Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

SISR: System for integrating semantic relatedness and similarity measures

Published: 01 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Semantic similarity and relatedness measures have increasingly become core elements in the recent research within the semantic technology community. Nowadays, the search for efficient meaning-centered applications that exploit computational semantics has become a necessity. Researchers, have therefore, become increasingly interested in the development of a model that can simulate the human thinking process and capable of measuring semantic similarity/relatedness between lexical terms, including concepts and words. Knowledge resources are fundamental to quantify semantic similarity or relatedness and achieve the best expression for the semantics content. No fully developed system that is able to centralize these approaches is currently available for the research and industrial communities. In this paper, we propose a System for Integrating Semantic Relatedness and similarity measures, SISR, which aims to provide a variety of tools for computing the semantic similarity and relatedness. This system is the first to treat the topic of computing semantic relatedness with a view of integrating different key stakeholders in a parameterized way. As an instance of the proposed architecture, we propose WNetSS which is a Java API allowing the use of a wide WordNet-based semantic similarity measures pertaining to different categories including taxonomic-based, features-based and IC-based measures. It is the first API that allows the extraction of the topological parameters from the WordNet "is a" taxonomy which are used to express the semantics of concepts. Moreover, an evaluation module is proposed to assess the reproducibility of the measures accuracy that can be evaluated according to 10 widely used benchmarks through the correlations coefficients.

