Ethical Concerns when Working with Mixed-Ability Groups of Children
Authors: 
Ana O Henriques, 
Patricia Piedade, Filipa Rocha, Isabel Neto, 
Hugo NicolauAuthors Info & Claims
Ana O Henriques, Patricia Piedade, Filipa Rocha, Isabel Neto, Hugo NicolauAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 53, Pages 1 - 9
Abstract
Accessibility research has gained traction, yet ethical gaps persist in the inclusion of individuals with disabilities, especially children. Inclusive research practices are essential to ensure that research and design solutions cater to the needs of all individuals, regardless of their abilities. Working with children with disabilities in Human-Computer Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction presents a unique set of ethical dilemmas. These young participants often require additional care, support, and accommodations, which can fall off researchers’ resources or expertise. The lack of clear guidance on navigating these challenges further aggravates the problem. To provide a basis on which to address this issue, we adopt a critical reflective approach, evaluating our impact by analyzing two case studies involving children with disabilities in HCI/HRI research. Flowing from these, we call for a shift in our approach to ethics in participatory research contexts to one that is processual, situational, and community-led.
References
[1]
2023. Ozobot | Robots to code and create with. https://ozobot.com/
[2]
2023. Sokoban Game. https://sokoban.info/
[3]
Alissa N. Antle. 2017. The ethics of doing research with vulnerable populations. Interactions 24, 6 (2017), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137107
[4]
Cristiana Antunes, Isabel Neto, Filipa Correia, Ana Paiva, and Hugo Nicolau. 2022. Inclusive’R’Stories: An Inclusive Storytelling Activity with an Emotional Robot. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889502
[5]
Cynthia L Bennett. [n. d.]. Accessible Design beyond Assistive Technologies: Future Directions for HCI Research. ([n. d.]).
[6]
Bas Brederode, Panos Markopoulos, Mathieu Gielen, Arnold Vermeeren, and Huib de Ridder. 2005. POwerball: The Design of a Novel Mixed-Reality Game for Children with Mixed Abilities. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boulder, Colorado) (IDC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109545
[7]
Daniel G. Cabrero, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, and José Abdelnour-Nocera. 2016. A Critique of Personas as representations of "the other" in Cross-Cultural Technology Design. In Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Nairobi, Kenya) (AfriCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998581.2998595
[8]
Lani Florian. 2008. INCLUSION: Special or inclusive education: future trends. British Journal of Special Education 35, 4 (2008), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00402.x
[9]
Christopher Frauenberger, Kay Kender, Laura Scheepmaker, Katharina Werner, and Katta Spiel. 2020. Desiging Social Play Things. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (New York, NY, USA). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420121
[10]
Batya Friedman and David G Hendry. 2019. Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology With Moral Imagination. The MIT Press.
[11]
Doris Fromberg. 1990. Play issues in early childhood education. Merrill Publishing Company. 223–243 pages.
[12]
Doris Fromberg and Dominic Gullo. 1992. Perspectives on children. Routledge. 191–194 pages.
[13]
Doris Pronin Fromberg and Doris Bergen. 2012. Play from birth to twelve: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings. Routledge.
[14]
Catherine Garvey. 1990. Play. Vol. 27. Harvard University Press.
[15]
Kenneth R. Ginsburg, the Committee on Communications, the Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child, and Family Health. 2007. The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development and Maintaining Strong Parent-Child Bonds. Pediatrics 119, 1 (01 2007), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2697 arXiv:https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-pdf/119/1/182/1118802/zpe00107000182.pdf
[16]
Anuradha Gokhale. 1995. Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology education 7, 1 (1995).
[17]
Kim Halskov and Nicolai Brodersen Hansen. 2015. The diversity of Participatory Design Research Practice at PDC 2002–2012. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003
[18]
Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14, 3 (1988), 575. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
[19]
D. Harcourt, B. Perry, and T. Waller. 2011. Researching Young Children’s Perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children. Routledge.
[20]
Sandra Harding (Ed.). 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge, New York, NY.
[21]
Ana O. Henriques, Hugo Nicolau, Anna R. L. Carter, Kyle Montague, Reem Talhouk, Angelika Strohmayer, Sarah Rüller, Cayley MacArthur, Shaowen Bardzell, Colin Gray, and Eleonore Fournier-Tombs. 2024 — in press. Fostering Feminist Community-Led Ethics: Building Tools and Connections. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2024 — in press). https://doi.org/10.1145/3656156.3658385
[22]
Ana O. Henriques, Sónia Rafael, Victor M Almeida, and José Gomes Pinto. 2023. The Problem with Gender-Blind Design and How We Might Begin to Address It: A Model for Intersectional Feminist Ethical Deliberation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 423, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3582750
[23]
Sally Holland, Emma Renold, Nicola J. Ross, and Alexandra Hillman. 2010. Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood 17, 3 (2010), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210369310
[24]
Catherine Holloway. 2019. Disability Interaction (DIX): A Manifesto. 26 (2 2019), 44–49. Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3310322
[25]
Johan Huizinga. 2014. Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Routledge.
