Who is “I”?: Subjectivity and Ethnography in HCI
May 2024
Article No.: 825, Pages 1 - 15
Abstract
HCI research applies ethnographic methods to understand and represent practices that involve the use of interactive systems. A subdomain of this work is interpretivist ethnography, which positions the researcher's perspectival view [37] as central to ethnographic research and its epistemic contribution. Given this we ask: How might ethnographic researchers in HCI surface the meaning-making role of their subjectivities in research? We reflect on our prior ethnographic fieldwork on small-scale sustainable farms in Indianapolis, Indiana to bring the ethnographic “I” into focus by articulating our reflections as “impressionist tales'' [64:101-124]. We ground this pursuit in sociologist Andrea Doucet's concept of “gossamer walls” to surface researcher's three reflexive relationships 1) with herself; 2) with participants; and 3) with her epistemic communities [34]. We build on and contribute to postmodern ethnography in HCI to clarify the epistemic virtues and methodological best practices of a more unapologetically subjective ethnographic practice in HCI.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File - Video Presentation
Video Presentation
- Download
- 151.55 MB
- Transcript
References
[1]
Crystal Abidin and Gabriele De Seta. 2020. Private messages from the field: Confessions on digital ethnography and its discomforts.
[2]
Chloe Ahmann, Ali Feser, Alix Johnson, Erin McFee, and Amy Leia McLachlan. 2023. Fieldwork confessionals. American Anthropologist 125, 3: 623–628.
[3]
Nikhil Anand. 2017. Hydraulic city: Water and the infrastructures of citizenship in Mumbai. Duke University Press.
[4]
R.J. Anderson. 1994. Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human–Computer Interaction 9, 2: 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0902_1
[5]
Babette Babich. 2017. Hermeneutic Philosophies of Social Science. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, UNITED STATES. Retrieved September 12, 2022 from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/pensu/detail.action?docID=5157002
[6]
Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Rachel E. Clarke, Charles Windlin, Anna Ståhl, Kristina Höök, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Emotion work in experience-centered design. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12.
[7]
Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. Humanistic HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 8, 4: 1–185. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00664ED1V01Y201508HCI031
[8]
Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Mark Blythe. 2018. Critical theory and interaction design. MIT Press.
[9]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1301–1310.
[10]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design.
[11]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2014. Utopias of participation: design, criticality, and emancipation. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts-Volume 2, 189–190.
[12]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2018. Utopias of participation: Feminism, design, and the futures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 1: 1–24.
[13]
Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: Social science, feminism, and HCI. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041
[14]
Howard S. Becker. 1996. The epistemology of qualitative research. Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry 27: 53–71.
[15]
Ruth Behar. 1997. The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Beacon Press.
[16]
Roni Berger. 2015. Now I see it, now I don't: Researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative research 15, 2: 219–234.
[17]
Wendell Berry. 2009. The Gift of Good Land: Further Essays Cultural and Agricultural. Counterpoint, Berkeley, Calif.
[18]
Joost Beuving and G. C. de Vries. 2015. Doing qualitative research: the craft of naturalistic inquiry. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
[19]
Heidi Biggs, Tejaswini Joshi, Ries Murphy, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2021. Alternatives to agrilogistics: designing for ecological thinking. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2: 1–31.
