Unscripted, Unproduced, Unstaged: Audience Perceptions of Authenticity of Microstreamers
Authors: 
Nick Bowman, 
Yoon Lee, Siyang Chen, Andrew Phelps, Mia Consalvo, Kelly BoudreauAuthors Info & Claims
Nick Bowman, Yoon Lee, Siyang Chen, Andrew Phelps, Mia Consalvo, Kelly BoudreauAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 63 - 68
Abstract
This work-in-progress investigates the perceived authenticity of microstreaming, a unique form of game streaming characterized by gamers streaming for small audiences with mostly non-monetary motivations. Prior research has identified three markers of authenticity in microstreams: unscripted interactions, low production values, and unstaged backgrounds. This study experimentally manipulates these markers to examine their individual and joint effects on perceived authenticity, as well as enjoyment of the streamed content. The findings will contribute to understanding the factors influencing perceived authenticity in microstreaming and shed light on how audience engage with online content creators.
References
[1]
Alice Audrezet, Gwarlann de Kerviler, and Julie Guidry Moulard. 2020. Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research 117 (2020), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
[2]
Nicholas David Bowman and Alan K. Goodboy. 2020. Evolving considerations and empirical approaches to construct validity in communication science. Annals of the International Communication Association 44, 3 (2020), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792791
[3]
Nicholas David Bowman and Justin Robert Keene. 2018. A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices. Communication Research Reports 35, 4 (2018), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1513273
[4]
Nicholas David Bowman and Patric R. Spence. 2020. Challenges and Best Practices Associated with Sharing Research Materials and Research Data for Communication Scholars. Communication Studies 71, 4 (2020), 708–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1799488 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1799488
[5]
Nicholas David Bowman, Alexander Vandewalle, Rowan Daneels, Yoon Lee, and Siyang Chen. 2023. Animating a Plausible Past: Perceived Realism and Sense of Place Influence Entertainment of and Tourism Intentions From Historical Video Games. Games and Culture (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231162428
[6]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[7]
Brian Chan and Kishonna Gray. 2020. Microstreaming, Microcelebrity, and Marginalized Masculinity: Pathways to Visibility and Self-Definition for Black Men in Gaming. Women’s Studies in Communication 43, 4 (2020), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2020.1833634
[8]
Mia Consalvo, Martin Lajeunesse, and Alexandru Zanescu. 2020. The authenticity engine: Livestreaming on Twitch. In Proceedings of Digital Games Research Association 2020.
[9]
Tobias Dienlin 2020. An Agenda for Open Science in Communication. Journal of Communication 71, 1 (2020), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052
[10]
Brooke Duffy. 2017. (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
[11]
Edgar Erdfelder, Franz Faul, and Axel Buchner. 1996. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 28, 1 (1996), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
[12]
Susan Ervin-Tripp. 1964. An Analysis of the Interaction of Language, Topic, and Listener. American Anthropologist 66, 6 (1964), 86–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/668163
[13]
Sandra K. Evans, Katy E. Pearce, Jessica Vitak, and Jeffrey W. Treem. 2017. Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22, 1 (2017), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
[14]
Erving Goffman. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.
[15]
Kent Grayson and Radan Martinec. 2004. Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. Journal of Consumer Research 31, 2 (2004), 296–312.
[16]
Andrew F. Hayes and Jacob J. Coutts. 2020. Use Omega Rather than Cronbach′s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But...Communication Methods and Measures 14, 1 (2020), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
[17]
Henry Jenkins. 2009. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. The MIT Press.
[18]
Mehdi Kaytoue, Adriano Silva, Loïc Cerf, Wagner Meira Jr., and Chedy Raïssi. 2012. Watch me playing, I am a professional: A first study on video game live streaming. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. 1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188259
[19]
Susie Khamis, Lawrence Ang, and Raymond Welling. 2017. Self-branding, ′micro-celebrity′ and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies 8, 2 (2017), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292
[20]
Jooyoung Angela Lee and Matthew S. Eastin. 2021. Perceived authenticity of social media influences: Scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 15, 4 (2021), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2020-0253
[21]
Alexander P. Leith. 2021. Parasocial cues: The ubiquity of parasocial relationships on Twitch. Communication Monographs 88, 1 (2021), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1868544
[22]
Alice E. Marwick. 2013. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. Yale University Press.
