Safety and Community Context: Exploring a Transfeminist Approach to Sapphic Relationship Platforms
Authors: 
Michael Ann DeVito, 
Jessica L. Feuston, Erika Melder, Christen Malloy, Cade Ponder, and 
Jed R. BrubakerAuthors Info & Claims
Michael Ann DeVito, Jessica L. Feuston, Erika Melder, Christen Malloy, Cade Ponder, and Jed R. BrubakerAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 203, Pages 1 - 34
Abstract
Relationship platforms (e.g., dating apps) are crucial tools for sapphics (trans women, cisgender women, and nonbinary people who are attracted to other sapphics). However, current platforms are not designed in a way that accounts for sapphic lived experience, especially the lived experience of sapphics who hold multiple marginalized identity characteristics. Even on platforms that do exist for sapphics, transgender women and nonbinary people are often subject to discrimination, fetishization, and stigmatization. To aid in the design of platforms that better serve the needs of multiply marginalized sapphics, we engaged a diverse group of 25 sapphics in six rounds of community discussion on key topics for relationship platform design. Based on participant discussions, we identify key challenges when designing for multiply marginalized sapphics around relationship structures, gender and sexuality classification, and safety priorities for interaction. We present two design priorities alongside community-sourced design directions which can help future designers address these challenges: identity-centric safety and community-based information formats.
Supplemental Material
ZIP File
SapphicPlatforms_Supplemental.pdf - Additional methods details, including discussion prompts and participant materials - PDF file, openable in any PDF viewer QT_pipeline_submission_cscw.py - Python script documenting our data output pipeline from Slack - Python script file, openable in any text editing program
- Download
- 257.70 KB
References
[1]
Patricia A Adler and Peter Adler. 1987. Membership Roles in Field Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
[2]
Alex A Ahmed. 2018. Trans Competent Interaction Design: A Qualitative Study on Voice, Identity, and Technology. Interacting with Computers, 30, 1: 53--71.
[3]
Sara Ahmed. 2006. Orientations: Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 12, 4: 543--574.
[4]
Milaine Alarie and Stéphanie Gaudet. 2013. ?I don't know if she is bisexual or if she just wants to get attention": Analyzing the various mechanisms through which emerging adults invisibilize bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 13, 2: 191--214.
[5]
Kath Albury, Christopher Dietzel, Tinonee Pym, Son Vivienne, and Teddy Cook. 2021. Not your unicorn: Trans dating app users' negotiations of personal safety and sexual health. Health Sociology Review, 30, 1: 72--86.
[6]
Melissa Anderson-Chavarria. 2021. The autism predicament: models of autism and their impact on autistic identity. Disability & Society1--21.
[7]
Rhonda N Balzarini, Christoffer Dharma, Taylor Kohut, Bjarne M Holmes, Lorne Campbell, Justin J Lehmiller, and Jennifer J Harman. 2019. Demographic comparison of American individuals in polyamorous and monogamous relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 56, 6: 681--694.
[8]
Jeremy Birnholtz, Colin Fitzpatrick, Mark Handel, and Jed R Brubaker. 2014. Identity, identification and identifiability: The language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, 3--12.
[9]
Courtney Blackwell, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Charles Abbott. 2015. Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 17, 7: 1117--1136.
[10]
Karen L Blair and Rhea Ashley Hoskin. 2019. Transgender exclusion from the world of dating: Patterns of acceptance and rejection of hypothetical trans dating partners as a function of sexual and gender identity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 7: 2074--2095.
[11]
Alan Borning and Michael Muller. 2012. Next Steps for Value Sensitive Design. In Proceedings of the 2012 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1125--1134.
[12]
Wendy Bostwick. 2012. Assessing bisexual stigma and mental health status: A brief report. Journal of Bisexuality, 12, 2: 214--222.
[13]
Lisa Bowleg. 2013. "Once you've blended the cake, you can't take the parts back to the main ingredients": Black gay and bisexual men's descriptions and experiences of intersectionality. Sex Roles, 68, 11--12: 754--767.