[20]
Heidi R. Biggs and Audrey Desjardins. 2020. High Water Pants: Designing Embodied Environmental Speculation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376429
[21]
Susanne Bødker. 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles (NordiCHI ’06), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476
[22]
Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22, 5: 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405
[23]
David Bordwell. 1991. Making meaning: Inference and rhetoric in the interpretation of cinema. Harvard University Press. Retrieved December 11, 2023 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=cIJs1s8xkTUC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Making+Meaning:+Inference+and+Rhetoric+in+the+Interpretation+of+Cinema&ots=dXmY64D5mx&sig=smK1d04OY9dAa_pzYAkPEAcr41U
[24]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13, 2: 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
[25]
Svend Brinkmann, Michael Hviid Jacobsen, and Søren Kristiansen. 2014. Historical Overview of Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.017
[26]
Leslie Allison Brown and Susan Strega. 2015. Research as resistance, 2e: Revisiting critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches. Canadian Scholars’ Press. Retrieved February 18, 2024 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=4UNVCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Research+as+Resistance&ots=WOxfRvcRmH&sig=fgFMEq_1GbOTulhNQI_PVk7kv60
[27]
Sara Heitlinger City, Bryan-Kinns Nick, Janis Kay, and Jefferies Goldsmiths. 2013. Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities Sonic and Inclusive Tangibles for Children with Autism View project Mutual Engagement View project. dl.acm.org: 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541023
[28]
Eric Corbett and Yanni Loukissas. 2019. Engaging Gentrification as a Social Justice Issue in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300510
[29]
Jason Patrick De Leon and Jeffrey H. Cohen. 2005. Object and Walking Probes in Ethnographic Interviewing. Field Methods 17, 2: 200–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05274733
[30]
Norman K. Denzin. 1997. Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Sage.
[31]
Audrey Desjardins and Aubree Ball. 2018. Revealing Tensions in Autobiographical Design in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’18), 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196781
[32]
Laura Devendorf, Kristina Andersen, and Aisling Kelliher. 2020. The Fundamental Uncertainties of Mothering: Finding Ways to Honor Endurance, Struggle, and Contradiction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 4: 26:1-26:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397177
[33]
Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861
[34]
Andrea Doucet. 2008. “From Her Side of the Gossamer Wall(s)”: Reflexivity and Relational Knowing. Qualitative Sociology 31, 1: 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-007-9090-9
[35]
Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press.
[36]
Paul Dourish. 2004. What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8, 1: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8
[37]
Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’06), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855
[38]
Paul Dourish. 2007. Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing for User eXperiences, 2–16.
[39]
Paul Dourish and Genevieve Bell. 2007. The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure: Meaning and structure in everyday encounters with space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32035t
[40]
Johanne Mose Entwistle, Mia Kruse Rasmussen, Nervo Verdezoto, Robert S. Brewer, and Mads Schaarup Andersen. 2015. Beyond the individual: The contextual wheel of practice as a research framework for sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1125–1134.
[41]
Arturo Escobar. 2018. Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press. Retrieved February 18, 2024 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=M0NRDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT7&dq=Design+for+the+pluriverse&ots=NBD_5zFBmq&sig=J49rB1ZVaOuP7H9hF0dtIWeqYXA
[42]
Didier Fassin. 2015. The public afterlife of ethnography. American Ethnologist 42, 4: 592–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12158
[43]
Patricia Garcia and Marika Cifor. 2019. Expanding our reflexive toolbox: Collaborative possibilities for examining socio-technical systems using duoethnography. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1–23.
[44]
Patricia Garcia and Marika Cifor. 2019. Expanding Our Reflexive Toolbox: Collaborative Possibilities for Examining Socio-Technical Systems Using Duoethnography. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 190:1-190:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359292
[45]
Rachael Garrett, Kristina Popova, Claudia Núñez-Pacheco, Thorhildur Asgeirsdottir, Airi Lampinen, and Kristina Höök. 2023. Felt Ethics: Cultivating Ethical Sensibility in Design Practice. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580875
[46]
Alice Goffman. 2015. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Retrieved September 11, 2023 from https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/O/bo18039324.html
[47]
Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14, 3: 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
[48]
Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1–25.
[49]
Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Janis Jefferies. 2013. Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, 255–264.
[50]
Kristina Hook. 2018. Designing with the body: Somaesthetic interaction design. MIt Press.
