Resonant Sticker Buttons: The Effect of Button Size and Feedback Latency on Perceived Button Weight and Vibrotactile Feedback Strength
Pages 210 - 227
Abstract
We use simple stickers on a wooden board to create ubiquitous touch interaction. Resonant frequencies make the board vibrate, creating tactile feedback when touching the stickers. In an experiment, we used stickers of three sizes to create Resonant Sticker Buttons and varied the delay of the feedback. Both size and feedback delay influenced the perceived weight of the buttons. While higher latencies result in a heavier perceived button, larger button sizes result in lighter perceived buttons and perceived feedback strength, and vice versa. Our findings suggest that touch interfaces with buttons of varying sizes, weights, and vibration strengths can be created on everyday surfaces, such as tables, by simply using stickers and speakers.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File
Video Figure
- Download
- 51.03 MB
References
[1]
Lynn Y Arnaut and Joel S Greenstein. 1986. Optimizing the touch tablet: The effects of control-display gain and method of cursor control. Human Factors 28, 6 (1986), 717–726.
[2]
Olivier Bau, Ivan Poupyrev, Ali Israr, and Chris Harrison. 2010. TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 283–292.
[3]
Bruce C Berndt and Ronald J Evans. 1981. The determination of Gauss sums. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 5, 2 (1981), 107–129.
[4]
James V Bradley. 1958. Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a Latin square design. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 53, 282 (1958), 525–528.
[5]
Stephen Brewster, Faraz Chohan, and Lorna Brown. 2007. Tactile feedback for mobile interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 159–162.
[6]
Stuart Card, Thomas Moran, and Allen Newell. 1986. The model human processor- An engineering model of human performance. Handbook of perception and human performance. 2, 45–1 (1986), 1 – 35.
[7]
Youngjun Cho, Andrea Bianchi, Nicolai Marquardt, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2016. RealPen: Providing Realism in Handwriting Tasks on Touch Surfaces Using Auditory-Tactile Feedback. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 195–205.
[8]
Inrak Choi, Heather Culbertson, Mark R. Miller, Alex Olwal, and Sean Follmer. 2017. Grabity: A Wearable Haptic Interface for Simulating Weight and Grasping in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Québec City, QC, Canada) (UIST ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 119–130.
[9]
Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. InFORM: Dynamic Physical Affordances and Constraints through Shape and Object Actuation. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom) (UIST ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 417–426.
[10]
Satoshi Hashiguchi, Shohei Mori, Miho Tanaka, Fumihisa Shibata, and Asako Kimura. 2018. Perceived Weight of a Rod under Augmented and Diminished Reality Visual Effects. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (VRST ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 6 pages.
[11]
Sean T. Hayes and Julie A. Adams. 2017. Control-display ratio enhancements for mobile interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 99 (2017), 57–71.
[12]
Seongkook Heo, Jaeyeon Lee, and Daniel Wigdor. 2019. PseudoBend: Producing Haptic Illusions of Stretching, Bending, and Twisting Using Grain Vibrations. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 803–813.
[13]
Hiroshi Ishii, Dávid Lakatos, Leonardo Bonanni, and Jean-Baptiste Labrune. 2012. Radical Atoms: Beyond Tangible Bits, toward Transformable Materials. Interactions 19, 1 (Jan. 2012), 38–51.
[14]
Brett R. Jones, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2013. IllumiRoom: Peripheral Projected Illusions for Interactive Experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 869–878.
[15]
Topi Kaaresoja, Stephen Brewster, and Vuokko Lantz. 2014. Towards the Temporally Perfect Virtual Button: Touch-Feedback Simultaneity and Perceived Quality in Mobile Touchscreen Press Interactions. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 11, 2, Article 9 (June 2014), 25 pages.
[16]
Topi Kaaresoja, Eve Hoggan, and Emilia Anttila. 2011. Playing with Tactile Feedback Latency in Touchscreen Interaction: Two Approaches. In Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - Volume Part II (Lisbon, Portugal) (INTERACT’11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 554–571.
[17]
Nicholas Katzakis, Jonathan Tong, Oscar Ariza, Lihan Chen, Gudrun Klinker, Brigitte Röder, and Frank Steinicke. 2017. Stylo and Handifact: Modulating Haptic Perception through Visualizations for Posture Training in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Brighton, United Kingdom) (SUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 58–67.
