Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Decomposition-based logic synthesis for PAL-based CPLDs

Published: 01 June 2010 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The paper presents one concept of decomposition methods dedicated to PAL-based CPLDs. The proposed approach is an alternative to the classical one, which is based on two-level minimization of separate single-output functions. The key idea of the algorithm is to search for free blocks that could be implemented in PAL-based logic blocks containing a limited number of product terms. In order to better exploit the number of product terms, two-stage decomposition and BDD-based decomposition are to be used. In BDD-based decomposition methods, functions are represented by Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ROBDDs). The results of experiments prove that the proposed solution is more effective, in terms of the usage of programmable device resources, compared with the classical ones.

    References

    [1]
    Akers, S. B. (1978). Functional testing with binary decision diagrams, Proceedings of the 8-th Annual Conference on Fault-Tolerant Computing, pp. 75-82.
    [2]
    Anderson, J. H. and Brown, S. D. (1998). Technology mapping for large complex PLDs, DAC '98: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Design Automation Conference, New York, NY, USA, pp. 698-703.
    [3]
    Ashar, P., Devadas, S. and Newton, A. R. (1992). Sequential Logic Synthesis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
    [4]
    Ashenhurst, R. (1957). The decomposition of switching functions, Proceedings of an International Symposium on the Theory of Switching, pp. 74-116.
    [5]
    Bolton, M. (1990). Digital Systems Design with Programmable Logic, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA.
    [6]
    Brace, K. S., Rudell, R. L. and Bryant, R. E. (1990). Efficient implementation of a bdd package, DAC '90: Proceedings of the 27th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, New York, NY, USA, pp. 40-45.
    [7]
    Brayton, R. K., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. L., McMullen, C. T. and Hachtel, G. D. (1984). Logic Minimization Algorithms for VLSI Synthesis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
    [8]
    Bryant, R. E. (1986). Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation, IEEE Transactions on Computers¿35(8): 677-691.
    [9]
    Burns, M., Perkowski, M., Jóźwiak, L. and Grygiel, S. (1998). An efficient and effective approach to column-based input/output encoding in functional decomposition, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Boolean Problems, Freiberg, Germany, pp. 19-29.
    [10]
    Chartrand, G. and Zhang, P. (2008). Chromatic Graph Theory, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
    [11]
    Chen, K. and Muroga, S. (1988). Input assignment algorithm for decoded-PLAs with multi-input decoders, IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. ICCAD-88. Digest of Technical Papers, Santa Clara, CA, USA, pp. 474-477.
    [12]
    Chen, S., Hwang, T. and Liu, C. (2002). A technology mapping algorithm for CPLD architectures, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, pp. 204-210.
    [13]
    Ciesielski, M. and Yang, S. (1992). PLADE: A two-stage PLA decomposition, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems¿11(8): 943-954.
    [14]
    Curtis, H. (1962). A New Approach to the Design of Switching Circuits, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.
    [15]
    De Micheli, G. (1994). Synthesis and Optimization of Digital Circuits, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, NY.
    [16]
    Devadas, S., Wang, A., Newton, A. and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1988). Boolean decomposition of programmable logic arrays, Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuit Conference, Rochester, NY, USA, Vol. 2, pp. 2.5.1-2.5.5.
    [17]
    Ebendt, R., Fey, G. and Drechsler, R. (2005). Advanced BDD Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
    [18]
    Kania, D. (2004). Logic Synthesis for PAL-based Complex Programmable Logic Devices, Zeszyty Naukowe: Elektronika, Vol. 14, pp. 5-212, (in Polish).
    [19]
    Kania, D., Kulisz, J. and Milik, A. (2005). A novel method of two-stage decomposition dedicated for PAL-based CPLDs, Proceedings of the 8th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design, Porto, Portugal, pp. 114-121.
    [20]
    Kim, J., Kim, H. and Lin, C. (2001). A new technology mapping for CPLD under the time constraint, Proceedings of the Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 235-238.
    [21]
    Kouloheris, J. and Gamal, A. (1992). PLA-based FPGA area versus cell C+ granularity, Proceedings of the Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Boston, MA, USA, Vol. 4, pp. 4.3.1-4.3.4.
    [22]