[14]
Judith Butler. 1993. Imitation and Gender Insubordination. In The Lesbian and Gay Studies reader, Henry Abelove, Michele Aina Barale and David M. Halperin (ed.). Routledge, New York, 307--320.
[15]
Paul Byron, Kath Albury, and Tinonee Pym. 2021. Hooking up with friends: LGBTQ+ young people, dating apps, friendship and safety. Media, Culture & Society, 43, 3: 497--514.
[16]
Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[17]
Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[18]
Andrea Daley, Judith A. MacDonnell, Shari Brotman, Melissa St Pierre, Jane Aronson, and Loralee Gillis. 2017. Providing health and social services to older LGBT adults. Annual Review of Gerontology & Geriatrics, 37, 143.
[19]
Gaby David and Carolina Cambre. 2016. Screened intimacies: Tinder and the swipe logic. Social media+ society, 2, 2: 2056305116641976.
[20]
Michael Ann DeVito. 2021. Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to Algorithmic Literacy on Changing Platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5, CSCW2: 339.
[21]
Michael Ann DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Julia R Fernandez. 2021. Values (Mis) alignment: Exploring Tensions Between Platform and LGBTQ+ Community Design Values. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5, CSCW1: 1--27.
[22]
Petra L. Doan and Harrison Higgins. 2011. The demise of queer space? Resurgent gentrification and the assimilation of LGBT neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 1: 6--25.
[23]
Stefanie Duguay. 2019. ?There's no one new around you": Queer Women's Experiences of Scarcity in Geospatial Partner-Seeking on Tinder. In The Geographies of Digital Sexuality, Catherine J Nash and Andrew Gorman-Murray (ed.). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 93--114.
[24]
Laura Boyd Farmer and Rebekah Byrd. 2015. Genderism in the LGBTQQIA community: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 9, 4: 288--310.
[25]
Brooke C Feeney and Nancy L Collins. 2015. A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 2: 113--147.
[26]
Julia R Fernandez and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2019. " I Don't Want Them to Not Know" Investigating Decisions to Disclose Transgender Identity on Dating Platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, CSCW: 1--21.
[27]
Lindsay Ferris and Stefanie Duguay. 2020. Tinder's lesbian digital imaginary: Investigating (im) permeable boundaries of sexual identity on a popular dating app. New Media & Society, 22, 3: 489--506.
[28]
Colin Fitzpatrick and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2018. ?I shut the door": Interactions, tensions, and negotiations from a location-based social app. New Media & Society, 20, 7: 2469--2488.
[29]
Michael Flood, Molly Dragiewicz, and Bob Pease. 2021. Resistance and backlash to gender equality. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56, 3: 393--408.
[30]
Human Rights Campaign Foundation. 2020. Violence Against the Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Community in 2020. Human Rights Campaign, Washington, DC. https://www.hrc.org/resources/violence-against-the-trans-and-gender-non-conforming-community-in-2020
[31]
Human Rights Campaign Foundation. 2021. Black LGBTQ People and Compounding Discrimination. Human Rights Campaign Foundation, Washington, DC. https://reports.hrc.org/black-lgbtq-discrimination-report
[32]
Human Rights Campaign Foundation. 2022. Fatal Violence Against the Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Community in 2022. Human Rights Campaign Foundation, Washington, DC. https://www.hrc.org/resources/fatal-violence-against-the-transgender-and-gender-non-conforming-community-in-2022
[33]
Jesse Fox and Rachel Ralston. 2016. Queer identity online: informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 65,: 635--642.
[34]
Batya Friedman, Peter H Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2006. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations, Ping Zhang and Dennis Galletta (ed.). M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 69--101.
[35]
Lesbian & Straight Education Network Gay, Center for Innovative Public Health Research, and Crimes Against Children Research Center. 2013. Out online: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth on the Internet. Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network, New York, NY. https://www.glsen.org/article/experiences-lgbtq-youth-online
[36]
Rita George and Mark A Stokes. 2018. Gender identity and sexual orientation in autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 22, 8: 970--982.
[37]
Rita George and Mark A Stokes. 2018. Sexual orientation in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 11, 1: 133--141.
