Skip header Section
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Software InspectionJune 1993
- Authors:
- Tom Gilb,
- Dorothy Graham,
- Editor:
- Susannah Finzi
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
From the Publisher:
It has proved to be an elusive goal - until now. The Inspection techniques illustrated in this book have brought clear benefits in terms of lower (or even zero) defects, higher productivity, better project tracking and improved documentation.
Cited By
Rahman A, Cysneiros L and Berry D An Empirical Study of the Impact of Waterfall and Agile Methods on Numbers of Requirements-Related Defects Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, (1143-1152)- Al-Bataineh O, Moonen L and Vidziunas L (2024). Extending the range of bugs that automated program repair can handle, Journal of Systems and Software, 209:C, Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024.
- Singla T, Anandayuvaraj D, Kalu K, Schorlemmer T and Davis J An Empirical Study on Using Large Language Models to Analyze Software Supply Chain Security Failures Proceedings of the 2023 Workshop on Software Supply Chain Offensive Research and Ecosystem Defenses, (5-15)
- Chong C, Thongtanunam P and Tantithamthavorn C Assessing the students' understanding and their mistakes in code review checklists Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Joint Track on Software Engineering Education and Training, (20-29)
- Baum T, Schneider K and Bacchelli A (2019). Associating working memory capacity and code change ordering with code review performance, Empirical Software Engineering, 24:4, (1762-1798), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019.
- Daun M, Brings J, Krajinski L and Weyer T On the benefits of using dedicated models in validation processes for behavioral specifications Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Processes, (44-53)
- Spadini D, Palomba F, Baum T, Hanenberg S, Bruntink M and Bacchelli A Test-driven code review Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering, (1061-1072)
- Zanaty F, Hirao T, McIntosh S, Ihara A and Matsumoto K An empirical study of design discussions in code review Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, (1-10)
- Ellis-Braithwaite R, Lock R, Dawson R and King T (2017). Repetition between stakeholder (user) and system requirements, Requirements Engineering, 22:2, (167-190), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017.
- Bosu A, Carver J, Bird C, Orbeck J and Chockley C (2017). Process Aspects and Social Dynamics of Contemporary Code Review, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 43:1, (56-75), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.
- Poth A (2016). Effectivity and economical aspects for agile quality assurance in large enterprises, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 28:11, (1000-1004), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016.
- Baum T, Kortum F, Schneider K, Brack A and Schauder J Comparing pre commit reviews and post commit reviews using process simulation Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and Systems Process, (26-35)
- Glinz M and Fricker S (2015). On shared understanding in software engineering, Computer Science - Research and Development, 30:3-4, (363-376), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015.
- Misra S, Fernández L and Colomo-Palacios R (2014). A simplified model for software inspection, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 26:12, (1297-1315), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014.
- Grissom S, Hundhausen C and Conrad P Alternatives to lecture Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, (275-276)
- Wang Z Selecting verification and validation techniques for simulation projects Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference: Simulation: Making Decisions in a Complex World, (1233-1244)
- Hundhausen C, Agrawal A and Agarwal P (2013). Talking about code, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 13:3, (1-28), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013.
- Ott D Automatic requirement categorization of large natural language specifications at mercedes-benz for review improvements Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, (50-64)
- Mandala N, Walia G, Carver J and Nagappan N Application of kusumoto cost-metric to evaluate the cost effectiveness of software inspections Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, (221-230)
- Shull F, Seaman C and Diep M Analyzing inspection data for heuristic effectiveness Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, (149-152)
- Dautovic A Automatic assessment of software documentation quality Proceedings of the 26th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, (665-669)
- Lochmann K and Goeb A A unifying model for software quality Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on Software quality, (3-10)
- Elberzhager F, Münch J, Rombach D and Freimut B Optimizing cost and quality by integrating inspection and test processes Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Software and Systems Process, (3-12)
- Hundhausen C, Agarwal P and Trevisan M Online vs. face-to-face pedagogical code reviews Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, (117-122)
- Hale D, Hale J and Smith R (2011). Evaluation of work product defects during corrective & enhancive software evolution, ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42:1, (59-73), Online publication date: 18-Feb-2011.
