Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Social Network Analysis of Nonprofits in Disaster Response: : The Case of Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States

Published: 01 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has created complex problems that require organizations to collaborate within and across the sector line. Social media data can provide insights into how nonprofits interact for the pandemic response from both social network and geographical perspectives. This study innovatively investigated the connection and interaction patterns among 74 National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster (NVOAD) nonprofits and three government agencies based on structural analyses and content analyses of their Twitter communications during the long-term global COVID-19 pandemic. The daily tweeting quantities of all nonprofits were generally consistent with the pandemic severity in the United States before July 2020 and remained stable afterward. Nonprofits’ tweets can reflect their purposes of sharing information, building communities, and taking actions for disaster response. Government agencies played leadership roles in providing COVID-19 guidelines and information. Human services, International and Foreign Affairs, and Public and Societal Benefit nonprofits, especially American Red Cross played central roles in the nonprofit communication network. Possible explanations include the following: (1) Geographically, connections and interactions among nonprofits are more likely to happen within the same city or in neighboring states. (2) Both mission homophily and heterophily contribute to connections and interactions among nonprofits, depending on their subsectors. The findings not only help the public better understand how nonprofits are collaboratively fighting the pandemic, but also provide guidance for nonprofits to plan for better interactions and communications in future disaster response.

References

[1]
Atkinson C. L. (2014). The 2011 flood in Minot (North Dakota, USA) and the role of faith-based and nonprofit groups in hazard event response and recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 8(June 2014), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.03.003
[2]
Atouba Y. C. and Shumate M. (2015). International nonprofit collaboration: Examining the role of homophily. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(3), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014524991
[3]
Boris E. T. (2006). Nonprofit organizations in a democracy-roles and responsibilities. In Boris E. T. and Steuerle C. E. (Eds.), Nonprofits & government: Collaboration & conflict (2nd ed., pp. 1–36). Urban Institute Press.
[4]
Boris E. T. and Steuerle C. E. (Eds.), (2006). Nonprofits & government: Collaboration & conflict (2nd ed.). Urban Institute Press.
[5]
Brengarth L. B. and Mujkic E. (2016). Web 2.0: How social media applications leverage nonprofit responses during a wildfire crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 54(3), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.010
[6]
Brown H. (2015). The institutional digital divide: Immigrant-serving nonprofit organization adoption of social media. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 680–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314563002
[7]
Campbell D. A., Lambright K. T., and Wells C. J. (2014). Looking for friends, fans, and followers? Social media use in public and nonprofit human services. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12261
[8]
CDC (2021). COVID data tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/
[9]
Chen B. and Graddy E. A. (2010). The effectiveness of nonprofit lead‐organization networks for social service delivery. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(4), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.20002
[10]
Curnin S. and O’Hara D. (2019). Nonprofit and public sector interorganizational collaboration in disaster recovery: Lessons from the field. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21389
[11]
Di Lauro S., Tursunbayeva A., and Antonelli G. (2019). How nonprofit organizations use social media for fundraising: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(7), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n7p1
[12]
Eller W., Gerber B. J., and Branch L. E. (2015). Voluntary nonprofit organizations and disaster management: Identifying the nature of inter-sector coordination and collaboration in disaster service assistance provision. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 6(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12081
[13]
ESRI (2019). ESRI ArcMap 10.7. Environmental Systems Research Institute.
[14]
Gan Y., Ma J., Wu J., Chen Y., Zhu H., and Hall B. J. (2020). Immediate and delayed psychological effects of province-wide lockdown and personal quarantine during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Psychological Medicine, 52(7), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720003116
[15]
Gong X. and Lane K. M. D. (2020). Institutional twitter usage among U.S. geography departments. Professional Geographer, 72(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2019.1653770
[16]
Gong X. and Yang X. (2020). Social media platforms. In Wilson J. P. (Ed.), The geographic information science & technology body of knowledge (pp. Forthcoming). https://gistbok.ucgis.org/bok-topics/social-media-platforms
[17]
Gong X. and Ye X. (2021). Governors fighting crisis: Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic across U.S. dtates on Twitter. Professional Geographer, 73(4), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2021.1895850
[18]
Guo C. and Saxton G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012471585
[19]
Guo C. and Saxton G. D. (2017). Speaking and being heard: How nonprofit advocacy organizations gain attention on social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017713724
[20]
Head B. W. and Alford J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
[21]
Huberman B., Romero D. M., and Wu F. (2008). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i1.2317
[22]
Kapitsinis N. (2020). The underlying factors of the COVID-19 spatially uneven spread. Initial evidence from regions in nine EU countries. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 12(6), 1027–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12340
[23]