[18]
Takahiro Kawabe and Yusuke Ujitoko. 2023. Pseudo-Haptic Heaviness Influenced by the Range of the C/D Ratio and the Position of the C/D Ratio Within a Given Range. IEEE Transactions on Haptics (2023), 1–6.
[19]
Chantal Keller, Jérémy Bluteau, Renaud Blanch, and Sabine Coquillart. 2012. PseudoWeight: Making Tabletop Interaction with Virtual Objects More Tangible. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (ITS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201–204.
[20]
Sunjun Kim and Geehyuk Lee. 2013. Haptic Feedback Design for a Virtual Button along Force-Displacement Curves. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom) (UIST ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–96.
[21]
Marco Kurzweg, Maximilian Letter, and Katrin Wolf. 2023. Vibrollusion: Creating a Vibrotactile Illusion Induced by Audiovisual Touch Feedback. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (<conf-loc>, <city>Vienna</city>, <country>Austria</country>, </conf-loc>) (MUM ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–197.
[22]
Marco Kurzweg, Simon Linke, Yannick Weiss, Maximilian Letter, Albrecht Schmidt, and Katrin Wolf. 2023. Assignment Of a Vibration To a Graphical Object Induced By Resonant Frequency. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023: 19th IFIP TC13 International Conference, York, UK, August 28 – September 1, 2023, Proceedings, Part I (York, United Kingdom). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 523–545.
[23]
Marco Kurzweg, Yannick Weiss, Marc O. Ernst, Albrecht Schmidt, and Katrin Wolf. 2024. A Survey on Haptic Feedback through Sensory Illusions in Interactive Systems. ACM Comput. Surv. (feb 2024). Just Accepted.
[24]
Roberto Longo, Thomas Delaunay, Didier Laux, Mohammed El Mouridi, Olivier Arnould, and Emmanuel Le Clezio. 2012. Wood elastic characterization from a single sample by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. Ultrasonics 52, 8 (2012), 971–974.
[25]
Pedro Lopes, Sijing You, Alexandra Ion, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Adding Force Feedback to Mixed Reality Experiences and Games Using Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13.
[26]
Akihiro Maehigashi, Akira Sasada, Miki Matsumuro, Fumihisa Shibata, Asako Kimura, and Sumaru Niida. 2021. Virtual Weight Illusion: Weight Perception of Virtual Objects Using Weight Illusions. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (<conf-loc>, <city>Yokohama</city>, <country>Japan</country>, </conf-loc>) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 344, 6 pages.
[27]
Akihiro Maehigashi, Akira Sasada, Miki Matsumuro, Fumihisa Shibata, Asako Kimura, and Sumaru Niida. 2021. Virtual Weight Illusion: Weight Perception of Virtual Objects Using Weight Illusions. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 344, 6 pages.
[28]
Cara M. Nunez, Sophia R. Williams, Allison M. Okamura, and Heather Culbertson. 2019. Understanding Continuous and Pleasant Linear Sensations on the Forearm From a Sequential Discrete Lateral Skin-Slip Haptic Device. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 12, 4 (2019), 414–427.
[29]
Jérôme Perret and Emmanuel Vander Poorten. 2018. Touching virtual reality: a review of haptic gloves. In ACTUATOR 2018; 16th International Conference on New Actuators. VDE, 1–5.
[30]
Claudio S. Pinhanez. 2001. The Everywhere Displays Projector: A Device to Create Ubiquitous Graphical Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (UbiComp ’01). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 315–331.
[31]
Pragathi Praveena, Daniel Rakita, Bilge Mutlu, and Michael Gleicher. 2020. Supporting Perception of Weight through Motion-Induced Sensory Conflicts in Robot Teleoperation. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 509–517.
[32]
Michael Rietzler, Gabriel Haas, Thomas Dreja, Florian Geiselhart, and Enrico Rukzio. 2019. Virtual Muscle Force: Communicating Kinesthetic Forces Through Pseudo-Haptic Feedback and Muscle Input. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 913–922.
[33]
Majed Samad, Elia Gatti, Anne Hermes, Hrvoje Benko, and Cesare Parise. 2019. Pseudo-Haptic Weight: Changing the Perceived Weight of Virtual Objects By Manipulating Control-Display Ratio. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13.
