research-article

A fully nonlinear three-dimensional dynamic frictional contact analysis method under large deformation with the area regularization

Authors:

Seung Lee Kwon,

Gun Jin YunAuthors Info & Claims

Engineering with Computers, Volume 40, Issue 1

Pages 399 - 421

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01795-x

Published: 06 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents the NTS-AR (node-to-segment with area regularization) method to analyze the three-dimensional dynamic frictional contact bodies under large deformation and plastic material behavior. The extended NTS-AR method considers the 3D geometric structure of the slave surface and frictional constraint in a convected coordinate system. Despite wide applications of the penalty-based node-to-segment (NTS) method, owing to its light computation cost, the penalty-based NTS algorithm still has limitations in convergence and accuracy. Unlike the original NTS method setting a constant penalty parameter, the NTS-AR method compensates the area so that a proper penalty parameter is applied for each slave node. To the best knowledge of authors, the NTS-AR method has been applied only to 2D frictionless contact problems, although the method maintains the advantages of the fast and straightforward algorithm of the original NTS method and shows an improved accuracy. Following validations with various three-dimensional numerical examples, the effects of friction on the tangential and normal forces and displacements under large deformation are investigated with the proposed method. In particular, a collision event of F-35B and aircraft carrier flight deck is simulated.

References

[1]

Zavarise G and De Lorenzis L The node-to-segment algorithm for 2D frictionless contact: classical formulation and special cases Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2009 198 3428-3451

[2]

Wriggers P and Laursen TA Computational contact mechanics 2006 Berlin Springer

[3]

Hughes TJR, Taylor RL, Sackman JL, Curnier A, and Kanoknukulchai W A finite element method for a class of contact-impact problems Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1976 8 249-276

[4]

Hallquist J (1979) NIKE2D: an implicit, finite-deformation, finite-element code for analyzing the static and dynamic response of two-dimensional solids. California Univ., Livermore (USA). Lawrence Livermore Lab.

[5]

Klaus-Jurgen Bathe AC A solution method for planar and axisymmetric contact problems Int J Numer Methods Eng 1985 21 65-88

[6]

Hallquist JO, Goudreau GL, and Benson DJ Sliding interfaces with contact-impact in large-scale lagrangian computations Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 1985 51 107-137

[7]

Simo JC, Wriggers P, and Taylor RL A perturbed Lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1985 50 163-180

[8]

Laursen TA and Simo JC A continuum-based finite element formulation for the implicit solution of multibody, large deformation frictional contact problems Int J Numer Methods Eng 1993 36 3451-3485

[9]

Wriggers P, Van Vu T, and Stein E Finite element formulation of large deformation impact-contact problems with friction Comput Struct 1990 37 319-331

[10]

Wriggers P and Simo JC A note on tangent stiffness for fully nonlinear contact problems Commun Appl Numer Methods 1985 1 199-203

[11]

Parisch H A consistent tangent stiffness matrix for three-dimensional non-linear contact analysis Int J Numer Methods Eng 1989 28 1803-1812

[12]

Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore software Technology corporation 3:25-31

[13]

Abaqus V (2014) 6.14 Documentation. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corporation 651

[14]

Puso MA and Laursen TA A mortar segment-to-segment frictional contact method for large deformations Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2004 193 4891-4913

[15]

Papadopoulos P and Taylor RL A mixed formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1992 94 373-389

Digital Library

[16]

Crisfield MA Re-visiting the contact patch test Int J Numer Methods Eng 2000 48 435-449

[17]

El-Abbasi N and Bathe K-J Stability and patch test performance of contact discretizations and a new solution algorithm Comput Struct 2001 79 1473-1486

[18]

Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera AT (1993) Domain decomposition by the mortar element method. In: Kaper HG, Garbey M, Pieper GW (eds) Asymptotic and numerical methods for partial differential equations with critical parameters. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 269–286

[19]

Zavarise G and Wriggers P A segment-to-segment contact strategy Math Comput Model 1998 28 497-515

Digital Library

[20]

Puso MA and Laursen TA A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2004 193 601-629

[21]

