e1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13415
[66]
Victoria Southgate, Catharine Van Maanen, and Gergely Csibra. 2007. Infant Pointing: Communication to Cooperate or Communication to Learn? Child Development 78, 3 (2007), 735--740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01028.x
[67]
Neomy Storch. 2004. Using Activity Theory to Explain Differences in Patterns of Dyadic Interactions in an ESL Class. The Canadian Modern Language Review 60, 4 (March 2004), 457--480. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.4.457 Publisher: University of Toronto Press.
[68]
Fumihide Tanaka and Shizuko Matsuzoe. 2012. Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 1, 1 (July 2012), 78--95. https: //doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Tanaka
[69]
Rianne van den Berghe, Sanne van der Ven, Josje Verhagen, Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz, Fotios Papadopoulos, and Paul Leseman. 2018. Investigating the Effects of a Robot Peer on L2 Word Learning. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 267--268. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176986
[70]
R. van den Berghe, J. Verhagen, O. Oudgenoeg-Paz, S. van der Ven, and P. Leseman. 2019. Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review. Review of Educational Research 89, 2 (2019), 259--295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318821286
[71]
Mieke VanderBorght and Vikram K. Jaswal. 2009. Who knows best? Preschoolers sometimes prefer child informants over adult informants. Infant and Child Development 18, 1 (2009), 61--71. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.591
[72]
Paul Vogt, Rianne van den Berghe, Mirjam de Haas, Laura Hoffman, Junko Kanero, Ezgi Mamus, Jean-Marc Montanier, Cansu Oranç, Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz, Daniel Hernández García, Fotios Papadopoulos, Thorsten Schodde, Josje Verhagen, Christopher D. Wallbridgell, Bram Willemsen, Jan de Wit, Tony Belpaeme, Tilbe Göksun, Stefan Kopp, Emiel Krahmer, Aylin C. Küntay, Paul Leseman, and Amit Kumar Pandey. 2019. Second Language Tutoring Using Social Robots: A Large-Scale Study. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 497--505. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673077 ISSN: 2167--2148.
[73]
Dale Walker, Charles Greenwood, Betty Hart, and Judith Carta. 1994. Prediction of School Outcomes Based on Early Language Production and Socioeconomic Factors. Child Development 65, 2 (1994), 606--621. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131404 Publisher: Wiley, Society for Research in Child Development.
[74]
J Kory Westlund, Leah Dickens, Sooyeon Jeong, Paul Harris, David DeSteno, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2015. A comparison of children learning new words from robots, tablets, & people. In Conference Proceedings New Friends 2015.
[75]
Cheryl Boyd Zimmerman. 1996. Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. In Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (1 ed.), James Coady and Thomas Huckin (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 5--19. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524643.003
[76]
Norbert Zmyj, Gisa Aschersleben, Wolfgang Prinz, and Moritz Daum. 2012. The Peer Model Advantage in Infants' Imitation of Familiar Gestures Performed by Differently Aged Models. Frontiers in Psychology 3 (2012). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00252

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Conformity and Trust in Multi-party vs. Individual Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3652988.3673954(1-9)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)OriBot: a novel origami robot creation system to support children’s STEAM learningMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-20438-xOnline publication date: 16-Nov-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2023
631 pages
ISBN:9781450399647
DOI:10.1145/3568162
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 March 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. child language learning
  2. collaborative learning
  3. depth of processing
  4. l2 learning
  5. multi-party interaction
  6. rall
  7. robot social role
  8. robot-assisted language learning
  9. second language
  10. social robotics
  11. task-induced involvement load
  12. word learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

HRI '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)312
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)42
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Conformity and Trust in Multi-party vs. Individual Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3652988.3673954(1-9)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)OriBot: a novel origami robot creation system to support children’s STEAM learningMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-20438-xOnline publication date: 16-Nov-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media