Kaplan A. M. and Haenlein M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
[24]
Kapucu N., Yuldashev F., and Ann M. (2011). Nonprofit organizations in disaster response and management: A network analysis. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 4(1), 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1991/jefa.v2i1.a13
[25]
Kelly K. J. (2013). The effectiveness of Twitter as a communication tool in college recruitment. Texas A&M University - Kingsville. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1416418482
[26]
Kietzmann J. H., Hermkens K., McCarthy I. P., and Silvestre B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
[27]
Kostkova P., Szomszor M., and St. Louis C. (2014). Swineflu: The use of Twitter as an early warning and risk communication tool in the 2009 swine flu pandemic. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 5(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2597892
[28]
Kwak H., Lee C., Park H., and Moon S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Rappa M., Jones P., Freire J., and Chakrabarti S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web (pp. 591–600). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751
[29]
Laniado D. and Mika P. (2010). Making sense of twitter. In Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web - Volume Part I, Shanghai, China, 7–11 November 2010, pp. 470–485.
[30]
Liu W. and Xu W. (2019). Tweeting to (selectively) engage: How government agencies target stakeholders on twitter during hurricane Harvey. International Journal of Communication, 13(2019), 4917–4939. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11588
[31]
Lovejoy K. and Saxton G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
[32]
Lovejoy K., Waters R. D., and Saxton G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
[33]
Muralidharan S., Rasmussen L., Patterson D., and Shin J.-H. (2011). Hope for Haiti: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter usage during the earthquake relief efforts. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 175–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.010
[34]
Nah S. and Saxton G. D. (2013). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society, 15(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812452411
[35]
NCCS (2021). National Taxonomy of exempt Entities (NTEE) codes. National Center for Charitable Statistics. https://nccs.urban.org/project/national-taxonomy-exempt-entities-ntee-codes#overview
[36]
NVOAD (2021). National voluntary organizations active in disaster. National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster. https://www.nvoad.org/
[37]
Panagiotopoulos P., Bigdeli A. Z., and Sams S. (2014). Citizen-government collaboration on social media: The case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.014
[38]
Pew Research Center (2021). Social media fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/
[39]
PRNewswire (2020). United Way Worldwide launches COVID-19 community response and recovery fund. Prnewswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/united-way-worldwide-launches-covid-19-community-response-and-recovery-fund-301025626.html
[40]
Rivera M. T., Soderstrom S. B., and Uzzi B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
[41]
Roberts N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1), 1–19.
[42]
Shapp A. (2014). Variation in the use of Twitter hashtags. In Qualifying paper in sociolinguistics. New York University.
[43]
Shearer E. and Mitchell A. (2021). News use across social media platforms in 2020. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/2021/01/12/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-in-2020/
[44]
Shemberger M. (2018). Nonprofit organizations’ use of social media in crisis communication. In Social media and crisis communication (pp. 227–237). Routledge.
[45]
Smith S. R. and Lipsky M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press.
[46]
Su J. G., Jerrett M., Meng Y.-Y., Pickett M., and Ritz B. (2015). Integrating smart-phone based momentary location tracking with fixed site air quality monitoring for personal exposure assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 506–507 (15 February 2015), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.022
[47]
Twitter (2021). Using twitter. Twitter Developer Platform. https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter#tweets
[48]
van Eck N. J. and Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
[49]
Waters R. D. and Jamal J. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.002
[50]
Weber E. and Khademian A. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
[51]
Worldometers (2021). COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
[52]
Wukich C. (2015). Social media use in emergency management. Journal of Emergency Management, 13(4), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2015.0242
[53]
Wukich C. and Steinberg A. (2013). Nonprofit and public sector participation in self-organizing information networks: Twitter hashtag and trending topic use during disasters. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 4(2), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12036
[54]
Ye X., Du J., Gong X., Na S., Li W., and Kudva S. (2021). Geospatial and semantic mapping platform for massive COVID-19 scientific publication search. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 5(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-021-00073-y
[55]
Young J. A. (2017). Facebook, twitter, and blogs: The adoption and utilization of social media in nonprofit human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1192574

Index Terms

  1. Social Network Analysis of Nonprofits in Disaster Response: The Case of Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Social Science Computer Review
          Social Science Computer Review  Volume 41, Issue 6
          Dec 2023
          418 pages

          Publisher

          Sage Publications, Inc.

          United States

          Publication History

          Published: 01 December 2023

          Author Tags

          1. nonprofits
          2. COVID-19
          3. disaster response
          4. Twitter
          5. spatial social network

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 0
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          View options

          Get Access

          Login options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media