Puso MA A 3D mortar method for solid mechanics Int J Numer Methods Eng 2004 59 315-336

[22]

Puso MA, Laursen TA, and Solberg J A segment-to-segment mortar contact method for quadratic elements and large deformations Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2008 197 555-566

[23]

Wohlmuth B A mortar finite element method using dual spaces for the lagrange multiplie SIAM J Numer Anal 2000 38 989-1012

Digital Library

[24]

Popp A, Gee MW, and Wall WA A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal-dual active set strategy Int J Numer Methods Eng 2009 79 1354-1391

[25]

Hartmann S, Brunssen S, Ramm E, and Wohlmuth B Unilateral non-linear dynamic contact of thin-walled structures using a primal-dual active set strategy Int J Numer Methods Eng 2007 70 883-912

[26]

Otto P, De Lorenzis L, and Unger JF Explicit dynamics in impact simulation using a NURBS contact interface Int J Numer Methods Eng 2019 121 1248-1267

[27]

Cavalieri FJ and Cardona A Numerical solution of frictional contact problems based on a mortar algorithm with an augmented Lagrangian technique Multibody Syst Dyn 2015 35 353-375

[28]

Almasi A, Kim T-Y, Laursen TA, and Song J-H A strong form meshfree collocation method for frictional contact on a rigid obstacle Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2019

[29]

Almasi A, Kim T-Y, and Song J-H Strong form meshfree collocation method for frictional contact between a rigid pile and an elastic foundation Eng Comput 2022

Digital Library

[30]

Beel A and Song J-H Strong-form meshfree collocation method for multibody thermomechanical contact Eng Comput 2021

Digital Library

[31]

Almasi A, Yoon Y-C, Kim T-Y, Laursen TA, and Song J-H A strong-form meshfree collocation method for modeling stationary cracks with frictional contact Int J Non-Linear Mech 2023

[32]

Zavarise G, Wriggers P, Stein E, and Schrefler BA Real contact mechanisms and finite element formulation—a coupled thermomechanical approach Int J Numer Methods Eng 1992 35 767-785

[33]

Zavarise G and De Lorenzis L A modified node-to-segment algorithm passing the contact patch test Int J Numer Methods Eng 2009 79 379-416

[34]

Zavarise G, Boso D, and Schrefler B Gladwell GML A contact formulation for electrical and mechanical resistance Contact mechanics 2002 Springer 211-218

[35]

Laursen TA and Simo JC An augmented lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction Comput Struct 1992 42 91-116

[36]

Yang B, Laursen TA, and Meng X Two dimensional mortar contact methods for large deformation frictional sliding Int J Numer Methods Eng 2005 62 1183-1225

[37]

Gitterle M, Popp A, Gee MW, and Wall WA Finite deformation frictional mortar contact using a semi-smooth Newton method with consistent linearization Int J Numer Methods Eng 2010 84 543-571

[38]

Weißenfels C (2013) Contact methods integrating plasticity models with application to soil mechanics. Dissertation, Leibniz Universität Hannover

[39]

McMeeking RM and Rice JR Finite-element formulations for problems of large elastic-plastic deformation Int J Solids Struct 1975 11 601-616

[40]

Kim H-G A comparative study of hyperelastic and hypoelastic material models with constant elastic moduli for large deformation problems Acta Mech 2016 227 1351-1362

[41]

Oldroyd JG On the formulation of rheological equations of state Proc R Soc Lond A 1950 200 523-541

[42]

Bathe K-J Finite element procedures 1996 New Jersey Prentice Hall

[43]

De Borst R, Crisfield MA, Remmers JJ, and Verhoosel CV Nonlinear finite element analysis of solids and structures 2012 New York John Wiley & Sons

[44]

Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B, and Elkhodary K Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures 2014 New York John Wiley & Sons

[45]

Carpenter NJ, Taylor RL, and Katona MG Lagrange constraints for transient finite element surface contact Int J Numer Methods Eng 1991 32 103-128

[46]

Oldenburg M and Nilsson L The position code algorithm for contact searching Int J Numer Methods Eng 1994 37 359-386

[47]

