Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/605397.605399acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesasplosConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Transactional lock-free execution of lock-based programs

Published: 01 October 2002 Publication History

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the difficulty in writing correct high-performance programs. Writing shared-memory multi-threaded programs imposes a complex trade-off between programming ease and performance, largely due to subtleties in coordinating access to shared data. To ensure correctness programmers often rely on conservative locking at the expense of performance. The resulting serialization of threads is a performance bottleneck. Locks also interact poorly with thread scheduling and faults, resulting in poor system performance.We seek to improve multithreaded programming trade-offs by providing architectural support for optimistic lock-free execution. In a lock-free execution, shared objects are never locked when accessed by various threads. We propose Transactional Lock Removal (TLR) and show how a program that uses lock-based synchronization can be executed by the hardware in a lock-free manner, even in the presence of conflicts, without programmer support or software changes. TLR uses timestamps for conflict resolution, modest hardware, and features already present in many modern computer systems.TLR's benefits include improved programmability, stability, and performance. Programmers can obtain benefits of lock-free data structures, such as non-blocking behavior and wait-freedom, while using lock-protected critical sections for writing programs.

References

[1]
A. R. Alameldeen, C. J. Mauer, M. Xu, P. J. Harper, M. M. Martin, D. J. Sorin, M. D. Hill, and D. A. Wood. Evaluating non-deterministic multi-threaded commercial workloads. In Fifth Workshop on Computer Architecture Evaluation Using Commercial Workloads, pages 30-38, Feb. 2002.
[2]
J. Allemany and E. Felten. Performance issues in non-blocking synchronization on shared-memory multiprocessors. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 125-134, Aug. 1992.
[3]
T. E. Anderson. The performance of spin lock alternatives shared-memory multiprocessors. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 1(1): 6-16, Jan. 1990.
[4]
G. Barnes. Method for implementing lock-free shared data structures. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pages 261-270, June 1993.
[5]
P. A. Bernstein and N. Goodman. Concurrency control in distributed database systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 13(2):185-221, June 1981.
[6]
B. N. Bershad. Practical considerations for lock-free concurrent objects. Technical Report CMU-CS-91-183, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Sept. 1991.
[7]
K. P. Eswaran, J. Gray, R. A. Lorie, and I. L. Traiger. The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system. Communications of the ACM, 11:624-633, 1976.
[8]
K. Gharachorloo, A. Gupta, and J. L. Hennessy. Two techniques to enhance the performance of memory consistency models. In Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on Parallel Processing, pages 355-364, Aug. 1991.
[9]
J. R. Goodman, M. K. Vernon, and P. J. Woest. Efficient synchronization primitives for large-scale cache-coherent shared-memory multiprocessors. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 64-75, Apr. 1989.
[10]
J. Gray. The transaction concept: Virtues and limitations. In Seventh International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 144-154, Sept. 1981.
[11]
M. Herlihy. Wait-free synchronization. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 13(1):124-149, Jan. 1991.
[12]
M. Herlihy. A methodology for implementing highly concurrent data objects. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 15(5):745-770, 1993.
[13]
M. Herlihy and J. E. B. Moss. Transactional Memory: Architectural support for lock-free data structures. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 289-300, May 1993.
[14]
E. H. Jensen, G. W. Hagensen, and J. M. Broughton. A new approach to exclusive data access in shared memory multiprocessors. Technical Report UCRL-97663, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, Nov. 1987.
[15]
N. P. Jouppi. Improving direct-mapped cache performance by the addition of a small fully-associative cache and prefetch buffers. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 364-373, May 1990.
[16]
A. Kägi, D. Burger, and J. R. Goodman. Efficient synchronization: Let them eat QOLB. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 170-180, June 1997.
[17]
S. Kaxiras and J. R. Goodman. Improving CC-NUMA performance using instruction-based prediction. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on High-Performance Architecture, pages 161-170, Jan. 1999.
[18]
L. I. Kontothanassis, R. W. Wisniewski, and M. L. Scott. Scheduler-conscious synchronization. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(1):3-40, 1997.
[19]
S. Kumar, D. Jiang, R. Chandra, and J. P. Singh. Evaluating synchronization on shared address space multiprocessors: Methodology and performance. In Proceedings of the 1999 SIGMETRICS Conference on Measurements and Modeling of Computer Systems, pages 23-34, May 1999.
[20]
H. Kung and J. T. Robinson. On optimistic methods of concurrency control. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 6(2):213-226, June 1981.
[21]
L. Lamport. Concurrent reading and writing. Communications of the ACM, 20(11):806-811, 1977.
[22]
L. Lamport. Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system. Communications of the ACM, 21:558-565, 1978.
[23]
K. M. Lepak and M. H. Lipasti. Temporally silent stores. In Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Oct. 2002.
[24]
J. F. Martínez and J. Torrellas. Speculative locks for concurrent execution of critical sections in shared-memory multiprocessors. In Workshop on Memory Performance Issues, June 2001.
[25]
J. F. Martínez and J. Torrellas. Speculative synchronization: Applying thread-level speculation to explicitly parallel applications. In Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Oct. 2002.
[26]
J. M. Mellor-Crummey and M. L. Scott. Algorithms for scalable synchronization on shared-memory multiprocessors. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 9(1):21-65, Feb. 1991.
[27]
M. M. Michael and M. L. Scott. Simple, fast, and practical nonblocking and blocking concurrent queue algorithms. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 267-275, May 1996.
[28]
M. M. Michael and M. L. Scott. Nonblocking algorithms and pre-emption-safe locking on multiprogrammed shared memory multiprocessors. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 51(1):1-26, 1998.
[29]
R. Rajwar. Speculation-Based Techniques for Transactional Lock-Free Execution of Lock-Based Programs. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 2002.
[30]
R. Rajwar and J. R. Goodman. Speculative Lock Elision: Enabling highly concurrent multithreaded execution. In Proceedings of the 34th International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 294-305, Dec. 2001.
[31]
R. Rajwar, A. Kägi, and J. R. Goodman. Improving the throughput of synchronization by insertion of delays. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, pages 168-179, Jan. 2000.
[32]
D. J. Rosenkrantz, R. E. Stearns, and P. M. Lewis. System level concurrency control for distributed database systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 3(2):178-198, June 1978.
[33]
N. Shavit and D. Touitou. Software Transactional Memory. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 204-213, Aug. 1995.
[34]
J. P. Singh, W.-D. Weber, and A. Gupta. SPLASH: Stanford parallel applications for shared memory. Computer Architecture News, 20(1):5-44, Mar. 1992.
[35]
A. Singhal, D. Broniarczyk, F. M. Cerauskis, J. Price, L. Yuan, G. Cheng, D. Doblar, S. Fosth, N. Agarwal, K. Harvey, and E. Hagersten. Gigaplane: A high performance bus for large SMPs. In Proceedings of the Symposium on High Performance Interconnects IV, pages 41-52, Aug. 1996.
[36]
J. M. Stone, H. S. Stone, P. Heidelberger, and J. Turek. Multiple reservations and the Oklahoma update. IEEE Parallel & Distributed Technology, 1(4):58-71, Nov. 1993.
[37]
J. Turek, D. Shasha, and S. Prakash. Locking without blocking: Making lock based concurrent data structure algorithms nonblocking. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 212-222, Aug. 1992.
[38]
J. D. Valois. Lock-Free Data Structures. PhD thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 1995.
[39]
S. C. Woo, M. Ohara, E. Torrie, J. P. Singh, and A. Gupta. The SPLASH-2 programs: Characterization and methodological considerations. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 24-36, June 1995.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)EDDYProceedings of the 28th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference10.1145/3566097.3567913(423-428)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Separating Mechanism from Policy in STM2023 32nd International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT)10.1109/PACT58117.2023.00031(279-296)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • (2023)lfbench: a lock-free microbenchmark suite2023 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)10.1109/ISPASS57527.2023.00040(322-324)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Transactional lock-free execution of lock-based programs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASPLOS X: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems
    October 2002
    318 pages
    ISBN:1581135742
    DOI:10.1145/605397
    • cover image ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
      ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review  Volume 36, Issue 5
      December 2002
      296 pages
      ISSN:0163-5980
      DOI:10.1145/635508
      Issue’s Table of Contents
    • cover image ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News
      ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News  Volume 30, Issue 5
      Special Issue: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems
      December 2002
      296 pages
      ISSN:0163-5964
      DOI:10.1145/635506
      Issue’s Table of Contents
    • cover image ACM SIGPLAN Notices
      ACM SIGPLAN Notices  Volume 37, Issue 10
      October 2002
      296 pages
      ISSN:0362-1340
      EISSN:1558-1160
      DOI:10.1145/605432
      Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 October 2002

