Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Mining Individual Learning Topics in Course Reviews Based on Author Topic Model

Published: 01 July 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Nowadays, Massive Open Online Courses MOOC has obtained a rapid development and drawn much attention from the areas of learning analytics and artificial intelligence. There are lots of unstructured data being generated in online reviews area. The learning behavioral data become more and more diverse, and they prompt the emergence of big data in education. To mine useful information from these data, we need to use educational data mining and learning analysis technique to study the learning feelings and discussed topics among learners. This paper aims to mine and analyze topic information hidden in the unstructured reviews data in MOOC, a novel author topic model based on an unsupervised learning idea is proposed to extract learning topics for the each learner. According to the experimental results, we will analyze and focuses of interests of learners, which facilitates further personalized course recommendation and improve the quality of online courses.

References

[1]
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
[2]
Brown, M. 2011. Learning analytics: The coming third wave. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative Brief, 1-4.
[3]
Chang, J., & Blei, D. M. 2009. Relational topic models for document networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Florida, USA pp. 81-88.
[4]
Chiu, M. M., & Fujita, N. 2014. Statistical discourse analysis of online discussions: Informal cognition, social metacognition, and knowledge creation. In Knowledge Creation in Education pp. 97-112. Springer Singapore.
[5]
Colace, F., Casaburi, L., De Santo, M., & Greco, L. 2015. Sentiment detection in social networks and in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1061-1067.
[6]
Dringus, L. P., & Ellis, T. 2005. Using data mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums. Computers & Education, 451, 141-160.
[7]
Ezen-CanA.BoyerK. E.KelloggS.BoothS. 2015, March. Unsupervised modeling for understanding MOOC discussion forums: a learning analytics approach. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge pp. 146-150. New York: ACM Press. 10.1145/2723576.2723589
[8]
Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. 2012. Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 153, 42-57.
[9]
He, W. 2013. Examining students online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 291, 90-102.
[10]
Li, H., Liu, J., & Zhang, S. 2011, May. Hierarchical Latent Dirichlet Allocation models for realistic action recognition. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP pp. 1297-1300. Prague: IEEE. 10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5946649
[11]
Miyoshi, T., & Yu, N. 2007. Sentiment classification of customer reviews on electric products. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics pp. 2028-2033. Montreal: IEEE Press.
[12]
MoghaddamS.EsterM. 2010, October. Opinion digger: an unsupervised opinion miner from unstructured product reviews. Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management pp. 1825-1828. New York: ACM Press. 10.1145/1871437.1871739
[13]
Mostow, J., & Beck, J. 2006. Some useful tactics to modify, map and mine data from intelligent tutors. Natural Language Engineering, 1202, 195-208.
[14]
Natek, S., & Zwilling, M. 2014. Student data mining solution-knowledge management system related to higher education institutions. Expert Systems with Applications, 4114, 6400-6407.
[15]
Norris, D., Baer, L., Leonard, J., Pugliese, L., & Lefrere, P. 2008. Action analytics: Measuring and improving performance that matters in higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 431, 42.
[16]
Peña-Ayala, A. 2014. Educational data mining: A survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works . Expert Systems with Applications, 414, 1432-1462.
[17]
PietyP. J.HickeyD. T.BishopM. J. 2014, March. Educational data sciences: Framing emergent practices for analytics of learning, organizations, and systems. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge pp. 193-202. New York: ACM. 10.1145/2567574.2567582
[18]
Popescu, A. M., & Etzioni, O. 2007. Extracting Product Features and Opinions from Reviews. Natural Language Processing and Text Mining pp. 9-28. Springer London.
[19]
Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D., Huang, B., Daumé, H., III, & Getoor, L. 2013, December. Modeling learner engagement in MOOCs using probabilistic soft logic. Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education Vol. 2, pp. 1-1.
[20]
Ravichandran, M., Kulanthaivel, G., & Chellatamilan, T. 2015. Intelligent topical sentiment analysis for the classification of e-learners and their topics of interest. ChemInform, 47, 409-416. 25866841.
[21]
Rosen-ZviM.GriffithsT.SteyversM.SmythP. 2004, July. The author-topic model for authors and documents. Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence pp. 487-494. Virginia: AUAI Press.
[22]
Shi, Y., Larson, M., & Jonker, C. M. 2015. Recurrent neural network language model adaptation with curriculum learning. Computer Speech & Language, 331, 136-154.
[23]
Siemens, G. 2010. What are learning analytics. Retrieved March, 10, 2011.
[24]
SteyversM.SmythP.Rosen-ZviM.GriffithsT. 2004, August. Probabilistic author-topic models for information discovery. Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining pp. 306-315. New York: ACM.
[25]
Wang, T., & Ren, Y. 2009. Research on personalized recommendation based on web usage mining using collaborative filtering technique. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and applications, 61, 62-72.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Identifying learners’ topical interests from social media content to enrich their course preferences in MOOCs using topic modeling and NLP techniquesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11373-128:5(5567-5584)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2022)Teaching Mode Based on Educational Big Data Mining and Digital TwinsComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2022/90719442022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image International Journal of Distance Education Technologies
International Journal of Distance Education Technologies  Volume 15, Issue 3
July 2017
103 pages
ISSN:1539-3100
EISSN:1539-3119
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

IGI Global

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2017

Author Tags

  1. Author Topic Mining
  2. Education Big Data
  3. Learner Analytics
  4. Massive Open Online Courses MOOC

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Identifying learners’ topical interests from social media content to enrich their course preferences in MOOCs using topic modeling and NLP techniquesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11373-128:5(5567-5584)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2022)Teaching Mode Based on Educational Big Data Mining and Digital TwinsComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2022/90719442022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media