[51]
Noura Howell, Audrey Desjardins, and Sarah Fox. 2021. Cracks in the Success Narrative: Rethinking Failure in Design Research through a Retrospective Trioethnography. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 6: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462447
[52]
Valerie J. Janesick. 2016. Contemplative qualitative inquiry: Practicing the Zen of research. Routledge. Retrieved February 18, 2024 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=j22TDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Contemplative+Qualitative+Inquiry&ots=ix5g8FL06e&sig=iVcDna6IG2QGNfuGyFfsDF5XJ8w
[53]
Tejaswini Joshi, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2021. The Flaky Accretions of Infrastructure: Sociotechnical Systems, Citizenship, and the Water Supply. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2: 1–27.
[54]
Vera Khovanskaya, Phoebe Sengers, Melissa Mazmanian, and Charles Darrah. 2017. Reworking the Gaps between Design and Ethnography. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5373–5385. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026051
[55]
John Law. 2004. After method: Mess in social science research. Psychology Press. Retrieved February 18, 2024 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=E20X7N0nBfQC&oi=fnd&pg=PP11&dq=After+Methods:+Mess+in+Social+Science+Research&ots=su9IPE9LOm&sig=egiyq7xtacPuZLKtKT7lVuV3k00
[56]
Wonjun Lee, Youn-kyung Lim, and Richard Shusterman. 2014. Practicing somaesthetics: exploring its impact on interactive product design ideation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS ’14), 1055–1064. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598561
[57]
Gayle Letherby, John Scott, and Malcolm Williams. 2012. Objectivity and Subjectivity in Social Research. SAGE.
[58]
Anqi Liu. ENTANGLED SELF-REFERENTIALITY: HA JIN AND CONFESSIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY. University of Georgia.
[59]
Szu Yu Liu, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2019. Symbiotic encounters: HCI and sustainable agriculture. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300547
[60]
Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Justin Cranshaw, and Asta Roseway. 2020. Making Air Quality Data Meaningful: Coupling Objective Measurement with Subjective Experience through Narration. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1313–1326. Retrieved July 21, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395517
[61]
Phillip Lopate. 2013. To show and to tell: The craft of literary nonfiction. Simon and Schuster.
[62]
Peter Lyle, Jaz Hee Jeong Choi, and Marcus Foth. 2014. Designing for grassroots food production: An event-based urban agriculture community. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2686612.2686666
[63]
Peter Lyle, Jaz Hee Jeong Choi, and Marcus Foth. 2015. Growing food in the city: Design ideations for urban residential gardeners. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768549
[64]
John Van Maanen. 2011. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, Second Edition. University of Chicago Press.
[65]
Elizabeth Mamali. 2019. Researcher's guilt: Confessions from the darker side of ethnographic consumer research. Consumption Markets & Culture 22, 3: 241–255.
[66]
John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as experience. interactions 11, 5: 42–43.
[67]
John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2005. Putting ‘felt-life’ at the centre of human–computer interaction (HCI). Cognition, Technology & Work 7, 4: 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0011-y
[68]
H. Michael. 1980. Agar, The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography.
[69]
Anne Michaels. 1997. Fugitive Pieces. Thorndike Press.
[70]
Katja Mruck and Günter Mey. 2019. Grounded Theory Methodology and Self-Reflexivity in the Qualitative Research Process. In The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP, 470–496. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485656.n25
[71]
Juliet Norton, Birgit Penzenstadler, and Bill Tomlinson. 2019. Implications of grassroots sustainable agriculture community values on the design of information systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359136
[72]
Charles Kay Ogden and Ivor Armstrong Richards. 1925. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Harcourt, Brace.
[73]
Barbara L. Paterson. 1994. A Framework to Identify Reactivity in Qualitative Research. Western Journal of Nursing Research 16, 3: 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599401600306
[74]
Peter Pels and Oscar Salemink. 1994. Introduction: Five theses on ethnography as colonial practice. History and Anthropology 8, 1–4: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.1994.9960856
[75]
Sarah Pink, Kerstin Leder Mackley, Val Mitchell, Marcus Hanratty, Carolina Escobar-Tello, Tracy Bhamra, and Roxana Morosanu. 2013. Applying the lens of sensory ethnography to sustainable HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 4: 1–18.