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    ASPLOS02

    Acceptance Rates

    ASPLOS X Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 175 submissions, 14%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 535 of 2,713 submissions, 20%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)EDDYProceedings of the 28th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference10.1145/3566097.3567913(423-428)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Separating Mechanism from Policy in STM2023 32nd International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT)10.1109/PACT58117.2023.00031(279-296)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
    • (2023)lfbench: a lock-free microbenchmark suite2023 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)10.1109/ISPASS57527.2023.00040(322-324)Online publication date: Apr-2023
    • (2021)Synchronization Strategies on Many-Core SMT Systems2021 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing (SBAC-PAD)10.1109/SBAC-PAD53543.2021.00017(54-63)Online publication date: Oct-2021
    • (2020)Chronos: Efficient Speculative Parallelism for AcceleratorsProceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems10.1145/3373376.3378454(1247-1262)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2020
    • (2020)INSTalyticsACM Transactions on Storage10.1145/336973815:4(1-30)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2020
    • (2019)Simplifying Transactional Memory Support in C++ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/332879616:3(1-24)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2019
    • (2018)Distributed Lock Management with RDMAProceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data10.1145/3183713.3196890(1571-1586)Online publication date: 27-May-2018
    • (2018)Improving Parallelism in Hardware Transactional MemoryACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/317796215:1(1-24)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2018
    • (2018)Automatic Reformulation of ODEs to Systems of First-Order EquationsACM Transactions on Mathematical Software10.1145/315944344:3(1-18)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media