References

[1]
Agirre E, Alfonseca E, Hall K, Kravalova J, Pasca M, Soroa A (2009) A study on similarity and relatedness using distributional and WordNet-based approaches. In: Proceedings of human language technologies: the 2009 annual conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boulder, CO, pp 19-27.
[2]
Al-Mubaid H, Nguyen HA (2006a) A cluster-based approach for semantic similarity in the biomedical domain. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society.
[3]
Al-Mubaid H, Nguyen HA (2006b) A cluster-based approach for semantic similarity in the biomedical domain. In: Conference proceedings: annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in medicine and biology society, IEEE engineering inmedicine and biology society conference, vol 1, pp 2713-2717.
[4]
Banerjee S, Pedersen T (2003) Extended gloss overlaps as a measure of semantic relatedness. In: Proceedings of the 18th international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Acapulco, Mexico, pp 805-810.
[5]
Batet M, Sánchez D, Valls A, Gibert K (2013) Semantic similarity estimation from multiple ontologies. Appl Intell 38:29-44.
[6]
Ben Aouicha M, Hadj Taieb MA (2016) Computing semantic similarity between biomedical concepts using new information content approach. J Biomed Inform 59:258-275.
[7]
Ben Aouicha M, Hadj Taieb MA, Hamadou AB (2016) Taxonomy-based information content and wordnet-wiktionary-wikipedia glosses for semantic relatedness. Appl Intell.
[8]
Bollegala D, Matsuo Y, Ishizuka M (2007) An integrated approach to measuring semantic similarity between words using information available on the web. In: Sidner CL, Schultz T, Stone M, Zhai C (eds) HLT-NAACL. The Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 340-347.
[9]
Bruni E, Tran NK, Baroni M (2014) Multimodal distributional semantics. J Artif Int Res 49:1-47.
[10]
Budanitsky A (1999) Lexical semantic relatedness and its application in natural language processing.
[11]
Budanitsky A, Hirst G (2001) Semantic distance in WordNet: an experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures. In: Workshop on WordNet and other lexical resources, second meeting of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics.
[12]
Dolan B, Quirk C, Brockett C (2004) Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: exploiting massively parallel news sources. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computational linguistics.
[13]
Gabrilovich E, Markovitch S (2007) Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artifical intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Hyderabad, India, pp 1606-1611.
[14]
Gao J-B, Zhang B-W, Chen XH (2015) A WordNet-based semantic similarity measurement combining edge-counting and information content theory. Eng Appl Artif Intell 39:80-88.
[15]
Gurevych I, Mühlhäuser M, Müller C, Steimle J, Weimer M, Zesch T (2007) Darmstadt Knowledge processing repository based on UIMA. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on unstructured information management architecture at biannual conference of the society for computational linguistics and language technology.
[16]
Gurevych I, Strube M (2004) Semantic similarity applied to spoken dialogue summarization. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computational linguistics.
[17]
Hadj Taieb MA, Ben Aouicha M, Ben Hamadou A (2013) Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia features. Knowl Based Syst 50:260-278.
[18]
Hadj Taieb MA, Ben Aouicha M, Ben Hamadou A (2014a) A new semantic relatedness measurement using WordNet features. Knowl Inf Syst 41:467-497.
[19]
Hadj Taieb MA, Ben Aouicha M, Ben Hamadou A (2014b) Ontology-based approach for measuring semantic similarity. Eng Appl Artif Intell 36:238-261.
[20]
Han X, Zhao J (2010) Structural semantic relatedness: a knowledge-based method to named entity disambiguation. In: Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden, pp 50-59.
[21]
Hao D, Zuo W, Peng T, He F (2011) An approach for calculating semantic similarity between words using WordNet. In: ICDMA. IEEE, pp 177-180.
[22]
Hill F, Reichart R, Korhonen A (2014) SimLex-999: evaluating semantic models with (genuine) similarity estimation. CoRR abs/1408.3456:.
[23]
Janowicz K, Keßler C, Schwarz M, Wilkes M, Panov I, Espeter M, Bäumer B (2007) Algorithm, implementation and application of the SIM-DL similarity server. In: Fonseca FT, Rodriguez MA, Levashkin S (eds) GeoS. Springer, Berlin, pp 128-145.
[24]
Jiang JJ, Conrath DW (1997) Semantic Similarity Based on Corpus Statistics and Lexical Taxonomy. CoRR cmp-lg/9709008:.
[25]
Kolb P (2008) DISCO: a multilingual database of distributionally similar words. In: Storrer A, Geyken A, Siebert A, Würzner K-M (eds) KONVENS 2008 - Ergänzungsband: Textressourcen und lexikalisches Wissen. Berlin, pp 37-44.
[26]
Kondrak G (2001) Identifying cognates by phonetic and semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics on language technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 1-8.
[27]
Leacock C, Chodorow M (1998) Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In: Fellfaum C (ed). MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 265-283.
[28]
Lesk M (1986) Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: how to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone. In: Proceedings of the 5th annual international conference on systems documentation. ACM, Toronto, ON, Canada, pp 24-26.
[29]
Li Y, Bandar ZA, McLean D (2003) An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 15:871-882.
[30]
Li B, Luo F, Wang JZ, Feltus FA, Zhou J (2010) Effectively integrating information content and structural relationship to improve the GO-based similarity measure between proteins. In: Arabnia HR, Tran Q-N, Chang R, He M, Marsh A, Solo AMG, Yang JY (eds) BIOCOMP. CSREA Press, pp 166-172.
[31]
Lin D (1998a) An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference on machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 296-304.
[32]
Lin D (1998b) Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and 17th international conference on computational linguistics, vol 2. Association for Computational Linguistics, Montreal, QC, Canada, pp 768-774.
[33]
Liu X-Y, Zhou Y-M, Zheng R-S (2007) Measuring semantic similarity in Wordnet. In: International conference on machine learning and cybernetics. IEEE, pp 3431-3435.
[34]