[76]
Andrea Ploder and Johanna Stadlbauer. 2016. Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics: Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences. Qualitative Inquiry 22, 9: 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658067
[77]
Robert Pool. 1991. Postmodern Ethnography? Critique of Anthropology 11, 4: 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9101100402
[78]
Heidi R. Biggs, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2021. Watching Myself Watching Birds. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445329
[79]
Amon Rapp. 2018. Autoethnography in Human-Computer Interaction: Theory and Practice. In New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2 - Methodologies, Michael Filimowicz and Veronika Tzankova (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_3
[80]
Amon Rapp. 2018. Reflexive Ethnographies in Human-Computer Interaction: Theory and Practice. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’18), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170646
[81]
Amon Rapp. 2021. In Search for Design Elements: A New Perspective for Employing Ethnography in Human-Computer Interaction Design Research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37, 8: 783–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1843296
[82]
Jennifer A. Rode. 2011. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interacting with Computers 23, 5: 393–400.
[83]
Jennifer A. Rode. 2011. Reflexivity in digital anthropology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978961
[84]
Jean J. Schensul and Margaret D. LeCompte. 2012. Essential ethnographic methods: A mixed methods approach. Rowman Altamira.
[85]
Richard Shusterman. 1999. Somaesthetics: A disciplinary proposal. The journal of aesthetics and art criticism 57, 3: 299–313.
[86]
Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson. 2012. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge.
[87]
Rosemary Steup, Lynn Dombrowski, and Norman Makoto Su. 2019. Feeding the world with data: Visions of data-driven farming. In DIS 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322382
[88]
Angelika Strohmayer, Mary Laing, and Rob Comber. 2017. Technologies and Social Justice Outcomes in Sex Work Charities: Fighting Stigma, Saving Lives. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3352–3364. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025615
[89]
Norman Makoto Su. 2020. Threats of the Rural: Writing and Designing with Affect. In HCI Outdoors: Theory, Design, Methods and Applications, D. Scott McCrickard, Michael Jones and Timothy L. Stelter (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45289-6_3
[90]
Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores. 1986. Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Intellect Books.
[91]
Peter Wright, Jayne Wallace, and John McCarthy. 2008. Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 15, 4: 1–21.
[92]
Dan Wulff, Sally St George, Sandy Harper-Jaques, and Lorne Jaques. 2012. Kitchen Stories: A Review. The Qualitative Report 17, 44: 1–10.
[93]
Ethnography and human-computer interaction | The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces. Retrieved May 3, 2021 from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/214811.214814
[94]
Salmer fra kjøkkenet (2003) - IMDb. Retrieved September 11, 2023 from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0323872/
[95]
Watch Kitchen Stories (English Subtitled) | Prime Video. Retrieved September 11, 2023 from https://www.amazon.com/Kitchen-Stories-English-Subtitled-Calmeyer/dp/B004GWURQA
Index Terms
- Who is “I”?: Subjectivity and Ethnography in HCI
Recommendations
Studying Infrastructuring Ethnographically
This paper is motivated by a methodological interest in how to investigate information infrastructures as an empirical, real-world phenomenon. We argue that research on information infrastructures should not be captive to the prevalent method choice of ...
Reflexive Ethnographies in Human-Computer Interaction: Theory and Practice
CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis course aims at introducing some key issues in contemporary ethnographic practice, emphasizing the role of the writing style and the epistemic position of the fieldworker in shaping a particular perspective on the observed phenomena. It outlines the ...
HCI Knowledges and Situated Dissemination
DIS '17 Companion: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive SystemsDrawing from STS, feminist STS and performance theories, my PhD interrogates the practice of research dissemination at an HCI workplace. By studying such practices at a micro level, I begin to construct a productive critique that addresses and questions ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
18961 pages
ISBN:9798400703300
DOI:10.1145/3613904
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Data Availability
Video Presentation: Video Presentation https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642727#3613904.3642727-talk-video.mp4
Funding Sources
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%
Upcoming Conference
CHI PLAY '24
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 510Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)510
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)510
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format