Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Strategies for Enhancing and Evaluating Interactivity in Web-Based Learning and Teaching

Published: 01 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Interactivity is often discussed in constructivist approaches to education, which enable the student to evolve, understand, or construct new ideas from existing concepts. Constructivist approaches rely on active participation in the learning situation. Interaction and participation are crucial ingredients in the learning process. But interactivity, as a specific learning concept that underlies the general notions of interaction and participation, is not easily tracked and evaluated. This paper examines how to evaluate interactivity. It outlines a number of criteria and student activities to evaluate success in interactive web-based teaching. These theoretical issues are illustrated in the context of two linguistics courses that involve both web-based course delivery and face-to-face course delivery. Measures taken to achieve interactivity in these courses are discussed before proposing qualitative and quantitative criteria for evaluating interactivity. Teachers in higher education can encourage students to have a more positive attitude through effective ways of increasing interaction, such as structuring the learning environment in such a way as to achieve a 'conversational learning community', a learning model that promotes informal, relaxed, and interactive communities of learners and teachers.

References

[1]
Barnard, R. 1995. Interactive Learning: A key to successful distance delivery. American Journal of Multimedia, 12, 45-47.
[2]
Blurton, C. 1999. New directions of ICT-use in education. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/lwf/d1/edict.pdf
[3]
Bodomo, A. 2006. Interactivity in Web-Based Learning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 1, 18-30.
[4]
Bodomo, A. B. 2008. Instructional interactivity in a web-based learning community. In Esnault, L. Ed., Web-Based Education and Pedagogical Technologies: Solutions for Learning Applications pp. 131-146. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
[5]
Bodomo, A. B., Luke, K. K., & Anttila, A. 2003. Evaluating interactivity in web-based learning. Global E-Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Education.
[6]
Brogan, P. 1999. Using the web for interactive teaching and learning: An imperative for the new millennium. San Francisco, CA: Macromedia.
[7]
Bruner, J. 1966. Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[8]
Bruner, J. 1983. Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language. New York, NY: Norton.
[9]
Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[10]
Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[11]
Daniel, J., & Marquis, C. 1983. Independence and interaction: Getting the mix right. Teaching at a Distance, 15, 445-460.
[12]
Duffy, T., & Jonassen, D. H. 1992. Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[13]
Freire, P. 1970. The Adult Literacy Process as Cultural Action for Freedom. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 205-212.
[14]
Graham, C. R. 2006. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. Eds., Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs pp. 3-21. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
[15]
Kearsley, G. 2010. Explorations in Learning & Instruction: Theory in Practice Database. Retrieved from http://tip.psychology.org/
[16]
Keegan, M. 1993. Optimizing the instructional moment: a guide to using Socratic, didactic, inquiry, and discovery methods. Educational Technology, 334, 17-22.
[17]
Kennedy, C. K., & Hinkley, M. 2009. An Evaluation of Blending Technology with Pedagogy for Teacher Education and its Implication for their Classroom Teaching. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 42, 61-79.
[18]
Laurillard, D. 1993. Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective use of Educational Technology. London, UK: Routledge.
[19]
Laurillard, D. 1994. Multimedia and the changing experience of the learner. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Information Technology in Training and Education Conference and Exhibition, APITITE 94, Brisbane, Australia Vol. 1, pp. 19-24.
[20]
Markwood, R., & Johnstone, S. 1994. New Pathways to a degree: Technology opens the college. Boulder, CO: Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications, Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
[21]
Moore, M. 1991. Editorial: distance education theory. American Journal of Distance Education, 53, 1-6.
[22]
Moore, M. 1992. Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 32, 1-6.
[23]
Moore, M. 1993. Theory of transactional distance. In Keegan, D. Ed., Theoretical Principles of Distance Education. London, UK: Routledge.
[24]
Nikolaidou, M., Sofianopoulou, C., Alexopoulou, N., Abeliotis, K., Detsis, V., & Chalkias, C. et¿al. 2010. The Blended Learning Ecosystem of an Academic Institution in Greece. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 53, 14-35.
[25]
Olapiriyakul, K., & Scher, J. 2006. A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 287-301.
[26]
Parker, A. 1999. Interaction in Distance Education: The critical conversation. Educational Technology Review, 12, 13-17.
[27]
Pask, G. 1975. Conversation, Cognition, and Learning. New York, NY: Elsevier.
[28]
Piaget, J. 1973. To Understand is to Invent. New York, NY: Grossman.
[29]
Sims, R. 1999. Interactivity on stage: strategies for learner-design communication. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 153, 257-272.
[30]
Sims, R. 2000. An interactive conundrum: Constructs of interactivity and learning theory. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 161, 45-57.
[31]
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. 2008. Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51, 318-336.
[32]
Strauss, M. J. 1994. A constructivist dialogue. The Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 324, 183-187.
[33]
Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[34]
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[35]
Wagner, J. 1994. Learning from a distance. International Journal of Multimedia, 192, 12-20.
[36]
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., & Frank, K. A. 2006. The Social Life of Technology: An Ecological Analysis of Technology Diffusion in Schools. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12, 135-149.

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Students' Perceptions of Teaching and Social PresenceInternational Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies10.4018/ijwltt.201501010310:1(27-44)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015
  1. Strategies for Enhancing and Evaluating Interactivity in Web-Based Learning and Teaching

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies
      International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies  Volume 5, Issue 4
      October 2010
      69 pages
      ISSN:1548-1093
      EISSN:1548-1107
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      IGI Global

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 October 2010

      Author Tags

      1. Conversational Learning Community CLC
      2. Evaluation
      3. Interactivity
      4. Learning
      5. Teaching
      6. Web-Based Education
      7. Web-Based Instruction

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2015)Students' Perceptions of Teaching and Social PresenceInternational Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies10.4018/ijwltt.201501010310:1(27-44)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media