- Ejaz R, Nazmeen M and Zafar M A quality assurance model for analysis phase Proceedings of the 2010 National Software Engineering Conference, (1-4)
- Juergens E, Deissenboeck F, Feilkas M, Hummel B, Schaetz B, Wagner S, Domann C and Streit J Can clone detection support quality assessments of requirements specifications? Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2, (79-88)
- Hundhausen C, Agrawal A, Fairbrother D and Trevisan M Does studio-based instruction work in CS 1? Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, (500-504)
- Hundhausen C, Agrawal A and Ryan K The design of an online environment to support pedagogical code reviews Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, (182-186)
- Lee C Adapting and adjusting test process reflecting characteristics of embedded software and industrial properties based on referential models Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human, (1372-1377)
- Kuliamin V (2009). Integration of verification methods for program systems, Programming and Computing Software, 35:4, (212-222), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009.
- Misra S and Akman I A Cognitive Evaluation for Meetings in Software Development Process Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology, (247-254)
- Mishra D and Mishra A (2009). Simplified software inspection process in compliance with international standards, Computer Standards & Interfaces, 31:4, (763-771), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.
- Bhatti S (2009). Deducing the complexity to quality of a system using UML, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 34:3, (1-7), Online publication date: 30-May-2009.
- Hundhausen C, Agrawal A, Fairbrother D and Trevisan M (2009). Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS 1 course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41:1, (291-295), Online publication date: 4-Mar-2009.
- Hundhausen C, Agrawal A, Fairbrother D and Trevisan M Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS 1 course Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, (291-295)
- Rombach D, Ciolkowski M, Jeffery R, Laitenberger O, McGarry F and Shull F (2008). Impact of research on practice in the field of inspections, reviews and walkthroughs, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 33:6, (26-35), Online publication date: 31-Oct-2008.
- Kim E and Jang Y A test improvement model for embedded software testing Proceedings of the 11th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, (79-84)
- Lee H and Jang Y An experience of implementing software metrics in an industrial environment Proceedings of the 11th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, (42-47)
- Laporte C, Doucet M, Bourque P and Belkébir Y Utilization of a set of software engineering roles for a multinational organization Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, (35-50)
- Denger C and Shull F (2007). A Practical Approach for Quality-Driven Inspections, IEEE Software, 24:2, (79-86), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2007.
- Wagner S A literature survey of the quality economics of defect-detection techniques Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering, (194-203)
- Denger C and Kolb R Testing and inspecting reusable product line components Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering, (184-193)
- He L and Carver J PBR vs. checklist Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering, (95-104)
- Phongpaibul M and Boehm B An empirical comparison between pair development and software inspection in Thailand Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering, (85-94)
- Motoyama T (2006). Improving Software Development through Three Stages, IEEE Software, 23:5, (81-87), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2006.
- Winkler D and Biffl S An empirical study on design quality improvement from best-practice inspection and pair programming Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, (319-333)
- Jäntti M, Toroi T and Eerola A Difficulties in establishing a defect management process Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, (142-150)
- Lange C Improving the quality of UML models in practice Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, (993-996)
- Lange C and Chaudron M Effects of defects in UML models Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, (401-411)
- Stürmer I, Conrad M, Fey I and Dörr H Experiences with model and autocode reviews in model-based software development Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Software engineering for automotive systems, (45-52)
- Freimut B, Briand L and Vollei F (2005). Determining Inspection Cost-Effectiveness by Combining Project Data and Expert Opinion, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31:12, (1074-1092), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005.
- Ahonen J and Sihvonen H How things should not be done Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Software Process Improvement, (59-70)
- Müller M (2005). Two controlled experiments concerning the comparison of pair programming to peer review, Journal of Systems and Software, 78:2, (166-179), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2005.
- Liu S, Nagoya F, Chen Y, Goya M and McDermid J An automated approach to specification-based program inspection Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Formal Methods and Software Engineering, (421-434)
- Koneri P, de Vreede G, Dean D, Fruhling A and Wolcott P The design and field evaluation of a repeatable collaborative software code inspection process Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Groupware: design, Implementation, and Use, (325-340)
- Hedberg H and Lappalainen J A Preliminary Evaluation of Software Inspection Tools,with the DESMET Method Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Quality Software, (45-54)
- Kutay C and Ali Babar M Teaching Three Quality Assurance Techniques in Tandem - Lessons Learned Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Quality Software, (307-312)
- Harjumaa L, Tervonen I and Huttunen A Peer Reviews in Real Life - Motivators and Demotivators Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Quality Software, (29-36)
- Hwang S and Song K Opportunity tree framework design for quality and delivery of software product Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems - Volume Part II, (1331-1337)
- Winkler D, Riedl B and Biffl S Improvement of Design Specifications with Inspection and Testing Proceedings of the 31st EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, (222-231)
- Boehm B (2005). Value-based quality processes and results, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 30:4, (1-6), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005.