[38]
Sarah A Gilbert. 2020. " I run the world's largest historical outreach project and it's on a cesspool of a website." Moderating a Public Scholarship Site on Reddit: A Case Study of r/AskHistorians. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4, CSCW1: 1--27.
[39]
Kishonna L Gray. 2012. Intersecting oppressions and online communities: Examining the experiences of women of color in Xbox Live. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 3: 411--428.
[40]
Mary L Gray. 2009. Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. NYU Press, New York, NY.
[41]
Oliver Haimson. 2018. Social media as social transition machinery. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, CSCW: 1--21.
[42]
Oliver L Haimson, Avery Dame-Griff, Elias Capello, and Zahari Richter. 2019. Tumblr was a trans technology: the meaning, importance, history, and future of trans technologies. Feminist Media Studies, 1--17.
[43]
Oliver L Haimson, Dykee Gorrell, Denny L Starks, and Zu Weinger. 2020. Designing trans technology: Defining challenges and envisioning community-centered solutions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--13.
[44]
Jean Hardy and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. Constructing a desiring user: Discourse, rurality, and design in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 13--25.
[45]
Joy L Hightower. 2015. Producing desirable bodies: Boundary work in a lesbian niche dating site. Sexualities, 18, 1--2: 20--36.
[46]
Levi CR Hord. 2020. Specificity without identity: Articulating post-gender sexuality through the ?non-binary lesbian". Sexualities,1--23.
[47]
Matthew W Hughey. 2014. White backlash in the ?post-racial'United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 5: 721--730.
[48]
Kevin T Hutzler, Traci A Giuliano, Jordan R Herselman, and Sarah M Johnson. 2016. Three'sa crowd: Public awareness and (mis) perceptions of polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 7, 2: 69--87.
[49]
Shanna K Kattari, N Eugene Walls, Darren L Whitfield, and Lisa Langenderfer-Magruder. 2015. Racial and ethnic differences in experiences of discrimination in accessing health services among transgender people in the United States. International Journal of Transgenderism, 16, 2: 68--79.
[50]
Os Keyes, Burren Peil, Rua M Williams, and Katta Spiel. 2020. Reimagining (women's) health: HCI, gender and essentialised embodiment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 27, 4: 1--42.
[51]
Christian Klesse. 2011. Shady characters, untrustworthy partners, and promiscuous sluts: Creating bisexual intimacies in the face of heteronormativity and biphobia. Journal of Bisexuality, 11, 2--3: 227--244.
[52]
Emi Koyama. 2003. The transfeminist manifesto. In Catching a Wave: Reclaiming Feminism for the 21st Century, Rory Dicker and Alison Piepmeier (ed.). Northeastern University Press, Boston, MA, 244--259.
[53]
Christopher A Le Dantec, Erika Shehan Poole, and Susan P Wyche. 2009. Values as Lived Experience: Evolving Value Sensitive Design in Support of Value Discovery. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1141--1150.
[54]
Laura Foran Lewis, Caroline Ward, Noah Jarvis, and Eleni Cawley. 2021. ?Straight Sex is Complicated Enough!": The Lived Experiences of Autistics Who are Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Asexual, or Other Sexual Orientations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51, 7: 2324--2337.
[55]
Christian Licoppe, Carole Anne Rivière, and Julien Morel. 2016. Grindr casual hook-ups as interactional achievements. New Media & Society, 18, 11: 2540--2558.
[56]
Carmen H Logie and Marie-Jolie Rwigema. 2014. ?The normative idea of queer is a white person": Understanding perceptions of white privilege among lesbian, bisexual, and queer women of color in Toronto, Canada. Journal of lesbian studies, 18, 2: 174--191.
[57]
Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Dhruv Jain, Lucy Lu Wang, Jon E. Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2021. What do we mean by ?accessibility research"? A literature survey of accessibility papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--18.
[58]
Caitlin MacLeod and Victoria McArthur. 2019. The construction of gender in dating apps: An interface analysis of Tinder and Bumble. Feminist Media Studies, 19, 6: 822--840.
