Optimized model analysis of blockchain PoW procotol under long delay attack
Authors: 
Tao Feng, Yufeng LiuAuthors Info & Claims
Tao Feng, Yufeng LiuAuthors Info & ClaimsAbstract
Abstract:Proof of work(POW) is one of the most widely used consensus method of bitcoin. In some chains, because of the large number of users, the huge amount of information interaction data, equipment hardware failure or malicious attacks on some nodes may cause communication delay, All of these may engender forks on the blockchain resulting data lose. Therefore, whether the blockchain protocol can achieve sufficient security in the asynchronous network environment with long delay, so how to reduce fork and user's data loss caused by long delay attack are important issue related to blockchain protocol. In this study,we optimized the existing model and proposed TOD to describe the evolution state of the main chain accurately.
References
[1]
Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system[J]. Consulted, 2008.
[2]
Ittay Eyal and Emin G.Sirer.Majority is not enough:Bitcoin mining is vulnerable.In Financial Crupotography and Data Security,volume 8437 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,Pages 436-454.Springer-Verlag.2014
[3]
Yonatan Sompolinsky and Aviv Zohar.Secure high-rate trancaction processing in bitcoin.In Financial Cryptography and Data Security,volume 8975 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,pages 507-527
[4]
Trom J. Cuckoo cycle: a memory bound graph-theoretic proof-of-work[C]//International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015: 49-62.
[5]
Arthur Gervais,Ghassan O.Karame,Karl Wust,Vasileios Glykantzis,Hubert Ritzdorf, and Srdjan Capkun.On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains.In ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security,Press,2016.
[6]
Bastiaan M. Preventing the 51%-attack: a stochastic analysis of two phase proof of work in bitcoin.2015.
[7]
Nayak K, Kumar S, Miller A, Stubborn mining: generalizing selfifish mining and combining with an eclipse attack. In: Proceedings of IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2016. 305–320.
[8]
Aggelos Kiayas and Giorgos Panagiotakos.Speed-Security Tradeoffs inBlockchain Protocols.In IACR ePrint Archive Report:2015/1019.2016.
[9]
Juan Garay,Aggelos Kiayias.and Nikos Leonardos. The bitcoin backbone protocol with chains of variable difficulty. In Advances in Cryptology - CRYP.TO 2017,volume 10401 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,pages 291-323.Springer-Verlag, 2017.
[10]
Pass R, Seeman L, shelat A. Analysis of the blockchain protocol in asynchronous networks. In: Proceedings of Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, 2017. 643–673.
[11]
Wei P W, Yuan Q, Zheng Y L. Security of the blockchain protocol against long delay attack. In: Proceedings of International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, 2018. 250–275.
[12]
Fork Rate-based Analysis of the Longest Chain Growth Time Interval of a PoW Blockchain, International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), 2019 IEEE DOI 10.1109/Blockchain.2019.00040.
[13]
Delay Analysis of Consensus Communication for Blockchain-Based Applications Using Network Calculus .IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.DOI 10.1109/LWC.2022.3183197.
[14]
Moustapha BA.The effect of propagation delay on the dynamic evolution of the Bitcoin blockchain.In:Digital Communications and NetworksVolume 6, Issue 2. 2020. PP 157-166.
[15]
Ziyu Zhou, Zongyang Zhang, Jianwei Liu .Research Method of Nakamoto Consensus Security Properties.SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis. 2022.53(05)
Index Terms
- Optimized model analysis of blockchain PoW procotol under long delay attack
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Security of the Blockchain Against Long Delay Attack
Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2018AbstractThe consensus protocol underlying Bitcoin (the blockchain) works remarkably well in practice. However proving its security in a formal setting has been an elusive goal. A recent analytical result by Pass, Seeman and shelat indicates that an ...
Attack and Vulnerability Simulation Framework for Bitcoin-like Blockchain Technologies
Middleware '18: Proceedings of the 19th International Middleware Conference (Posters)Despite the very high volatility of the cryptocurrency markets, the interest in the development and adaptation of existing cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin as well as new distributed ledger technologies is increasing. Therefore, understanding the ...
BDoS: Blockchain Denial-of-Service
CCS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications SecurityProof-of-work (PoW) cryptocurrency blockchains like Bitcoin secure vast amounts of money. Their operators, called miners, expend resources to generate blocks and receive monetary rewards for their effort. Blockchains are, in principle, attractive ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2023
598 pages
ISBN:9781450399449
DOI:10.1145/3590003
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 29 May 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
CACML 2023
CACML 2023: 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
March 17 - 19, 2023
Shanghai, China
Acceptance Rates
CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate 93 of 241 submissions, 39%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 93 of 241 submissions, 39%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 27Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)22
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format