[26]
Ole Sejer Iversen, Rachel Charlotte Smith, and Christian Dindler. 2017. Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Stanford, California, USA) (IDC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079725
[27]
Alison Kafer. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
[28]
Paul A. Komesaroff. 1995. From bioethics to microethics: ethical debate and clinical medicine. Duke University Press, New York, USA, 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822379782-004
[29]
Patricia Leavy. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.001.0001
[30]
Oussama Metatla, Sandra Bardot, Clare Cullen, Marcos Serrano, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2020. Robots for Inclusive Play: Co-Designing an Educational Game With Visually Impaired and Sighted Children. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA). Association for Computing Machinery, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376270
[31]
Oussama Metatla, Janet C Read, and Matthew Horton. 2020. Enabling Children to Design for Others with Expanded Proxy Design. Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394431
[32]
Brooke Ayers Morris, Hayati Havlucu, Alison Oldfield, and Oussama Metatla. 2023. Double Empathy as a Lens to Understand the Design Space for Inclusive Social Play Between Autistic and Neurotypical Children. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 91, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585828
[33]
Isabel Neto, Filipa Correia, Filipa Rocha, Patricia Piedade, Ana Paiva, and Hugo Nicolau. 2023. The robot made us hear each other: Fostering inclusive conversations among mixed-visual ability children. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 13–23.
[34]
Isabel Neto, Yuhan Hu, Filipa Correia, Filipa Rocha, João Nogueira, Katharina Buckmayer, Guy Hoffman, Hugo Nicolau, and Ana Paiva. 2024. " I’m Not Touching You. It’s The Robot!": Inclusion Through A Touch-Based Robot Among Mixed-Visual Ability Children. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 511–521.
[35]
Isabel Neto, Hugo Nicolau, and Ana Paiva. 2021. Community Based Robot Design for Classrooms with Mixed Visual Abilities Children. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445135
[36]
Isabel Neto, Hugo Nicolau, and Ana Paiva. 2021. Fostering Inclusive Activities in Mixed-Visual Abilities Classrooms Using Social Robots. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI ’21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3446356
[37]
Patricia Piedade, Isabel Neto, Ana Cristina Pires, Rui Prada, and Hugo Nicolau. 2023. PartiPlay: A Participatory Game Design Kit for Neurodiverse Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597638.3614496
[38]
Patricia Piedade, Isabel Neto, Ana Cristina Pires, Rui Prada, and Hugo Nicolau. 2024. Inclusion as a Process: Co-Designing an Inclusive Robotic Game with Neurodiverse Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3663548.3675664
[39]
Filipa Rocha, Filipa Correia, Isabel Neto, Ana Cristina Pires, João Guerreiro, Tiago Guerreiro, and Hugo Nicolau. 2023. Coding Together: On Co-located and Remote Collaboration between Children with Mixed-Visual Abilities. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 606, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581261
[40]
Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4 (3 2008), 5–18. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
[41]
Kiley Sobel, Katie O’Leary, and Julie A Kientz. 2015. Maximizing Children’s Opportunities with Inclusive Play: Considerations for Interactive Technology Design. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, NY, USA). Association for Computing Machinery, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771844
[42]
Katta Spiel. 2024. Practicing Humility: Design as Response, Not as Solution. Postdigital Science and Education 6 (3 2024), 25–31. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00436-2
[43]
Katta Spiel, Emeline Brulé, Christopher Frauenberger, Gilles Bailly, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2018. Micro-Ethics for Participatory Design with Marginalised Children. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (Hasselt and Genk, Belgium) (PDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210603
[44]
Katta Spiel and Kathrin Gerling. 2021. The Purpose of Play: How HCI Games Research Fails Neurodivergent Populations. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 28 (4 2021). Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432245
[45]
Austin Toombs, Shad Gross, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2016. From Empathy to Care: A Feminist Care Ethics Perspective on Long-Term Researcher–Participant Relations. Interacting with Computers 29, 1 (12 2016), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww010 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-pdf/29/1/45/8508330/iww010.pdf
[46]
Joan C. Tronto. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care (1 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070672
[47]
Joan C. Tronto. 1998. An Ethic of Care. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging 22, 3 (1998), 15–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44875693
[48]
Joan C. Tronto and Berenice Fisher. 1990. Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring. SUNY Press, 36–54.
[49]
Rua M Williams and Juan E Gilbert. 2019. “Nothing About Us Without Us” Transforming Participatory Research and Ethics in Human Systems Engineering. In Advancing diversity, inclusion, and social justice through human systems engineering. CRC Press, 113–134.
[50]
Lan Xiao, Maryam Bandukda, Katrin Angerbauer, Weiyue Lin, Tigmanshu Bhatnagar, Michael Sedlmair, and Catherine Holloway. 2024. A Systematic Review of Ability-diverse Collaboration through Ability-based Lens in HCI. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 961, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3641930
Index Terms
- Ethical Concerns when Working with Mixed-Ability Groups of Children
Recommendations
BrailleBlocks: Braille Toys for Cross-Ability Collaboration
ASSETS '19: Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and AccessibilityLess than 10% of blind people in the United States are Braille readers, yet Braille literacy remains crucial for education and employment [2,3]. BrailleBlocks is a system to help blind or visually impaired children learn Braille with a sighted parent. ...
A study of the challenges related to DIY assistive technology in the context of children with disabilities
DIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systemsThe term Do It Yourself Assistive Technology (DIY-AT) refers to the creation and adaptation of AT by non-professionals, including people with disabilities and their families, friends and caregivers. Previous research has argued that the development of ...
Design Opportunities for AAC and Children with Severe Speech and Physical Impairments
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAugmentative and alternative communication (AAC) technologies can support children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI) to express themselves. Yet, these seemingly 'enabling' technologies are often abandoned by this target group, ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2024
1475 pages
ISBN:9798400706776
DOI:10.1145/3663548
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 27 October 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Agência Nacional de Inovação
Conference
ASSETS '24
Sponsor:
ASSETS '24: The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
October 27 - 30, 2024
NL, St. John's, Canada
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 57Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)57
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in