[59]
Haley MacLeod, Ben Jelen, Annu Prabhakar, Lora Oehlberg, Katie Siek, and Kay Connelly. 2016. Asynchronous Remote Communities (ARC) for Researching Distributed Populations. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 1--8.
[60]
Juan F. Maestre, Haley MacLeod, Ciabhan L. Connelly, Julia C. Dunbar, Jordan Beck, Katie A. Siek, and Patrick C. Shih. 2018. Defining Through Expansion: Conducting Asynchronous Remote Communities (ARC) Research with Stigmatized Groups. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 557.
[61]
J Nathan Matias. 2019. The civic labor of volunteer moderators online. Social Media + Society, 5, 2: 1--12.
[62]
Amy C Moors, Amanda N Gesselman, and Justin R Garcia. 2021. Desire, familiarity, and engagement in polyamory: Results from a national sample of single adults in the United States. Frontiers in Psychology, 12619640.
[63]
Sarah Murray and Megan Sapnar Ankerson. 2016. Lez takes time: Designing lesbian contact in geosocial networking apps. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33, 1: 53--69.
[64]
Kevin L Nadal, Chassitty N Whitman, Lindsey S Davis, Tanya Erazo, and Kristin C Davidoff. 2016. Microaggressions toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and genderqueer people: A review of the literature. The journal of sex research, 53, 4--5: 488--508.
[65]
Michael E Newcomb, Ricky Hill, Kathleen Buehler, Daniel T Ryan, Sarah W Whitton, and Brian Mustanski. 2020. High burden of mental health problems, substance use, violence, and related psychosocial factors in transgender, non-binary, and gender diverse youth and young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 2: 645--659.
[66]
Sonali Patel. 2019. ?Brown girls can't be gay": Racism experienced by queer South Asian women in the Toronto LGBTQ community. Journal of lesbian studies, 23, 3: 410--423.
[67]
Ruth Pearce, Sonja Erikainen, and Ben Vincent. 2020. TERF wars: An introduction. The Sociological Review, 68, 4: 677--698.
[68]
Kathryn J Perkins. 2022. Willful lives: Self-determination in lesbian and trans feminisms. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 26, 2: 194--198.
[69]
Carla A Pfeffer. 2014. ?I don't like passing as a straight woman": Queer negotiations of identity and social group membership. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1: 1--44.
[70]
Anthony T Pinter, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Jed R Brubaker. 2021. Entering Doors, Evading Traps: Benefits and Risks of Visibility During Transgender Coming Outs. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4, CSCW3: 1--27.
[71]
Jonathan L Poquiz, Claire A Coyne, Robert Garofalo, and Diane Chen. 2021. Comparison of gender minority stress and resilience among transmasculine, transfeminine, and nonbinary adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68, 3: 615--618.
[72]
John R Porter, Kiley Sobel, Sarah E Fox, Cynthia L Bennett, and Julie A Kientz. 2017. Filtered out: Disability disclosure practices in online dating communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer interaction, 1, CSCW: 1--13.
[73]
Annu Sible Prabhakar, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Vanessa M. Kleinschmidt, Ben Jelen, Haley MacLeod, Kay Connelly, and Katie A. Siek. 2017. Investigating the suitability of the asynchronous, remote, community-based method for pregnant and new mothers. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4924--4934.
[74]
Lex Pulice-Farrow, Zakary A Clements, and M Paz Galupo. 2017. Patterns of transgender microaggressions in friendship: The role of gender identity. Psychology & Sexuality, 8, 3: 189--207.
[75]
Tinonee Pym, Paul Byron, and Kath Albury. 2021. ?I still want to know they're not terrible people': Negotiating ?queer community'on dating apps. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24, 3: 398--413.
[76]
Michael J Rosenfeld and Reuben J Thomas. 2012. Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77, 4: 523--547.
[77]
Hannah Rossiter. 2016. She's always a woman: Butch lesbian trans women in the lesbian community. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 20, 1: 87--96.
[78]
Bidushy Sadika, Emily Wiebe, Melanie A Morrison, and Todd G Morrison. 2020. Intersectional microaggressions and social support for LGBTQ persons of color: A systematic review of the Canadian-based empirical literature. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 16, 2: 111--147.
