Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

A Token Gesture: Non-Transferable NFTs, Digital Possessions and Ownership Design

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents the design, deployment and qualitative study of a large-scale, public, generative art exhibition, through which passers-by could create artworks, and mint a non-fungible-token (NFT). Following the month-long exhibition, during which 229 anonymous participants produced artworks, 69 non-transferable NFTs were minted, we surveyed (33) and interviewed (14) expert and novice participants about their experiences. We explored contemporary challenges of owning digital things, and the extent to which NFTs, and 'Web3' technologies offer meaningful forms of ownership. Our findings describe how the inability to trade this NFT, and its unique circumstances of acquisition, made it meaningful in ways that extended beyond its immediate (limited) utility and offered participants something through which to construct identity. Reflecting on the aspirations, contradictions, and misconceptions of forms of ownership enabled by NFTs, we conclude with proposals for renewed attention in HCI to the nature of digital possessions, and the potential for 'ownership design'.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Supplemental video
ZIP File

References

[1]
Memo Akten. 2022. The Unreasonable Ecological Cost of #CryptoArt. https://memoakten.medium.com/the-unreasonable-ecological-cost-of-cryptoart-2221d3eb2053
[2]
Lennart Ante. 2021. Non-fungible Token (NFT) Markets on the Ethereum Blockchain: Temporal Development, Cointegration and Interrelations. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904683
[3]
Andrea Vanina Arias. 2007. Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Swords and Armor: Regulating the Theft of Virtual Goods Comment. Emory Law Journal, Vol. 57, 5 (2007), 1301--1346. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/emlj57&i=1315
[4]
Ralph Barthel, Kerstin Leder Mackley, Andrew Hudson-Smith, Angelina Karpovich, Martin Jode, and Chris Speed. 2013. An Internet of Old Things as an Augmented Memory System. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., Vol. 17, 2 (feb 2013), 321--333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0496--8
[5]
Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Amos Cappellaro, and Ylva Fernaeus. 2022. Stakeholders and Value in the NFT Ecosystem: Towards a Multi-disciplinary Understanding of the NFT Phenomenon. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519694
[6]
Russell W. Belk. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, Vol. 15, 2 (1988), 139--168. https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/15/2/139/1841428
[7]
Balázs Bodó, Alexandra Giannopoulou, João Pedro Quintais, and Péter Mezei. 2022. The Rise of NFTs: These Aren't the Droids You're Looking For. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4000423
[8]
Joanna Brooks, Serena McCluskey, Emma Turley, and Nigel King. 2015. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 12, 2 (2015), 202--222.
[9]
Jed R. Brubaker and Vanessa Callison-Burch. 2016. Legacy Contact: Designing and Implementing Post-Mortem Stewardship at Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2908--2919. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858254
[10]
Christian Bräm, Marco Eilers, Peter Müller, Robin Sierra, and Alexander J. Summers. 2021. Rich specifications for Ethereum smart contract verification. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, Vol. 5, OOPSLA (Oct. 2021), 146:1--146:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485523
[11]
S. Casale-Brunet, P. Ribeca, P. Doyle, and M. Mattavelli. 2021. Networks of Ethereum Non-Fungible Tokens: A graph-based analysis of the ERC-721 ecosystem. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.12545 arXiv:2110.12545 [cs].
[12]
Alan Chamberlain, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, Matt Jones, and Yvonne Rogers. 2012. Research in the Wild: Understanding 'in the Wild' Approaches to Design and Development. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 795--796. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318078
[13]
Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2021. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Thematic Analysis (2021), 1--100.
[14]
Anil Dash. 2021. NFTs Weren't Supposed to End Like This. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/04/nfts-werent-supposed-end-like/618488/ Section: Ideas.
[15]
Abigail Durrant, David Kirk, Diego Trujillo Pisanty, Wendy Moncur, Kathryn Orzech, Tom Schofield, Chris Elsden, David Chatting, and Andrew Monk. 2017. Transitions in Digital Personhood: Online Activity in Early Retirement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6398--6411. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025913
[16]
Chris Elsden, Abigail C. Durrant, David Chatting, and David S. Kirk. 2017. Designing Documentary Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 649--661. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064714
[17]
Chris Elsden, Abigail C. Durrant, and David S. Kirk. 2016a. It's Just My History Isn'T It?: Understanding Smart Journaling Practices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2819--2831. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858103
[18]
Chris Elsden, David S. Kirk, and Abigail C. Durrant. 2016b. A Quantified Past: Toward Design for Remembering With Personal Informatics. Human--Computer Interaction, Vol. 31, 6 (Nov. 2016), 518--557. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2015.1093422 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2015.1093422.