[34]
Jonas Schmidtler and Klaus Bengler. 2018. Influence of Size-Weight Illusion on Usability in Haptic Human-Robot Collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 11, 1 (2018), 85–96.
[35]
Youngbo Aram Shim and Geehyuk Lee. 2018. Demonstrating Gamepad with Programmable Haptic Texture Analog Buttons. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 194–196.
[36]
Marco Speicher, Jan Ehrlich, Vito Gentile, Donald Degraen, Salvatore Sorce, and Antonio Krüger. 2019. Pseudo-Haptic Controls for Mid-Air Finger-Based Menu Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6.
[37]
Stanley S Stevens. 1960. The psychophysics of sensory function. American scientist 48, 2 (1960), 226–253.
[38]
Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. 1997. Grounded theory in practice. Sage.
[39]
R A Syaputra and A Widiyanto. 2020. Implementation of the level of detail method on augmented reality android-based applications. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1517, 1 (apr 2020), 012090.
[40]
Luca Turchet, Maud Marchal, Anatole Lécuyer, Rolf Nordahl, and Stefania Serafin. 2010. Influence of Auditory and Visual Feedback for Perceiving Walking over Bumps and Holes in Desktop VR. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Hong Kong) (VRST ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139–142.
[41]
Yusuke Ujitoko, Yuki Ban, Takuji Narumi, Tomohiro Tanikawa, Koichi Hirota, and Michitaka Hirose. 2015. Yubi-Toko: Finger Walking in Snowy Scene Using Pseudo-Haptic Technique on Touchpad. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Emerging Technologies (Kobe, Japan) (SA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 29, 3 pages.
[42]
Mark Weiser. 1991. The Computer for the 21 st Century. Scientific american 265, 3 (1991), 94–105.
[43]
Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1996. Designing calm technology. PowerGrid Journal 1, 1 (1996), 75–85.
[44]
Daehan Wi, Angela Sodemann, and Riley Chicci. 2017. Vibratory haptic feedback assistive device for visually-impaired drivers. In 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI). IEEE, 1–5.
[45]
Jan Willms, Maximilian Letter, Emile Marchandise, and Katrin Wolf. 2023. Pull Outperforms Push as Vibrotactile Wristband Feedback for Mid-Air Gesture Guidance. In Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2023 (<conf-loc>, <city>Rapperswil</city>, <country>Switzerland</country>, </conf-loc>) (MuC ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 138–148.
[46]
Katrin Wolf and Timm Bäder. 2015. Illusion of Surface Changes Induced by Tactile and Visual Touch Feedback. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1355–1360.
[47]
Taiki Yamada, Fumihisa Shibata, and Asako Kimura. 2018. Analysis of the R-V dynamics illusion behavior in terms of auditory stimulation. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (VRST ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 70, 2 pages.
[48]
Chien-Hsien Yeh, Fong-Chin Su, Yan-Shen Shan, Marat Dosaev, Yury Selyutskiy, Irina Goryacheva, and Ming-Shaung Ju. 2020. Application of piezoelectric actuator to simplified haptic feedback system. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 303 (2020), 111820.
Index Terms
- Resonant Sticker Buttons: The Effect of Button Size and Feedback Latency on Perceived Button Weight and Vibrotactile Feedback Strength
Recommendations
Tactile feedback for button GUI on touch devices
CHI EA '12: CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper, we describe a tactile feedback for a button GUI activated by a tap gesture on mobile touch devices. We implemented a new HW platform based on a film-type actuator to obtain a large range of tactile expression. From the analysis of touch ...
Study on Size Design of Touch-Sensitive Button
Human-Computer Interaction. Recognition and Interaction TechnologiesAbstractTo examine the effects of button size with different shape on the usability of touch screen devices. Considering the forefinger operation, the subjective and objective evaluation were combined to assess the ergonomics of the touch-sensitive button ...
Towards the Temporally Perfect Virtual Button: Touch-Feedback Simultaneity and Perceived Quality in Mobile Touchscreen Press Interactions
Pressing a virtual button is still the major interaction method in touchscreen mobile phones. Although phones are becoming more and more powerful, operating system software is getting more and more complex, causing latency in interaction. We were ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2024
568 pages
Copyright © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 02 December 2024
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
Conference
MUM '24
MUM '24: International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
December 1 - 4, 2024
Stockholm, Sweden
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 27Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)27
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format