Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3584931.3606981acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identifying Potential Inlets of Man in the Artificial Intelligence Development Process: Man and Antiblackness in AI Development

Published: 14 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we hope to identify how the typical or standard artificial intelligence development process encourages or facilitates the creation of racialized technologies. We begin by understanding Sylvia Wynter's definition of the biocentric Man genre and its exclusion of Blackness from humanness. We follow this with outlining what we consider to be the typical steps for developing an AI-based technology, which we've broken down into 6 stages: identifying a problem, development process and management tool selection, dataset development and data processing, model development, deployment and risk assessment, and integration and monitoring. The goal of this paper is to better understand how Wynter's biocentric Man is being represented and reinforced by the technologies we are producing in the AI lifecycle and by the lifecycle itself; we hope to identify ways in which the distinction of Blackness from the ‘ideal’ human leads to perpetual punishment at the hands of these technologies. By deconstructing this development process, we can potentially identify ways in which humans in general have not been prioritized and how those affects are disproportionately affecting marginalized people. We hope to offer solutions that will encourage changes in the AI development cycle.

References

[1]
Katherine McKittrick. 2015. Sylvia Wynter on being human as praxis. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
[2]
Emily Anne Parker. 2021. Elemental difference and the climate of the body. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
[3]
Simone Browne. 2015. Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
[4]
Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, Haoran Zhang, Matthew B. McDermott, Irene Y. Chen, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. 2021. Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nature Medicine 27, 12 (2021), 2176–2182.
[5]
Alex Najibi. 2020. Racial discrimination in face recognition technology. (October 2020). Retrieved May 31, 2023 from https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2020/racial-discrimination-in-face-recognition-technology/
[6]
Adolfo Rafael Mora. 2020. Shades in gender: Visualizing gender diversity through color palettes. Communication Teacher 35, 1 (2020), 43–48.
[7]
The City of Detroit. Retrieved May 31, 2023 from https://detroitmi.gov/webapp/project-green-light-map
[8]
Lynne Peeples. 2020. What the data say about police brutality and racial bias — and which reforms might work. Nature 583, 7814 (2020), 22–24.
[9]
Elizabeth Dwoskin. 2021. Israel escalates surveillance of Palestinians with facial recognition program in West Bank. (November 2021). Retrieved May 31, 2023 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/israel-palestinians-surveillance-facial-recognition/2021/11/05/3787bf42-26b2-11ec-8739-5cb6aba30a30_story.html
[10]
Daswin De Silva and Damminda Alahakoon. 2022. An artificial intelligence life cycle: From conception to production. Patterns 3, 6 (2022), 100489.
[11]
Saleema Amershi 2019. Software engineering for machine learning: A case study. 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) (August 2019), 291–300.
[12]
Léo Dreyfus-Schmidt Kenji Lefevre. 2020. Introducing MLOps, O'Reilly Media, Inc.
[13]
Billy Perrigo. 2023. OpenAI used Kenyan workers on less than $2 per hour: Exclusive. (January 2023). Retrieved May 31, 2023 from https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/
[14]
Richard W. Pew and Anne S. Mavor. 2007. Human-system integration in the system development process a new look, Washington, D.C.: National Academics Press.
[15]
Katie Rawson and Trevor Muñoz. 2019. Against Cleaning. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019 (2019), 279–292.
[16]
Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (2021).
[17]
Alexandra Mateescu and Madeleine Clare Elish. 2019. AI in context. (January 2019). Retrieved May 31, 2023 from https://datasociety.net/library/ai-in-context/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Writing with artificial intelligence? Ad-hoc-survey findings raise awareness for critical literacy at the International Literacy DayInternational Journal of Lifelong Education10.1080/02601370.2024.234965743:4(371-384)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
  • (2024)How to use generative AI more responsiblyNature Reviews Psychology10.1038/s44159-024-00339-43:8(501-502)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
October 2023
596 pages
ISBN:9798400701290
DOI:10.1145/3584931
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. artificial intelligence
  2. blackness
  3. development processes
  4. race
  5. the biocentric man

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CSCW '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)103
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Writing with artificial intelligence? Ad-hoc-survey findings raise awareness for critical literacy at the International Literacy DayInternational Journal of Lifelong Education10.1080/02601370.2024.234965743:4(371-384)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
  • (2024)How to use generative AI more responsiblyNature Reviews Psychology10.1038/s44159-024-00339-43:8(501-502)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media