Wong SV, Hamouda AMS, and Hashmi MSJ Kinematic contact-impact algorithm with friction Int J Crashworthiness 2010 6 65-82

[48]

Har J and Fulton RE A parallel finite element procedure for contact-impact problems Eng Comput 2003 19 67-84

Digital Library

[49]

Rackauskaite E, Kotsovinos P, and Rein G Model parameter sensitivity and benchmarking of the explicit dynamic solver of LS-DYNA for structural analysis in case of fire Fire Saf J 2017 90 123-138

[50]

Bhat AR (2009) Finite element modeling and dynamic impact response evaluation for ballistic applications. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University

[51]

Gough V Friction of rubber Rubber Chem Technol 1960 33 158-180

[52]

Arkin WM, Handler J (1989) Naval accidents, 1945–1988. Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies

[53]

Carden HD (1982) Correlation and assessment of structural airplane crash data with flight parameters at impact. NASA

[54]

Alfaro-Bou E, Vaughan Jr VL (1977) Light airplane crash tests at impact velocities of 13 and 27 m/s. NASA

[55]

Jackson KE, Putnam JB (2020) Simulation of a full-scale crash test of a fokker F28 fellowship aircraft. NASA

[56]

Paik JK Ultimate limit state analysis and design of plated structures 2018 New York John Wiley & Sons

[57]

Wierzbicki T and Abramowicz W On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures J Appl Mech 1983 50 727-734

[58]

Malyshev V (2014) Tribological aspects in friction stir welding and processing In: 1st edn. Advances in Friction-Stir Welding and Processing, Elsevier, pp. 329–386.

[59]

Taylor L, Flanagan D (1989) PRONTO 3D: a three-dimensional transient solid dynamics program. Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

[60]

Sugano T, Tsubota H, Kasai Y, Koshika N, Orui S, Von Riesemann W, Bickel D, and Parks M Full-scale aircraft impact test for evaluation of impact force Nucl Eng Des 1993 140 373-385

[61]

Wilt T, Chowdhury A, Cox P (2011) Response of reinforced concrete structures to aircraft crash impact. Prepared for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contract NRC-02-07-006

[62]

Martin L (2021) F-35 lightning II program status and fast facts. Lockheed Martin. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/aero/documents/F-35/F35_LightningII_Fast%20Facts_December_2021.pdf. Accessed 7 Jun 2022

Cited By

Kang SLee SShin S(2024)Efficient implementation on accuracy improvement of the two-dimensional node-to-segment contact approach for explicit dynamic analysisComputational Mechanics10.1007/s00466-023-02425-574:1(113-127)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00466-023-02425-5

Index Terms

A fully nonlinear three-dimensional dynamic frictional contact analysis method under large deformation with the area regularization

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Investigation into three-dimensional effects of finite contact width on fretting fatigue

Three-dimensional effects due to finite contact width on the contact characteristics and fretting fatigue behavior were investigated. Two contact configurations were considered: cylinder-on-flat and flat with rounded edge-on flat. Three-dimensional ...
Investigation of joint clearance effects on the dynamic performance of a planar 2-DOF pick-and-place parallel manipulator

In this study, the effects of joint clearance on the dynamic performance of a planar 2-DOF pick-and-place parallel manipulator are investigated. The parallel manipulator is modeled by multi-body system dynamics. The contact effect in revolute joints ...
A general three-dimensional L-section beam finite element for elastoplastic large deformation analysis

In this paper, the development of a general three-dimensional L-section beam finite element for elastoplastic large deformation analysis is presented. We propose the generalized interpolation scheme for the isoparametric formulation of three-dimensional ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Engineering with Computers

Engineering with Computers Volume 40, Issue 1

Feb 2024

662 pages

EISSN:1435-5663

Issue’s Table of Contents

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 06 March 2023

Accepted: 08 February 2023

Received: 02 September 2022

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Defense Industry Technology Center
Seoul National University

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kang SLee SShin S(2024)Efficient implementation on accuracy improvement of the two-dimensional node-to-segment contact approach for explicit dynamic analysisComputational Mechanics10.1007/s00466-023-02425-574:1(113-127)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00466-023-02425-5

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents