Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2591796.2591854acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exponential improvement in precision for simulating sparse Hamiltonians

Published: 31 May 2014 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    We provide a quantum algorithm for simulating the dynamics of sparse Hamiltonians with complexity sublogarithmic in the inverse error, an exponential improvement over previous methods. Specifically, we show that a d-sparse Hamiltonian H on n qubits can be simulated for time t with precision ε using O(τlog(τ/ε)/log log(τ/ε)) queries and O(τnlog2(τ/ε)/log log(τ/ε)) additional 2-qubit gates, where τ=d2||H||maxt. Unlike previous approaches based on product formulas, the query complexity is independent of the number of qubits acted on, and for time-varying Hamiltonians, the gate complexity is logarithmic in the norm of the derivative of the Hamiltonian. Our algorithm is based on a significantly improved simulation of the continuous- and fractional-query models using discrete quantum queries, showing that the former models are not much more powerful than the discrete model even for very small error. We also significantly simplify the analysis of this conversion, avoiding the need for a complex fault correction procedure. Our simplification relies on a new form of "oblivious amplitude amplification" that can be applied even though the reflection about the input state is unavailable. Finally, we prove new lower bounds showing that our algorithms are optimal as a function of the error.

    Supplementary Material

    MP4 File (p283-sidebyside.mp4)

    References

    [1]
    D. Aharonov and A. Ta-Shma. Adiabatic quantum state generation and statistical zero knowledge. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 20--29, 2003.
    [2]
    A. Ambainis, A. M. Childs, B. W. Reichardt, R. Špalek, and S. Zhang. Any AND-OR formula of size N can be evaluated in time N1/2+o(1)on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal on Computing, 39(6):2513--2530, 2010.
    [3]
    A. Ambainis, L. Magnin, M. Roetteler, and J. Roland. Symmetry-assisted adversaries for quantum state generation. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 167--177, 2011.
    [4]
    R. Beals, H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, M. Mosca, and R. de Wolf. Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. Journal of the ACM, 48(4):778--797, 2001.
    [5]
    D. W. Berry, G. Ahokas, R. Cleve, and B. C. Sanders. Efficient quantum algorithms for simulating sparse Hamiltonians. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 270(2):359--371, 2007.
    [6]
    D. W. Berry and A. M. Childs. Black-box Hamiltonian simulation and unitary implementation. Quantum Information and Computation, 12(1--2):29--62, 2012.
    [7]
    D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, R. Kothari, and R. D. Somma. Exponential improvement in precision for simulating sparse Hamiltonians, 2013. arXiv:1312.1414. Full version of the present paper.
    [8]
    D. W. Berry, R. Cleve, and S. Gharibian. Gate-efficient discrete simulations of continuous-time quantum query algorithms. Quantum Information and Computation, 14(1--2):1--30, 2014.
    [9]
    A. M. Childs. Quantum information processing in continuous time. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.
    [10]
    A. M. Childs. On the relationship between continuous- and discrete-time quantum walk. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 294(2):581--603, 2010.
    [11]
    A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, E. Deotto, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, and D. A. Spielman. Exponential algorithmic speedup by quantum walk. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 59--68, 2003.
    [12]
    A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, S. P. Jordan, and D. Yonge-Mallo. Discrete-query quantum algorithm for NAND trees. Theory of Computing, 5(5):119--123, 2009.
    [13]
    A. M. Childs and R. Kothari. Simulating sparse Hamiltonians with star decompositions. In Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication, and Cryptography (TQC 2010), volume 6519 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 94--103, 2011.
    [14]
    A. M. Childs and N. Wiebe. Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations. Quantum Information and Computation, 12:901--924, 2012.
    [15]
    B. D. Clader, B. C. Jacobs, and C. R. Sprouse. Preconditioned quantum linear system algorithm. Physical Review Letters, 110(25):250504, 2013.
    [16]
    R. Cleve, D. Gottesman, M. Mosca, R. D. Somma, and D. Yonge-Mallo. Efficient discrete-time simulations of continuous-time quantum query algorithms. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 409--416, 2009.
    [17]
    E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann. A quantum algorithm for the Hamiltonian NAND tree. Theory of Computing, 4(8):169--190, 2008.
    [18]
    E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser. Limit on the speed of quantum computation in determining parity. Physical Review Letters, 81(24):5442--5444, 1998.
    [19]
    E. Farhi and S. Gutmann. Analog analogue of a digital quantum computation. Physical Review A, 57(4):2403--2406, 1998.
    [20]
    R. P. Feynman. Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(6--7):467--488, 1982.
    [21]
    A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Physical Review Letters, 103(15):150502, 2009.
    [22]
    J. Huyghebaert and H. D. Raedt. Product formula methods for time-dependent Schrödinger problems. Journal of Physics A, 23(24):5777, 1990.
    [23]
    T. Lee, R. Mittal, B. W. Reichardt, R. Špalek, and M. Szegedy. Quantum query complexity of state conversion. In Proceedings of the 52nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 344--353, 2011.
    [24]
    S. Lloyd. Universal quantum simulators. Science, 273(5278):1073--1078, 1996.
    [25]
    C. Marriott and J. Watrous. Quantum Arthur--Merlin games. Computational Complexity, 14(2):122--152, 2005.
    [26]
    C. Mochon. Hamiltonian oracles. Physical Review A, 75(4):042313, 2007.
    [27]
    D. Nagaj, P. Wocjan, and Y. Zhang. Fast amplification of QMA. Quantum Information and Computation, 9(11-12):1053--1068, 2009.
    [28]
    D. Poulin, A. Qarry, R. D. Somma, and F. Verstraete. Quantum simulation of time-dependent Hamiltonians and the convenient illusion of Hilbert space. Physical Review Letters, 106(17):170501, 2011.
    [29]
    M. Suzuki. General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 32(2):400--407, 1991.
    [30]
    N. Wiebe, D. W. Berry, P. Hoyer, and B. C. Sanders. Simulating quantum dynamics on a quantum computer. Journal of Physics A, 44(44):445308, 2011.

