Appalachian Ingenuity and the Need for Rurally Sustaining Computational Thinking Pathways
Pages 133 - 138
Abstract
Our research-practice partnership with two school districts in Eastern Kentucky has created a rurally sustaining computational thinking (CT) pathway. In this paper we share our project's operational understanding of the concept of rural sustainability in the context of CT pathways. We posit that an effective CT pathway for rural communities must be firmly rooted in their cultural wealth, funds of knowledge, and socioeconomic priorities. Moreover, it should empower students to draw upon their own innovation heritage, leveraging CT as a tool to identify and address community challenges. Emphasizing the necessity of incorporating rural contexts into discussions on equitable access to computing education, our conceptualization provides insights into how policy and research can contribute to this important goal.
References
[1]
Brittany Aronson and Judson Laughter. 2016. The Theory and Practice of Culturally Relevant Education: A Synthesis of Research Across Content Areas. Rev. Educ. Res. 86, 1 (March 2016), 163--206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
[2]
Code.org, CSTA, ECEP Alliance. 2023. 2023 State of Computer Science Education: Kentucky. Retrieved from https://advocacy.code.org/stateofcs
[3]
Loni Crumb, Crystal Chambers, Amy Azano, Africa Hands, Kristen Cuthrell, and Max Avent. 2023. Rural cultural wealth: dismantling deficit ideologies of rurality. J. Multicult. Educ. 17, 2 (May 2023), 125--138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-06--2022-0076
[4]
Ron Eglash, Juan E. Gilbert, and Ellen Foster. 2013. Toward culturally responsive computing education. Commun. ACM 56, 7 (July 2013), 33--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2483852.2483864
[5]
Andrew Herod. 1999. Re¯ections on interviewing foreign elites: praxis, positionality, validity, and the cult of the insider. (1999).
[6]
Emi Iwatani, Traci Tackett, Kelsey Tackett, Neil Arnett, and Payton May. 2021. Leveraging Community Cultural Wealth to Support K-8 CT Education in Kentucky Appalachia. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), May 23, 2021. IEEE, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1--2. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021.9620610
[7]
Susan E. Keefe. 2005. Appalachian cultural competency: a guide for medical, mental health, and social service professionals (1st ed ed.). University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
[8]
Alyssa López-Quiñones, Marlen Martinez-Lopez, Cueponcaxochitl D. Moreno Sandoval, Joseph Carroll-Miranda, April E. Lindala, Michelle C. Chatman, Jeffery Fleming, Ebony Terrell Shockley, Denise Cadeau, and Elizabeth Flores-Reyes. 2023. Ancestral Computing for Sustainability: Centering Indigenous Epistemologies in Researching Computer Science Education. TechTrends 67, 3 (May 2023), 435--445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00820-y
[9]
Luis C. Moll, Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff, and Norma Gonzalez. 1992. Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms. Theory Pract. 31, 2, (1992), 132--141.
[10]
Zachary J. Richards and Tamra Stambaugh. 2021. National Context of Rural Schools. In Serving Gifted Students in Rural Settings (1st ed.). Routledge, New York, 1--21. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003237938--2
[11]
Kimberly A. Scott, Kimberly M. Sheridan, and Kevin Clark. 2015. Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited. Learn. Media Technol. 40, 4 (October 2015), 412--436. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.924966
[12]
Kristin A. Searle and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2015. Culturally Responsive Making with American Indian Girls: Bridging the Identity Gap in Crafting and Computing with Electronic Textiles. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on GenderIT, April 24, 2015. ACM, Philadelphia PA USA, 9--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807565.2807707
[13]
Shaping Our Appalachian Region (SOAR). 2018. Blueprint. A plan for our future: A strategic approach Shfor Appalachia Kentucky. Retrieved from https://www.soar-ky.org/plan/
[14]
Caryn M. Vazzana and Jeta Rudi-Polloshka. 2019. Appalachia Has Got Talent, But Why Does It Flow Away? A Study on the Determinants of Brain Drain From Rural USA. Econ. Dev. Q. 33, 3 (August 2019), 220--233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242419844320
[15]
Aman Yadav, Hai Hong, and Chris Stephenson. 2016. Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends 60, 6 (November 2016), 565--568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087--7
[16]
Tara J. Yosso *. 2005. Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethn. Educ. 8, 1 (March 2005), 69--91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
Index Terms
- Appalachian Ingenuity and the Need for Rurally Sustaining Computational Thinking Pathways
Recommendations
Infusing Computational Thinking Across Disciplines: Reflections & Lessons Learned
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationIn this work, we describe our effort to develop, pilot, and evaluate a model for infusing computational thinking into undergraduate curricula across a variety of disciplines using multiple methods that previously have been individually tried and tested, ...
Thinking about Computational Thinking: Lessons from Education Research
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationComputational thinking (CT) is a means to help learners engage in authentic disciplinary and problem-solving practices of computer science (CS). For CS classrooms, CT is considered "thinking like a computer scientist". CT is believed to be an important ...
Building Awareness of Computational Thinking Pathways across a Large School District
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2As states move to adopt computer science (CS) and computational thinking (CT) standards to prepare students for an increasingly technological world, school districts are integrating curriculum with CT skills and practices, building the capacity of their ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
321 pages
ISBN:9798400706264
DOI:10.1145/3653666
- General Chair:
- Tamara Pearson,
- Program Chairs:
- Carla Strickland,
- Maya Israel
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 16 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
Funding Sources
Conference
RESPECT 2024
Sponsor:
RESPECT 2024: Conference for Research on Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology
May 16 - 17, 2024
GA, Atlanta, USA
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 27Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)27
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in