- Winkler D, Biffl S and Thurnher B Investigating the impact of active guidance on design inspection Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, (458-473)
- Kollanus S Issues in software inspection practices Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, (429-442)
- Boehm B Value-based quality processes and results Proceedings of the third workshop on Software quality, (1-6)
- Nick M, Denger C and Willrich T Experience-based support for code inspections Proceedings of the Third Biennial conference on Professional Knowledge Management, (121-126)
- Rajan H and Sullivan K Aspect language features for concern coverage profiling Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, (181-191)
- Bhatti S (2005). Why quality?, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 30:2, (1-5), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005.
- Kussmaul C (2005). Using agile development methods to improve student writing, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 20:3, (148-156), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2005.
- Müller M (2004). Are Reviews an Alternative to Pair Programming?, Empirical Software Engineering, 9:4, (335-351), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.
- Traore I and Aredo D (2004). Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based Verification, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30:11, (736-753), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2004.
- Kalinowski M and Travassos G A Computational Framework for Supporting Software Inspections Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering, (46-55)
- Harjumaa L, Tervonen I and Vuorio P Improving Software Inspection Process with Patterns Proceedings of the Quality Software, Fourth International Conference, (118-125)
- Kothari S, Bishop L, Sauceda J and Daugherty G (2004). A Pattern-Based Framework for Software Anomaly Detection, Software Quality Journal, 12:2, (99-120), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2004.
- Chmiel R and Loui M Debugging Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, (17-21)
- Chmiel R and Loui M (2004). Debugging, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36:1, (17-21), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2004.
- Padberg F, Ragg T and Schoknecht R (2004). Using Machine Learning for Estimating the Defect Content After an Inspection, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30:1, (17-28), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004.
- Ciolkowski M, Laitenberger O and Biffl S (2003). Software Reviews, IEEE Software, 20:6, (46-51), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2003.
- Halling M, Biffl S and Grünbacher P (2003). An economic approach for improving requirements negotiation models with inspection, Requirements Engineering, 8:4, (236-247), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2003.
- Grünbacher P, Halling M and Biffl S An empirical study on groupware support for software inspection meetings Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, (4-11)
- Thelin T, Runeson P and Wohlin C (2003). An Experimental Comparison of Usage-Based and Checklist-Based Reading, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29:8, (687-704), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2003.
- Dunsmore A, Roper M and Wood M (2003). The Development and Evaluation of Three Diverse Techniques for Object-Oriented Code Inspection, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29:8, (677-686), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2003.
- Dunsmore A, Roper M and Wood M (2003). Practical Code Inspection Techniques for Object-Oriented Systems, IEEE Software, 20:4, (21-29), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2003.
- Gantner T and Barth T Experiences on defining and evaluating an adapted review process Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, (506-511)
- Kylmäkoski R Efficient authoring of software documentation using RaPiD7 Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, (255-261)
- Biffl S and Halling M (2003). Investigating the Defect Detection Effectiveness and Cost Benefit of Nominal Inspection Teams, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29:5, (385-397), Online publication date: 1-May-2003.
- Almeida Jr. J, Camargo Jr. J, Basseto B and Paz S (2003). Best Practices in Code Inspection for Safety-Critical Software, IEEE Software, 20:3, (56-63), Online publication date: 1-May-2003.
- Laitenberger O and Rombach D (Quasi-)experimental studies in industrial settings Lecture notes on empirical software engineering, (167-227)
- Shull F, Carver J, Travassos G, Maldonado J, Conradi R and Basili V Replicated studies Lecture notes on empirical software engineering, (39-84)
- Jalote P and Saxena A (2002). Optimum Control Limits for Employing Statistical Process Control in Software Process, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28:12, (1126-1134), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2002.
- Laitenberger O, Beil T and Schwinn T (2002). An Industrial Case Study to Examine a Non-Traditional Inspection Implementation for Requirements Specifications, Empirical Software Engineering, 7:4, (345-374), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2002.
- Moll J, Jacobs J, Freimut B and Trienekens J The Importance of Life Cycle Modeling to Defect Detection and Prevention Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice
- Kelly D and Shepard T Qualitative observations from software code inspection experiments Proceedings of the 2002 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research
- Biffl S and Gutjahr W (2002). Using a Reliability Growth Model to Control Software Inspection, Empirical Software Engineering, 7:3, (257-284), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2002.