[79]
Joseph Seering. 2020. Reconsidering community self-moderation: the role of research in supporting community-based models for online content moderation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4, CSCW2: 107.
[80]
Joseph Seering, Tony Wang, Jina Yoon, and Geoff Kaufman. 2019. Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New Media & Society, 21, 7: 1417--1443.
[81]
Léa J Séguin. 2019. The good, the bad, and the ugly: Lay attitudes and perceptions of polyamory. Sexualities, 22, 4: 669--690.
[82]
Paul Stenner, Lindsay O'Dell, and Alison Davies. 2019. Adult women and ADHD: on the temporal dimensions of ADHD identities. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49, 2: 179--197.
[83]
Denise Tse-Shang Tang. 2017. All I get is an emoji: Dating on lesbian mobile phone app Butterfly. Media, Culture & Society, 39, 6: 816--832.
[84]
Charlotte Chuck Tate. 2012. Considering lesbian identity from a social--psychological perspective: Two different models of ?being a lesbian". Journal of Lesbian Studies, 16, 1: 17--29.
[85]
Jan E. Trost. 1986. Statistically nonrepresentative stratified sampling: A sampling technique for qualitative studies. Qualitative sociology, 9, 1: 54--57.
[86]
Ashley Marie Walker and Michael Ann DeVito. 2020. "'More gay' fits in better": Intracommunity Power Dynamics and Harms in Online LGBTQ+ Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--15.
[87]
Jillian Weiss. 2011. Reflective paper: GL versus BT: The archaeology of biphobia and transphobia within the US gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 11, 4: 498--502.
[88]
Jillian T Weiss. 2007. The lesbian community and FTMs: Détente in the butch/FTM borderlands. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 11, 3--4: 203--211.
[89]
Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. Volunteer moderators in twitch micro communities: How they get involved, the roles they play, and the emotional labor they experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--13.
[90]
Longxuan Zhao, Jiacheng Liu, and Zhanghao Li. 2022. Online dating beyond dating apps: An exploration of self-presentation of Chinese gay men dating on Zhihu. International Journal of Communication, 1619.
[91]
Douglas Zytko, Nicholas Mullins, Shelnesha Taylor, and Richard H Holler. 2022. Dating Apps Are Used for More Than Dating: How Users Disclose and Detect (Non-) Sexual Interest in People-Nearby Applications. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6, GROUP: 1--14.
[92]
Douglas Zytko, Victor Regalado, Nicholas Furlo, Sukeshini A Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2020. Supporting women in online dating with a messaging interface that improves their face-to-face meeting decisions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4, CSCW2: 1--30.
Index Terms
- Safety and Community Context: Exploring a Transfeminist Approach to Sapphic Relationship Platforms
Recommendations
Designing Trans Technology: Defining Challenges and Envisioning Community-Centered Solutions
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsTransgender and non-binary people face substantial challenges in the world, ranging from social inequities and discrimination to lack of access to resources. Though technology cannot fully solve these problems, technological solutions may help to address ...
"Do You Ladies Relate?": Experiences of Gender Diverse People in Online Eating Disorder Communities
CSCWThe study of eating disorders online has a long tradition within CSCW and HCI scholarship. Research within this body of work highlights the types of content people with eating disorders post as well as the ways in which individuals use online spaces for ...
"This is the kind of experience I want to have": Supporting the experiences of queer young men on social platforms through design
DIS '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceQueer young men (similar to others in the LGBTQ+ community) depend heavily on social platforms but their use can often be problematic. Their needs are often not adequately considered in the design of general platforms and they can be exposed to intra-...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 26 April 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Data Availability
SapphicPlatforms_Supplemental.pdf - Additional methods details, including discussion prompts and participant materials - PDF file, openable in any PDF viewer QT_pipeline_submission_cscw.py - Python script documenting our data output pipeline from Slack - Python script file, openable in any text editing program https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653694#V8cscw203aux.zip
Funding Sources
- Computing Research Association
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 138Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)138
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)43
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in