Liu H, Chen Y (2010) Computing semantic relatedness between named entities using Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on artificial intelligence and computational intelligence, vol 01. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 388-392.
[35]
Marie-Francine M (2013) Similarity measures for semantic relation extraction. Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve.
[36]
Matsuo Y, Sakaki T, Uchiyama K, Ishizuka M (2006) Graph-based word clustering using a web search engine. In: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia, pp 542-550.
[37]
Meng L, Gu J, Zhou Z (2012) A new model of information content based on concept's topology for measuring semantic similarity in WordNet. Int J Grid Distrib Comput 5:81-94.
[38]
Meng L, Gu J (2012) A new model for measuring word sense similarity in WordNet. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on advanced communication and networking. SERSC, Jeju, Korea, pp 18-23.
[39]
Miller GA, Charles WG (1991) Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Lang Cogn Process 6:1-28.
[40]
Ovaska K, Laakso M, Hautaniemi S (2008) Fast gene ontology based clustering for microarray experiments. BioData Min 1.
[41]
Patwardhan S, Pedersen T (2006) Using WordNet-based context vectors to estimate the semantic relatedness of concepts. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2006 workshop making sense of sense-bringing computational linguistics and psycholinguistics together, pp 1-8.
[42]
Pedersen T, Patwardhan S, Michelizzi J (2004) WordNet:: similarity: measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: Demonstration papers at HLT-NAACL 2004. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, MA, pp 38-41.
[43]
Petrakis EGM, Varelas G, Hliaoutakis A, Raftopoulou P (2006) X-similarity: computing semantic similarity between concepts from different ontologies. J Digit Inf Manag 4:233-237.
[44]
Pilehvar MT, Jurgens D, Navigli R (2013) Align, disambiguate and walk: a unified approach for measuring semantic similarity. In: ACL (1). The Association for Computer Linguistics, pp 1341-1351.
[45]
Pirró G (2009) A semantic similarity metric combining features and intrinsic information content. Data Knowl Eng 68:1289-1308.
[46]
Rada R, Mili H, Bicknell E, Blettner M (1989) Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 19:17-30.
[47]
Resnik P (1999) Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: an information based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. J Artif Intell Res 11:95-130.
[48]
Rodriguez MA, Egenhofer MJ (2003) Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 15:442-456.
[49]
Rubenstein H, Goodenough JB (1965) Contextual correlates of synonymy. Commun ACM 8:627-633.
[50]
Sánchez D, Batet M, Isern D (2011) Ontology-based information content computation. Knowl Based Syst 24:297-303.
[51]
Sánchez D, Solé-Ribalta A, Batet M, Serratosa F (2012) Enabling semantic similarity estimation across multiple ontologies: an evaluation in the biomedical domain. J Biomed Inform 45:141-155.
[52]
¿aric F, Glava¿ G, Karan M, ¿najder J, Dalbelo Ba¿ic B (2012) TakeLab: systems for measuring semantic text similarity. In: Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval 2012). Association for Computational Linguistics, Montréal, Canada, pp 441-448.
[53]
Sebti A, Barfroush AA (2008) A new word sense similarity measure in WordNet. In: IMCSIT. IEEE, pp 369-373.
[54]
Seco N, Veale T, Hayes J (2004) An intrinsic information content metric for semantic similarity in WordNet. In: Proceedings of ECAI 4.
[55]
Stevenson M, Greenwood MA (2005) A semantic approach to IE pattern induction. In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 379-386.
[56]
Sussna M (1993) Word sense disambiguation for free-text indexing using a massive semantic network. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, Washington, DC, USA, pp 67-74.
[57]
Tapeh AG, Rahgozar M (2008) A knowledge-based question answering system for B2C eCommerce. Knowl Based Syst 21:946-950.
[58]
Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psychol Rev 84:327-352.
[59]
Wang JZ, Du Z, Payattakool R, Yu PS, Chen C-F (2007) A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO terms. Bioinformatics 23:1274-1281.
[60]
Wang T, Hirst G (2011) Refining the notions of depth and density in WordNet-based semantic similarity measures. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Edinburgh, UK, pp 1003-1011.
[61]
Wu H, Su Z, Mao F, Olman V, Xu Y (2005) Prediction of functional modules based on comparative genome analysis and Gene Ontology application. Nucleic Acids Res 33:2822-2837.
[62]
Wu Z, Palmer M (1994) Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, NM, pp 133-138.
[63]
Zesch T (2010) Study of semantic relatedness of words using collaboratively constructed semantic resources, pp 1-130.
[64]
Zhou Z, Wang Y, Gu J (2008) A new model of information content for semantic similarity in WordNet. In: International conference on future generation communication and networking symposia, vol 3, pp 85-89.
[65]
Zhou Z, Wang Y, Gu J (2008) New model of semantic similarity measuring in WordNet. In: 3rd international conference on intelligent system and knowledge engineering, 2008 (ISKE 2008). IEEE, pp 256-261.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)A formal model of semantic computingSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-018-3502-523:14(5411-5429)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  1. SISR: System for integrating semantic relatedness and similarity measures

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications
      Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications  Volume 22, Issue 6
      March 2018
      335 pages
      ISSN:1432-7643
      EISSN:1433-7479
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Springer-Verlag

      Berlin, Heidelberg

      Publication History

      Published: 01 March 2018

      Author Tags

      1. Knowledge resource
      2. Semantic relatedness
      3. Semantic similarity
      4. Semantic technology
      5. WNetSS API

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2019)A formal model of semantic computingSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-018-3502-523:14(5411-5429)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019

      View Options

      View options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media