- Anda B and Sjøberg D Towards an inspection technique for use case models Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering, (127-134)
- Wong Y Use of software inspection inputs in practice Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, (725-726)
- Dunsmore A, Roper M and Wood M Further investigations into the development and evaluation of reading techniques for object-oriented code inspection Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, (47-57)
- Lawson D and Coleman G Investigating software measures to improve product reliability Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing, (1031-1035)
- Miller J, Macdonald F and Ferguson J (2002). ASSISTing Management Decisions in the Software Inspection Process, Information Technology and Management, 3:1-2, (67-83), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2002.
- Middleton P (2001). Lean Software Development, Software Quality Journal, 9:4, (241-252), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.
- Hallin M, Grünbacher P and Biffl S Tailoring a COTS Group Support System for Software Requirements Inspection Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering
- Siy H and Votta L Does The Modern Code Inspection Have Value? Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'01)
- Stevens K (2001). Experiences teaching software engineering for the first time, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33:3, (77-80), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2001.
- McConnell S (2001). Common Sense, IEEE Software, 18:4, (5-7), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2001.
- Shepard T and Kelly D How to do inspections when there is no time Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering
- Biffl S, Freimut B and Laitenberger O Investigating the cost-effectiveness of reinspections in software development Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, (155-164)
- Biffl S and Grossmann W Evaluating the accuracy of defect estimation models based on inspection data from two inspection cycles Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, (145-154)
- Dunsmore A, Roper M and Wood M Systematic object-oriented inspection — an empirical study Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, (135-144)
- Hatton L (2001). Exploring the Role of Diagnosis in Software Engineering, IEEE Software, 18:4, (34-39), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2001.
- Stevens K Experiences teaching software engineering for the first time Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, (77-80)
- van Genuchten M, van Dijk C, Scholten H and Vogel D (2001). Using Group Support Systems for Software Inspections, IEEE Software, 18:3, (60-65), Online publication date: 1-May-2001.
- Laitenberger O, El Emam K and Harbich T (2001). An Internally Replicated Quasi-Experimental Comparison of Checklist and Perspective-Based Reading of Code Documents, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27:5, (387-421), Online publication date: 1-May-2001.
- Withers D Some fundamental issues in model building Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation, (432-439)
- Hazeyama A An Education Class on Design and Implementation of an Information System in a University and Its Evaluation 24th International Computer Software and Applications Conference, (21-27)
- Briand L, Freimut B and Vollei F Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Inspections by Combining Project Data and Expert Opinion Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering
- Viega J, McGraw G, Mutdosch T and Felten E (2000). Statically Scanning Java Code, IEEE Software, 17:5, (68-74), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2000.
- Dunsmore A, Roper M and Wood M Object-oriented inspection in the face of delocalisation Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering, (467-476)
- Briand L, El Emam K, Freimut B and Laitenberger O (2000). A Comprehensive Evaluation of Capture-Recapture Models for Estimating Software Defect Content, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26:6, (518-540), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2000.
- Land L, Sauer C and Jeffery R (2000). The Use of Procedural Roles in Code Inspections, Empirical Software Engineering, 5:1, (11-34), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2000.
- Sauer C, Jeffery D, Land L and Yetton P (2000). The Effectiveness of Software Development Technical Reviews, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26:1, (1-14), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2000.
- Johnson P and Disney A (1999). A Critical Analysis of PSP Data Quality, Empirical Software Engineering, 4:4, (317-349), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1999.
- Travassos G, Shull F, Fredericks M and Basili V (1999). Detecting defects in object-oriented designs, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 34:10, (47-56), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1999.
- Travassos G, Shull F, Fredericks M and Basili V Detecting defects in object-oriented designs Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, (47-56)
- Woodward S (1999). Evolutionary Project Management, Computer, 32:10, (49-57), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1999.
- Macdonald F and Miller J (1999). A Comparison of Computer Support Systems for Software Inspection, Automated Software Engineering, 6:3, (291-313), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1999.
- Laitenberger O and Atkinson C Generalizing perspective-based inspection to handle object-oriented development artifacts Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, (494-503)
- Adams T (1999). A formula for the re-inspection decision, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 24:3, (80), Online publication date: 1-May-1999.