[19]
Chris Elsden, Arthi Manohar, Jo Briggs, Mike Harding, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2018. Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174032
[20]
Chris Elsden and Chris Speed. 2022. Designing new money: Creative transactions on Twitch. In Proceedings of the 2022 Design Research Society Conference. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.574
[21]
Ji Eun Song, Jaeyoun You, and Joongseek Lee. 2021. ?I Might be Using His? But It is Also Mine!": Ownership and Control in Accounts Designed for Sharing. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445301
[22]
Tonya M Evans. 2019. Cryptokitties, cryptography, and copyright. AIPLA QJ, Vol. 47 (2019), 219.
[23]
Christopher Frayling. 1994. Research in art and design (Royal College of Art Research Papers, vol 1, no 1, 1993/4). (1994).
[24]
Michael Froehlich, Franz Waltenberger, Ludwig Trotter, Florian Alt, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2022. Blockchain and Cryptocurrency in Human Computer Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 155--177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533478
[25]
Brian L. Frye. 2021. After Copyright: Pwning NFTs in a Clout Economy. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3971240
[26]
Brian L. Frye. 2022. How to Sell NFTs without Really Trying. Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law, Vol. 13, 1 (2022), 113--140. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/harvsel13&i=121
[27]
William Gaver. 2012. What Should We Expect from Research through Design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 937--946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538
[28]
Lincoln Geraghty. 2014. Cult collectors. Routledge.
[29]
Colin M. Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L. Toombs. 2018. The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108
[30]
Jane Gruning. 2017. Models for Ownership: Implications for Long-term Relationships to Objects. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2607--2613. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053232
[31]
Jane Gruning and Siân Lindley. 2016. Things We Own Together: Sharing Possessions at Home. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1176--1186. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858154
[32]
Andres Guadamuz. 2021. The treachery of images: non-fungible tokens and copyright. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 16, 12 (Dec. 2021), 1367--1385. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab152
[33]
Rebecca Gulotta, Alex Sciuto, Aisling Kelliher, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2015. Curatorial Agents: How Systems Shape Our Understanding of Personal and Familial Digital Information. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3453--3462. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702297
[34]
Richard Harper, Siân Lindley, Eno Thereska, Richard Banks, Philip Gosset, Gavin Smyth, William Odom, and Eryn Whitworth. 2013. What is a File?. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1125--1136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441903
[35]
Michael A Heller and James Salzman. 2022. Mine!: How the Hidden Rules of Ownership Control Our Lives. Anchor Books.
[36]
Henry Jenkins. 2020. Comics and stuff. In Comics and Stuff. New York University Press.
[37]
David Joselit. 2021. NFTs, or The Readymade Reversed. October 175 (April 2021), 3--4. https://doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00419
[38]
Arnav Kapoor, Dipanwita Guhathakurta, Mehul Mathur, Rupanshu Yadav, Manish Gupta, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2022. TweetBoost: Influence of Social Media on NFT Valuation. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022 (WWW '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 621--629. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487553.3524642
[39]
Michael Karim and Gergana Tomova. 2021. Research Note: Cryptoasset consumer research 2021. Technical Report. Financial Conduct Authority. https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/research/research-note-cryptoasset-consumer-research-2021
[40]
Ju Won Kim, Jae Geun Song, Tae Rim Lee, and Ju Wook Jang. 2022. Performance Evaluation of NFT Trading Platform Based on Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain. In 2022 The 8th International Conference on Computing and Data Engineering (ICCDE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 65--70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512850.3512855
[41]
David Kirk, Abigail Sellen, Carsten Rother, and Ken Wood. 2006. Understanding photowork. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 761--770. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124885
[42]
Siân E. Lindley, Catherine C. Marshall, Richard Banks, Abigail Sellen, and Tim Regan. 2013. Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (WWW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 749--760. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488454
[43]
Simon Mackenzie and Di?na B?rzi?a. 2021. NFTs: Digital things and their criminal lives. Crime, Media, Culture (Aug. 2021), 17416590211039797. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211039797 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[44]
Catherine C. Marshall, Sara Bly, and Francoise Brun-Cottan. 2006. The Long Term Fate of Our Digital Belongings: Toward a Service Model for Personal Archives. Archiving Conference, Vol. 2006, 1 (Jan. 2006), 25--30.
