Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/644108.644143acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessodaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Online learning in online auctions

Published: 12 January 2003 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
Peter Auer, Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi, Yoav Freund, and Robert E. Schapire. Gambling in a rigged casino: The adversarial multi-armed bandit problem. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 1995.
[2]
Amitabha Bagchi, Amitabh Chaudhary, Rahul Garg, Michael T. Goodrich, and Vijay Kumar. Seller-focused algorithms for online auctioning. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2001), volume 2125. Springer Verlag LNCS, 2001.
[3]
Ziv Bar-Yossef, Kirsten Hildrum, and Felix Wu. Incentive-compatible online auctions for digital goods. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 964--970, 2002.
[4]
Amos Fiat, Andrew Goldberg, Jason Hartline, and Anna Karlin. Competitive generalized auctions. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 02), 2002.
[5]
Andrew Goldberg, Jason Hartline, and Andrew Wright. Competitive auctions and digital goods. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 735--744, 2001.
[6]
Ron Lavi and Noam Nisan. Competitive analysis of incentive compatible on-line auctions. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-00), pages 233--241, 2000.
[7]
Nick Littlestone and Manfred K. Warmuth. The weighted majority algorithm. Information and Computations, 108:212--261, 1994.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Reviews

Barrett Hazeltine

Performance of an online auction can be improved by an algorithm that learns from the set of bids already made. An online auction receives bids, and deals with each individually, deciding whether to accept a bid or wait for a higher one. This paper sets bounds on the performance of a learning algorithm, and shows that, for moderately long auctions, the performance is better than that of an existing algorithm. The proofs use formal mathematics, which are difficult to summarize. The flavor of the paper may be given by a simplification of one result: For any function f(h) = o(h log log h) , where h is the ratio between the highest and lowest bids, if the sequences of bids made is greater than or equal to f(h) , then the revenue generated is comparable to that of an optimal offline auction. The paper seems to be intended for those mathematically inclined, and does not focus on the mechanics of the algorithm.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SODA '03: Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
January 2003
891 pages
ISBN:0898715385

Sponsors

Publisher

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

United States

Publication History

Published: 12 January 2003

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 411 of 1,322 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Regulation of Algorithmic CollusionProceedings of the Symposium on Computer Science and Law10.1145/3614407.3643706(98-108)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2024
  • (2019)Bandits and Experts in Metric SpacesJournal of the ACM10.1145/329987366:4(1-77)Online publication date: 31-May-2019
  • (2018)Dynamic Pricing in Spatial CrowdsourcingProceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data10.1145/3183713.3196929(773-788)Online publication date: 27-May-2018
  • (2018)Bandits with KnapsacksJournal of the ACM10.1145/316453965:3(1-55)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
  • (2017)Online Pricing for Mobile Crowdsourcing with Multi-Minded UsersProceedings of the 18th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing10.1145/3084041.3084058(1-10)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2017
  • (2017)An Online Pricing Mechanism for Mobile Crowdsensing Data MarketsProceedings of the 18th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing10.1145/3084041.3084044(1-10)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2017
  • (2016)Simple pricing schemes for consumers with evolving valuesProceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms10.5555/2884435.2884536(1476-1490)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2016
  • (2016)Dynamic Pricing and Traffic Engineering for Timely Inter-Datacenter TransfersProceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference10.1145/2934872.2934893(73-86)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2016
  • (2016)Do prices coordinate markets?Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/2897518.2897559(440-453)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2016
  • (2015)Dynamic Pricing with Limited SupplyACM Transactions on Economics and Computation10.1145/25591523:1(1-26)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media