    Cited By

    View all

    Index Terms

    1. Exponential improvement in precision for simulating sparse Hamiltonians

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        STOC '14: Proceedings of the forty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
        May 2014
        984 pages
        ISBN:9781450327107
        DOI:10.1145/2591796
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 31 May 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Hamiltonian simulation
        2. quantum algorithms

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        STOC '14
        Sponsor:
        STOC '14: Symposium on Theory of Computing
        May 31 - June 3, 2014
        New York, New York

        Acceptance Rates

        STOC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 91 of 319 submissions, 29%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)239
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
        Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)An introduction to quantum computing for statisticians and data scientistsFoundations of Data Science10.3934/fods.2024013(0-0)Online publication date: 2024
        • (2024)Complexity of Digital Quantum Simulation in the Low-Energy Subspace: Applications and a Lower BoundQuantum10.22331/q-2024-07-15-14098(1409)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2024
        • (2024)Polynomial Equivalence of Complexity GeometriesQuantum10.22331/q-2024-07-02-13918(1391)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
        • (2024)Parallel Quantum Algorithm for Hamiltonian SimulationQuantum10.22331/q-2024-01-15-12288(1228)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2024
        • (2024)Quantum and Classical Query Complexities of Functions of MatricesProceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3618260.3649665(573-584)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
        • (2024)Quantum Genetic Algorithm With Individuals in Multiple RegistersIEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation10.1109/TEVC.2023.329678028:3(788-797)Online publication date: Jul-2024
        • (2024)Qubit-Efficient Randomized Quantum Algorithms for Linear AlgebraPRX Quantum10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.0203245:2Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Non-unitary Trotter circuits for imaginary time evolutionQuantum Science and Technology10.1088/2058-9565/ad53fb9:4(045007)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
        • (2024)A complexity efficient penta-diagonal quantum smoothing filter for bio-medical signal denoising: a study on ECGScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-59851-514:1Online publication date: 8-May-2024
        • (2024)Hunting for quantum-classical crossover in condensed matter problemsnpj Quantum Information10.1038/s41534-024-00839-410:1Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media