- Brykczynski B (1999). A survey of software inspection checklists, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 24:1, (82), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1999.
- Runeson P and Wohlin C (1998). An Experimental Evaluation of an Experience-Based Capture-RecaptureMethod in Software Code Inspections, Empirical Software Engineering, 3:4, (381-406), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1998.
- Disney A and Johnson P (1998). Investigating data quality problems in the PSP, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 23:6, (143-152), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.
- Disney A and Johnson P Investigating data quality problems in the PSP Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (143-152)
- MacDonald F and Miller J (1998). A Comparison of Tool-Based and Paper-Based Software Inspection, Empirical Software Engineering, 3:3, (233-253), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1998.
- Seaman C and Basili V (1998). Communication and Organization, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24:7, (559-572), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1998.
- Johnson P and Tjahjono D (1998). Does Every Inspection Really Need a Meeting?, Empirical Software Engineering, 3:1, (9-35), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1998.
- Miller J, Wood M and Roper M (1998). Further Experiences with Scenarios and Checklists, Empirical Software Engineering, 3:1, (37-64), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1998.
- Parnas D (1998). Successful software engineering research, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 23:3, (64-68), Online publication date: 1-May-1998.
- Wohlin C and Runeson P Defect content estimations from review data Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, (400-409)
- Briand L, El Emam K, Laitenberger O and Fussbroich T Using simulation to build inspection efficiency benchmarks for development projects Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, (340-349)
- Johnson P (1998). Reengineering inspection, Communications of the ACM, 41:2, (49-52), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1998.
- Van Genuchten M, Cornelissen W and Van Dijk C (1997). Supporting inspections with an electronic meeting system, Journal of Management Information Systems, 14:3, (165-178), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1997.
- Belli F and Crisan R Empirical Performance Analysis of Computer-Supported Code-Reviews Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering
- Briand L, Emam K, Freimut B and Oliver Quantitative Evaluation of Capture-Recapture Models to Control Software Inspections Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering
- Land L, Sauer C and Jeffery R (1997). Validating the defect detection performance advantage of group designs for software reviews, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 22:6, (294-309), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1997.
- Allen G, Davies L, Lindmark G and Karlsson E (1997). TTM15—a large multi-site improvement project, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 22:6, (111-124), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1997.
- Land L, Sauer C and Jeffery R Validating the defect detection performance advantage of group designs for software reviews Proceedings of the 6th European SOFTWARE ENGINEERING conference held jointly with the 5th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (294-309)
- Allen G, Davies L, Lindmark G and Karlsson E TTM15—a large multi-site improvement project Proceedings of the 6th European SOFTWARE ENGINEERING conference held jointly with the 5th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (111-124)
- Land L, Jeffery R and Sauer C Validating the Defect Detection Performance Advantage of Group Designs for Software Reviews Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference
- Ebrahimi N (1997). On the Statistical Analysis of the Number of Errors Remaining in a Software Design Document after Inspection, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23:8, (529-532), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1997.
- Baker R Code reviews enhance software quality Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, (570-571)
- Johnson P and Tjahjono D Assessing software review meetings Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, (118-127)
- Kelsey R (1997). Integrating a defect typology with containment metrics, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 22:2, (64-67), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1997.
- Porter A and Johnson P (1997). Assessing Software Review Meetings, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23:3, (129-145), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1997.
- Chernak Y (1996). A Statistical Approach to the Inspection Checklist Formal Synthesis and Improvement, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22:12, (866-874), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1996.
- Tervonen I (1996). Support for Quality-Based Design and Inspection, IEEE Software, 13:1, (44-54), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1996.
- Johnson P An instrumented approach to improving software quality through formal technical review Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, (113-122)
- Mordinyi R, Winkler D, Ekaputra F, Wimmer M and Biffl S Investigating model slicing capabilities on integrated plant models with AutomationML 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), (1-8)
Recommendations
Task-directed software inspection technique: an experiment and case study
CASCON '00: Proceedings of the 2000 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative researchResearch in software inspection has led to the development of inspection techniques focused on providing structure and guidance to the individual inspector, with the goal of improving effectiveness. This paper defines and investigates a new inspection ...
Task-directed software inspection
Special issue: Applications of statistics in software engineeringSoftware inspection is recognized as an effective verification technique. Despite this fact, the use of inspection is surprisingly low. This paper describes a new inspection technique, called task-directed inspection (TDI), and a light-weight process, ...