[23]
Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13, 1 (2011), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
[24]
Julie G. Moulard, Dan Hamilton Rice, Colleen P. Garrity, and Sarah M. Mangus. 2014. Artist authenticity: how artists’ passion and commitment shape consumers’ perceptions and behavioral intentions across genders. Psychology and Marketing 31, 8 (2014), 576–590.
[25]
Ray Oldenburg. 1989. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. Paragon House, New York.
[26]
Mary Beth Oliver, Nicholas David Bowman, Julia K. Woolley, Ryan Rogers, Brett I. Sherrick, and Mun-Youn Chung. 2016. Video Games as Meaningful Entertainment Experiences. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 5, 4 (2016), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000066
[27]
Patrick B. O′Sullivan and Caleb T. Carr. 2018. Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society 20, 3 (2018), 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104
[28]
Andrew Phelps, Nicholas D. Bowman, Mia Consalvo, and Sam Smyth. 2022. Shared spaces as authentic. In Proceedings for Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 55. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/79721
[29]
Andrew Phelps, Nicholas D. Bowman, Mia Consalvo, and Sam Smyth. 2022. Streaming small shared spaces: Exploring the connectedness of the physical spaces of microstreamers and their audience. Selected Papers of Internet Research (2022). https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12224
[30]
Andrew Phelps and Mia Consalvo. 2020. Laboring artists: Art streaming on the videogame platform Twitch. In Proceedings for Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 53. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/64068
[31]
Jih-Hsuan Tammy Lin, Nicholas Bowman, Shu-Fang Lin, and Yen-Shen Chen. 2019. Setting the digital stage: Defining game streaming as an entertainment experience. Entertainment Computing 31 (2019), 100309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100309
[32]
T. L. Taylor. 2012. Raising the stakes: e-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming. MIT Press.
[33]
Twitch Advertising. 2022. Twitch Advertising Audience. Twitch.com. https://twitchadvertising.tv/audience/
[34]
[34] TwitchMetrics.net. 2023. https://www.twitchmetrics.net/games
[35]
TwitchTracker.com. 2023. Twitch live stream statistics. https://twitchtracker.com/statistics/
[36]
Peter Vorderer, Dorothée Hefner, Leonard Reinecke, and Christoph Klimmt. 2017. Permanently online, permanently connected. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276472
[37]
Philipp Wollborn, Ulf Holder, and Dominik Dornekott. 2021. Entrepreneurial efforts and opportunity costs: Evidence from Twitch streamers. Social Science Research Network (2021). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3801017
[38]
Jamie Woodcock and Mark R. Johnson. 2019. Live Streamers on Twitch.tv as Social Media Influencers: Chances and Challenges for Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication 13, 4 (2019), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1630412
[39]
Andrew Young and Grant Wiedenfeld. 2022. A Motivation Analysis of Video Game Microstreamers: ′Finding My People and Myself′ on YouTube and Twitch. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 66, 2 (2022), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2022.2086549
Index Terms
- Unscripted, Unproduced, Unstaged: Audience Perceptions of Authenticity of Microstreamers
Recommendations
Differences in Heritage Tourism Experience between VR and AR: A Comparative Experimental Study Based on Presence and Authenticity
This study developed two distinct types of remote heritage virtual tourism programs, namely VR and AR. We utilized the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) model to understand how users’ perceptions of vividness and interactivity in VR and AR influence ...
Interactive stories and the audience: Why empathy is important
SPECIAL ISSUE: TV and Video Entertainment EnvironmentsInteractive narratives have long been advocated as having the potential to create more immersive and transformative experiences for audiences by adding the pleasure of agency. In practice, however, finding the balance between sufficient interactivity ...
Exploring students' awareness and perceptions
This study investigates students' awareness and perceptions of m-learning and examines the factors affecting students' behavioral intention to adopt m-learning, by using a modified research model that integrate technology acceptance model (perceived ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2023
370 pages
ISBN:9798400700293
DOI:10.1145/3573382
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 06 October 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CHI PLAY '23
Sponsor:
CHI PLAY '23: The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
October 10 - 13, 2023
ON, Stratford, Canada
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 319 of 1,024 submissions, 31%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 389Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)279
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)38
Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in