[45]
Catherine C. Marshall and Frank M. Shipman. 2011. Social media ownership: using twitter as a window onto current attitudes and beliefs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1081--1090. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979103
[46]
Anthony Masure and Guillaume Helleu. 2021. Singularizing the multiple. Multitudes, Vol. 85, 4 (Dec. 2021), 210--219. https://www.cairn-int.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=E_MULT_085_0210 Bibliographie_available: 0 Cairndomain: www.cairn-int.info Cite Par_available: 0 Publisher: Assoc. Multitudes.
[47]
Thomas W Merrill. 2015. Ownership and possession. Law and economics of possession (2015), 1--39.
[48]
Daniel Miller. 2008. The comfort of things. Polity.
[49]
Richard Mortier, Hamed Haddadi, Tristan Henderson, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2014. Human-data interaction: The human face of the data-driven society. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6159 (2014).
[50]
Dave Murray-Rust, Chris Elsden, Bettina Nissen, Ella Tallyn, Larissa Pschetz, and Chris Speed. 2021. Blockchain and Beyond: Understanding Blockchains through Prototypes and Public Engagement. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (nov 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3503462 Just Accepted.
[51]
Ilya Musabirov, Denis Bulygin, Paul Okopny, and Alexander Sirotkin. 2017. Deconstructing Cosmetic Virtual Goods Experiences in Dota 2. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2054--2058. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025893
[52]
Matthieu Nadini, Laura Alessandretti, Flavio Di Giacinto, Mauro Martino, Luca Maria Aiello, and Andrea Baronchelli. 2021. Mapping the NFT revolution: market trends, trade networks, and visual features. Scientific Reports, Vol. 11, 1 (Oct. 2021), 20902. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00053--8 Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
[53]
Jeremy K. Nguyen. 2022. Racial discrimination in non-fungible token (NFT) prices? CryptoPunk sales and skin tone. Economics Letters, Vol. 218 (Sept. 2022), 110727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110727
[54]
William Odom. 2014. Critically Exploring the Virtual Possession Design Space Through Fieldwork and Constructive Design Research. PhD Dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.698.2889&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[55]
William Odom, Abi Sellen, Richard Harper, and Eno Thereska. 2012. Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 781--790. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207789
[56]
William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Youn-kyung Lim, Audrey Desjardins, Bart Hengeveld, and Richard Banks. 2016. From Research Prototype to Research Product. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2549--2561. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858447
[57]
William Odom, MinYoung Yoo, Henry Lin, Tijs Duel, Tal Amram, and Amy Yo Sue Chen. 2020. Exploring the Reflective Potentialities of Personal Data with Different Temporal Modalities: A Field Study of Olo Radio. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 283--295. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395438
[58]
William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Teenagers and Their Virtual Possessions: Design Opportunities and Issues. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1491--1500. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979161
[59]
William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Placelessness, spacelessness, and formlessness: experiential qualities of virtual possessions. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, 985--994. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2598577
[60]
UK Ministry of Justice. 2022. Law Commission consultation on digital assets. https://consult.justice.gov.uk/law-commission/digital-assets-consultation/
[61]
Yong Jin Park. 2013. Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Communication research, Vol. 40, 2 (2013), 215--236.
[62]
Aaron Perzanowski and Jason Schultz. 2016. The End of Ownership: Personal Property in the Digital Economy. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035019.001.0001
[63]
Jason Potts and Ellie Rennie. 2019. Web3 and the creative industries: how blockchains are reshaping business models. A Research Agenda for Creative Industries (Sept. 2019), 93--111. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788118576/9781788118576.00013.xml ISBN: 9781788118583 Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing Section: A Research Agenda for Creative Industries.
[64]
Pablo Rodrigo, Johan Pouwelse, and Martijn de Vos. 2021. UniCon: Universal and Scalable Infrastructure for Digital Asset Management. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Distributed Infrastructure for Common Good (DICG'21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3493426.3493823
[65]
Meni Rosenfeld et al. 2012. Overview of colored coins. White paper, bitcoil. co. il, Vol. 41 (2012), 94.
[66]
Cornel Sandvoss. 2005. Fans: The mirror of consumption. Polity.
[67]
Riddhi Setti. 2022. Seth Green's Stolen ?Bored Ape' Muddles NFT Legal Ownership. Bloomberg Law (2022). https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/seth-greens-stolen-bored-ape-muddles-nft-legal-ownership
[68]
