Collaboration Patterns and Impact of Sharing at CHIIR
Authors: 
Toine Bogers, 
Birger Larsen, Marijn Koolen, Maria Gäde, Mark M. Hall, Vivien PetrasAuthors Info & Claims
Toine Bogers, Birger Larsen, Marijn Koolen, Maria Gäde, Mark M. Hall, Vivien PetrasAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 313 - 320
Abstract
We studied the collaboration patterns of CHIIR authors, and found that most papers are collaborative. A core of 33% of the CHIIR researchers are directly connected and frequently co-author, and several disconnected clusters also make frequent CHIIR contributions. We also studied citation impact of the CHIIR papers and show that in relation to research design type, theoretical and empirical papers tend to receive more citations than resource papers. With regards to sharing and re-use, papers that share at least one resource tend to have significantly higher citation impact—in particular when sharing data resources and design resources. Re-using resources does not significantly increase citation impact in itself.
References
[1]
Jonathan Adams. 2013. The fourth age of research. Nature 497, 7451 (2013), 557–560.
[2]
Dag W. Aksnes, Fredrik Niclas Piro, and Kristoffer Rørstad. 2019. Gender gaps in international research collaboration: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 120, 2 (June 2019), 747–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03155-3
[3]
Franz Barjak and Simon Robinson. 2008. International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance. Social geography 3, 1 (2008), 23–36.
[4]
Christoph Bartneck and Jun Hu. 2009. Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings(CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518810
[5]
Lutz Bornmann. 2012. Measuring the societal impact of research: research is less and less assessed on scientific impact alone—we should aim to quantify the increasingly important contributions of science to society. EMBO reports 13, 8 (2012), 673–676.
[6]
Tindaro Cicero and Marco Malgarini. 2021. 5.4 Research Collaboration and Bibliometric Performance. In Handbook Bibliometrics. De Gruyter, 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110646610-032
[7]
YING DING, SCHUBERT FOO, and GOBINDA CHOWDHURY. 1998. A Bibliometric Analysis of Collaboration in the Field of Information Retrieval. The International Information & Library Review 30, 4 (1998), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1006/iilr.1999.0103
[8]
Pablo Dorta-González, Sara M González-Betancor, and María Isabel Dorta-González. 2021. To what extent is researchers’ data-sharing motivated by formal mechanisms of recognition and credit?Scientometrics 126, 3 (2021), 2209–2225.
[9]
Ali Gazni and Mike Thelwall. 2014. The long-term influence of collaboration on citation patterns. Research Evaluation 23 (07 2014), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu014
[10]
Maria Gäde, Marijn Koolen, Mark Hall, Toine Bogers, and Vivien Petras. 2021. A Manifesto on Resource Re-Use in Interactive Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446056
[11]
Mark M. Hall. 2019. To Re-use is to Re-write: Experiences with Re-using IIR Experiment Software. In Proceedings of the CHIIR 2019 Workshop on Barriers to Interactive IR Resources Re-use co-located with the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, BIIRRR@CHIIR 2019, Glasgow, UK, March 14, 2019(CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2337), Toine Bogers, Samuel Dodson, Maria Gäde, Luanne Freund, Mark M. Hall, Marijn Koolen, Vivien Petras, Nils Pharo, and Mette Skov (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org, 19–23. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2337/paper3.pdf
[12]
J. S. Katz and Diana Hicks. 1997. How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics 40, 3 (Nov. 1997), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02459299
[13]
Diane Kelly 2009. Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 3, 1–2(2009), 1–224. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000012
[14]
Youngseek Kim and Jeffrey M Stanton. 2016. Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists’ data-sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67, 4(2016), 776–799.
[15]
Rob Kitchin. 2014. The data revolution : big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences (elektronisk udgave. ed.). SAGE, Los Angeles.
[16]
Jonathan M. Levitt and Mike Thelwall. 2009. Citation Levels and Collaboration within Library and Information Science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60, 3 (mar 2009), 434–442.
[17]
Heather A Piwowar, Roger S Day, and Douglas B Fridsma. 2007. Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PloS one 2, 3 (2007), e308.
[18]
Henning Pohl and Aske Mottelson. 2019. How we Guide, Write, and Cite at CHI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310429
[19]
John A. Stewart. 1994. The Poisson-lognormal model for bibliometric/scientometric distributions. Information Processing & Management 30, 2 (1994), 239–251.
[20]
K. Subramanyam. 1983. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science 6, 1 (1983), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105
[21]
Theodora Tsikrika, Birger Larsen, Henning Müller, Stefan Endrullis, and Erhard Rahm. 2013. The Scholarly Impact of CLEF (2000–2009). In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_1
[22]
Jessica EM van der Wal, Rose Thorogood, and Nicholas PC Horrocks. 2021. Collaboration enhances career progression in academic science, especially for female researchers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 288, 1958 (2021), 20210219.
[23]
Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman. 2009. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 2 (Dec. 2009), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Index Terms
- Collaboration Patterns and Impact of Sharing at CHIIR
Recommendations
Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University's publications
This study aims to investigate the influence of different patterns of collaboration on the citation impact of Harvard University's publications. Those documents published by researchers affiliated with Harvard University in WoS from 2000---2009, ...
Productivity trends and citation impact of different institutional collaboration patterns at the research units’ level
AbstractIn order to gain a deeper understanding of how research performance and collaboration patterns of institutions affect productivity trends and citations, this paper classifies institutions into two types: main and normal institutions, and then ...
Fractionalization of research impact reveals global trends in university collaboration
AbstractThe importance of collaborations between research institutions in producing highly-cited publications is well documented in the scientometric literature. To avoid a double-counting of these publications at the institutional level, the fractional ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 20 March 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CHIIR '23: ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
March 19 - 23, 2023
TX, Austin, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 163 submissions, 34%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 79Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)12
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format