    Lai, Y., Pan, K. and Pedram, M. (1994). FPGA synthesis using function decomposition, ICCS '94: Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computer & Processors, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 30-35.
    [23]
    Lai, Y., Pan, K. and Pedram, M. (1996). OBDD-based function decomposition: Algorithms and implementation, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems¿15(8): 977-990.
    [24]
    Minato, S. (1996). Binary Decision Diagrams and Applications for VLSI CAD, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
    [25]
    Murgai, R., Brayton, R. and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1994). Optimum functional decomposition using encoding, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference on Design Automation, New York, NY, USA, pp. 408-414.
    [26]
    Muthukumar, V. (2001). An improved input-output encoding approach for functional decomposition, DSD '01: Proceedings of the Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 144-147.
    [27]
    Muthukumar, V., Bignall, R. and Selvaraj, H. (2000). An input-output encoding approach for serial decomposition, SBC-CI'0: Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Integrated Circuits and Systems Design, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 61-68.
    [28]
    Nowicka, M., Łuba, T. and Selvaraj, H. (1997). Multilevel decomposition strategies in decomposition-based algorithms and tools, International Workshop on Logic and Architecture Synthesis, Grenoble, France, pp. 129-136.
    [29]
    Opara, A. (2009). Decompositional Synthesis Methods of Combinatorial Circuits with Binary Decision Diagrams Application, Ph.D. thesis, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, (in Polish).
    [30]
    Opara, A. and Kania, D. (2000). A novel non-disjunctive method for decomposition of CPLDs, Electronics and Telecommunications Quarterly¿55(1): 95-111.
    [31]
    Rawski, M., Łuba, T. and Falkowski, B. (2008). Logic synthesis method for FPGAs with embedded memory blocks, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 2014-2017.
    [32]
    Rudell, R. (1993). Dynamic variable ordering for ordered binary decision diagrams, Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 42-47.
    [33]
    Saldanha, A., Villa, T., Brayton, R. and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1994). Satisfaction of input and output encoding constraints, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems¿13(5): 589-602.
    [34]
    Scholl, C. (2001). Functional Decomposition with Application to FPGA Synthesis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
    [35]
    Yan, K. (2001). Practical logic synthesis for CPLDs and FPGAs with PLA-style logic blocks, Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Asia South Pacific Design Automation, ACM New York, NY, USA, pp. 231-234.
    [36]
    Yang, C. and Ciesielski, M. (2002). BDS: A BDD-based logic optimization system, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems¿21(7): 866-876.
    [37]
    Yang, S. and Ciesielski, M. J. (1991). Optimum and suboptimum algorithms for input encoding and its relationship to logic minimization, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems¿10(1): 4-12.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Improving characteristics of LUT-based Mealy FSMsInternational Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science10.34768/amcs-2020-005530:4(745-759)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
    • (2017)Logic synthesis for FPGAs based on cutting of BDDMicroprocessors & Microsystems10.1016/j.micpro.2017.06.01052:C(173-187)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
    • (2014)Selection of search strategies for solving 3-SAT problemsInternational Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science10.2478/amcs-2014-002124:2(283-297)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
    International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science  Volume 20, Issue 2
    Number 2 / June 2010
    177 pages
    ISSN:1641-876X
    EISSN:2083-8492
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Walter de Gruyter & Co.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 June 2010

    Author Tags

    1. Bdd
    2. Cpld
    3. Decomposition
    4. Logic Optimization
    5. Technology Mapping

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Improving characteristics of LUT-based Mealy FSMsInternational Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science10.34768/amcs-2020-005530:4(745-759)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
    • (2017)Logic synthesis for FPGAs based on cutting of BDDMicroprocessors & Microsystems10.1016/j.micpro.2017.06.01052:C(173-187)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
    • (2014)Selection of search strategies for solving 3-SAT problemsInternational Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science10.2478/amcs-2014-002124:2(283-297)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media