Molly Stephens. 2001. Sales of In-Game Assets: An Illustration of the Continuing Failure of Intellectual Property Law to Protect Digital-Content Creators Note. Texas Law Review, Vol. 80, 6 (2001), 1513--1536. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tlr80&i=1527
[69]
Sean Sullivan. 2022. "NFTs: Future or Fad?" Excerpts From A Practical Discussion of NFT Use Cases and Copyright Concerns Raised by NFT Offerings. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 45, 3 (July 2022), 365--370. https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v45i3.10011 Publisher: Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts.
[70]
Lana Swartz. 2022. Theorizing the 2017 blockchain ICO bubble as a network scam. new media & society, Vol. 24, 7 (2022), 1695--1713.
[71]
Ella Tallyn, Joe Revans, Evan Morgan, and Dave Murray-Rust. 2020. GeoPact: Engaging Publics in Location-Aware Smart Contracts through Technological Assemblies. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 799--811. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395583
[72]
Alex Thorn, Michael Marcantonio, and Gabe Parker. 2022. A Survey of NFT Licenses: Facts & Fictions. Technical Report. https://www.galaxy.com/research/insights/a-survey-of-nft-licenses-facts-and-fictions/
[73]
Sarah Thornton. 1995. Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Polity Press, Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ed/detail.action?docID=1584071
[74]
Foteini Valeonti, Antonis Bikakis, Melissa Terras, Chris Speed, Andrew Hudson-Smith, and Konstantinos Chalkias. 2021. Crypto collectibles, museum funding and OpenGLAM: challenges, opportunities and the potential of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, 21 (2021), 9931.
[75]
Max Van Kleek, Daniel A. Smith, Dave Murray-Rust, Amy Guy, Kieron O'Hara, Laura Dragan, and Nigel R. Shadbolt. 2015. Social Personal Data Stores: The Nuclei of Decentralised Social Machines. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (Florence, Italy) (WWW '15 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1155--1160. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2743975
[76]
Fernanda B. Viégas, Scott Golder, and Judith Donath. 2006. Visualizing Email Content: Portraying Relationships from Conversational Histories. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 979--988. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124919
[77]
Gang Wang and Mark Nixon. 2021. SoK: tokenization on blockchain. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing Companion (UCC '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492323.3495577
[78]
Rebecca D. Watkins, Abigail Sellen, and Siân E. Lindley. 2015. Digital Collections and Digital Collecting Practices. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3423--3432. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702380
[79]
E. Glen Weyl, Puja Ohlhaver, and Vitalik Buterin. 2022. Decentralized Society: Finding Web3's Soul. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4105763
[80]
Bryan White, Aniket Mahanti, and Kalpdrum Passi. 2022. Characterizing the OpenSea NFT Marketplace. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022 (WWW '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 488--496. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487553.3524629
[81]
Jordan White, William Odom, and Nico Brand. 2020. Exploring Location Histories as a Design Material for Reflection with Memory Compass & Memory Tracer. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS' 20 Companion ). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 221--226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395878
[82]
Andree E Widjaja, Jengchung Victor Chen, Badri Munir Sukoco, and Quang-An Ha. 2019. Understanding users' willingness to put their personal information on the personal cloud-based storage applications: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 91 (2019), 167--185.
[83]
Huijun Xiong, Xinwen Zhang, Danfeng Yao, Xiaoxin Wu, and Yonggang Wen. 2012. Towards End-to-End Secure Content Storage and Delivery with Public Cloud. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CODASPY '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 257--266. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133601.2133633
[84]
Xuan Zhao and Siân E. Lindley. 2014. Curation through Use: Understanding the Personal Value of Social Media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2431--2440. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557291
[85]
Shoshana Zuboff. 2015. Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of information technology, Vol. 30, 1 (2015), 75--89.
[86]
Pinar Çaglayan Aksoy and Zehra Özkan Üner. 2021. NFTs and copyright: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 16, 10 (Oct. 2021), 1115--1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab104 io

Index Terms

  1. A Token Gesture: Non-Transferable NFTs, Digital Possessions and Ownership Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
    CSCW
    April 2024
    6294 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3661497
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2024
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. blockchain
    2. digital possessions
    3. generative art
    4. nfts
    5. non-transferable
    6. ownership
    7. public experiences
    8. web3

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Engineering Physical Sciences Research Council

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 380
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)380
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)50
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media