Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Model-based Testing: Where Does It Stand?: MBT has positive effects on efficiency and effectiveness, even if it only partially fulfills high expectations.

Published: 31 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

You have probably heard about MBT (model-based testing), but like many software-engineering professionals who have not used MBT, you might be curious about others’ experience with this test-design method. From mid-June 2014 to early August 2014, we conducted a survey to learn how MBT users view its efficiency and effectiveness. The 2014 MBT User Survey, a follow-up to a similar 2012 survey, was open to all those who have evaluated or used any MBT approach. Its 32 questions included some from a survey distributed at the 2013 User Conference on Advanced Automated Testing. Some questions focused on the efficiency and effectiveness of MBT, providing the figures that managers are most interested in. Other questions were more technical and sought to validate a common MBT classification scheme. A common classification scheme could help users understand both the general diversity and specific approaches. The 2014 survey provides a realistic picture of the current state of MBT practice. This article presents some highlights of the survey findings.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Testing adaptation policies for software componentsSoftware Quality Journal10.1007/s11219-019-09487-w28:3(1347-1378)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2020
  • (2018)Interactive System TestingProceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems10.1145/3220134.3220146(1-5)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2018
  • (2018)Integrating Requirements Specification and Model-Based Testing in Agile Development2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)10.1109/RE.2018.00041(336-346)Online publication date: Aug-2018
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Model-based Testing: Where Does It Stand?: MBT has positive effects on efficiency and effectiveness, even if it only partially fulfills high expectations.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Queue
    Queue  Volume 13, Issue 1
    Networks
    December 2014 / January 2015
    26 pages
    EISSN:1542-7749
    DOI:10.1145/2716276
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 December 2014
    Published in QUEUE Volume 13, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Popular
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2,134
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)203
    Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Testing adaptation policies for software componentsSoftware Quality Journal10.1007/s11219-019-09487-w28:3(1347-1378)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2020
    • (2018)Interactive System TestingProceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems10.1145/3220134.3220146(1-5)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2018
    • (2018)Integrating Requirements Specification and Model-Based Testing in Agile Development2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)10.1109/RE.2018.00041(336-346)Online publication date: Aug-2018
    • (2018)MobSTer: A model-based security testing framework for web applicationsSoftware Testing, Verification and Reliability10.1002/stvr.1685(e1685)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2018
    • (2017)Testing uncertainty of cyber-physical systems in IoT cloud infrastructures: combining model-driven engineering and elastic executionProceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Testing Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/3107091.3107093(5-8)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2017
    • (2016)ReferencesModel-Based Testing Essentials10.1002/9781119130161.refs(269-272)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2016
    • (2015)Mining Workflow Models from Web ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2015.246154241:12(1184-1201)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Magazine Site

    View this article on the magazine site (external)

    Magazine Site

    Login options

    Full Access

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media